Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1037
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 19:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
CSM 9, like CSM's 7 & 8 before us will be continuing to hold regular Town Hall meetings where you the public can ask questions live to your CSM representatives.
The first Town Hall of CSM 9's term will be held on Sunday June 22nd 2014 from 19.00 UTC.
As with past Town Halls, this will be held on the EVE University Public Mumble and broadcast live by EVE Radio.
You will be able to ask questions live on the night via the in game channel "CSM Townhall", or if you are unable to attend you can post questions in this thread and we will ensure our moderator on the day asks them of us.
We look forward to seeing many people attend this Town Hall. RvB Ganked: EVE's Number One Public Roam |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3375
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 19:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Be gentle It's my first time. Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
DJWiggles
Eve Radio Corporation
181
|
Posted - 2014.06.05 20:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Like a bad penny i will be turning up for this as per usual Live on Eve Radio Sundays 18:00 GMT with me & friends blabbering on about Eve and stuff-áFollow me on twitter http://twitter.com/WigglesGRN, like me on facebook http://facebook.com/wigglesGRN or check out my blog http://wiggles.gamingradio.net/blog
|
Freelancer117
so you want to be a Hero
214
|
Posted - 2014.06.05 22:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
and so it continues...
- How does the CSM look at the stories that are created by the capsuleers in New Eden with artistic integrity (no compromise of the pilot or his work for real life profit) versus CCP's view that the stories that are created in New Eden can not necessarily just be re-told straight (Dark Horse for example)
- Are the stories that are created everyday and in specific B-R5RB or Asakai the intellectual property of CCP and allowed to be altered/tweaked in the narrative to suit the needs of the company to reach a large potential customerbase ?
- Should Live Events, or another form of CCP ingame involvement, be used to create awareness to that large potential customerbase, for example "the slaughter of the lambs" during the Ghost Site live event in November 2013.
sources: Torfi Frans +ôlafsson interview with RPS http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/06/03/forging-frontiers-eves-future/
http://i.imgur.com/LnM7QGW.png (3-4 times as many new trials after B-R5RB)
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3841974#post3841974 Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Neville Smit
EVE University Ivy League
44
|
Posted - 2014.06.06 21:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
EVE University is pleased to host this CSM Town Hall on our public Mumble server - all are welcome!
To set up Mumble access, follow these instructions: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Mumble#PUBLIC_Mumble_Quick_Connect_Guide
I am an unapologetic fan of EVE Online. My blog: http://nevillesmit.com/ - My Twitter: https://twitter.com/NevilleSmit |
corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
404
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 15:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'll be there if anyone wants to ask me stuff. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
599
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 16:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yes ,i worte it down if rl permits |
l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment The Camel Empire
953
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 13:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
If I will make it, I will ask why we don't have top hats yet in the NEX store. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |
Radric Davids
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
42
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 14:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
I will be there suggesting that blockade runners be immune to customs officers scanning them for drugs |
Ripard Teg
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
906
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 17:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
1. CSM8 sometimes disagreed internally about feedback that should be given to CCP about a given feature and instead of trying to show a single face, would often give CCP all of the varying opinions of that feature and let CCP decide. Is CSM9 operating the same way? I'm particularly curious about differing public CSM9 member reactions to the freighter/JF rebalance for Kronos and the jump fuel nerf for Crius.
2. For the new CSM members, what's been your biggest surprise about being on the CSM so far? [url]http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/[/url]: wherein I ramble about EVE Online, gaming, and from time to time... life. |
|
Jadecougar
Surreptitious Technologies The Shadow Ultimatum
78
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 07:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Be gentle It's my first time.
I'd really like to know whether the latest organisational changes within CCP will be helping or hindering the 3rd party tool development in the short and medium term in terms of CREST.
I'd also like your comments related to the development of EVE Gate as a more expanded out-of-client 'command center' as was originally communicated by CCP themselves back in (I want to say) Fanfest 2011. With EVE Gate clearly incomplete and non-functional as-is for corp and alliance leaders, for example, it would be great to get a follow up on the status and roadmap of the development of it, if possible.
Lastly, expanding on the re-organisation of CCP, it would be great to get an idea of how things are being re-organised and whether or not that will/is further increasing the integration of CSM and CCP's co-operation. |
Mag's
the united
17406
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 07:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
Why can't we have an off option for tooltips? Why are CCP so against such a simple option and why hasn't the CSM been more active in supporting the player base on this?
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
Worrff
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mangala Solaris wrote:
You will be able to ask questions live on the night via the in game channel "CSM Townhall", or if you are unable to attend you can post questions in this thread and we will ensure our moderator on the day asks them of us.
Unfortunately, I probably will not be able to attend, so can the following question be asked:
GÇ£Why on earth did you not stop the Tooltip disaster getting anywhere near Tranquility until it was in a fit state to do so ?GÇ¥
Thanks
|
Dradis Aulmais
Bad Kitty Corp The Morrigan Irregulars
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 00:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
I often travel for work and play with members of the military. With real life issues woul the CSM look in to out of game/ eve-gate que managment? Or at least open it for 3 party devs to look in to? |
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1340
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 16:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Disable tooltip button please. The Tears Must Flow |
Panterata
BRUTAL GENESIS GaNg BaNg TeAm
32
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 08:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yes +1 for tooltips. We want a disable tooltip button
The DEV team do not listen us after 58 pages about this issue. - people don't want slider, they want on/off button! |
Aliventi
Southern Cross Empire Flying Dangerous
744
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 19:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
I am US TZ so 1900 is probably going to be a little early for me. I am just going to post this question here:
Lowsec used to suck. Over the past few years lowsec has recieved a FW rework, Tags for sec rats appearing in their belts, Mordu's rats, more WHs spawning, Besieged Covert Research Facility was added to lowsec and in the only way to get the new low-grade implants, and today it was announced in a Dev blog that they are getting the Thukker Component Assembly Array to help prevent the loss of their cap producers when the refining changes are made.
In other words, one could convincingly argue that lowsec doesn't suck any longer. There is still some work to do, but there are lots of things that make lowsec unique. Which I agree is good for Eve as a whole and applaud CCP for their work in this area.
My issue is that NPC nullsec is stuck in a pretty terrible position. I think the best description I have heard is "NPC nullsec is the old useless lowsec with bubbles and bombs". NPC nullsec gets none of the benefits of being SOV nullsec and is being outdone with all the buffs lowsec has recently seen. Particularly the areas of Syndicate, Outer Ring, and Great Wildlands which don't get pirate missions/LP stores or officer rats.
So my questions are: is this something the CSM considers a problem? If so, are you going to ask CCP to do something about it? If you are, what would you like to see happen? Join [FIGL] Flying Dangerous Today! |
asteroidjas
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services The Possum Lodge
78
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 13:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Panterata wrote:Yes +1 for tooltips. We want a disable tooltip button
The DEV team do not listen us after 58 pages about this issue. - people don't want slider, they want on/off button! wrong, most of us want the old ones back, not just an "on/off", as some of the tooltips are actually useful.
(yes, we both are assuming we know what others want, based on our view of the responses in that threadnaught) |
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
1279
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 14:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
Q: Is this being looked into at all\discussed with the CSM-CCP: Tooltips going to be separated out so that the Neocom Tooltips have a separate delay to say Capacitor\Overheat and again separate to the Overview Tooltips?
Q: Is this being looked into at all\discussed with the CSM-CCP: Change the icons of Covert Ops Cyno, Cyno and Command Processors to be unique. I personally think that nothing should share the same icon unless it has the same purpose i.e. AB's, MWD's, WCS etc.
Q: Is it being discussed internally within the CSM about not implementing things without a "tone down\turn off" option? I like the Tooltips but I either have to have them in my face with short delay on everything to see my wallet amount without waiting 30 seconds or all at 30 seconds delay which affects how quickly I can see my Cap amount, OH stats etc. I don't want to turn them off but the option would be nice for those that do. More often than not CCP try to force us to use things before giving us the option to "tone down" or turn it off. CQ for instance, Tooltips is another one.
If that's not the sort of thing you were after then I'm sorry. Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |
MooMooDachshundCow
Incertae Sedis Trapped.
18
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 19:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
corbexx wrote:I'll be there if anyone wants to ask me stuff.
Yes, good. I have many important questions for you, such as:
1. Now that you've made CSM, will you remove your CSM 9 ad from your sig? 2. When are you coming to sing for us? 3. When are we getting WH stabs?
KTHX |
|
|
CCP Falcon
7526
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 11:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Freelancer117 wrote:and so it continues... - How does the CSM look at the stories that are created by the capsuleers in New Eden with artistic integrity (no compromise of the pilot or his work for real life profit) versus CCP's view that the stories that are created in New Eden can not necessarily just be re-told straight (Dark Horse for example)
The CSM can speak for themselves on this one, however CCP have been pretty open and direct on this one. The first volume of True Stories was written as an account from one side of a chain of events. It's naturally going to be biased toward those telling the stories, and told from their point of view. That's the whole point of it.
It's not designed to be a fully factual reference to an event that occurred, it's designed to be a dramatization of events told through the eyes of a player who may or may not be biased.
Freelancer117 wrote: - Are the stories that are created everyday and in specific B-R5RB or Asakai the intellectual property of CCP and allowed to be altered/tweaked in the narrative to suit the needs of the company to reach a large potential customerbase ?
I don't really see the meaning of this question. Events happen the way that they happen, and they'll be displayed as such. I, for one, will actively oppose any form of embellishment of events or factual narrative.
Freelancer117 wrote:- Should Live Events, or another form of CCP ingame involvement, be used to create awareness to that large potential customerbase, for example "the slaughter of the lambs" during the Ghost Site live event in November 2013.
Live events are a tool for us to use in order to bring a little flavor to New Eden. We've used these for marketing purposes in the past (see Operation: Highlander and Operation: Spectre), but in the same respect, personally I prefer them, to be far more storyline focused and driven. Since they now fall entirely in my ballpark as of very recently, this is the way they'll remain for the best part.
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Manager -á || -á EVE Illuminati
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
CCP Falcon
7526
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 11:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Also, if the CSM or some of our players would like me to be present at the CSM townhall to discuss stuff like this, I'm more than happy to be there.
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Manager -á || -á EVE Illuminati
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
CCP Leeloo
C C P C C P Alliance
344
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 11:23:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ripard Teg wrote:1. CSM8 sometimes disagreed internally about feedback that should be given to CCP about a given feature and instead of trying to show a single face, would often give CCP all of the varying opinions of that feature and let CCP decide. Is CSM9 operating the same way? I'm particularly curious about differing public CSM9 member reactions to the freighter/JF rebalance for Kronos and the jump fuel nerf for Crius. Will comment on this from the point of view of CCP.
We don't (at least trying not to) force CSM members to represent a single point of view, even though it would be easier to process the feedback if all opinions would match each other. Every member of the CSM represents the area they are specializing in, in the way they believe is it right. If two (or more) members of the CSM provide two (or more) different opinions - we will consider all of them. Furthermore, a lot of different opinions is usually an additional sign that something is going wrong.
tl;dr if the CSM member doesn't want to be a 'team player' he (or she) doesn't have to. CCP Leeloo | CSM Coordinator | Russian Community Coordinator | @ccp_leeloo |
|
Dradis Aulmais
Bad Kitty Corp The Morrigan Irregulars
2
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 00:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
I have heard from many (what I would consider) solid sources, that ISD has edited CCP post and has intervened in CCP in game channel talks with players citing TOS violations. I've myself have seen ISD personnel respond to in game problems in a way I would consider consistent with a lack of training. Are there any checks on ISD? Should CCP/CSM find credible evidence that this is happening will there be action?
*note: I do not have direct experience and evidence of this happening. But I live in 'Merica where agency's have a tendency to go overboard with power. |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
4445
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 12:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
Dradis Aulmais wrote:Are there any checks on ISD? There are indeed regular audits and considerable checks in place. Additionally each team has a dedicated CCP liaison, monthly reviews are conducted and the application process is quite strict - furthermore each ISD volunteer has signed a NDA with CCP. That said, if you have questions about a specific action by ISD (for example forum moderation or in-game help channel moderation), you are more than welcome to ask the CCP staff for a review by submitting a support ticket to the Rules & Policies -> Game Masters & ISD queue.
Dradis Aulmais wrote:Should CCP/CSM find credible evidence that this is happening will there be action? ISD is bound to high standards and ethics. As such, any severe breach of these ethics (that has to be confirmed by CCP) will have consequences. Details about specific volunteers will not be released though as this would be a violation of our privacy policy regarding volunteers.
All that said, I would like to point to the fantastic and outstanding work done by the ISD volunteers throughout all the years. Most of this work is not easily visible, but nonetheless very important. During the last 12 months, ISD investigated more than 10,000 bug reports, spent more than 3,500 hours in the help channels, investigated more than 9,500 forum moderation requests and created/updated hundreds of lore and fiction relevant articles - a truly fantastic work! CCP Phantom - Senior Community Representative - Volunteer Manager |
|
Panterata
BRUTAL GENESIS GaNg BaNg TeAm
33
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 19:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=344245
Page 58! They continue ignore us and make their "own" fixes on tooltips. Are you deaf?! WE DON'T WANT THIS STUPID TOOLTIPS! |
Alexis Nightwish
State War Academy Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 19:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
I won't be able to attend so here is my question: What is the priority list/roadmap for intended fixes and new content over the next year? I'm not asking for NDA stuff, just a general list of things that are going to be worked on, and their relative levels of importance. |
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects
751
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 16:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ali Ares: how goes the new player improvement talks with CCP with regards to industry. I.E. what was talked about in your Hangout a couple weeks ago.
Can any thing else be said about Fozzies new initiative that was talked about on the CSM update yesterday?
If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide
See you around the universe. |
Enta Ozuwara
Brave Operations - Lollipop Division Brave Collective
20
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 17:59:00 -
[29] - Quote
This is something that should be adressed by CCP rather than the CSM, but since they don't seem to give a flying **** the only resort seems to be pressuring CCP into acting on this issue.
So what's the issue? The EVE client ships with severely insecure software. A six year old browser to be precise (That's Chrome 3!). This is pretty lame by itself as the IGB could be so much more, blending in with the other UI elements to create something like a UI mod. This is currently impossible because the IGB does not support modern web technologies.
What is more concerning is the amount of security issues that have been patched in the Chrome browser in those 6 years. Here's a pretty complete catalogue of them (not all apply to Chrome 3, but enough do): https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?adv_search=true&cves=on&cpe_version=cpe%3a%2fa%3agoogle%3achrome%3a10.0.601.0&startIndex=0
I've already brought up the issue more than a year ago on these very forums and the EVE subreddit. You should be able to find it in my recent posts as I don't post a lot on the forums. The response from CCP was a disgraceful attempt at shifting responsibility on me, asking me to provide a proof-of-concept exploit that could impact players' computers. I did, but the issue I've demonstrated was not severe enough for CCP to act. The employee I corrisponded with back then has since left CCP and left a statement on the subreddit a few days ago. In short: He also banged his head against a corporate wall trying to get this disgraceful issue fixed. Nobody cared. ( http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/27g99h/a_tad_funny_and_a_bit_embarassing_this_ingame/ci14tp5 )
So what is the actual impact on this? In the worst case scenario someone could remotely execute code on your computer, just by you clicking a link in EVE. You most likely wouldn't even notice besides perhaps the IGB crashing. Of course this could always happen, but the EVE client is at an extreme risk of being hit with such outdated software and so many potential owned boxes. CCP needs to either update the browser or remove it alltogether for all of us to be reasonably safe.
Related Threads: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=205388 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=239089 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3330282 |
Oranosis Hastil
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 19:37:00 -
[30] - Quote
As stated by Enta Ozuwara, the IGB really needs updating. My main problem with it is not being able to view PDF's or youtube video's, especially as a new player, and wanting to look up tips and tricks on playing etc! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |