Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5170
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 11:48:00 -
[841] - Quote
Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships...
LOL - slightly absurd example there. If you're being kited by a frigate outrunning your 4875 m/s Valkyrie IIs, turn around and get out of his point range. That or put him down with your RLML IIs
I actually think this Gila change could be interesting. 2 Medium drones with the dps of 6 heavies and tank, speed and tracking of assault frigates has potential. Think of it as having a drone bay full of 10 Enyos that you can launch 2 at a time. If your target wastes his DPS taking out one of your drones, launch another one. You have 8 spares.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
618
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 12:02:00 -
[842] - Quote
a frigate can kite and passively shield tank 200dps worth of 8km/s warrior IIs. you don't seriously think that some damage bonused lights on a TQ gila actually do anything, do you? |
Medalyn Isis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
103
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 12:20:00 -
[843] - Quote
Just waiting for the battleship proposals now. |
Rab See
Fool Mental Junket
57
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 12:33:00 -
[844] - Quote
Can we delete the 'what I want in faction battleships' from this thread ffs.
Barking up the real tree again, its one thing that my eve mates have been stating, again and again.
I'm getting/using Ashimuu with these changes.
Vigilant is fine.
Gila, desperate to try it on Sisi. Looks good.
Phantasm, getting it back out, buying one.
Cynabal, selling it, dumping it, using a Rupture/Munnin/Loki/Stabber ....
So many people will just have a ship that doesn't take their fittings, and doesn't get used.
What is wrong with CCP? Effectively they don't know how to make Minmatar/Angels interesting. We have heard many ideas here, before the Warp speed intro, but nobody except CCP proposed it. For fleet work, warp speed means slowest. For solo work, it means nothing. For small gang work it mean "come with something useful'. The Cynabal is none of those 'interesting' things.
On the field it doesn't help anyone more than a cheap minmatar cruiser, its expensive and neutered by CCP for **** knows what reason. It wasn't 'overpowered', just better than most of the others. But it got the **** kicked out of it, and left with a useless bonus, while the others got interesting.
Want to get fast tackle in? Use an assault frig, faster more agile and can close to scram/web on the other side of that gate better. Am I alone in thinking this, and waiting for the hammer on the Mach?
|
Medalyn Isis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
103
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 13:07:00 -
[845] - Quote
I've spent quite a while looking at what is possible with the new Phantasm and Ashimmu. Both have a lot of options available to them, so there will be many interesting ways to fit them which is good.
I've come up with quite a few fits now which I want to test out on Singularity. From initial impressions though, I reckon both ships look sound.
I'm not sure about how this AB bonus is going to work on the Nightmare though, perhaps consider increasing the boost speed from 20% to something a little higher to make it worthwhile.
Also Rise, yesterday you said the battleship proposals will be here soon! :) |
Draco Knight
Worms Coalition The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 13:17:00 -
[846] - Quote
Give the ashimmu nos range bonus only and give back the 1 high slot, loose 1 med slot for the additional 1 low slot instead. Would be so much more brawler!!! Could even nano it with the additional speed boost... lol!
Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu
Warp Disruptor II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Medium Armor Repairer II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Damage Control II Heat Sink II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2620
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 13:32:00 -
[847] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships... LOL - slightly absurd example there. If you're being kited by a frigate outrunning your 4875 m/s Valkyrie IIs, turn around and get out of his point range. That or put him down with your RLML IIsI actually think this Gila change could be interesting. 2 Medium drones with the dps of 6 heavies and tank, speed and tracking of assault frigates has potential. Think of it as having a drone bay full of 10 Enyos that you can launch 2 at a time. If your target wastes his DPS taking out one of your drones, launch another one. You have 8 spares.
Yeah, that's just an awesome example.
You just have to give up a midslot, likely tank. Plus, you are only giving up how much damage with your example? The 10% drone spec skill does not apply to them. And hell, they only cost 1.8 million each. No biggie when they get popped, right?
Bottom line, this is an awful design. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |
Anthar Thebess
REPUBLIKA ORLA C0VEN
377
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 13:43:00 -
[848] - Quote
Give sansha shield modules and sansha afterburner to Sansha Phantasm.
Why sansha have only armor modules when all their faction ships are shield based and will have bonus to AB?
Isthar Changes LVL 5 Missions in Nullspace |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5790
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:00:00 -
[849] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:War Kitten wrote:Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships... LOL - slightly absurd example there. If you're being kited by a frigate outrunning your 4875 m/s Valkyrie IIs, turn around and get out of his point range. That or put him down with your RLML IIsI actually think this Gila change could be interesting. 2 Medium drones with the dps of 6 heavies and tank, speed and tracking of assault frigates has potential. Think of it as having a drone bay full of 10 Enyos that you can launch 2 at a time. If your target wastes his DPS taking out one of your drones, launch another one. You have 8 spares. Yeah, that's just an awesome example. You just have to give up a midslot, likely tank. Plus, you are only giving up how much damage with your example? The 10% drone spec skill does not apply to them. And hell, they only cost 1.8 million each. No biggie when they get popped, right? Bottom line, this is an awful design.
When CCP implements this change and if (as i'm sure) it becomes a popular (pve and pvp) ship as opposed to what it is now (the poor man's ishtar), will you return here and admit you were wrong?
Rhetorical question of course, we all know the answer. |
Icewolf7
Anomalous Existence
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:00:00 -
[850] - Quote
Fabulous Rod wrote:Imiarr Timshae wrote:Well I will simply never use my gila again. Edit : I don't ever use my gila it's so bad already. I guess I'll just continue to never use my gila. Good work as ever (SARCASM) Edit : Concerns over Gila 1. Far less damage 2. Inability to use sentry drones. 3. Removal of all shield tanking sentry ships (cruiser class) from the game. 4. Massive lack of adaptability. 5. Un-bonused light drones. In short - You have nerfed the gila, which was admittedly already one of the worst pirate cruisers. How have these concerns not been addressed in 40+ pages. Is there anyone who actually use a gila who wants these ridiculous changes that make Guristas have extreme niche application?
there seem to be a few pilots saying "oh boy this will spark my interest to fly the Gila(even though it seems they have never used one)"
The entire reason behind the Gurista's changes seems to be to get rid of as much drones on the field as possible. |
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5790
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:08:00 -
[851] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships... LOL - slightly absurd example there. If you're being kited by a frigate outrunning your 4875 m/s Valkyrie IIs, turn around and get out of his point range. That or put him down with your RLML IIsI actually think this Gila change could be interesting. 2 Medium drones with the dps of 6 heavies and tank, speed and tracking of assault frigates has potential. Think of it as having a drone bay full of 10 Enyos that you can launch 2 at a time. If your target wastes his DPS taking out one of your drones, launch another one. You have 8 spares.
Right, and mobile depot means more than 8 spares. And every second someone is shooting at your (now faster and more tanky small sig) drones is a second they aren't shooting at you.
With the bonuses they'll be getting, the new Gila Droens won't actualylbe drones any more, but more like Honorverse Style LACs lol. There is imo much more chance of people finding the situation grossly overpowered than of people hating the change because of the loss of the sentry drone crutch. |
Laiannah Sahireen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
68
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:09:00 -
[852] - Quote
Fabulous Rod wrote:Why do you ******* devs feel the need to change anything about Guristas. The best part about missiles is the ease of switching damage types and you do your best to give them a niche application. We spend years training these skill intensive ships because we like what they do and you change them to be "new and exciting". All the time I spent maxing out sentries for my Guristas now worthless to me. **** you.
Judging by this post and the 5 that followed it, I'd say the neckbeard rage is strong with this one.
Just because you're bad at adapting and terrified of change, doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't get interesting new options. Sentries fit on a ton of boats, not just the Gila and RS.
If you pull your head out of your rear, you'll probably see a lot of new opportunities that you couldn't see before. |
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
307
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:09:00 -
[853] - Quote
Draco Knight wrote:Give the ashimmu nos range bonus only and give back the 1 high slot, loose 1 med slot for the additional 1 low slot instead. Would be so much more brawler!!! Could even nano it with the additional speed boost... lol!
Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu
Warp Disruptor II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Medium Armor Repairer II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Damage Control II Heat Sink II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I no god no. loosing a mid on this ship will be devastating. this fit doesnt work on any of the 3 mid amarr ships and it wont work on this ship either. |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2620
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:09:00 -
[854] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:War Kitten wrote:Anhenka wrote:Gila changes make me sad.
Will be easily kited to death by a t1 frigate able to outrun slow mediums, and a 500% bonus to drone HP won't save them if a cruiser sized hull decides to pop drones. 4x the health of paper is still paper. And when one pops, you lose the vast majority of your dps.
Just ew. Bleeeh. Need to go sell my WH site fit Gila to people who don't read dev blogs before summer hits.
I honestly don't know what you have against the Guristas ships... LOL - slightly absurd example there. If you're being kited by a frigate outrunning your 4875 m/s Valkyrie IIs, turn around and get out of his point range. That or put him down with your RLML IIsI actually think this Gila change could be interesting. 2 Medium drones with the dps of 6 heavies and tank, speed and tracking of assault frigates has potential. Think of it as having a drone bay full of 10 Enyos that you can launch 2 at a time. If your target wastes his DPS taking out one of your drones, launch another one. You have 8 spares. Yeah, that's just an awesome example. You just have to give up a midslot, likely tank. Plus, you are only giving up how much damage with your example? The 10% drone spec skill does not apply to them. And hell, they only cost 1.8 million each. No biggie when they get popped, right? Bottom line, this is an awful design. When CCP implements this change and if (as i'm sure) it becomes a popular (pve and pvp) ship as opposed to what it is now (the poor man's ishtar), will you return here and admit you were wrong? Rhetorical question of course, we all know the answer.
You mean like how the Marauder nerfs and BS warp speed and acceleration nerfs were a huge hit with the Incursion crowd? I see how all those Bastion only Marauder fleets are dominating the Incursions today. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
618
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:15:00 -
[855] - Quote
the incursion crowd is terrible |
gascanu
Bearing Srl.
88
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:28:00 -
[856] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:Why do you ******* devs feel the need to change anything about Guristas. The best part about missiles is the ease of switching damage types and you do your best to give them a niche application. We spend years training these skill intensive ships because we like what they do and you change them to be "new and exciting". All the time I spent maxing out sentries for my Guristas now worthless to me. **** you. Judging by this post and the 5 that followed it, I'd say the neckbeard rage is strong with this one. Just because you're bad at adapting and terrified of change, doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't get interesting new options. Sentries fit on a ton of boats, not just the Gila and RS. If you pull your head out of your rear, you'll probably see a lot of new opportunities that you couldn't see before.
in fact is quite the opposite: the new gila will be a close range boat and that's it about "new opportunities" the gila as it it right now in eve is by far more versatile than this "rebalanced" gila; atm you can use it to do about anything, from close range brawler to a long range sniper; after the change you will be stuck with medium drones, while an ishtar for example will be abble to chose what types of drones should deploy: sentrys or heavys or medium or lights or ecm(or even salvage drones, lol); see, this^^ really sounds like allot of opportunities... |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5171
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:31:00 -
[857] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: You mean like how the Marauder nerfs and BS warp speed and acceleration nerfs were a huge hit with the Incursion crowd? I see how all those Bastion only Marauder fleets are dominating the Incursions today.
I didn't realize the incursion community had it so rough. Please CCP, give the poor incursion runners a handout, they don't seem to make enough money.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5571
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:38:00 -
[858] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: You mean like how the Marauder nerfs and BS warp speed and acceleration nerfs were a huge hit with the Incursion crowd? I see how all those Bastion only Marauder fleets are dominating the Incursions today.
I didn't realize the incursion community had it so rough. Please CCP, give the poor incursion runners a handout, they don't seem to make enough money. Also, I wasn't aware that Marauders were designed to only be used by incursion runners. Since I see them in use everywhere it's going to be quite a chore to contact all of those people using them and let them know they are doing it wrong. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
Laiannah Sahireen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
69
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:55:00 -
[859] - Quote
gascanu wrote:Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:Why do you ******* devs feel the need to change anything about Guristas. The best part about missiles is the ease of switching damage types and you do your best to give them a niche application. We spend years training these skill intensive ships because we like what they do and you change them to be "new and exciting". All the time I spent maxing out sentries for my Guristas now worthless to me. **** you. Judging by this post and the 5 that followed it, I'd say the neckbeard rage is strong with this one. Just because you're bad at adapting and terrified of change, doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't get interesting new options. Sentries fit on a ton of boats, not just the Gila and RS. If you pull your head out of your rear, you'll probably see a lot of new opportunities that you couldn't see before. in fact is quite the opposite: the new gila will be a close range boat and that's it about "new opportunities" the gila as it it right now in eve is by far more versatile than this "rebalanced" gila; atm you can use it to do about anything, from close range brawler to a long range sniper; after the change you will be stuck with medium drones, while an ishtar for example will be abble to chose what types of drones should deploy: sentrys or heavys or medium or lights or ecm(or even salvage drones, lol); see, this^^ really sounds like allot of opportunities...
You're exactly the kind of person I was describing. |
gascanu
Bearing Srl.
89
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:02:00 -
[860] - Quote
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:gascanu wrote:Laiannah Sahireen wrote:Fabulous Rod wrote:Why do you ******* devs feel the need to change anything about Guristas. The best part about missiles is the ease of switching damage types and you do your best to give them a niche application. We spend years training these skill intensive ships because we like what they do and you change them to be "new and exciting". All the time I spent maxing out sentries for my Guristas now worthless to me. **** you. Judging by this post and the 5 that followed it, I'd say the neckbeard rage is strong with this one. Just because you're bad at adapting and terrified of change, doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't get interesting new options. Sentries fit on a ton of boats, not just the Gila and RS. If you pull your head out of your rear, you'll probably see a lot of new opportunities that you couldn't see before. in fact is quite the opposite: the new gila will be a close range boat and that's it about "new opportunities" the gila as it it right now in eve is by far more versatile than this "rebalanced" gila; atm you can use it to do about anything, from close range brawler to a long range sniper; after the change you will be stuck with medium drones, while an ishtar for example will be abble to chose what types of drones should deploy: sentrys or heavys or medium or lights or ecm(or even salvage drones, lol); see, this^^ really sounds like allot of opportunities... You're exactly the kind of person I was describing.
lol, so i give you an argumented reply and all you can answer is that ? i wonder who is the "neckbeard rage person" here
p.s: i'm sorry i don't agree with you, that will never happen again! pls, just don't call me bad names, everything but that... lol |
|
Vadeim Rizen
TYR. Exodus.
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:04:00 -
[861] - Quote
So I like that you reduced the nerf to the cynabal's powergrid, but I'm curious why there is still a nerf to powergrid at all? For artillery as it is I already require an ACR. Having to add a 2nd ACR would really make the arty cynabal even weaker than it already is. I'm having trouble seeing what it is you are trying to accomplish here. You're adding warp speed, but reducing the scan resolution and overall fitting, so it's kind of conflicting ideas on whether or not it's to be a cruiser/interceptor hybrid.... I like the idea of having a fast assault cruiser that does mediocre dps, but there is no tank if you take away pwg. as it stands right now my arty cynabal has 1 acr, and can only fit 1 lse with the medium neut. That's about 20k ehp, and does not need to be nerfed as that's already pretty week. There are assault frigs that are around 13k ehp. The cap life is already not very good after previous nerfs, and now a ship that's strength is supposed to be warping around like a frig is getting yet another nerf to cap regeneration, scan res, and tank.
TL;DR If you're going to mess with the cynabal, do it right... make your mind up on what this ship is supposed to be and quit making me change my fits if we're just going to go around in circles and not accomplish anything here.
EDIT: It's ok to just leave it alone all together. Nobody would be mad at you. Actually it appears from 95% percent of the posters here we'd rather you just leave it alone to begin with. |
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
620
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:21:00 -
[862] - Quote
Vadeim Rizen wrote: EDIT: It's ok to just leave it alone all together. Nobody would be mad at you. Actually it appears from 95% percent of the posters here we'd rather you just leave it alone to begin with.
but it's awful |
Vadeim Rizen
TYR. Exodus.
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:23:00 -
[863] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Vadeim Rizen wrote: EDIT: It's ok to just leave it alone all together. Nobody would be mad at you. Actually it appears from 95% percent of the posters here we'd rather you just leave it alone to begin with.
but it's awful
It's better than it would be with his proposed changes. |
Denrace
Viziam Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:38:00 -
[864] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:TinkerHell wrote: Can the Adrestia also get this? Currently its point range bonus means it can point further than it can lock. It is slightly annoying.
nerfing links would also fix your problem
I wish someone would nerf your posting dumbass |
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
620
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:49:00 -
[865] - Quote
Denrace wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:TinkerHell wrote: Can the Adrestia also get this? Currently its point range bonus means it can point further than it can lock. It is slightly annoying.
nerfing links would also fix your problem I wish someone would nerf your posting dumbass
that's you, you're a dumbass |
Jamir Von Lietuva
LDK Sorry We're In Your Space Eh
17
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 15:55:00 -
[866] - Quote
OK, lets put it simple.
Why would anyone fly a kiting Cynabal after the changes over a kiting GIla, Vagabond or a rail Deimos? |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
731
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:13:00 -
[867] - Quote
Jamir Von Lietuva wrote:OK, lets put it simple.
Why would anyone fly a kiting Cynabal after the changes over a kiting GIla, Vagabond or a rail Deimos?
the only reason i can think of it cos i've got a cynabal but not a vagabond Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
LaserzPewPew
Hard Knocks Inc.
31
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:17:00 -
[868] - Quote
While we are trying to make a valid use for medium drones, can we have the signature resolution of their weapons looked at? Both medium and heavy drones have 125 sig res.
Also, a missile bonus on a drone boat has very little place. The Gila should have a medium drone speed/tracking buff. After all, if you want medium drones to be used someday in the future, they need to be capable of compensating for the terrible drone AI that is now.
|
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
620
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:23:00 -
[869] - Quote
LaserzPewPew wrote: Also, a missile bonus on a drone boat has very little place.
why |
Arthur Aihaken
Arsenite
3264
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:26:00 -
[870] - Quote
LaserzPewPew wrote:Also, a missile bonus on a drone boat has very little place. The Gila should have a medium drone speed/tracking buff. After all, if you want medium drones to be used someday in the future, they need to be capable of compensating for the terrible drone AI that is now. The Guristas ships are based on Caldari hulls (or vice-versa), so yes - they should have a missile bonus. The kinetic/thermal missile bonus is actually a welcome change. As for the drones, the new passive low-slot navigation and omni modules should help with any speed and tracking issues. Let's not also forget that medium drones are getting a velocity buff as well. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |