Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
realdognose
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
62
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 22:11:00 -
[91] - Quote
+1 so far.
+1 for Alliance Bookmarks.
(or even better: Deployable Alliance-Beacons with a maximum lifetime of 24hours - could be nice for 0.0-Fleets as well) |
Valenthe de Celine
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
130
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 22:29:00 -
[92] - Quote
Moloney wrote:Completely useless when your corp moves out of WHs due to the rest of the changes. Not true. When you place your WH on the market and sell it for pennies, the new bookmark copying feature will benefit you greatly as you sell off all that used to matter to you to some yokel that doesn't know how bad things are now. |
Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 10:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
I thought the copying restrictions would be lifted more than they have been. I can copy 10 BMs at a time now, instead of 5. I still experienced a multi-minute delay between copy operations. Also, updating the corp bookmarks remains slow.
Was I doing this at a time when the "bookmark server" is busy; or are the limits still pretty low? I am not impressed. |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
149
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 20:30:00 -
[94] - Quote
I realy like the 10 bm limit. I just copied 34 bookmarks to pass the scanned change to an other corp in the alliance. Although alliance or fleet bookmarks would be more handy , i think it will help us . The big number of wormholes makes it that a lot of copying of bm's are nescesairy. I would love to have an easier way to know if you have 10 bm's selected or not. Maybe add some column in the bm list with a number so when you need to copy 34 bm's you know you have done 1-10 ,11-20 and still need to do 20-30 and 30-34. Now we are just counting them. Maybe some UI magic could help? Say if you select 12 bm's the last 2 selected ones have a different collor or something. So you can see that you need to go back a few. |
Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights Galactic Skyfleet Empire
379
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 04:11:00 -
[95] - Quote
+1 Decent change, though - this seems to favor large corps and alliances more than small corps. We jumped on the alliance band-wagon to avert getting ****ed by these changes. Net effect? Blue donut-ing WH space. *golf clap* |
Kinraka
Happy Endings. Happy Endings
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 04:44:00 -
[96] - Quote
Traiori wrote:This is a good change, and one that improves QoL in wormholes.
I look forward to seeing Alliance bookmarks as well, which would also reduce the amount of bookmarks that some groups need to copy over between people. +1 to alliance bookmarks Sheep shagger from way back
|
Kristian Hackett
Alpha Republic - Transcenders of Space and Time Solyaris Chtonium
20
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 03:30:00 -
[97] - Quote
Here's what needs to happen - the ability to copy a SINGLE bookmark linked by one player into a chat into your personal folder. No grand alliance schemes or anything like that. I'm annoyed that I can't copy a bookmark I made for one corp in my Alliance into my personal folder now that I've moved into a different corp within the same Alliance. Aircraft Maintenance - Using a high school diploma to fix what a college degree just f***ed up. "Life is too short to drink cheap beer." |
Newt BlackCompany
BlackCompany Personal Corp
9
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 04:28:00 -
[98] - Quote
1) allow copying of bm's from corp bm's directly. Right now, you have to copy them to your personal bm's before you can duplicate them to a container.
2) allow sharing of bm's in chats via a link, just like we share fits and locations and such. After all, a bm is really just a set of coordinates.
3) allow copying of any number (up to the 250 bm or whatever limit) of bm's at once. doing it 10-by-10 is tedious.
4) wasn't there something discussed about alliance-level bm's? That'd be a very good idea - at least until pos and corp permissions are fixed so that I don't need to be in a different corp to online a reactor array, or otherwise also have the rights to offline the pos shields!
Thanks, Newt
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |