Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1008
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Working on a list of topics that automatically earn a lock!
After all, we know its the 'CCP sad feel' content that matters, not the rules. Wait, you really thought it was about the rules?
And yes, this breaks the rules about discussion of moderation. I'll take a page out of America's Official skidmark-in-the-undershorts, Prez Obama. "So? Sue me."
I'll make it even easier. This is also is a troll -so no need to reload your copy-pasta, we all know you have the 'troll justification' hotkeyed.
1.Discussion of the New Order, the CODE, or James 315 in a positive, constructive context. -A few idiots that don't accept the CODE, get mad, thus - its automatically a troll.
2.Discussion of Dust as anything other than a positive. -If you agree with the majority of the human race - that Dust sucks and was a stupid idea to begin with - well, CCP doesn't want THOSE kinds of opinions on GD. Not good for retention rates.
3.Discussion of PLEX prices in any form.
4.Defense of Erotica1 Witchhunts, racism, and why he needs to be roundhouse-kicked in the face. A-OK, threadnaught ahoy! Try to defend him and take he **** out of Riptard? Earn a two week forum ban. <----personal experience.
5.-Discussion of ganking in anything other than a negative context. -"How can we nerf it?" = acceptibru "How we can improve life for gankers?" = troll.
6.Discussion of AFK Cloaking in any form.
7.GRR Goons!
8. I stopped playing Eve for (some honest reason)! You love EVE? Tell me more! Not happy/bored/mad and can clearly express why? Not interested, Locked!
9.Giving valuable advice on CCP personnel decisions! -Most Western countries, its generally encouraged for customers share their opinions about individual employees and corporate management, and offer advice on whether or not they should be retained - or replaced. Do it here, you get a ban. Your opinion is not simply not welcome. And woe betide anyone who breaks the unspoken rule about Chribba-endorsed ice-cream flavored employees - in this case we are ALL on double-secret probation.
10. Topics about other locked topics! <----to show I no mad.
Any others?
Edit for format |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
4376
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Discussions about space?
You know, that thing we all fly around in The Muppets: P+¦pc++rn (thanks Ria!) |
Saleika Issikainen
Sassikainen
6
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:Discussions about space? You know, that thing we all fly around in
Personally, I like to discuss what's going on when I am in space bounty hunting.
I'm shocked CCP takes exception to this. |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1009
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
You know, maybe this thread should actually be stickied.
It might save the ISDs a lot of time, not that ISD workload concerns me much.
Instead of making up bogus reasons to lock threads over and over, stop playing games and point them here.
"Whoops, you talked about PLEX." Rule #35
"Nope, we can't have people trashing Dust." Rule #39
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
8323
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
That is a fairly comprehensive list. I have a few to add though. Oh, and in before lock, of course.
Discussing exploits is a great way to get an auto lock.
Discussing the overall hotness of anyone but CCP Guard is almost a guaranteed lock.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |
Crazey Monkey
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
46
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
This thread has been closed due to trolling.
Insert quote about some rules nobody reads about. |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1009
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:That is a fairly comprehensive list. I have a few to add though. Oh, and in before lock, of course.
Discussing exploits is a great way to get an auto lock.
Discussing the overall hotness of anyone but CCP Guard is almost a guaranteed lock.
Comprehensive? Those are just the ones I could come up within in the 5 minutes or so I spent thinking about it after clocking out! Most are topics which I've gotten silly locks or bans for over the years.
The point of the thread was to get others to fill in the gaps a bit. Well, that and take a gratuitous shot at Obummer, since its a doomed thread to begin with. |
Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
48
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 04:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
A thread about to be locked about threads that shouldn't be locked. I like it. |
Paranoid Loyd
1066
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
There are no threads locked that should not be. Our ISD overlords know all. "PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1010
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
I too, was in space when my bounty got hunted.
Sadly, I rarely go there any more. In space, that is.
Had a very interesting convo with the fellow while waiting for my flight in Helsinki-Vantaa airport a couple years ago.
Tangled with a similarly named alt of his, and didn't realize until much later who it was - or why he was trying to destroy my POS.
Cool, chill guy done wrong by the usual suspects. |
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
3306
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Do I get a bounty if I report a troll? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=346564 - a proposal to overhaul the Logistics skill https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. www.minerbumping.com - ganking miners and causing chaos |
Nikolai Lachance
Happy Wheels Logistics
135
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
Uhm... this thread?
It's not like the forum rules are ambiguous or ad-hoc. This thread clearly violates the rule of discussing forum moderation. |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1015
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nikolai Lachance wrote:Uhm... this thread?
It's not like the forum rules are ambiguous or ad-hoc. This thread clearly violates the rule of discussing forum moderation.
Wow! What was your first clue?
Quoting myself....20 minutes ago, OP.
Quote: And yes, this breaks the rules about discussion of moderation. I'll take a page out of America's Official skidmark-in-the-undershorts, Prez Obama. "So? Sue me."
Quoting Aerosmith's Steven Tyler, May 1997
Quote: "Well, that I guess that makes you a genius!" |
Bianca Silver
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
87
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
Just posting to distribute some likes btl.
|
Ria Nieyli
14867
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Phrasing is subpar. Do not remove a fly from your friend's forehead with a hatchet.
- Ancient Chinese Proverb |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5172
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Working on a list of topics that automatically earn a lock! After all, we know its the 'CCP sad feel' content that matters, not the rules. Wait, you really thought it was about the rules? And yes, this breaks the rules about discussion of moderation. I'll take a page out of America's Official skidmark-in-the-undershorts, Prez Obama. "So? Sue me." I'll make it even easier. This is also is a troll -so no need to reload your copy-pasta, we all know you have the 'troll justification' hotkeyed. 1. Discussion of the New Order, the CODE, or James 315 in a positive, constructive context.-A few idiots that don't accept the CODE, get mad, thus - its automatically a troll. 2. Discussion of Dust as anything other than a positive.-If you agree with the majority of the human race - that Dust sucks and was a stupid idea to begin with - well, CCP doesn't want THOSE kinds of opinions on GD. Not good for retention rates. 3. Discussion of PLEX prices in any form.4. Defense of Erotica1Witchhunts, racism, and why he needs to be roundhouse-kicked in the face. A-OK, threadnaught ahoy! Try to defend him and take he **** out of Riptard? Earn a two week forum ban. <----personal experience. 5. -Discussion of ganking in anything other than a negative context.-"How can we nerf it?" = acceptibru "How we can improve life for gankers?" = troll. 6. Discussion of AFK Cloaking in any form.7. GRR Goons!8. I stopped playing Eve for (some honest reason)!You love EVE? Tell me more! Not happy/bored/mad and can clearly express why? Not interested, Locked! 9. Giving valuable advice on CCP personnel decisions!-Most Western countries, its generally encouraged for customers share their opinions about individual employees and corporate management, and offer advice on whether or not they should be retained - or replaced. Do it here, you get a ban. Your opinion is not simply not welcome. And woe betide anyone who breaks the unspoken rule about Chribba-endorsed ice-cream flavored employees - in this case we are ALL on double-secret probation. 10. Topics about other locked topics! <----to show I no mad.
Any others?
Edit for format
Discussion about walking in stations.
But admittedly, that and the other topics might not be themselves taboo, it's just the threads around them devolve into trolling and smearing.
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1016
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ria Nieyli wrote:Phrasing is subpar.
Sorry, my general rule is never to post an OP that takes me longer than it takes for an ISD to lock it.
Because it is kind of like them 'ganking' your time. I aim for at least a 1:1 time ratio when 'forum bumping' the mods.
Sadly, I broke this rule here. Took me 3 minutes to write it.
I suppose I should have permit-tanked this thread with more copy-pasta.
|
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
1281
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Working on a list of topics that automatically earn a lock! After all, we know its the 'CCP sad feel' content that matters, not the rules. Wait, you really thought it was about the rules? And yes, this breaks the rules about discussion of moderation. I'll take a page out of America's Official skidmark-in-the-undershorts, Prez Obama. "So? Sue me." I'll make it even easier. This is also is a troll -so no need to reload your copy-pasta, we all know you have the 'troll justification' hotkeyed. 1. Discussion of the New Order, the CODE, or James 315 in a positive, constructive context.-A few idiots that don't accept the CODE, get mad, thus - its automatically a troll. 2. Discussion of Dust as anything other than a positive.-If you agree with the majority of the human race - that Dust sucks and was a stupid idea to begin with - well, CCP doesn't want THOSE kinds of opinions on GD. Not good for retention rates. 3. Discussion of PLEX prices in any form.4. Defense of Erotica1Witchhunts, racism, and why he needs to be roundhouse-kicked in the face. A-OK, threadnaught ahoy! Try to defend him and take he **** out of Riptard? Earn a two week forum ban. <----personal experience. 5. -Discussion of ganking in anything other than a negative context.-"How can we nerf it?" = acceptibru "How we can improve life for gankers?" = troll. 6. Discussion of AFK Cloaking in any form.7. GRR Goons!8. I stopped playing Eve for (some honest reason)!You love EVE? Tell me more! Not happy/bored/mad and can clearly express why? Not interested, Locked! 9. Giving valuable advice on CCP personnel decisions!-Most Western countries, its generally encouraged for customers share their opinions about individual employees and corporate management, and offer advice on whether or not they should be retained - or replaced. Do it here, you get a ban. Your opinion is not simply not welcome. And woe betide anyone who breaks the unspoken rule about Chribba-endorsed ice-cream flavored employees - in this case we are ALL on double-secret probation. 10. Topics about other locked topics! <----to show I no mad.
Any others?
Edit for format Discussion about walking in stations. But admittedly, that and the other topics might not be themselves taboo, it's just the threads around them devolve into trolling and smearing.
Most recently discussion about bounty hunting. Should we discuss bounty hunting here? I like bounties....people with bounties pay for the ammo when I kill their ships. I could do that forever and never run out of money. TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|
Rob Kashuken
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
ooh, can I play?
#42 Posting a 'duplicate thread' when the last thread on the issue was locked.... 2 years ago before the mechanics change. |
Shakale Steinberg
Aliastra Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
The list is nearly infinite and varies based on the blood sugar levels of ISD on any given day.
A comprehensive list is nearly infinite, and the forum rules justify pretty much any ISD action. I can't really think of anything it doesn't cover. "Trolling" is a pretty ambiguous, term, that covers pretty much any action or statement some one could find as inflammatory. I could say CCP makes good decisions, and then get my post removed because some one thought I was being sarcastic, and attempting to get a rise out of people.
The safest way to not get a forum ban / thread deletion is to just not post.
"I will not let any one post on this forum" - ISD Dorrim Barstorlode |
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5176
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
Eugene Kerner wrote: Most recently discussion about bounty hunting. Should we discuss bounty hunting here? I like bounties....people with bounties pay for the ammo when I kill their ships. I could do that forever and never run out of money.
I don't recall... oh.... um... heh
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
|
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
3300
|
Posted - 2014.07.31 05:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
Thanks for saving me time by saying which rules you broke up front.
Thread locked. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |