Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
|
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
4604
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
I think you better be wearing asbestos underwear.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2969
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
i think you're not nearly as funny as you think you are |
hedge betts Shiyurida
State Protectorate Caldari State
219
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
On the off chance this is not a troll thread.
You have more of a chance of cup doing a rollback to 2009 than what you suggest. Pog mo thoin |
Wulfgar WarHammer
Imperium Research Inc
112
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
This thread is going places... |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:i think you're not nearly as funny as you think you are
i know you may not believe it, but im not trying to be funny.
all i hear is more fights all eve is about is everyone versus everyone
well i think that the risk adverse should get what they want to. it is a sandbox after all why shouldn't eve have totally safe areas?
all i hear is we want more victims to shoot.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21010
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sure. Here is a full list of the restrictions that should apply:
-+ You can obviously not lock any player ship. -+ You can't activate any kind of AoE weaponry or module. -+ You can't use the market, contracts or the trading window. -+ You can't access or manage POSes and their services. -+ You can't mine. -+ You can't shoot rats. -+ You can't access any kind of container in space. -+ You can't carry any cargo out of or into a station. -+ You can't use the on-board scanner or scan probes. -+ You can't be in a fleet. -+ You can't use salvagers and similar mini-profession modules. -+ You can't access the industry interface. -+ There will be no access free-floating sites in space. -+ There will be no planets. -+ There will be no station offices or services besides refitting, resculpting, and the NeX.
That should keep out all the PvP. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think? That actually exists already. A place where absolutely nobody can attack your or bump you or anything.
It's called being docked.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sure. Here is a full list of the restrictions that should apply:
-+ You can obviously not lock any player ship.
That should keep out all the PvP.
i would have agreed with you if you stopped there but you didnt so i have to disagree. but thank you for posting
|
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:it is a sandbox after all why shouldn't eve have totally safe areas? Wait, whaaaaaat? Did I read this right? You know what a sandbox is right? They give you the basic tool, you manage your own destiny. If anything it would be more sandbox to totally remove and non-player driven entities like concord and facpo and leave it up to players to arrange defence. Now I'm not saying that should in any way be done, but jamming in more automatic safeties is pretty much the opposite of sandbox.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21026
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:i would have agreed with you if you stopped there but you didnt so i have to disagree. but thank you for posting Then you can forget about your idea.
Either you remove all PvP and all reasons for PvP from an area, or you allow all PvP. You don't get to do PvP or competitive activities in an environment where others are not allowed to PvP or compete back. It just doesn't work that way.
If you want PvP gone, all the things on the list (and probably a few more that I have missed) will have to go.
Quote:it is a sandbox after all why shouldn't eve have totally safe areas? Because being a multiplayer sandbox precludes such areas from existing. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
901
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think? For your heresy against HTFU and calls to nerf hisec we are adding a +1 to the Kill It Forward queue. An innocent carebear in hisec will be murdered, and advised it was because of your actions.
Your heresy, our hands, their blood, your conscience. When the long list of nerfs to hisec stop, we will stop.
F
Would you like to know more? |
Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
1291
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
:Trammel:
Look how that ended up. I'm Denzel Washington, and I play chess. |
Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
657
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
You are perfectly safe docked only thing missing is \dance. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|
Shydow Lugia
Amtrack Mafia
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
No. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6016
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
I'm all for it as long as the players in that super safe space can do NOTHING that affects players outside of it (who are actually taking risks, evne the 'regular high sec' guy who are at least risking suicide ganks and wardecs).
No isk making, no standings gains, no trading, no contracting. Then you got a deal.
|
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think? For your heresy against HTFU and calls to nerf hisec we are adding a +1 to the Kill It Forward queue. An innocent carebear in hisec will be murdered, and advised it was because of your actions. Your heresy, our hands, their blood, your conscience. When the long list of nerfs to hisec stop, we will stop. F
yawn. psychotic behaviour, i block logis in incursion sites, thats all i do, me and my blackbird pissin off the incursions runners who insist on killing my mom. and you think i am going to care about some random you try to pop. why stop at one? do 500, CCP should do it just to see all your tears. must drive you insane imagining an area where carebears can play free and carelessly without worrying about getting ganked by some random. none of you have convinced me that this is a bad idea. in fact to me it almost feels like you want this too. |
Winchester Steele
1027
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
We already have it. It has Pandas and everything. It's called WoW, and its that way. ----> ... |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:15:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
I'm all for it as long as the players in that super safe space can do NOTHING that affects players outside of it (who are actually taking risks, evne the 'regular high sec' guy who are at least risking suicide ganks and wardecs). No isk making, no standings gains, no trading, no contracting. Then you got a deal.
i disagree. there should be missions mining distribution missions and other cool things. explain to me why the risk adverse are not allowed their own place? i think its a case of you wanting to fight with pilots who have no interest in fighting and that frustrates you and even the thought of a place where they can do what they like and be safe must be very frustrating for you.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2224
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
Are you Baltec 1's alt?
I think we should be told This is not a signature. |
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6028
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:18:00 -
[21] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote: i disagree. there should be missions mining distribution missions and other cool things. explain to me why the risk adverse are not allowed their own place?
Bolded the answer to your question.
Quote: i think its a case of you wanting to fight with pilots who have no interest in fighting and that frustrates you and even the thought of a place where they can do what they like and be safe must be very frustrating for you.
I am a PVE pilot. I fight Sanshas and Guristas. I also take risks, and since this is a game, I get enough reward for the risk.
What you want is like saying you should be able to score points in soccer without so much effort as kicking the ball into a goal. That's not a game, it's *insert censored word for self pleasuring*.
|
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
147
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:20:00 -
[22] - Quote
I think this is the dumbest idea ever, and you really didnt think it through. I also think you should put the game down and go play something different. This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165 |
Magnus Cortex
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
80
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:21:00 -
[23] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE
Trammel killed UO and Ultrasec would kill EVE
|
Killian Redbeard
3dge of D4rkness
41
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:23:00 -
[24] - Quote
I believe the Test Server gives you everything you want. You just have to accept that fact that when the server is mirrored you will have to redo all the things you did as they will be wiped out. That is, unless you did the same on the main server then it would still be there. But you will be completely safe and can do what you want. Just stay out of the authorized PVP areas on the test server. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21040
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:i disagree. there should be missions mining distribution missions and other cool things. They can, but they would have to be completely isolated from the part of the game where they interact with other people. This already exists and is called the X-series.
Quote:explain to me why the risk adverse are not allowed their own place? They are, for one, but the kind of risk aversion you're talking about would require them to play a completely different game GÇö a singleplayer version that is not supported by the multiplayer game that is EVE. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:how about CCP making an area of space where it is actually SAFE, where any aggression like locking up a ship or bumping results in ship and pod being destroyed..a super safe hisec ultra sec if you will.
Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER.
everyone is banging on about getting more players into the game, welll...this post is directed to all the risk adverse pilots who want to carebear without worry. knowing that gankers and griefers cannot operate as they do now in normal hisec..
i am certain that an area of ultra-sec would be stuffed with pilots every day. and the forums filled with the raised voices of all those pvp pilots who want more access to victims to fatten up killlboards and being denied. let the tears of frustration flow.
nerf hisec ? no i say make ultra sec.
what do you think?
Are you Baltec 1's alt? I think we should be told
nope this is my main, youll find me sitting in my blackbird in local for the hq incursion sites. ive still not heard a decent argument against ultra sec, i expected better to be honest. i suspect that should CCP actually make an area of ultra sec it will be filled to cap everyday.
|
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote: i disagree. there should be missions mining distribution missions and other cool things. explain to me why the risk adverse are not allowed their own place?
Bolded the answer to your question. Quote: i think its a case of you wanting to fight with pilots who have no interest in fighting and that frustrates you and even the thought of a place where they can do what they like and be safe must be very frustrating for you.
I am a PVE pilot. I fight Sanshas and Guristas. I also take risks, and since this is a game, I get enough reward for the risk. What you want is like saying you should be able to score points in soccer without so much effort as kicking the ball into a goal. That's not a game, it's *insert censored word for self pleasuring*.
nope im not saying that at all. i never mentioned football. explain to me why having a totally safe area is bad?
|
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2225
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:31:00 -
[28] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote: i disagree. there should be missions mining distribution missions and other cool things. explain to me why the risk adverse are not allowed their own place?
Bolded the answer to your question. Quote: i think its a case of you wanting to fight with pilots who have no interest in fighting and that frustrates you and even the thought of a place where they can do what they like and be safe must be very frustrating for you.
I am a PVE pilot. I fight Sanshas and Guristas. I also take risks, and since this is a game, I get enough reward for the risk. What you want is like saying you should be able to score points in soccer without so much effort as kicking the ball into a goal. That's not a game, it's *insert censored word for self pleasuring*. nope im not saying that at all. i never mentioned football. explain to me why having a totally safe area is bad?
Because this is Eve Online.
Simple really. This is not a signature. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21043
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:explain to me why having a totally safe area is bad? Because it would have to be a completely separate game and would therefore divert resources away from EVE. It would have to be a separate game because such an area would be one big godmode exploit and it can therefore not be allowed to interact in any way with anything other players do.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
147
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ill debunk ultrasec once you answer this: what is the benefit to the game's economy, player base and content? This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |