Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
12019
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Fourth and Fifth hand information is always reliable.
My mother's next door neighbors dogwalker's plumber's daughters boyfriends ex-roomates former bandmember's highschool track and field coaches father-in law's nurses cousin thrice removed said that. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Ms Kat
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
72
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
You can amuse yourself by trolling but the matter remains, the person has no reason to say this unless it was true. The fact other people piped up saying this was the case and for the latest person to get ganked should petition to be reimbursed makes me believe its happening.
If you were there you would be worried as well |
Anslo
Scope Works
4836
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:55:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP reimbursed my carrier as well. I, too, will recant the tale of my brave minerchon over comms.
|
Amyclas Amatin
xX-Crusader-Xx Li3 Federation
223
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 22:59:00 -
[34] - Quote
Can everyone calm down and tell us all about how ccp reimbursed your shiny ships? For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/ High-Sec has a future, But do You? Buy a Mining Permit to Secure yours today. |
masternerdguy
State Protectorate Caldari State
1603
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 23:04:00 -
[35] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Can everyone calm down and tell us all about how ccp reimbursed your shiny ships?
So so so I'm like hanging with my mates down in Stain And dumbo hits self destruct on his carrier for lols And then he can't turn it off and his carrier blows up And he petitions CCP and CCP looks at him and says "We won't reimburse that with video evidence"
And dumbo goes "I hate this stupid game" And I'm like whatever
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1zvhJRIM7M
Things are only impossible until they are not. |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1350
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 23:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:You can amuse yourself by trolling but the matter remains, the person has no reason to say this unless it was true. The fact other people piped up saying this was the case and for the latest person to get ganked should petition to be reimbursed makes me believe its happening.
If you were there you would be worried as well If you send me your isk, I will return it in one day with 10% interest. It's true, I have no reason to say this otherwise. |
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
393
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 01:33:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bah, ganking ships with 20 isBoxed tornadoes is not fun at all, its like shooting fish in a barrel.
Its actually a good question, whether the loss to isBoxed gank should be reimbursed or not. Arguments on both sides are valid.
On one hand, if guy has 20 accounts, he has a right to use them simultaneously as he sees fit. And how is being ganked by 20 isBoxer nadoes different from being ganked by 20 regular pirates?
On the other hand, isBoxing in gank PvP specifically is a very unfair advantage over regular guys - instantaneous reaction time, flawless execution, etc. isBoxer is a very useful tool for PvP scenarios where precision strike is required. Not so much in regular free-flowing combat, where it may be restrictive, but for ganks, its amazing tool.
So I dont know if I would object to a reimbursement. Where do you draw a line? I use alts as scouts/falcons/combat cynos etc. Not isBoxed, but multi-boxed - similar thing in principle.
I would probably come to a compromise. Reimburse first vindi loss, say second wont be reimbursed. And keep eye on isBoxing guys - if its just 1 or 2 dudes who do it in high sec, let them. If it grows uncontrollably, well, then CCP has a problem. |
masternerdguy
State Protectorate Caldari State
1606
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 01:34:00 -
[38] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Bah, ganking ships with 20 isBoxed tornadoes is not fun at all, its like shooting fish in a barrel.
Its actually a good question, whether the loss to isBoxed gank should be reimbursed or not. Arguments on both sides are valid.
On one hand, if guy has 20 accounts, he has a right to use them simultaneously as he sees fit. And how is being ganked by 20 isBoxer nadoes different from being ganked by 20 regular pirates?
On the other hand, isBoxing in gank PvP specifically is a very unfair advantage over regular guys - instantaneous reaction time, flawless execution, etc. isBoxer is a very useful tool for PvP scenarios where precision strike is required. Not so much in regular free-flowing combat, where it may be restrictive, but for ganks, its amazing tool.
So I dont know if I would object to a reimbursement. Where do you draw a line? I use alts as scouts/falcons/combat cynos etc. Not isBoxed, but multi-boxed - similar thing in principle.
I would probably come to a compromise. Reimburse first vindi loss, say second wont be reimbursed. And keep eye on isBoxing guys - if its just 1 or 2 dudes who do it in high sec, let them. If it grows uncontrollably, well, then CCP has a problem.
isboxing a mining fleet is unfair to the regular guy too. Things are only impossible until they are not. |
Klymer
Hedion University Amarr Empire
541
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 01:54:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote: I am very disappointed, very disappointed indeed.
Not as much as I am for reading your crappy, rumor mongering thread.
|
45thtiger 0109
AL3XAND3R.
61
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 02:04:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:For those who don't know there has been a 20 man tornado isboxed gank fleet killing incursion runners.
Today on comms I heard claims that CCP have been reimbursing the ships lost to gankers if the gankers were using ISboxer. If this is indeed accurate this needs looking into. Its a slippery slope, next you will reimburse for normal ganks, then for normal losses.
Rule 1 of eve, don't fly it if you cant afford to loose it. If these losses were reimbursed I am very disappointed, very disappointed indeed.
EvE is working as intended
ISBoxer is working as intended
CCP is working as Intended
Ms Kat Forum Post is not working as intended.
CCP & ISD Are Going To Press The Big Lock Red Button and the is working as Intended I am not a CCP employee-ájust having a input in the EvE forum
|
|
Dealth Striker
Striker Ltd
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 02:32:00 -
[41] - Quote
Too funny on how immature some of the posters are. It must be an addiction that one cannot leave a post alone to die but have to get in some smart-aleck comment. Hmm I must have an addiction for posting too.... *sigh* Striker Out!! |
Aramatheia
Tiffany and Co.
206
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 02:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ms Kat wrote:For those who don't know there has been a 20 man tornado isboxed gank fleet killing incursion runners.
Today on comms I heard claims that CCP have been reimbursing the ships lost to gankers if the gankers were using ISboxer. If this is indeed accurate this needs looking into. Its a slippery slope, next you will reimburse for normal ganks, then for normal losses.
Rule 1 of eve, don't fly it if you cant afford to loose it. If these losses were reimbursed I am very disappointed, very disappointed indeed.
that guy and his 20 man tornado fleet is an absolute blast.
he was there last night, he lost 1 ship to a killright, he then lost 2 ships in 2 sites due to warping into a site 5 minutes after it was started, pulling new wave aggro and then he lost 2 more after i, bumped 2 of his ships out of align on the gate before they took it. He then inexplicably immediately warped his guys out of the site but not waiting for the 2 that i bumped, they sat there and were also killed.
Great success! |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1351
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 02:45:00 -
[43] - Quote
Dealth Striker wrote:Too funny on how immature some of the posters are. It must be an addiction that one cannot leave a post alone to die but have to get in some smart-aleck comment. Hmm I must have an addiction for posting too.... *sigh* Good for you. The first step is admitting you have a problem. |
Asia Leigh
Beyond New Frontier
106
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 02:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
I heard a guy say over comms say that CCP was giving 30B isk to everyone who posts in this thread. Must be true, because someone said so, right? Erotica 1: Scams someone-á-á Ripard: Makes inflamatory blog post that incites eve community and the MMO community-á Sohkar: I wasn't harrased-á-á-á-áCCP: Banned-á-á-á Moral of this story? If you don't want to get banned, don't **** off CSM |
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2575
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 03:05:00 -
[45] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:I heard a guy say over comms say that CCP was giving 30B isk to everyone who posts in this thread. Must be true, because someone said so, right?
Pop over to our comms. I'll tell you how they're giving out 60B. More isk equals more truth, right? That seems to be OP's line of thinking. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |
|
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2964
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 04:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
Quote:31. Rumor mongering is prohibited.
Rumor threads and posts which are based off no actual solid information and are designed to either troll or annoy other users will be locked and removed. These kinds of threads and posts are detrimental to the wellbeing and spirit of the EVE Online Community, and can create undue panic among forum users, as well as adding to the workload of our moderators. Thread closed. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |