Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
De'Veldrin
Black Serpent Technologies The Unthinkables
2494
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 12:46:00 -
[91] - Quote
JediMind Tricks wrote:soooo many 1 monitor scrubs worrying about having to alt-tab to order a XXL pizza Stop being peasants and go buy another one
So what you're saying is that everyone who has more than one monitor is a Fatty McFatterson who uses the second monitor solely to speed up their ability to inhale large amounts of calories at an ever increasing rate? Like little human black holes of foodstuffs? Is that what you're implying? HUH?!?! MAMBA is recruiting. -áWhen other folks are whining about a lack of content, we go out and create it. The case of Shrodinger's Hotdropper |
Nose' Feliciano
97
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 12:53:00 -
[92] - Quote
what is IGB? Ladies, you know what they say about guys with big noses right? Heh-heh!! That's right, it means they are either Jewish or Italian.
:P |
JediMind Tricks
1st. Pariah Malefactor corp.
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 12:56:00 -
[93] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:JediMind Tricks wrote:soooo many 1 monitor scrubs worrying about having to alt-tab to order a XXL pizza Stop being peasants and go buy another one So what you're saying is that everyone who has more than one monitor is a Fatty McFatterson who uses the second monitor solely to speed up their ability to inhale large amounts of calories at an ever increasing rate? Like little human black holes of foodstuffs? Is that what you're implying? HUH?!?!
Obviously! lets be fair siggy/dotlan/all that other stuff comes second to be being able to order fast food without having to turn your eyes away from eve for 2 seconds. If they took away the IGB im sure there would be more cases like that Chinese kid that forgot to eat for three days while playing WoW
All this talk of fast food really makes me want a pizza now.... Thanks for wrecking shotting my diet |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7135
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 12:57:00 -
[94] - Quote
Two step wrote:CCP should not remove the IGB, they should be devoting more effort to it, including more integration with the client. I should be able to drag items into the IGB.
If they want to remove it, I could imagine some of the functionality being replicated in CREST, for example things like location/ship type tracking. Until that is available, CCP should not even consider removing it.
+1. Removing the IGB is a terrible, dumb idea.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7135
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:01:00 -
[95] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:Austin K'Pfor wrote:PLEASE GOD NO I USE THIS IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN NEW EDEN ^ FUKUNG WILL LOSE SO MUCH TRAFFIC, CCP?!?!?! WHERE IS YOUR COMPASSION FOR SHITLERS EVERYWHERE?! WHY DO YOU WANT TO PROTECT LOCAL SO BAD?!?!
Fukung has at times been the only thing keeping me awake on those long patrols in deep space (ie sitting on a titan waiting for our cyno bait ship to find a pod or rookie ship for us to hotdrop with 70 HACs).
|
Icarus Able
Revenant Tactical Ineluctable.
410
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:01:00 -
[96] - Quote
Hatshepsut IV wrote:Sparrow Creature wrote:Right, because everyone living in WHs would just up and cancel their subscriptions. No one at all would even try to adapt. I completely agree with your assessment of what would come to pass.
I'm pretty sure you don't actually scan that much if you think removing our mapping tools is just a matter of 'adapting'. If someone takes away your eyesight you don't continue to drive by 'adapting'.
Mine along with many other corps dont use mapping tools. Its called having a good bookmark system and doing this thing called communicating. Im not saying the mapping tools arent good and make things easier but saying its impossible to work without them is incredibly idiotic.
That said.
Keep the IGB. It seriously shouldnt take that much dev time to keep up to date. |
Prince Kobol
1968
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:02:00 -
[97] - Quote
Jack Tronic wrote:http://show.gamingradio.net/2014/06/22/csm-9-townhall-1/ At around 59 minutes,
According to the latest CSM townhall. CCP is thinking about REMOVING the IGB. Apparently "issues" about the work maintaining the IGB. Also an CSM member says there is little interest in keeping it.
Ignoring the fact that the IGB helps in times of mining or shooting the worlds most boring NPCs. (Don't lie, C5/C6 sleeper sites are on autopilot at this point). The IGB is the only way our wormhole mapping tools remain valid.
Let this be a call to arms. Don't let CCP remove the IGB. Otherwise you'll also be forced to run two monitors to use an browser while playing EVE. You'll be forced to manually map wormholes/
Don't let this be an end of an era because CCP is delusional about the quality of their own content.
Yes, users of Tripwire, vippy, evewholes, and whatever the heck else is out there, this affects all of you.
You must all be vocal about how much you love the IGB.
Edit: EVE's new "SSO" is NOT a replacement. It is simply an authenication service and has no capability in providing the data that the IGB provides. Nor will it make your life convenient browsing the interwebs while autopiloting sleeper sites.
For me this is the biggest reason to get rid of the IGB.
|
Grog Aftermath
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
Never use it.
But then again I'm not interested in SSO either. |
Aebe Amraen
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
72
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:28:00 -
[99] - Quote
This is the first mention I have ever heard of CREST interacting with the client, rather than just with the server. Forgive me for misunderstanding something that CCP devs have never talked (publically) about before. The website <-> CREST <-> Server <-> Client route seems a bit unnecessarily circuitous, but if it provides the same functionality as the IGB javascript I can live with it. |
Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland Test Alliance Please Ignore
729
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:46:00 -
[100] - Quote
TEST Intel map uses features of the IGB. While it will work OOG, it works better through the IGB. Please do not remove it. GÇ£I personally refuse to help AAA take space from itself so it can become an even shittier version of itselfGÇ¥ -Grath Telkin, 2014. |
|
Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
250
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:55:00 -
[101] - Quote
Nose' Feliciano wrote:what is IGB? Incestual Goon Bromance |
Lady Zarrina
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
137
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 13:59:00 -
[102] - Quote
Removing the IGB is very bad idea. damn it is hard to delete my signature |
JediMind Tricks
1st. Pariah Malefactor corp.
2
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:03:00 -
[103] - Quote
Yang Aurilen wrote:Nose' Feliciano wrote:what is IGB? Incestual Goon Bromance
Idiotic goon brotherhood
man, i may make that my next corp name |
Elvis Fett
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
249
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:08:00 -
[104] - Quote
Removing the IGB makes about as much sense as removing the Jukebox, none what so ever. So taking that into consideration, say goodbye to your IGB.
IGB = In Game Browser |
Dave stark
6518
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:09:00 -
[105] - Quote
i probably missed it but; if they remove the IGB what will happen when you click a link in a chat channel? Or are we just not going to have the functionality to open a link from a chat channel if the igb goes poof?
the only use my igb has is reminding me that it sucks and i need to paste that youtube link in to a non-****** browser to watch the video some one has sent me the link for.
|
Jake Rivers
Senex Legio
211
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:11:00 -
[106] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Get rid of the IGB...for an in game browser that can actually load video.
+1
Senex Legio |
Nash MacAllister
Anomalous Existence Low-Class
144
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:50:00 -
[107] - Quote
As a WH corp, we use multiple tools on a continuous basis that all rely on the IGB. If you remove it and the functionality it provides, our life becomes much more difficult and without a doubt, activity levels will suffer.
Either update it, retaining compatibility with the existing IGB, or leave it alone. But do not remove it. Yes, if you have to ask yourself the question, just assume we are watching you... |
Kaaeliaa
Ministry of War
1827
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:56:00 -
[108] - Quote
I play in true fullscreen. That isn't changing, so, don't do anything hasty. The IGB is outdated, but unless you give us more tools in the game's UI, it's necessary. |
Karak Terrel
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER CODE.
624
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 14:57:00 -
[109] - Quote
No matter how crappy and old the IGB is, it's still better than IE |
MHayes
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:14:00 -
[110] - Quote
I think Dev time is better used on other things.
Just run in a window and get 2 screens if browsing while playing is that important.
I do think that having more out of game tools in game would be nice but that is the beauty of the PC. We can do other stuff on them at the same time as playing a game. Dev time can be better used to do other stuff. |
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1389
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:20:00 -
[111] - Quote
Aquila Sagitta wrote:Remove IGB and replace with updated IGB pls pls pls
Gib html 5 and websockets plox!
This pretty much sums it up. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
Pine Marten
Viziam Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:26:00 -
[112] - Quote
They do not have enough people since laying off so many.
If they put some on the browser, a mini-patch will be pushed back 6 months. |
Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
498
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:33:00 -
[113] - Quote
Nose' Feliciano wrote:what is IGB?
Its that thing large black (or occasionally white) box that locks the game up for 10 seconds when you click a link in a chat channel.
|
Sarmatiko
1620
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:38:00 -
[114] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Really the only question and problem with moving from the IGB to CREST is the fact that you can browse the IGB from the client versus alt-tabbing. From our, or mine anyways, understanding most of you guys have multiple monitors and that's not an issue.
Is there any official statistic on multimonitor usage or where does this "most of you" come from?
From my experience, possible removal of IGB will **** up help channels pretty bad. Quick puush image for newbie, showing where "feature N" is located? Image with ponies? Mod link check? You have to ALT-Tab. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. Long requested HTML5 YouTube support? Nah! Lets just remove IGB instead!
-¥ |
Lugia3
Intentionally Dense Easily Excited
1013
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 15:47:00 -
[115] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Really the only question and problem with moving from the IGB to CREST is the fact that you can browse the IGB from the client versus alt-tabbing. From our, or mine anyways, understanding most of you guys have multiple monitors and that's not an issue. There are also other applications that will overlay your current web browser with the game. Things like Overwolf I think it's called. The benefits from us doing things through CREST and relying on you guys to use an existing browser are immense. We get to focus on making cool things instead of trying to maintain a customized browser in the client. Not sure you guys realize just how much work there is in maintaining something as complex as a browser and how much of a security problem for everyone this is.
Aaaaaaand nope!
Because everyone wants to copy-paste every reaction GIF from local into an external browser, taking precious time away by alt-tabbing and also losing window focus.
"CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
6058
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 16:49:00 -
[116] - Quote
I have no idea what its for.
It never seems to work for me, and its really slow.
But I guess if it works for some people and its there, why remove it?
EDIT: NM, that was answered in the same Dev paragraph that suggested using out-of-game adaptations with my client (lol, not gonna happen) "Many have joined the battle, many have survived the tests and trials, but countless have fallen because they weren't the sharpest, the fastest thinking, the most devious, the most ruthless or most intelligent. -áLog in and Compete!"-á- CCP Falcon
|
Nose' Feliciano
99
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 17:09:00 -
[117] - Quote
wouldn't removing CQ be a better choice than IGB?
get you priorities straight CCP.
CQ is useless. IGB is useful. Ladies, you know what they say about guys with big noses right? Heh-heh!! That's right, it means they are either Jewish or Italian.
:P |
RoAnnon
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
366
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 17:21:00 -
[118] - Quote
KEEP the IGB!! So, you're a bounty hunter. No, that ain't it at all. Then what are you? I'm a bounty hunter. |
Carmen Electra
subn3t
569
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 17:30:00 -
[119] - Quote
+1
Kill IGB. http://www.google.com/chrome |
Felicity Love
Ka'ra Shabuir Inc.
2003
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 17:37:00 -
[120] - Quote
Just get rid of "DUST", entirely, (not that SONY is doing so well these days) including it's limited and annoying overlap into this game -- and redirect some "human resources" to EVE and, in this case, any alleged issues with maintaining the IGB.
This (alleged? hypothetical?) "IGB" frenzy is not an issue, it's a symptom of the larger problem that is simply too few people are (again) spread too thinly across too many "projects".
Geeeee.... one might even say, hypothetically of course, just go ahead and sell the company, seeing as how recent downsizing might easily be construed, hypothetically of course, as the all too common restructuring tactic of making "the books" look more appealing to a potential white knight.
Hypothetically, of course.
"Psssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh" -á-- That ambiguous and pseudo-technical term used by management to describe, to staff, how frakking cool something looks inside their own heads.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |