Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
1567
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 02:47:00 -
[181] - Quote
The only way to get marmite off the jita undock is to put a freighter alt in your corp and warp it to the perimeter gate. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11295
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 02:49:00 -
[182] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Baltec has disappeared instead of answering the questions about his claims of high sec being more profitable than null sec, because I guess he can't prove it since it's a fact that null sec is more profitable than high sec. I found this video on youtube, it's from the best forum on the internet. It's how I imagine baltec trying to explain himself: And boom goes the dynamite!
I was busy.
You know you could look up all of this info f, its not like its a state secret. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
447
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 02:50:00 -
[183] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:baltec1 wrote:
Null anoms.
how is 60-90 mil better than 70-120 mil?
Plexing is restricted to no more than 100 people per region, we have tens of thousands of pilots. Its not viable on a large scale.
In fairness, in this post: baltec1 wrote: Average earnings from anoms is around 60 mil/hr, 90mil/hr at the very best and we suffer interuptions.
high sec nets you 70mil/hr very easily going up to 100-120mil/hr from level 4s with no interuptions.
So running anoms is 60-90mil per hour in null sec And high sec nets you 70-120mil from level 4's with no interruptions. Now, you seem to be comparing Null Sec anomalies to High sec missions. Now that seems unfair, because you're comparing oranges to apples. What is the amount of isk you can earn doing level 4 missions in null sec, since there are mission agents that offer level 4's in null sec? If the general understanding is that you earn more isk for completing a mission in null sec compared to high sec, which will be answered as the case in the EvE help channel, then shouldn't that same action be paying more in null sec? Instead of comparing null sec anomalies to high sec level 4's, could you please curtail your explanation to at least the same activity? anomalies in high sec to null and missions in high sec compared to null. Also, because I don't know, can you please tell me which region of space your 10000 pilots are currently sitting in so I may look at the map in eve to see a giant red bubble symbolizing 10000 people actively competing for the 100 plexes that region may offer? There are no mission in sov space, we have anoms in place of them. As I said, only 100 at most can run plex per region. We simply do not have the space to make them viable for large scale consumption. Even if we take over all of null. It doest matter if we dont have 10000 people in one place at the same time, 101 is enough to overwhelm the sites in any region.
And which region/regions of space do you own? Also, what's preventing you from going to other regions in null sec to make use of their anoms? Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5326
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:16:00 -
[184] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
And which region/regions of space do you own? Also, what's preventing you from going to other regions in null sec to make use of their anoms?
Ladies and gentlemen, he really is this stupid. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
447
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:21:00 -
[185] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
And which region/regions of space do you own? Also, what's preventing you from going to other regions in null sec to make use of their anoms?
Ladies and gentlemen, he really is this stupid.
Imagine that, another personal attack, breaking rule #4 of these forums from Kaarous Aldurad. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21238
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:28:00 -
[186] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: And which region/regions of space do you own? Also, what's preventing you from going to other regions in null sec to make use of their anoms?
Ladies and gentlemen, he really is this stupid. Imagine that, another personal attack, breaking rule #4 of these forums from Kaarous Aldurad. Just consider it an expression of genuine limitless bewilderment by the implications of what you just asked. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
447
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:34:00 -
[187] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: And which region/regions of space do you own? Also, what's preventing you from going to other regions in null sec to make use of their anoms?
Ladies and gentlemen, he really is this stupid. Imagine that, another personal attack, breaking rule #4 of these forums from Kaarous Aldurad. Just consider it an expression of genuine limitless bewilderment by the implications of what you just asked.
he can think what he wants, but he's not allowed to personally attack someone. If he wishes to express what you say a "genuine limitless bewilderment" then maybe he should demonstrate his own intelligence in a manner that doesn't break the forum's rules. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21239
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:36:00 -
[188] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:he can think what he wants, but he's not allowed to personally attack someone. So you understand why your personal attacks are not allowed then, no matter what how you try to justify them? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:36:00 -
[189] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:he can think what he wants, but he's not allowed to personally attack someone. So you understand why your personal attacks are not allowed then, no matter what how you try to justify them?
Link my personal attack(s). Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21239
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:40:00 -
[190] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Link my personal attack(s). Already did, and you already responded (by repeating the personal attacks, no less). You tried to justify them rather than accept that you need to stop, so skip the silly evasions.
That's also why I'm asking: do you understand now why your personal attacks are not allowed, no matter how you try to justify them? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:44:00 -
[191] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Link my personal attack(s). Already did, and you already responded. You tried to justify them rather than accept that you need to stop, so skip the silly evasions. That's also why I'm asking: do you understand now why your personal attacks are not allowed, no matter how you try to justify them?
Sure, If I make a personal attack it shouldn't be allowed, when I make one, I'll feel bad for having done it.
Until then, here is proof that I've not insulted anyone here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4510584#post4510584
Calling you obsessive is a fact, because you're acting obsessively. Obsession isn't even an insult, unless of course you perceive it to be. But if you consider obsession an insult, then you should stop insulting yourself by acting in a manner you find to be insulting.
Now I'm willing to continuously prove my statements, while you refuse to. If you wish to have an actual conversation, then I'm going to request that you prove your statements.
if you cannot, then I'm going to consider you a troll, who is trolling, and regard you as such. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21239
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 03:51:00 -
[192] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Sure, If I make a personal attack it shouldn't be allowed, when I make one, I'll feel bad for having done it. You're feeling plenty bad, then, presumably since you use them a whole lot? Actually, I can only assume no, since that's the entire goal of your trolling attempts.
Quote:Calling you obsessive is a GǪpersonal attack no matter how you try to justify it, you hypocrite. It is also a lie, you liar. Remember what you said? GǣHe can think what he wants, but he's not allowed to personally attack someoneGǥ, well that goes for you too. Since you very obviously feel that it is okay to be abusive to people if you can justify it, then his calling you stupid is 100% okay too.
So make up your mind: if you're going to attack people for what they say and try to control what they can or can't say, then get all snivelly when you get what you give or just follow your own rules and stop attacking people, you troll.
Quote:Now I'm willing to continuously prove my statements, while you refuse to. Liar. See, that's the great thing about my position: you provide all the proof I ever need for my claims about you so I can just sit back and relax. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:03:00 -
[193] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Sure, If I make a personal attack it shouldn't be allowed, when I make one, I'll feel bad for having done it. You're feeling plenty bad, then, presumably since you use them a whole lot? Actually, I can only assume no, since that's the entire goal of your trolling attempts. Quote:Calling you obsessive is a GǪpersonal attack no matter how you try to justify it, you hypocrite. It is also a lie, you liar. Remember what you said? GǣHe can think what he wants, but he's not allowed to personally attack someoneGǥ, well that goes for you too. Since you very obviously feel that it is okay to be abusive to people if you can justify it, then his calling you stupid is 100% okay too. So make up your mind: if you're going to attack people for what they say and try to control what they can or can't say, then get all snivelly when you get what you give or just follow your own rules and stop attacking people, you troll. Quote:Now I'm willing to continuously prove my statements, while you refuse to. Liar. See, that's the great thing about my position: you provide all the proof I ever need for my claims about you so I can just sit back and relax.
Link me my personal attacks, you cannot because I have said none.
Calling you obsessive isn't a personal attack because it's an observation being made within the confines of the rules, I'm not insulting you when I point out your being obsessive, which you are, because you are in fact being obsessive.
Obsessive isn't an insult, here's the definition of obsession again because you appear to have forgotten:
the domination of one's thoughts or feelings by a persistent idea, image, desire, etc.
You're obsessively trying to dominate my feelings with your persistent idea that I'm a liar.
Your calling me a liar being against the rules, because it's a statement you cannot prove.
Calling anyone stupid is 100% not okay because it specifically states in the forum rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
Something I can prove you've done, something you can't prove I've done. Your insistence that I'm breaking the rules is delusional because you cannot prove it, and while you make your claims that I am breaking the rules, you break the rules in the process rendering your entire platform obsolete.
You state that my giving you your "proof" is wrong too, because even though you state I'm giving you the proof, you can't accurately explain how I am by providing legitimate proof. To "create" proof, you step outside of the rules stated by CCP regarding their forum rules, and leverage a personal attack to solidify your position, but it's against the rules. So if you cannot accurately prove your claim within the rules, then your claim is invalid.
I can prove my claims, and I do when asked. You on the other hand, do not.
You're a troll, because you lie and refuse to prove your lies as otherwise. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5327
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:07:00 -
[194] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
Calling you obsessive isn't a personal attack because it's an observation being made within the confines of the rules
Neither is what I said, it's an observation of the incredibly stupid thing you said.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:07:00 -
[195] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Calling you obsessive isn't a personal attack because it's an observation being made within the confines of the rules
Neither is what I said, it's an observation of the incredibly stupid thing you said.
Explain how it's stupid.
Also, what I said by definition isn't an insult.
What you said, by definition, is an insult
and insults being against the rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5327
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:12:00 -
[196] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Calling you obsessive isn't a personal attack because it's an observation being made within the confines of the rules
Neither is what I said, it's an observation of the incredibly stupid thing you said. Explain how it's stupid.
"Hey gais where do Goonz live?" "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:14:00 -
[197] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Calling you obsessive isn't a personal attack because it's an observation being made within the confines of the rules
Neither is what I said, it's an observation of the incredibly stupid thing you said. Explain how it's stupid. "Hey gais where do Goonz live?"
Please quote where I typed like that. If not I'm going to consider this just another insult.
So this is how you guys operate huh?
You get bested by someone who's better at communicating, and you start insulting people you disagree with?
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21243
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:15:00 -
[198] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Link me my personal attacks Already did; you already responded to them using personal attacks; you can lie about it and try (and fail) to evade it all you want, but it won't go away.
Quote:Calling you obsessive is GǪa personal attack no matter how you try to justify it. The fact that you keep repeating it just makes you a hypocrite in face of the rules you're dictating to others, as does your obsessive need to try to dominate every debate you enter regardless of whether you have to drag the whole thread off topic to do so or not and then trying to shift the blame to others when you get exactly what you want.
Quote:Your calling me a liar being GǪvery obviously true since you provide all the evidence ever needed every time you post. I have provided ample proof of it, and your insistence on lying about it and ignoring it doesn't make it go away GÇö it just makes you more the liar.
Oh, and I have indeed explained how you provide that proof every time you post. You were just so much in a hurry to evade the topic and lie about it that you missed out the very obvious reference. So we'll add that one to the near-infinite list of your lies.
Quote:Calling anyone stupid is 100% GǪokay according to your own standards since it is an observation being made in spite of the rules. If you think that your personal attacks are excluded just because you feel you can justify them to yourself, then that just makes you deluded as well as a hypocrite. Of course, since, being a troll and all, you are specifically out to generate that kind of response, it should hardly be a shock to you when it appears. It means you've succeeded, after all. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:16:00 -
[199] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Link me my personal attacks Already did; you already responded to them using personal attacks; you can lie about it and try (and fail) to evade it all you want, but it won't go away. Quote:Calling you obsessive is GǪa personal attack no matter how you try to justify it. The fact that you keep repeating it just makes you a hypocrite in face of the rules you're dictating to others, as does your obsessive need to try to dominate every debate you enter regardless of whether you have to drag the whole thread off topic to do so or not and then trying to shift the blame to others when you get exactly what you want. Quote:Your calling me a liar being GǪvery obviously true since you provide all the evidence ever needed every time you post. I have provided ample proof of it, and your insistence on lying about it and ignoring it doesn't make it go away GÇö it just makes you more the liar. Quote:Calling anyone stupid is 100% GǪokay according to your own standards since it is an observation being made in spite of the rules. If you think that your personal attacks are excluded just because you feel you can justify them to yourself, then that just makes you deluded as well as a hypocrite. Of course, since, being a troll and all, you are specifically out to generate that kind of response, it should hardly be a shock to you when it appears. It means you've succeeded, after all.
Prove it. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5327
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:17:00 -
[200] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: So this is how you guys operate huh?
You actually asked, first of all, where Goonswarm lives.
My mom knows where Goonswarm lives for crying out loud.
Then you asked "What's stopping you from just going to every other region of nullsec and making money there?"
If you weren't trolling, then that is by far the dumbest thing I have ever heard anyone say on these forums.
First of all, if they controlled the entirety of nullsec instead of 1/3 of it like they actually do, there still are not enough anoms for them. There wouldn't be enough anoms if you got rid of 80% of the entire population of nullsec.
In the meantime, L4s are both limitless, and can be accessed by an infinite numbers of players, 23/7.
Which is why highsec > every other area of space as far as personal income goes.
That is not in keeping with risk/reward, so not only does highsec need nerfed, but it needs to be made less safe as well. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21243
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:20:00 -
[201] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Prove it. Already did a long long time ago, and you keep presenting the proof every time you post. Asking for more proof just demonstrates how tangled up in your lies you've become.
Quote:Please quote where I typed like that. Pretty much right here. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:20:00 -
[202] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: So this is how you guys operate huh?
You actually asked, first of all, where Goonswarm lives. My mom knows where Goonswarm lives for crying out loud. Then you asked "What's stopping you from just going to every other region of nullsec and making money there?" If you weren't trolling, then that is by far the dumbest thing I have ever heard anyone say on these forums. First of all, if they controlled the entirety of nullsec instead of 1/3 of it like they actually do, there still are not enough anoms for them. There wouldn't be enough anoms if you got rid of 80% of the entire population of nullsec. In the meantime, L4s are both limitless, and can be accessed by an infinite numbers of players, 23/7. Which is why highsec > every other area of space as far as personal income goes. That is not in keeping with risk/reward, so not only does highsec need nerfed, but it needs to be made less safe as well.
And who's fault is it, other than their own, that they've put themselves into a corporation/alliance that (quoting baltec) has 10000 pilots?
Because they've chosen to conduct their corporation in a manner that present a situation where their extraordinary numbers provides a disadvantage, the game is suppose to be changed to suit them? Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5327
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:22:00 -
[203] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: And who's fault is it, other than their own, that they've put themselves into a corporation that (quoting baltec) has 10000 pilots?
Whose fault is it that the mechanics of nullsec cannot support personal income for even a medium amount of players?
CCP's. Well, they're fixing that.
Quote: Because they've chosen to conduct their corporation in a manner that present a situation where their extraordinary numbers provides a disadvantage, that the game is suppose to be changed to suit them?
No, so that people who want to live there, have a reason to live there instead of highsec where everything is better. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21243
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:22:00 -
[204] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:And who's fault is it, other than their own, that they've put themselves into a corporation that (quoting baltec) has 10000 pilots? Irrelevant. The problem baltec1 is describing is the same regardless of corp sizes.
Quote:Because they've chosen to conduct their corporation in a manner that present a situation where their extraordinary numbers provides a disadvantage, the game is suppose to be changed to suit them? That's just it: it's not their extraordinary numbers that provide the disadvantage GÇö it's the imbalance between highsec and nullsec that does. The same problem would exist if there were just 100 of them (in fact, probably more so) because the mechanics that create the problem are still the same. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1358
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:24:00 -
[205] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Link me my personal attacks, you cannot because I have said none.
Hahahahahaha....What?....Hahahahahahaha
That's not a personal attack on you DE, just my immediate reaction reading that. You have a long history of attacking other people on the forum.
You seem to have toned in down a bit in the last few weeks, but when you first came here, you attacked just about everyone who said or did something you didn't like.
I think that's why you find yourself in so many conflicts now. It's not only to do with your ideas, but also the reputation you have set for yourself.
Your signature alone is not necessary. Let go and move past it. The constant dragging up of the past does nothing to make many of us feel any different about you.
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:24:00 -
[206] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: And which region/regions of space do you own?
and
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: "Hey gais where do Goonz live?"
are different, aren't they? Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5327
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:24:00 -
[207] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: And which region/regions of space do you own?
and Kaarous Aldurald wrote: "Hey gais where do Goonz live?"
are different, aren't they?
They're both equally stupid. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21244
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:25:00 -
[208] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:And which region/regions of space do you own? and Kaarous Aldurald wrote:"Hey gais where do Goonz live?" are different, aren't they? No. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
448
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:33:00 -
[209] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Link me my personal attacks, you cannot because I have said none. Hahahahahaha....What?....Hahahahahahaha That's not a personal attack on you DE, just my immediate reaction reading that. You have a long history of attacking other people on the forum. You seem to have toned in down a bit in the last few weeks, but when you first came here, you attacked just about everyone who said or did something you didn't like. I think that's why you find yourself in so many conflicts now. It's not only to do with your ideas, but also the reputation you have set for yourself. Your signature alone is not necessary. Let go and move past it. The constant dragging up of the past does nothing to make many of us feel any different about you.
Yea, I adapted. The initial posts of mine were hard hitting and through the act of doing, I learned who the people are. I've learned that tippia lies and trolls, and kaarous insults. I've learned that ralph will follow me around and bite my ankles, and jenna side will insult me. I've learned a bit about you too, you'll swing into a post where I'm getting insulted, where I'm not insulting others, and then insult me and move on.
You also constantly bring up the past, and then tell me that I'm the one bringing up the past, when besides my signature, I'm instigating no such thing.
Also, in this "long history" of mine you speak of, you'll see no personal insults. You'll see no statements where I say the game needs to be changed to fit how I think it should be. You will see me classify someone as having an opinion I should not take into consideration because they make their objective clear through their breaking of forum rules such as personal attack and trolling. Which why should I not be allowed to come to a conclusion about someone who breaks the forums rules by leveraging personal attacks against me, especially when I'm doing no such thing?
Also, I need the signature. Because tippia constantly lies about me, and when I tell him his opinion is worthless because he's a liar, he says he's not. So having the signature right there ready go to makes it easy for me to provide a quick link completely shattering his stance that he's not a liar, meaning his lies are in fact lies. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1271
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 04:33:00 -
[210] - Quote
Rule #0 of GD. Don't bother arguing with Tippia. Either you are right and Tippia will try and bury you in a mountain of trolling, or you are wrong and will bury yourself under a mountain of trolling. Either way there is a mountain of trolling involved so you loose.
Also..... Yea, Divine. Don't go blaming goons for the lack of PvE density in Null. This is something that even I've spoken at length about a need to change. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |