Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
KillerLU
|
Posted - 2006.07.11 08:15:00 -
[211]
Would be wonderfull if the devs applied this. Good job Sarmaul. This is really a thread that needs attention cause it's really contructive, not like the 40 pages whining Amarr thread...
and BUMP
|
Velvet Valour
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.14 18:07:00 -
[212]
bump to keep the thread going. . .
"i'd write this in pencil if i thought it would make you less permanent" |
Molten Steel
|
Posted - 2006.07.15 19:47:00 -
[213]
Such a fine tread is just begging for a sticky.
In the mean time *bump* should do the trick.
|
Rexthor Hammerfists
Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.15 21:48:00 -
[214]
what about giving several amarr ships bonusses to nos.
like the 6th amarr frig could get one, and that cruiser that has a bonus to remote cap trans atm.
would make things more interesting.
coulod also become an khanid thing, instead of missiles. - Purple Conquered The World, We the Universe.
|
Qwynn
Legion HQ Storm Armada
|
Posted - 2006.07.16 02:51:00 -
[215]
Quote: The New Malediction
Slots: 4/3/3 (same) Missiles: 3 (+1) Turrets: 3 (same) Drones: 5m3 (+5m3)
Shield: 300 (-75) Armor: 481 (+75) Hull: Whatever it is now (not in item database).
Amarr Frigate Bonus: 10% bonus to Medium Energy Turret capaicitor use and 10% bonus to EM missile damage per level.
Interceptors Bonus: 5% reduction in Signature Radius and 5% bonsu to all armor resistances per level.
might want to change that, but a malediction able to fit heavy pulses II sounds nifty d:
I'm not under the alcafluence of inkahol that some thinkle peep I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get. |
El Ponja
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 06:38:00 -
[216]
Bump for an excelent solution
|
Leandro Salazar
Aeon Industries
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 15:36:00 -
[217]
This belong on page one until its in! --------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
|
Hitomi Ayame
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 16:24:00 -
[218]
What, this thread lives? Excellent! - - -
The Royal Knights of Khanid are now recruiting!
Step up and serve God and Khanid today!
|
Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 20:32:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Qwynn
Quote: The New Malediction
Slots: 4/3/3 (same) Missiles: 3 (+1) Turrets: 3 (same) Drones: 5m3 (+5m3)
Shield: 300 (-75) Armor: 481 (+75) Hull: Whatever it is now (not in item database).
Amarr Frigate Bonus: 10% bonus to Medium Energy Turret capaicitor use and 10% bonus to EM missile damage per level.
Interceptors Bonus: 5% reduction in Signature Radius and 5% bonsu to all armor resistances per level.
might want to change that, but a malediction able to fit heavy pulses II sounds nifty d:
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
Ki'ath Jahra
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 21:14:00 -
[220]
Super-bumpage!
|
|
El Ponja
|
Posted - 2006.07.19 04:05:00 -
[221]
and this post is..........back to front page, where it belongs
|
Pia Zawa
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 08:41:00 -
[222]
Jepp, so it is.
I wonder why we haven't seen one single dev in here. Are they busy implementing these changes |
Kldraina
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 09:12:00 -
[223]
Edited by: Kldraina on 20/07/2006 09:12:50 The Devs are probably still trying to figure out what Khanid are supposed to be. When I first started playing a Year ago, they looked like shield tanking Sansha. Now, I'm not sure what they are.
It's kinda weird. The flavor says strong shields, but the numbers say strong armor. |
Saktas
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 10:37:00 -
[224]
Edited by: Saktas on 20/07/2006 10:42:09 Sarmaul a brilliant thread that must never die ..Please Devs make it so.. I don't wont Khanid to be the new "I win" because I have a missile spamming armourtanking mf of a ship..just please make them what they were ment to be..a cool alternative to predictable Amarr (ooh i wonder what dmg type that {insert Amarr ship} is going to do to me) armour tankers.
I think moast races agree this is a good idea , even if the finer points havn't been worked out yet..deserves a sticky!!
Signed Venveda
Khanid Wolves (sorry, defaulted bak to alt wen posted!!)
|
xenorx
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 13:45:00 -
[225]
Originally by: Sniser
Originally by: Hellspawn01
Whats an amarr ship without laser cap use bonus?
a good ship?
It could be argued either way really.
There are still a few of us that remember back three years ago when amarr pilots were fitting projectiles on their ships because they could not sustain the cap use on their lasers. The game has changed a lot since then so it may be time to change it again.
Sarmaul for a minmitar your not so bad. Well thought out and presented post on a subject that needs to be addressed.
No one can hear you scream in space, so just shut up and die already. |
Jake Noble
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 15:32:00 -
[226]
Back to the top!
|
Tranklukator
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 22:06:00 -
[227]
signed.
|
El Ponja
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.21 23:36:00 -
[228]
and up again you go! Summarized index thread for "Amarr" http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=344179Amarr[/ |
Entropist
Agony Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 03:51:00 -
[229]
Must . . . keep . . . thread . . .alive!
------------------
|
Ithildin
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 04:25:00 -
[230]
Even though it's been brought up once that I noticed, I don't think Sarmaul has yet justified why he's opted for a double damage bonus to EM missiles for the Malediction, in addition to the standard laser capacitor use bonus (making for one more bonus than that of it's peers). While EM damage truely is inferior on the frigate level (need ship categories that are likely to shield boost/extend in order for EM to be useful, frigates don't have room for shield tanks after propulsion jamming has been fitted), the simple matter of fact is that the damage level will be disproportionately (did I manage to speel that right?) increased. Additionally, all it will accomplish is an EM Crow that is slightly more agile and slightly faster. That said, the Malediction might be in a modest need of a form of boost, but let's not forget that while Khanid strive to bring the best of Amarr and Caldari together, they are Amarr first and foremost. Their shields etc are only larger and better in comparison with non-Caldari peers, most likely Khanid ships will still feature superior Armour compared to non-Amarr peers (although not quite as superior as, for example, Carthum might make them).
P.S. 10% <type> missile damage bonus merits a 5% <other types> damage bonus. Dark skies torn apart Heavens open before me I, the light of death |
|
Terakas
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 04:36:00 -
[231]
Hmmmm...
Terakas approves but now faces the decision of whether to buy a Sacri in the hope that one day it will be something other than a space-brick or carry on saving for his Zealot.... |
Leandro Salazar
Aeon Industries
|
Posted - 2006.07.24 14:13:00 -
[232]
Bump for Tux! --------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
|
Agama
Veto.
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 01:39:00 -
[233]
A bump for a great topic.
Please bring this in.....
'Death solves all problems- no man, no problem' J.V. Stalin, 1918 |
Entropist
Agony Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 04:03:00 -
[234]
Bumpage.
Keep this thread on the front page and maybe we'll get some results in a couple patches from now or at least a dev acknowledgement.
|
Kldraina
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 06:44:00 -
[235]
Edited by: Kldraina on 25/07/2006 06:45:34 Here's a crazy idea to try making the Sacrilige completely unpredictable:
PG: 1000 CPU: 400 Armor: 1800 Shield: 1800
Fittings: 6-5-5 3 turret, 3 launcher
Boni: Cruiser skill: +5% armor resists per level, and -10% laser cap use per level. HAC skill: +5% shield resists per level, and 5% improved missile RoF per level.
Now, I know the boni suck, so I tried upping the fittings, CPU, and shields to help out.
So now I ask, could this ship, actually be useful? Or would the split boni, prevent it from being useful even with the extra mid and CPU? (The basic idea is to make the Sac a real wild card). |
Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 15:15:00 -
[236]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Someone should sticky this until the powers that be have recongized it, then we won't have to bump it all the time :D
FFS, stop bumping these two threads! First the amarr one and now this one. I request a op to frigging lock these threads since they are nothing but bumps these days.
Do you really think Tuxford has missed them? You wont get a reply no matter how many times you bump them.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 15:24:00 -
[237]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Do you really think Tuxford has missed them? You wont get a reply no matter how many times you bump them.
YES WE WELL
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
Azaries
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 15:28:00 -
[238]
Seems like a good idea and the Amarians need some PvP love.
I get tired of always seing Vaga's and Crows.
|
Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 15:33:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Ithildin Even though it's been brought up once that I noticed, I don't think Sarmaul has yet justified why he's opted for a double damage bonus to EM missiles for the Malediction, in addition to the standard laser capacitor use bonus (making for one more bonus than that of it's peers).
Because if you look at the Malediction it already has dual bonuses. You could copy the Crow template but that would prevent people from fitting lasers on it without it's cap dying. The 50% is because the Crow gets 50% to Kinetic. If lasers didn't need that stupid bonus to be viable I wouldn't have put it on there.
Quote: While EM damage truely is inferior on the frigate level (need ship categories that are likely to shield boost/extend in order for EM to be useful, frigates don't have room for shield tanks after propulsion jamming has been fitted), the simple matter of fact is that the damage level will be disproportionately (did I manage to speel that right?) increased.
What?
Quote: Additionally, all it will accomplish is an EM Crow that is slightly more agile and slightly faster.
Yes, but everyone knows the Crow needs nerfing anyway, and the Mal will have the advantage of a light drone.
Quote: P.S. 10% <type> missile damage bonus merits a 5% <other types> damage bonus.
Wrong, see the Crow.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
Entropist
Agony Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 16:52:00 -
[240]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Someone should sticky this until the powers that be have recongized it, then we won't have to bump it all the time :D
FFS, stop bumping these two threads! First the amarr one and now this one. I request a op to frigging lock these threads since they are nothing but bumps these days.
Do you really think Tuxford has missed them? You wont get a reply no matter how many times you bump them.
This thread will continue to be bumped until it is either recognized by a CCP representative or some changes are made in the game. There is no reason to lock it as everyone is technically allowed one bump a day.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |