Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
6326
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 09:22:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Imiarr Timshae wrote:
This isn't true.
Player A deploys a MTU and then Garde II's
Player B gains a suspect flag by shooting Player A's MTU.
Player A's drones automatically (if set to "aggressive) engage Player B.
Limited Engagement begins.
Player A's drones have instigated an unforced attack against a "globally legal" target with a suspect flag without explict instruction to do so.
This behaviour should no longer exist since a patch was put in place to stop it. If you can replicate it on the live server currently, then bug report it and message Lebowski about it as well. This. It was fixed months ago.
Imiarr Timshae wrote:I was not up to date! Do you have a link to the patch notes/rough estimation of when this was patched out? I retract my statement aimed at Lebowski as I have become enlightened :)
I think this is the one.
Quote:Patch notes for EVE Online: Rubicon 1.1 Released on Tuesday, January 28th 2014
Drones that are set to aggressive will no longer perform automatic actions against a target if those actions would trigger a new Limited Engagement, unless explicitly instructed to engage that target. |
Imiarr Timshae
Funny Men In Funny Hats
166
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 09:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Thanks to both of you.
It's suprisingly easy to miss the important patch notes TSCA - Free 3rd Party & Collateral Holding Service - POS Deployment Corp Sale/Boosting |
Jessica Duranin
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 09:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
Imiarr Timshae wrote:Thanks to both of you. It's suprisingly easy to miss the important patch notes It's more surprising how you could miss all the whine threads filled with tears from highsec 'PvPers' when this was patched. |
Ms Kat
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 10:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
This would only work if the 7 or 8 members in the original fleet had safety set to red. If they did they deserved all they got imo.
Before the whole safety system this could be done, not only with drones but with remote sebo's, remote tracking computers etc, if assigned to someone, said someone could go criminal dragging all "helping" into the concordokken party |
Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2989
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:This would only work if the 7 or 8 members in the original fleet had safety set to red. If they did they deserved all they got imo.
Before the whole safety system this could be done, not only with drones but with remote sebo's, remote tracking computers etc, if assigned to someone, said someone could go criminal dragging all "helping" into the concordokken party
Nope.
This has never worked with drones. 'Assistance' modules used to infer GCC before Incursion 1.1 (or thereabouts) but outside of, perhaps, a couple of patch day bugs, this has never been intended gameplay, or something you could make happen.
Much like "drones on aggressive will engage can flippers!" it's highsec-hearsay.
e: for clarity, you could do this if you got someone to put their logi drones on you. This was the best way of getting a whole incursion to go GCC, convince everyone logi drones are amazing, and get the battleships to get them on logistics. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
648
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote: If they were on green that's a faulty game mechanic, and they should be reimbursed.
safeties are a faulty mechanic imo PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://i.imgur.com/N949bKU.jpg proving that Im a sociopathic ganker and all around scum of the game http://i.imgur.com/RX8oBRN.jpg |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1222
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Nope.
This has never worked with drones. 'Assistance' modules used to infer GCC before Incursion 1.1 (or thereabouts) but outside of, perhaps, a couple of patch day bugs, this has never been intended gameplay, or something you could make happen.
Much like "drones on aggressive will engage can flippers!" it's highsec-hearsay.
Actually post Crimewatch 2.0 till a very recent patch Drones on aggressive would engage suspects who fired at your property. Mainly known as the MTU exploit. And a number of shiny ships went down in a very short time period to that unintended behaviour till word got around. Then CCP fixed it.
As for you A.M. Well, HTFU, CCP disagrees with you on that one. :P |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
649
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:
Nope.
This has never worked with drones. 'Assistance' modules used to infer GCC before Incursion 1.1 (or thereabouts) but outside of, perhaps, a couple of patch day bugs, this has never been intended gameplay, or something you could make happen.
Much like "drones on aggressive will engage can flippers!" it's highsec-hearsay.
Actually post Crimewatch 2.0 till a very recent patch Drones on aggressive would engage suspects who fired at your property. Mainly known as the MTU exploit. And a number of shiny ships went down in a very short time period to that unintended behaviour till word got around. Then CCP fixed it. As for you A.M. Well, HTFU, CCP disagrees with you on that one. :P
Can your MTU be shot and looted without the guy shooting/looting be flagged a criminal and allow you to kill him?
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://i.imgur.com/N949bKU.jpg proving that Im a sociopathic ganker and all around scum of the game http://i.imgur.com/RX8oBRN.jpg |
Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
199
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:04:00 -
[39] - Quote
On a related note who fits their ships with 7b worth of mods to do high-sec level 4s?
Who has an entire corp like this?
Where do I sign up? |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |