Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
423
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok, this is the information we have in hand, and I'm tired of people cross posting about it in several threads, so time to consolidate.
1) Everything will be destructible.
I personally do not see this happening. It would be effectively the end of high sec, if not Eve. But in order to be able to both build and destroy 'everything', then, well...
2) Freighters are being changed in a manner which would allow cap ships to be brought into high sec.
Based on what we know this *is* the case. Several people have suggested that there will be a stealth nerf of some sort to prevent this, but it dovetails too neatly with number 1 for my taste, so we have to consider that they're going to change the rules about cap ships in high sec.
3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
4) the Dust debacle
Frankly this worries me. There's real potential to damage CCPs reputation in this, and real negative repercussions might even be felt here in EvE.
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Noriko Mai
1266
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, this is the information we have in hand, and I'm tired of people cross posting about it in several threads, so time to consolidate.
1) Everything will be destructible.
I personally do not see this happening. It would be effectively the end of high sec, if not Eve. But in order to be able to both build and destroy 'everything', then, well...
2) Freighters are being changed in a manner which would allow cap ships to be brought into high sec.
Based on what we know this *is* the case. Several people have suggested that there will be a stealth nerf of some sort to prevent this, but it dovetails too neatly with number 1 for my taste, so we have to consider that they're going to change the rules about cap ships in high sec.
3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
4) the Dust debacle
Frankly this worries me. There's real potential to damage CCPs reputation in this, and real negative repercussions might even be felt here in EvE.
1) It was just for marketing and hype. Later in the stream CCP Seagul said "Everything player build should be destructible". How many player build high sec stations are ingame?
3) Smaller changes means probably less bugs per "expansion"
4) No one gives a ****. The do the only right thing and everyone is happy about it. (I don't count PS3 kids) |
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5159
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lock Probability: GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûÆ 95% FuryBotGäó 0.86
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
Nhod Whic
Nexus Industry Division
4
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
You sound *concerned*...
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, this is the information we have in hand, and I'm tired of people cross posting about it in several threads, so time to consolidate.
1) Everything will be destructible.
I personally do not see this happening. It would be effectively the end of high sec, if not Eve. But in order to be able to both build and destroy 'everything', then, well...
2) Freighters are being changed in a manner which would allow cap ships to be brought into high sec.
Based on what we know this *is* the case. Several people have suggested that there will be a stealth nerf of some sort to prevent this, but it dovetails too neatly with number 1 for my taste, so we have to consider that they're going to change the rules about cap ships in high sec.
3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
4) the Dust debacle
Frankly this worries me. There's real potential to damage CCPs reputation in this, and real negative repercussions might even be felt here in EvE.
|
Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
7754
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
I like Cheese. Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!! |
Regan Rotineque
Arch Angels Assault Force The Kadeshi
307
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote: Lock Probability: GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûÆ 95% FuryBotGäó 0.86
my spidey senses are tingling......... |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
423
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nhod Whic wrote:You sound *concerned*...
I've had too many MMOs go belly up around me because the idea fairy got loose in the dev office
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Myxx
727
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
i don't think that they're going to actually allow EVERYTHING in highsec to be destroyed. nullsec and MAYBE lowsec... sure, why not? Highsec? ... I don't see that happening.
As far as caps in highsec goes... wut? Where did you see/hear this? Needs citation.
The DUST thing: Again, wut? I missed that presentation because I was out buying groceries... what happened? Can someone give me the TLDR? |
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
1182
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Did he really say two MAJOR Releases a year?
CCP: "We know what's best for the game, so you can't have any options....." |
Eto Demerhzel
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cap in HS https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4541567#post4541567
Myxx wrote:
The DUST thing: Again, wut? I missed that presentation because I was out buying groceries... what happened? Can someone give me the TLDR?
TL:DR : Eve legion -> dust on pc.. panic!! |
|
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2596
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tollen Gallen wrote:I like Cheese.
I quite like you. +1 Aaaaaaand relax. |
Cyoban
Hedion University Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
I like threads like this. |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3152
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
It's always funny when people come around and say "As a..." and don't supply any proof of the claimed credentials as if their word alone means anything on the internet. I'm sure that it's somewhere on the fallacy list. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1729
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
I am actually excited and cautiously optimistic about each and every single one of your four "concerns". |
Thead Enco
47th Ronin
164
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:44:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok,
4) the Dust debacle
Frankly this worries me. There's real potential to damage CCPs reputation in this, and real negative repercussions might even be felt here in EvE.
CCP did what needed to be done, now Legion could be quite possbily the EVE FPS that the community praises NOT the one that it laughs at. CCP made a good call on this and if people spent $100's of dollars on a game that's platform was near the end of it's lifespan than it's your own damn fault simply as that. #ERAofthePChasreturned
-á"A Lannister always pays his debts."
-áTyrion Lannister |
TedStriker
The Scope Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: 3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Am utterly rubbish at this.
Lemme try anyways.
The only thing that has been nerfed is reprocessing. I feel for the noobs here.
That's it.
Everything else has been given an opportunity to try and affect your market. Also - my Rifter is still a bit ****. I still fly them but I die a bit less.
Could I get a buff to Breachers as I reckon they should be more quick.
Also - while I am at it - I need a buff to the Moa since as you are shitting up it's natural good looks it should be better.
And could I get a Ten...oh whatever..... Aaaaaaand relax. |
Noriko Mai
1268
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
TedStriker wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote: 3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000 |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:49:00 -
[19] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:TedStriker wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote: 3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000
I do C++ if I can help. I also run a SQL (Squirrel noob) sanctuary. Aaaaaaand relax. |
Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
24
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
Summary*
Thanks. |
|
Jur Tissant
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
There's no way they're going to let people run around blowing up trade hubs. "Everything", after all, can't mean EVERYTHING. The stars? Planets, moons?
There won't be cap ships in high-sec, this has already been confirmed in an F&I thread but I'm too lazy to dig for a link...
I'm skeptical of the new development cycle but if they can make it work it might really liven things up. |
Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
24
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:TedStriker wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote: 3) More new content per year.
I'm not opposed to this in the least, but as an IT professional, I have to call into question how effective QA can be with this sort of time table. Let's be honest, CCP has trouble with game breaking bugs with just two major content releases a year. Firing off new content like a machinegun strikes me as being a bit foolhardy in that context.
Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000 I do C++ if I can help. I also run a SQL (Squirrel noob) sanctuary. You don't know Cygnet, I guess...
Well ... that's him.
He's no use, but please treat him nicely anyway. |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Summary*
Thanks.
Get that face out of here. Aaaaaaand relax. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5677
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
"Freighters with rigs".
If they don't nerf them to compensate, they'll I'll be bringing caps into highsec.
You already mentioned this, but there is no way in the Seven Hells that this will happen without compensating nerfs. Honestly no clue why it's even being considered. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:"Freighters with rigs".
If they don't nerf them to compensate, they'll be bringing caps into highsec.
You already mentioned this, but there is no way in the Seven Hells that this will happen without compensating nerfs. Honestly no clue why it's even being considered.
It seems a buff to haulers - but secretly we all know they will fit cargo rigs so we all scoff behind our masks Aaaaaaand relax. |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
13065
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:TedStriker wrote:Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000
Yep. Our IT manager at work couldn't even handle it when I hijacked his 2 office printers with a simple Windows setup wizard and printed nothing but doctoral thesis on goats and goat husbandry for a whole day. He is currently the focus of my own investigation. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
24
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Summary*
Thanks. Get that face out of here. I don't think talking to me that way is going to help you. |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:55:00 -
[28] - Quote
Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Jayem See wrote:Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Summary*
Thanks. Get that face out of here. I don't think talking to me that way is going to help you.
I could recommend a decent sculptor if that would help? Aaaaaaand relax. |
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
200
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:55:00 -
[29] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:TedStriker wrote:Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000 Yep. Our IT manager at work couldn't even handle it when I hijacked his 2 office printers with a simple Windows setup wizard and printed nothing but doctoral thesis on goats and goat husbandry for a whole day. He is currently the focus of my own investigation. Shared printers is serious business. This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165 |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2598
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 22:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
Erufen Rito wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:TedStriker wrote:Why do i always start to giggle when someone claims to be an "it professional" (whatever that means....its a..broad field you know?) and then fails to see that in large releases you can't test dependencies like you can with "on the go" releases of finished stuff. Its way better not to throw everything together 2 weeks before you have to release it. I can make tables in HTML. IT professional level > 9000 Yep. Our IT manager at work couldn't even handle it when I hijacked his 2 office printers with a simple Windows setup wizard and printed nothing but doctoral thesis on goats and goat husbandry for a whole day. He is currently the focus of my own investigation. Shared printers is serious business.
Step away from the photocopier. Aaaaaaand relax. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |