Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Flaming Forum Spammer
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 23:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
The basic cargo hold has worked for years, but we've got specialized holds for ammo, ore, PI, etc... for different ships.
Why not an ammo bay?
example: 100 for crystals/cap boosters 150 for hybrid/missile 175 for projectile
adjustment multiplier as ship size increases. |
Arden Elenduil
The League of Extraordinary Mentlegen
84
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 23:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mainly because it forces people to choose between what they want to bring. More ammo, more cap boosters, more nanite paste, boosters, mobile depot, etc...
It makes it necessary to make choices (be it in a small manner), which is a good thing. |
Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
258
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 23:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Flaming Forum Spammer wrote:The basic cargo hold has worked for years, but we've got specialized holds for ammo, ore, PI, etc... for different ships.
Why not an ammo bay?
example: 100 for crystals/cap boosters 150 for hybrid/missile 175 for projectile
adjustment multiplier as ship size increases. Reduce cargo capacity, and then maintain missile/hybrid cargo capacity dominance and your idea makes sense.
I'm utterly opposed to it though. I like being able to shove anchorable bubbles in my ships(like cepters). Schrodinger's Hot Dropper |
Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
619
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 23:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
no problem they'll just divide the current cargo hold in half and give you that for ammo... and the other half for anything else.. can't you see that would be a nerf? you can expand cargo holds.. you can't expand "ammo holds" . -á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
1611
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 00:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
this would be a nerf. EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY?No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided""So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time" |
Zan Shiro
Alternative Enterprises
438
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 04:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kaerakh wrote:Reduce cargo capacity, and then maintain missile/hybrid cargo capacity dominance and your idea makes sense..
This would be the most likely caveat ccp would give based in the frieghter redo.
Which is where this idea is going to lose support. Some ships I go by a set number of reloads and rest of cargo is other stuff. Set number was based on experience and average use of ammo. BAsh bs, long nights yeah I used some ammo. AF or inty runs....did not ever see the need to have ammo for 10's of reloads. either lack of non-suicidal to engage targets or lack of skill if I did engage something had me punch out long before I said oh crap, running low on ammo most itmes lol.
I prefer the nice open m3 of the general cargo hold. I would not want ccp saying here is your 200m3 ammo bay we took the 200 m3 from general cargo for.
|
Arronicus
X-Prot Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
1025
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 06:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Completely opposed to this idea, I like there being an option to dictate how much of what I can stuff in, whether I'm focusing on a ton of ammo for long pve excursions, or stuffing a ton of other goodies in there, or leaving room for MTUs or loot. |
Minty Aroma
Nisroc Angels The Obsidian Front
37
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 07:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
I am also opposed to this idea, but whilst we're on the topic of specialized holds, can we get a Fedo hold/pen on all Minmatar ships? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |