Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
OberFuhrer
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:01:00 -
[1]
The title says it all. I don't see it listed on the market at all, yet it is listed as a tech 2 item.
|
Lord Slater
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:02:00 -
[2]
its not available on amrket yet [read years] YARRR HAHAHA im the happy pirate YARRRR
|
Hoshi
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:12:00 -
[3]
Burn Eden has one. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
DoctorGonzo
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:23:00 -
[4]
I think they'll change how wcs's work before releasing the Tech II version.
Get Your BoB Protection Kit Here |
Hehulk
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:23:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Hoshi Burn Eden has one.
This^ They won it in a recent contest ---------- Please choose one signature image, as per the forum rules. - Teblin |
vecdran
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:33:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Hoshi Burn Eden has one.
Three.
No one seems to get it right :P
|
Tyranical Teabagger
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:35:00 -
[7]
it'd be nice if when reverse engineering comes out they started selling reverse engineered copies for astronimical prices.
|
Nahia Senne
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:45:00 -
[8]
tech2 wcs would mean tech2 scramblers. tech2 scramblers would be fitted by most pirates while tech2 wcs would be a problem for young carebears.
|
Luc Boye
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:46:00 -
[9]
Notice how he had to post with alt about this one =)
|
Barsei
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 16:54:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Barsei on 12/05/2006 16:54:34 CCP when someone of you read this thread:
DONT release the BPOs
why ??
its realy simple. thats only a moneymaker BPO and everyone will buy the tech2 version of the WCS and everyone must buy the tech2 version of the warp scrambler/disruptor and nothing will be changed.
it will be need the same amount of tech2 scrambler/disruptor to warp scrambler a ship that have the same amount of WCS like now, nothing will be changed.
only the bpo owner will profit from that and noone else. it doesnt will help the WCS user or the warp scrambler/disruptor user.
@all sorry for that bad english
|
|
Xori Ruscuv
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:01:00 -
[11]
Please introduce Tech 2 WCS. It will make the whine threads so much more entertaining. It will be like a combination of the HAC price threads and the WCS whine threads!
Gotcha! I bet that got ya all hot under the collar, didn't it? |
Viktor Fyretracker
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:02:00 -
[12]
there should be a +2 WCS that isnt tech 2 imo, just somehow restrict it to haulers/transports like how strip miners are only for barges. no balance would be effected and no apocs with +16 warp power.
|
Barsei
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:08:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Xori Ruscuv Please introduce Tech 2 WCS. It will make the whine threads so much more entertaining. It will be like a combination of the HAC price threads and the WCS whine threads!
it doesnt will change anything, when ccp release the wcs tech2 bpo then everyone will whine and ccp must release the tech2 version of warp scrambler/disruptor.
and the onlyone who will win is not the preyer or the hunter, it would be the bpo owners
|
Tsual
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:10:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker there should be a +2 WCS that isnt tech 2 imo, just somehow restrict it to haulers/transports like how strip miners are only for barges. no balance would be effected and no apocs with +16 warp power.
Blokade runner gets a standart bonus of +3 warp core strength. ******************** Those without a tribe can only keep their word.
|
Xori Ruscuv
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:12:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Barsei
Originally by: Xori Ruscuv Please introduce Tech 2 WCS. It will make the whine threads so much more entertaining. It will be like a combination of the HAC price threads and the WCS whine threads!
it doesnt will change anything, when ccp release the wcs tech2 bpo then everyone will whine and ccp must release the tech2 version of warp scrambler/disruptor.
and the onlyone who will win is not the preyer or the hunter, it would be the bpo owners
Yeah, that is exactly my point. People will still whine about WCS, but will whine that WCS II forces them to fit scram II. And then they will whine beause the prices are so high...
... just like a WCS + HAC price thread!
Gotcha! I bet that got ya all hot under the collar, didn't it? |
Neon Genesis
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 17:30:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Nahia Senne tech2 wcs would mean tech2 scramblers. tech2 scramblers would be fitted by most pirates while tech2 wcs would be a problem for young carebears.
I find this an amusingly biased statement. Don't want to start a flamewar about carebear/pirate and wcs, but what makes you point out only the problems for young carebears?
What about t1 users who would need t2 scrams to compete?
Also, geddons with 16 warp strength? No thanks.
There, i just contributed nothing to your thread |
Dreez
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 18:17:00 -
[17]
Its on Shin RaŠs Raven . (Sry, couldnt help myself).
Current Location: After 2 years of waiting, getting ready for another hunt.
|
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 18:30:00 -
[18]
WCS2 - strenght 1, 25CPU.
Sorted!
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Sucram
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 18:40:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker there should be a +2 WCS that isnt tech 2 imo, just somehow restrict it to haulers/transports like how strip miners are only for barges. no balance would be effected and no apocs with +16 warp power.
Hmmm... DonŠt really know how that would be possible with only 7 lowslots...
|
Hydraxian
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 21:53:00 -
[20]
If they want to make fewer people use them in combat setups throw a penalty on them like 25% slower ROF or something (nerfing offence rather than defence for obvious reasons). Meaning people who want to use them in combat to get away will have to sacrifice something other than a low slot.
|
|
Max Hardcase
|
Posted - 2006.05.12 22:54:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Max Hardcase on 12/05/2006 22:57:17 I'm for releasing it, that way our current targets might engage us just once. I mean with so many stabs fitted they don't even dare to fight cause it gimps the setups completely. Atleast with WCS2 they might not totally gimp their setups.
---------------------------------------------- Max Hardcase > yawn-o-rama Max Hardcase > is this typical of RA warfare ? FreaKsh0 > yes boredom fitted in all their high slots |
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2006.05.13 00:46:00 -
[22]
WCS2 won't be moneymakers.
Expanded Cargohold IIs, now there's a freaking huge moneymaker.
Selling them for a few million and massively undercutting the entire named-hull mod market. It'd probably oust the Cap charger II as the most "omgiwin" bpo in EVE.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |