Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 12:32:00 -
[121] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them. The Rules:10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.
OK ... I will ask these same questions in a mail, as you stated, and then we will publish the results. Considering the Dev Post: An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment, the very large response from the community, the affect this could have on game play, and the stated interest from the very pilots that are being asked to vote for a candidate who they are now being denied information they may find relative, I find this very curious. This subject does NOT only affect CCP, or CSM, but many other EVE pilots.
Allowing other pilots to have this conversation on other websites has already make it a public matter. You can't put the stink back in the bottle once you let it out. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred
4539
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 20:56:00 -
[122] - Quote
I'd still like to hear some thoughts on the recent controversy. You were on my suggested ballot last time, and I (and others) would like to hear your opinions. To avoid falling afoul of ISD's rules here, lets not talk about specific bans or actions by CCP, but lets talk about where you think a line should be drawn on behavior in and out of game. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Panhandle Industries
389
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 23:51:00 -
[123] - Quote
Monk, what changes do you feel could be made to have a positive impact on player retention in eve? New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |
Abla Tive
Serpent.Sisters.of.Eve
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:00:00 -
[124] - Quote
Question about mining activity to all candidates |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1099
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:51:00 -
[125] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post.
The Rules: 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Meilandra Vanderganken
Aliastra Gallente Federation
110
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 10:56:00 -
[126] - Quote
High sec content creation, I like that! |
Xeihun Khamez
The Conference Elite CODE.
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 11:16:00 -
[127] - Quote
You have my vote, and I'm leaving Catalyst wrecks all through Highsec encouraging others to vote as well. |
Esha Amphal
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 17:02:00 -
[128] - Quote
CSM9 Issue Panel: War Decs | Declarations of War Podcast
Do your vote ballot a favour and set aside an hour to have a listen. This will give you a clearer idea about Psychotic Monk, in his element perhaps discussing mechanics that relate strongly to hi-sec, but also his impressive communication skills and charismatic tendencies. These qualities are always in demand on the CSM - it's all fine and good if you understand game mechanics inside and out, but if a candidate struggles to communicate that knowledge... that should give you, the voter, pause.
Psychotic Monk brings up many excellent points that the other candidates overlook in the matter of war decs. Pieces under threat of combat just as valuable as pieces being attacked, for example, and the issues with war decs stemming from greater issues with corporation mechanics as well. While the other candidates were content to place varying levels of restrictions on war dec offenders and defenders, Monk took the host Alekseyev Karrde (CSM7 member) by surprise and pushed for more incentives and motivations for staying within a corporation. Better, more worthwhile corporation establishments. More encouragement and rewards for standing your ground and meeting the risk of a war dec head on, rather than dissolve the corp you're in and start fresh.
Considering that Psychotic Monk was the only 'criminal mind' on the panel, I found it fairly ironic that he was the only one to directly point at the source of the problem and give -constructive- feedback on how to move forward. |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
946
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 20:32:00 -
[129] - Quote
Esha Amphal wrote:...and give -constructive- feedback on how to move forward. I would feel more confident about a candidate who also gave some feedback in their own thread. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1217
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 21:31:00 -
[130] - Quote
Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options. |
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
4461
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:08:00 -
[131] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options.
What hard questions? The only ones I've seen in a while consist of "I hate you because you is pirate!" or "What do you think about Erotica1?"
There have been precious few people asking him "questions" that weren't pure bullshit. ISD Ezwal has basically been having to camp out in this thread because it's mostly personal attacks and "+1" statements. Not a lot to reply to. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
946
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:26:00 -
[132] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options. What hard questions? The only ones I've seen in a while consist of "I hate you because you is pirate!" or "What do you think about Erotica1?" There have been precious few people asking him "questions" that weren't pure bullshit. ISD Ezwal has basically been having to camp out in this thread because it's mostly personal attacks and "+1" statements. Not a lot to reply to. Then you fail at comprehension. Let me put it in a simple manner that even you cannot obfuscate.
Monk, without reference to specific players, is the bonus room the sort of emergent gameplay that your platform embraces? If so, what message would you use your CSM term to convey to CCP? If not, how do you reconcile this with the fact that you have participated in bonus rooms? Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
4461
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:20:00 -
[133] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options. What hard questions? The only ones I've seen in a while consist of "I hate you because you is pirate!" or "What do you think about Erotica1?" There have been precious few people asking him "questions" that weren't pure bullshit. ISD Ezwal has basically been having to camp out in this thread because it's mostly personal attacks and "+1" statements. Not a lot to reply to. Then you fail at comprehension. Let me put it in a simple manner that even you cannot obfuscate. Monk, without reference to specific players, is the bonus room the sort of emergent gameplay that your platform embraces? If so, what message would you use your CSM term to convey to CCP? If not, how do you reconcile this with the fact that you have participated in bonus rooms?
See above, about E1. Again. In before Ezwal deletes this one too. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
946
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:24:00 -
[134] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Zappity wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options. What hard questions? The only ones I've seen in a while consist of "I hate you because you is pirate!" or "What do you think about Erotica1?" There have been precious few people asking him "questions" that weren't pure bullshit. ISD Ezwal has basically been having to camp out in this thread because it's mostly personal attacks and "+1" statements. Not a lot to reply to. Then you fail at comprehension. Let me put it in a simple manner that even you cannot obfuscate. Monk, without reference to specific players, is the bonus room the sort of emergent gameplay that your platform embraces? If so, what message would you use your CSM term to convey to CCP? If not, how do you reconcile this with the fact that you have participated in bonus rooms? See above, about E1. Again. In before Ezwal deletes this one too. There is a distinction between the behaviour associated with the bonus room (fine to discuss) and Erotica 1. Notice that I specifically exclude reference to specific players. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
4461
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:34:00 -
[135] - Quote
Zappity wrote: There is a distinction between the behaviour associated with the bonus room (fine to discuss) and Erotica 1. Notice that I specifically exclude reference to specific players.
I understand your intent, but you can't say things like "without taking specific characters into account" and then ask about something exclusively associated with a specific character in a massively high profile context from a week ago.
It's a loaded question, it's an attempt at guilt by association, it's bullshit, and if I were him I wouldn't bother answering it either. Stay on message, and all that. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Esha Amphal
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:57:00 -
[136] - Quote
Zappity wrote:I would feel more confident about a candidate who also gave some feedback in their own thread.
Complete agreement. I tweeted a while ago that Monk's forum absence was concerning. There are many unanswered questions here that require his attention, and yours is one of the more pressing matters.
It may be a loaded question but it is valid nonetheless. Monk isn't the kind of person to shy from these kinds of questions, and doesn't need to be defended by others.
So, seeing as he's not here answering questions I'm concerned his real life has become too busy and he won't have the time for a CSM position, unless he's able to juggle it differently than he is at the moment.
The podcast panel was impressive. He is campaigning elsewhere. He is a candidate worthy of consideration, but he needs to attend to this thread. Damn right. |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
946
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 01:16:00 -
[137] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It's a loaded question, it's an attempt at guilt by association, it's bullshit, and if I were him I wouldn't bother answering it either. Stay on message, and all that. I understand that concern. I had him on my CSM8 list. I think you are oversimplifying the situation. Anyway, I would counter that refusing to address the topic is a very poor strategy - I imagine there are quite a few people like me who aren't impressed with the ""lalalalala, I can't hear you!!!" approach. Silence on the topic of limiting emergent gameplay will just mean that he doesn't make it onto my CSM9 list.
I want to know what he thinks about limiting emergent gameplay. Can it go too far? Will his message to CCP be that they should just back off? Does he agree with CSM8's position to support CCP in limiting the sandbox? Does he think, on reflection, that the bonus room was not an acceptable extension? These questions will surely be of direct relevance to CSM9.
From the OP:
Psychotic Monk wrote:It is fundamentally important that someone with significant hands on experience in these matters be on hand to help CCP determine what is or isn't going to be good for the health of emergent gameplay in highsec. Yes, that's why you made my list for CSM8. Can we please have your views on what is/isn't good for the health of emergent gameplay? Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Cailus
The Filthy Few Break-A-Wish Foundation
13
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 07:16:00 -
[138] - Quote
As always, you can count on my vote! Psychotic Monk for CSM9 |
Eva Darke
The Scope Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 07:31:00 -
[139] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sadly I have to agree with Zappity. I actually put a vote in behind Monk last elections and would have done so again this time, as I feel that the Ganker/Criminal playstyle is an important part of EVE even if we don't like it that much when we receive it. However Monk hasn't answered the hard questions in this thread, only the nice soft questions as well as not giving feedback even though we are past the date he said he would be back by, which leaves me feeling his campaign is based on popularity issues rather than seriousness, & that he won't be as effective as other options. What hard questions? The only ones I've seen in a while consist of "I hate you because you is pirate!" or "What do you think about Erotica1?" There have been precious few people asking him "questions" that weren't pure bullshit. ISD Ezwal has basically been having to camp out in this thread because it's mostly personal attacks and "+1" statements. Not a lot to reply to.
I like Monk and what he stands for. I voted for him last year and I think he'd be good for the CSM as a whole. But I also agree with Zappity here. The questions I posted back on page 5 are still unanswered, and I don't think they were particularly hard or loaded questions either.
The E1 association needs to be addressed if he's serious about communicating honestly with players, but Monk's lack of participation in his own thread is concerning. |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3436
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 13:59:00 -
[140] - Quote
I am happy to endorse you for election to the 9th Council of Stellar Management! Good luck at the polls!
Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
|
WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
241
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:30:00 -
[141] - Quote
You introduced me to what EVE really is all about some time ago, and you have since inspired me on numerous occasions to create content for myself, and others. One phrase i keep remembering is the one of your website "Be the chaos you want to see in the universe", and it reminds me that EVE really is an amazing game with limitless possibilities. And we need to keep the game this way. It's why we all love EVE.
You had my vote last CSM, and you have my vote this CSM! Best of luck good sir! You're the person the CSM , and EVE needs. |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
849
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:00:00 -
[142] - Quote
Well GOD knows we need someone like Monk to counter your desire to further nerf hisec with abominations like consensual-only-wardecs Trebor.
Would you like to know more? |
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
46
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:12:00 -
[143] - Quote
Snupe Doggur wrote:Snupe Doggur wrote:What was the most enjoyable part of your Bonus Round participation, Monk? What was least enjoyable? How did you happen to become involved? I would like to add one more question: to what extent did you share in the "take" of Bonus Rounds, Psychotic Monk? Same questions, I guess, for Monk.
|
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1974
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 01:16:00 -
[144] - Quote
Hey guys. I didn't want to make my **** extremely public, but you deserve an answer on why I'm not present in this thread. I've upended my life and moved and also am having trouble getting internet set up in the new place. Once this is sorted I expect to be present again, but it's taking longer than expected.
As for a question that's being asked repeatedly, I'd like to address this now that fewer people are openly howling for blood and hopefully we can talk about this more or less rationally.
So, without further ado, here's a list of things you aren't mad about:
Someone getting mad at their attacker.
A list of things that routinely cost people every last space-dime they have
Out of the box thinking costing someone a great deal.
A singing ransom, known in some circles as 'torture'. Last time you saw one of these you thought it was hilarious.
I think I covered all the points. Anything I missed that you're mad about?
Belligerent Undesirables Selling Griefer Immunity |
Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2481
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 05:37:00 -
[145] - Quote
WASPY69 wrote: One phrase i keep remembering is the one of your website "Be the chaos you want to see in the universe", and it reminds me that EVE really is an amazing game with limitless possibilities. And we need to keep the game this way. It's why we all love EVE.
Blame me for that phrase.
I cannot believe I had never seen that squirrel ransom video before. Next time I have someone in ransom negotiations, I want a helium balloon handy to do that too. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |
Cannibal Kane
Somali Coast Guard Authority
3545
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 09:23:00 -
[146] - Quote
As of yesterday there are now 3 accounts from my side voting for Monk.
Really liked the Wardec Pod cast.
"I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. He flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. His hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. It was truly majestic. And while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off. Because I am like that." - NEONOVUS |
Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
911
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 12:50:00 -
[147] - Quote
Mister Monk, with your entire platform, attitude and charisma combined with the brilliant comments on the wardec podcast, the fact that you are number one on my Vote Match and with this post to seal the deal, you've secured all my top votes. Congratulations I hope you get a seat in the CSM and continue on your chosen path.
You'll be followed by (in Vote Match proposed order for things I find important): DJ FunkyBacon, Ali Aras, Jayne Fillon, Mangala Solaris, Xenuaria and Xander Phoena.
D.
HTFU, in moderation ofcourse. If perchance the above statement has rustled a CSM's jimmies, I respectfully beg of him/her not to blog about it nor pressurize CCP to ban me. |
merrizon
New Eden Tea Traders
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 12:59:00 -
[148] - Quote
(apologies for this soppy ish poorly written post but I just wanted to have my two cents)
I have to say I totally support Monk and everything he's done for the game.
I'm a 2007 toon but for the most part I never really got what the game was about so I would sub shoot rats and rocks inevitably get bored and unsub never really making the most of my early in game life. This would follow a pretty regular 6 month to a year pattern. I'd join corps who were decent enough but mainly were just using me to boost numbers and weren't too fussed about teaching me anything useful in the game or teaching me anything particularly fun that kept me invested in the game. I think for a lot of new players this is the life they get caught up in and it's easy to see why they lose interest and don't find enjoyment in what they do.
Fast forward and a friend introduces me to groups like SN, BU and the NO and I realized how much more there was to this game. These groups had their own way of doing things that wasn't what ccp had expected but was there anyway because a few smart cookies learnt how to play the system. They weren't breaking the rules they just knew how they worked and how to get around them or use them to their advantage. It was like this whole other layer I had never seen before was added in the game and talk about great people they couldn't do enough to help me. which is pretty cool for as their labelled "griefing sociopaths". Monk and the gang made the game fun for me and since then I've never looked back. For this reason I will be voting monk for csm and I hope others will to.
and god bless us everyone |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15024
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 13:06:00 -
[149] - Quote
Vote Monk Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 14:50:00 -
[150] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:...I think I covered all the points....
Vote Bonus Round! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |