Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Mai Khumm
593
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
So...let me get this straight?
Quote: In turn, this allows us to change several points:
Allow Starbases to be anchored anywhere in high-security space and without standing requirements (minus some protected solar systems, like Jita or new player starting systems of course).
I just want to be 100% sure on this. In the summer expansion I don't need standings to shove a POS in highsec AND I don't need to have it tied to a moon?
Also, if the not being tied to a moon thing is true. Along with the lack of standings needed, does this apply to nullsec? I hope that its carefully looked into so nullsec bloc and dump a POS into anyt system they choose. *insert witty saying here* |
|
CCP Ytterbium
C C P C C P Alliance
3292
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mai Khumm wrote:So...let me get this straight? Quote: In turn, this allows us to change several points:
Allow Starbases to be anchored anywhere in high-security space and without standing requirements (minus some protected solar systems, like Jita or new player starting systems of course).
I just want to be 100% sure on this. In the summer expansion I don't need standings to shove a POS in highsec AND I don't need to have it tied to a moon? Also, if the not being tied to a moon thing is true. Along with the lack of standings needed, does this apply to nullsec? I hope that its carefully looked into so nullsec bloc and dump a POS into anyt system they choose.
You'll still need a moon, by "anywhere" we mean anywhere in the security band, including solar systems that were previously restricted, like 0.8-1.0. |
|
Mai Khumm
593
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Mai Khumm wrote:So...let me get this straight? Quote: In turn, this allows us to change several points:
Allow Starbases to be anchored anywhere in high-security space and without standing requirements (minus some protected solar systems, like Jita or new player starting systems of course).
I just want to be 100% sure on this. In the summer expansion I don't need standings to shove a POS in highsec AND I don't need to have it tied to a moon? Also, if the not being tied to a moon thing is true. Along with the lack of standings needed, does this apply to nullsec? I hope that its carefully looked into so nullsec bloc and dump a POS into anyt system they choose. You'll still need a moon, by "anywhere" we mean anywhere in the security band, including solar systems that were previously restricted, like 0.8-1.0.
Thanks for the quick reply!!!
Is there something in place that'll prevent people from dumping POSs everywhere on day 1 and just abandoning them?
Is there something in the works for removing a abandoned highsec POS without wardeccing its owner?
Also, can you give a list of "Protected" systems? *insert witty saying here* |
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3446
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 17:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
This really should be in the blog comments
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Xaniff wrote: 2. I predict there will be even more abandoned POSes out hogging all the spaces next to the moons. There needs to be some mechanic for these to be abandoned and destroyed in a reasonable amount of time after running out of fuel and failing to be maintained (like the secure containers that are lost, whether they hold goods or not).
Yeah, that's a good point, we'll note that one down. |
Azami Nevinyrall
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1849
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 17:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
I've stated this before in my campaign, and I'll say it again here!
After X days (I say 7-10) after the POS has been without fuel. The POS in question model will change to make it look abandoned. At that point, you can use the Hacking minigame to hack and "Highjack" the POS in question... New player experience, more highsec PvE missions, casual play, balance, counters to AFK cloaking, expanding the NEX store, and Power Projection.
Azami Nevinyrall for CSM9! |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1148
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 17:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Please contain the discussion about the upcoming Industry changes to the relevant thread.
Thread locked.
The rules: 16. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.
As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |