Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Iain Cariaba
In Over Our Heads
65
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 16:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
NearNihil wrote:If the sec status would be account-wide, I'd make a suicide ganking alt in a heartbeat. Why? Because living in nullsec means that a) sec status means nothing and b) shooting rats there gets it back up pretty quickly anyway (interpret that as you will). Then, if you still have low sec status, it a matter of, 'Hey corpie with high sec status, buy this for me while you're in Jita.'
Achievement: Bypass to OP's suggestion without even needing to personally pay for a second account. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
819
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 17:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
if you are so certain its a throwaway alt report it. Get IP banned. Wins for everyone. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12064
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 17:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:As much as it would thoroughly inconvenience me, threads like this make me think "my god, highsec just needs to burn for a month straight".
Then people would have something to cry about. If only people had the logistics and will to make this happen.
Even if we had the isk logistics and will, it cannot be done. It hasn't been possible to truely burn highsec for close to a decade now. Bears of today just don't know how good they have it these days. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Elfi Wolfe
University of Caille Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 17:23:00 -
[34] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:afkalt wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:As much as it would thoroughly inconvenience me, threads like this make me think "my god, highsec just needs to burn for a month straight".
Then people would have something to cry about. If only people had the logistics and will to make this happen. Even if we had the isk logistics and will, it cannot be done. It hasn't been possible to truely burn highsec for close to a decade now. Bears of today just don't know how good they have it these days.
No kidding. Last few weeks of beta you could not get out if the station sometimes without someone shooting at you. Let alone trying to fly a few systems. "Please point to the place on the doll where the carebear touched you." |
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
167
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 17:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Elfi Wolfe wrote:baltec1 wrote:afkalt wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:As much as it would thoroughly inconvenience me, threads like this make me think "my god, highsec just needs to burn for a month straight".
Then people would have something to cry about. If only people had the logistics and will to make this happen. Even if we had the isk logistics and will, it cannot be done. It hasn't been possible to truely burn highsec for close to a decade now. Bears of today just don't know how good they have it these days. No kidding. Last few weeks of beta you could not get out if the station sometimes without someone shooting at you. Let alone trying to fly a few systems.
Could you manage a week? If other large coalitions were involved too?
It is something which would be very worth setting side political differences for, for the period
I don't see ALL of high sec being viable, but more hubs and chokes maybe. |
Iain Cariaba
In Over Our Heads
67
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 18:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Could you manage a week? If other large coalitions were involved too? It is something which would be very worth setting side political differences for, for the period I suggested this very thing on one of the numerous nerf ganking threads. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7330
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 18:16:00 -
[37] - Quote
Throwaway alts, alt recycling, etc, is a myth. Your entire premise is nonsense from the start. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |
SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
1002
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 18:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
Great idea.
Starting a new F&I thread should result in an immediate public vote on whether or not all of the poster's characters should be forcibly biomassed as a consequence of their shiptoasting. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2148
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 18:55:00 -
[39] - Quote
hmm "CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
Unsuccessful At Everything |
Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
321
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 21:53:00 -
[40] - Quote
Grobalobobob Bob wrote:-snip- OP, are you related to this guy at all?
Also,
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: le bandwagon Schrodinger's Hot Dropper |
|
|
ISD Atomic Dove
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
17
|
Posted - 2014.06.21 12:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
Good Evening,
I have cleaned up this thread to remove off topic posts and personal attacks.
Although ganking is a controversial issue that divides players I ask that you please do not take frustrations out and direct them in an abusive way towards others.
Quote: 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
12. Spamming is prohibited.
Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or nonsensical post that has no substance and is often designed to annoy other forum users
ISD Atomic Dove Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |