Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
11557
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:32:00 -
[91] - Quote
olan2005 wrote:Your actions are aimed at avatars in game to disrupt in game activities . Cloak away it's fine .
Thank you for your input Olan! But the avatars don't have fear responses, nor do they control themselves. Technically, my actions are directed at the people behind those avatars, for it is the player who decides not to undock because of fear, and its the player who will not be making ISK, and it is the player behind the avatar that is willing to question my parentage or my mother's extracurricular activities in local. If I were camping rats, I would agree with you 100%, but these are real people here.
Knowing now the above statement, would your informed opinion be that AFK Cloaking is harassment towards these people, or that my actions would be breaking the EULA or ToS? Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
John XIII
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
138
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:43:00 -
[92] - Quote
It's aggravating as all get out! One of my best space-friends does that all night long to some of our damn reds. Oh he's logged on all right but if I want to ask him about strategies for boxing kangaroos or throwing boomerangs... nothing! Sometimes I have important questions about sheep husbandry and can't get an answer because he is AFK. It's just selfish and rude friends.
Other than all that, I think AFK cloaking is the cat's pajamas.
Shine on you crazy diamonds |
Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 01:48:00 -
[93] - Quote
Successful at wasting electricity. |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
11561
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:03:00 -
[94] - Quote
John XIII wrote:It's aggravating as all get out! One of my best space-friends does that all night long to some of our damn reds. Oh he's logged on all right but if I want to ask him about strategies for boxing kangaroos or throwing boomerangs... nothing! Sometimes I have important questions about sheep husbandry and can't get an answer because he is AFK. It's just selfish and rude friends. Other than all that, I think AFK cloaking is the cat's pajamas. Shine on you crazy diamonds
Thank you John! Im sorry that AFK Cloaking might be ruining your friendship with your best space buddy. Boomerang skills and sheep husbandry are important topics, and shouldn't be ignored. So you believe that I might be selfish in my endeavors? I hadn't thought of that aspect. I believed I was helping create content and weed out the bots, while also giving the fearful a lesson in not fearing the unknown. You've given me something to think about John.
Unezka Turigahl wrote: Successful at wasting electricity.
Thank you for your input Unezka! That is a fancy name there isn't it?
It does indeed use a lot of power to keep 3 towers and 9 monitors going doesn't it? I will have to take a gander at Newegg tonight to see if there are any power saving options for my setup. Id hate to think that im hurting the environment with my actions.
Would you care to give me your opinion on if my actions are holding people against their will, or harassing them in any way? Those 2 questions just pop out as answerable by you, seeing as that you are environmentally conscious and probably care about holding onto mother earth, or harassing endangered species. All I ask is that it be an informed opinion, based on facts and not my reputation or bad publicity surrounding my chosen profession. I look forward to hearing back from you! Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
John XIII
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
139
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:12:00 -
[95] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:stuff
I don't mind that you do it but if my bro is online he should be available to describe successful techniques for swimming with great white sharks. That's all I'm saying.
Hearing pro ratters grumble about an AFK cloaker is a great excuse to say things like, HTFU, Don't undock..., let's go roam! |
Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1622
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
X up if you find this thead has harrased you and if Unsuccessful should get a forum ban for it.
X I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1992
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:30:00 -
[97] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:I am an AFK cloaker.
I admit that I use AFK cloaking...and lately...AFK noobing... to wage psychological warfare on systems of carebears.
I pray on people's fear of the unknown. I make them afraid of the boogeyman. They become their own worst enemy.
I do this while I am at work, more than 40 miles away from my home computer. I log several accounts on position them in the systems of my interest, and go to work. I don't see them again for 10 hours..or more.
I would like some actual feedback on the following:
-Am I within the bounds of "emergent gameplay"? -Are my despicable activities allowed under the Eve Online Tos or EULA in peoples opinions? -Does psychological warfare of this type construe harassment in the eyes of the Eve populace? -If someone is unwilling to undock because of my actions, am I holding them against their will? -If I am affecting the virtual income of others, and ISK can buy PLEX which has real world value, Am I violating any monetary laws in peoples opinion? -I endure lots of harassment in local via questions about my parentage,my intelligence, my mothers bedroom activities, the size of my manhood, even my own sexual preference... am I also considered a victim?
I don't expect any official Dev or GM responses. I will put in separate support tickets to get official answers if and when I seek them. What I am after is the opinions of the population who play the game on the above issues. All I ask is that people be civil and respectful towards each other in this thread. Thank you in advance for your responses. Completely valid gameplay. I petitioned an AFK cloaker this week but only because of really low personal attacks that breached the EULA. But then obviously it wasn't actually AFK.
Cynos need fixing but cloaking AFK is a good mechanic. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
11565
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 02:31:00 -
[98] - Quote
John XIII wrote:I don't mind that you do it but if my bro is online he should be available to describe successful techniques for swimming with great white sharks. That's all I'm saying.
Hearing pro ratters grumble about an AFK cloaker is a great excuse to say things like, HTFU, Don't undock..., let's go roam!
My, your friend sounds like a wealth useful knowledge.
Im glad that you are encouraging people to go out on a roam, rather than let their imagination go wild. Telling the to HTFU is also fantastic! Eve is not a game for the thin-skinned. The thin-skinned tend to make emotional comments, and tend to not think for themselves. Anyone who encourages others to grow a thicker skin, and therefore begin to think for themselves, is a-ok in my book. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1992
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 03:06:00 -
[99] - Quote
Jessica Danikov wrote:If Sun-Tzu played EVE, he'd love cynos, he'd love cloaky ships, and he'd especially love the two used together in anger.
GÇ£If I determine the enemy's disposition of forces while I have no perceptible form, I can concentrate my forces while the enemy is fragmented. The pinnacle of military deployment approaches the formless: if it is formless, then even the deepest spy cannot discern it nor the wise make plans against it.GÇ¥ Nah. I think he'd think EvE simple and lacking entirely in tactical opportunity. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |
Graabeerd Khagah
ImaNicePirate.com Ideal Society
126
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 04:54:00 -
[100] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:I am an AFK cloaker.
No..no..BLOODY NO! The last thing we need is this thread again. Mr Epeen I see why you may think that. Should I change the name of the thread to reflect something like "Your opinions on my gameplay choices"? I can see this thread might be overlooked because of the AFK cloak in the title. {fingers in ears} Lah lah lah...I can't heeere you. Mr Epeen
*Pulls fingers out of Mr. Epeen's ears* Can you hear me now??? LOL!!! |
|
Lila Merle
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 11:21:00 -
[101] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: -Are my despicable activities
Why do you believe your activities are despicable? I have been entertained reading this thread. I am easily amused and it's given me ideas.
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5164
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 12:07:00 -
[102] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Ive camped you recently haven't I? Ive heard these words before.... Actually what I find most scary is now I know you are AFK at work, I wonder who's been answering me back in local. According to some of my local logs, the Mrs. tends to do a rather rousing UaE impersonation, and has actually made me laugh a few times. You must be in a system where it requires a little proof that my noobs are a threat by typing in local at random times, which is not uncommon.
I think having your Mrs. impersonate you by typing in local while you're away and logged in might be construed as account sharing and be against the EULA/ToS.
Otherwise, no the rest of the AFK cloaking hunting stuff has very little in common with the parallels you're trying to draw with other current events. Carry on cloaking.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
olan2005
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 12:39:00 -
[103] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:olan2005 wrote:Your actions are aimed at avatars in game to disrupt in game activities . Cloak away it's fine . Thank you for your input Olan! But the avatars don't have fear responses, nor do they control themselves. Technically, my actions are directed at the people behind those avatars, for it is the player who decides not to undock because of fear, and its the player who will not be making ISK, and it is the player behind the avatar that is willing to question my parentage or my mother's extracurricular activities in local. If I were camping rats, I would agree with you 100%, but these are real people here. Knowing now the above statement, would your informed opinion be that AFK Cloaking is harassment towards these people, or that my actions would be breaking the EULA or ToS?
Nope the only affect of cloak camping is the loss of isk revenue in-game . its fine , most people will find a way around that by moving system so forth . and its not aimed directly at a player , but done through intermediaries ( being your avatars ). Its eve . The risk v reward is what draws people in . Its fine to deny someone isk making opportunities . Its fine to scam , them or blow there stuff up . Its fine to have some banter in local . Everyone knows what local can be like in big fleet fights. With regards to recent events its about taking elements within the game outside of the game with the sole purpose of humiliation of an indidividual . |
Remiel Pollard
Stirling Iron Society A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3131
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 12:41:00 -
[104] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:I think the OP's name is more relevant now than ever.
If he's reading local then he's already been unsuccessful at the afk part. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
872
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 12:50:00 -
[105] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Clearly only your "victims" must decide. If they feel oppressed and harassed by your sitting around and doing nothing then you are a bad person and should get the banhammer no question. This is why im doing this thread. You see, my "victims" constantly use buzzwords like "harassment", "oppression" and "ban", as well as "Against my will" and "ruining my gameplay" as well as "Breaking the EULA and ToS" and "against international law". I want to ask the community about the morality of my gameplay choices to see if they are using those buzzwords in order to gain a response from someone, or just using them willy-nilly, because I believe that using terms like those in inappropriate situations lessen their effects, and take away from actual victims who are placed in those situations. Much like the boy who cried wolf. And as always, Thank you for your contribution Malcolm!
Hmmm i always assumed they were flirting with me..... I don't speak Russian but do you think my ones might be threatening me? This requires a radical rethink as Putin has a policy of protecting his citizens wherever they may be and i don't know if he has an eve account or not. Can anyone help me with this? If he does how many of the Russian army can he mobilise to defend Geminate? Gosh i am worried now....... Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1055
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 12:58:00 -
[106] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post.
The rules: 26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Jagoff Haverford
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
81
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 13:32:00 -
[107] - Quote
It's easier if I number them, so I'm going to edit your quote just a bit:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: I would like some actual feedback on the following:
1 -Am I within the bounds of "emergent gameplay"? 2 -Are my despicable activities allowed under the Eve Online Tos or EULA in peoples opinions? 3 -Does psychological warfare of this type construe harassment in the eyes of the Eve populace? 4 -If someone is unwilling to undock because of my actions, am I holding them against their will? 5 -If I am affecting the virtual income of others, and ISK can buy PLEX which has real world value, Am I violating any monetary laws in peoples opinion? 6 -I endure lots of harassment in local via questions about my parentage,my intelligence, my mothers bedroom activities, the size of my manhood, even my own sexual preference... am I also considered a victim?
1. Yes. Clearly and easily, yes. 2. Again yes. I think it might be hyperbole to call them "despicable". 3. No. As the mechanics currently stand, it's simply part of the game. 4. No, not at all. There are hundreds of other systems that they can head to instead. 5. No. I personally felt that this question was where you clearly became a troll, but I'll answer it anyway. 6. No. Again, that's part of the game.
I really don't want to participate in yet another discussion of the cycle here. I will say that there is a fundamental chain of bad game design things going on here. It simply shouldn't be possible for any player to have this kind of outsized impact on other players when they are 40 miles from their keyboard.
|
Clementina
Coreli Corporation
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 14:51:00 -
[108] - Quote
I'll answer your questions, since you insist so.
-Am I within the bounds of "emergent gameplay"?
Emergent Gameplay Learning what the rule implies You are playing right
-Are my despicable activities allowed under the Eve Online Tos or EULA in peoples opinions?
Remember that this game contains Enough grief to try a bear's brain They petition devs "That is legal" they said "Get your revenge in the game"
-Does psychological warfare of this type construe harassment in the eyes of the Eve populace?
Miner is harassed When his mining ship is lost Not when he is docked
-If someone is unwilling to undock because of my actions, am I holding them against their will?
One Person's noob ship Makes a ratting fleet afraid Held With their own will
-If I am affecting the virtual income of others, and ISK can buy PLEX which has real world value, Am I violating any monetary laws in peoples opinion?
My Friend he bought all of the trains Made me pay high rate shine or rain I called the SEC They agreed it was sleazy But Sherman Act is not in the game
-I endure lots of harassment in local via questions about my parentage,my intelligence, my mothers bedroom activities, the size of my manhood, even my own sexual preference... am I also considered a victim?
Petition the ones Who pollute local with trash Once you get back home
Also I'll add the your invention of AFK Noobing has given lie to any notion that people who complain about AFK Cloaking have done everything that they could do to eliminate the 'threat' to their ships or ops. It has solved the AFK 'problem' once and for all. |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
11606
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:05:00 -
[109] - Quote
I would like to thank everyone for their responses during the night. I see that once again I am accused of drawing parallels between this thread and another. I will once again reinforce the fact that I have excused myself from that other thread, and this thread is about my actions, and things that I personally have been accused of. Every question ive asked is being taken out of eve-mails and local chatter.
War Kitten wrote: I think having your Mrs. impersonate you by typing in local while you're away and logged in might be construed as account sharing and be against the EULA/ToS.
War Kitten, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. For the time being I will have her cease typing in local until I can make an appropriate support ticket. I have already text her to have her not do it today. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
11606
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:12:00 -
[110] - Quote
Clementina wrote:Also I'll add the your invention of AFK Noobing has given lie to any notion that people who complain about AFK Cloaking have done everything that they could do to eliminate the 'threat' to their ships or ops. It has solved the AFK 'problem' once and for all.
Thank you Clementina for taking the time to answer my questions! Your comment above is exactly why I did it! Now if I could only get all the people to understand the difference between AFK Cloakers and Cloaked hunting, my ultimate mission would be complete.
There will come a time when people will start finding my nooblets and killing them, but you see..those people will have started becoming less afraid of the unknown, and are actually taking steps to solve their perceived "problem" instead of running to the forums and calling for change! Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
|
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
360
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:12:00 -
[111] - Quote
To answer your question, Unsuccessful, afk cloaking only works because of local.
Remove local from null-sec, like where I live, in wormholes, and things get a lot more interesting.
Also, I think your friend got perma-banned, or at least temp-banned. Havent seen any posts from him or any alts. |
Zenos Ebeth
DEAD JESTERS The Harlequin's
133
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:13:00 -
[112] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: -Am I within the bounds of "emergent gameplay"? -Are my despicable activities allowed under the Eve Online Tos or EULA in peoples opinions? -Does psychological warfare of this type construe harassment in the eyes of the Eve populace? -If someone is unwilling to undock because of my actions, am I holding them against their will? -If I am affecting the virtual income of others, and ISK can buy PLEX which has real world value, Am I violating any monetary laws in peoples opinion? -I endure lots of harassment in local via questions about my parentage,my intelligence, my mothers bedroom activities, the size of my manhood, even my own sexual preference... am I also considered a victim? .
Well if you want opinions , here they come , in order:
- Probably ? I'm mean afk cloaking is nothing new so I'm not sure it's really "emergent" anymore.
- Yes.
- Only for carebears who go to nullsec for safe farm while not expecting pvp.
- Technically you are not physically preventing them from undocking , however they don't want to undock because of your presence so i would say yes. (not saying there is nothing they can do about it btw. The easiest way of dealing with being "held against your will" by afk cloakers is to wait for your balls to drop first and hit that undock button.)
- You are affecting Their in-game income if they refuse to undock because of your presence in the system. Plex have a price yes , however they cannot be traded for actual money under the ToS , so they are not actually worth anything unless you RMT. Also monetary laws actually involve money , not pixels in a pixel spaceship video game.
And anyone who says you're breaking the law by being in a system and doing nothing is just hilarious.
-You're as much a "victim" of their smack talk as they are "victims" of your afk cloaking. As in not at all. Bad posts are not welcome on these forums.-á -CCP Falcon
|
Batelle
Tymast Industries 150th
2530
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:20:00 -
[113] - Quote
Alyth Nerun wrote:Supreme Protector and Savior of highsec James 315, father of the New Order wrote: First of all, we can note that nowhere in the Code does it say anything about AFK cloaking--or any other AFK activity other than AFK mining. Once again, this makes perfect sense. We would not, for example, threaten to bump someone who was AFK while docked in a station. Nor is it bot-aspirant behavior to be AFK while docked. Mining in highsec is the only situation in which being AFK is problematic.
source
Damn, figured you cultist RPers would be a bit better at keeping your stories straight. Your high priest himself seems to have forgotten AFK hauling. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
Jer'ith Bodas
Bad Touches
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:23:00 -
[114] - Quote
Honestly, as a WH resident I don't understand the furor over AFK cloakers.
WH residents are all cloaky hunters at some point (except the hard-core industrialists perhaps). When we run sites, we have no comforting local to assure us we're safe (or not). In W-space you always have to be prepared to be ambushed; watching d-scan for ships, the discovery scanner for new sigs- you're never safe. Even if you know (think) your statics are closed and there are no 162s- there is still the possibility of a log-in trap.
Every now and then we get a null static.
System after empty system. We can rat in perfect safety as long as local is empty.
In null. Where the risk is supposed to be high.
That's pretty backwards, that someone can rat in sov space in complete safety- and it's not even their space!!
If you ask me, null should be less safe, not more safe.
If someone cloaking in local completely paralyzes you and your corp- well, the phrase HTFU is thrown around a lot these days... |
Batelle
Tymast Industries 150th
2530
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:27:00 -
[115] - Quote
Jer'ith Bodas wrote:Honestly, as a WH resident I don't understand the furor over AFK cloakers.
Cynos (you don't have to agree that its a big deal, but that's the reason people care).
Also, UAE, wouldn't it be a rather simple matter to distinguish your hunters from your noobcampers by looking at killboards? "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
Miichael Epic
The Neutral Zone
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:29:00 -
[116] - Quote
I'm planning to roll in a Nemesis, totally black ops cloaked.....but not for the reason you might think.
I just simply want to pilot my way through New Eden, see null sec, see low sec, see high sec in every empire, find a wormhole, get lost in a wormhole, be pissed I can't find my way OUT of the wormhole, FINALLY find my way out and head home and dock the Nemesis, grab my Covetor and do some mining lol
But I don't want to be warp scrambled as soon as I jump through a stargate or blown up by some little punk a$s b!tch when I'm answering my girlfriends latest text message sending me photos of her banging body and telling me what happened at Dance it Off or at the gym with her friend Sydney or whatever else she tells me.
In my opinion...people who camp stargates are b!tches with tiny manhoods. So yeah...covert ops ship, pushed to the hilt with cloaking....just so I can roll through New Eden without the tiny manhoods trying to show me how big they are(nt) |
Jer'ith Bodas
Bad Touches
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:33:00 -
[117] - Quote
Cynos = Suddenly enemy fleet on you, right?
Covops cloak also = Suddenly enemy fleet on you also
How is a cyno fleet really any different than a dozen T3s uncloaking on you?
Or an inty warping in faster than he'll appear on scan and holding you till the Really Bad People arrive?
The only real difference is: WHers take this risk as part of the game. Nullbears think they should be safe while playing.
|
Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1626
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:58:00 -
[118] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Alyth Nerun wrote:Supreme Protector and Savior of highsec James 315, father of the New Order wrote: First of all, we can note that nowhere in the Code does it say anything about AFK cloaking--or any other AFK activity other than AFK mining. Once again, this makes perfect sense. We would not, for example, threaten to bump someone who was AFK while docked in a station. Nor is it bot-aspirant behavior to be AFK while docked. Mining in highsec is the only situation in which being AFK is problematic.
source Damn, figured you cultist RPers would be a bit better at keeping your stories straight. Your high priest himself seems to have forgotten AFK hauling.
Yes it is a bit of an conundrum. The Saviour does appear to be in contradiction. In this instance we need to look at the entirety of his writings to give meaning to this subject. In doing so we see that the Supreme Protector casts an angry stare at AFK mining and goes on at great length about purging it from New Eden. But the teachings of James 315 show that what makes AFK mining so heinous is the wonton generation of financial wealth while sitting in space in a ship of fragile construction, then demanding recompense when that ship suddenly explodes. Further reading also shows the Father of the New Order recoiling at any in space display of both obscene wealth and expectation of perfect safety.
Given all that it is clear that the Supreme Protector and Savior of Hisec and Father of the New Order James 315 thinks that in space activites should be performed without an expectation of safety most especially when generation of ISKs are going on. Since AFK cloakers are not generating any isk, except on their market alts, they do not draw the ire of our Saviour (peace be upon him). Also, its not called the New Order of Hisec for nothin'.
---
How was that? I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |
Celestra Doxaila
MinTek Heavy Industries
77
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 16:01:00 -
[119] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:I think the OP's name is more relevant now than ever.
Yeah, he is probably in wormhole space. :) |
Celestra Doxaila
MinTek Heavy Industries
77
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 16:04:00 -
[120] - Quote
Miichael Epic wrote:I'm planning to roll in a Nemesis, totally black ops cloaked.....but not for the reason you might think.
I just simply want to pilot my way through New Eden, see null sec, see low sec, see high sec in every empire, find a wormhole, get lost in a wormhole, be pissed I can't find my way OUT of the wormhole, FINALLY find my way out and head home and dock the Nemesis, grab my Covetor and do some mining lol
But I don't want to be warp scrambled as soon as I jump through a stargate or blown up by some little punk a$s b!tch when I'm answering my girlfriends latest text message sending me photos of her banging body and telling me what happened at Dance it Off or at the gym with her friend Sydney or whatever else she tells me.
In my opinion...people who camp stargates are b!tches with tiny manhoods. So yeah...covert ops ship, pushed to the hilt with cloaking....just so I can roll through New Eden without the tiny manhoods trying to show me how big they are(nt)
If you are using wormholes instead of stargates to enter null, you are most likely perfectly safe. It is very rare anyone camps a wormhole exit, and even then it is pretty easy to jump back into the wormhole if things get hot. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |