Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
w3ak3stl1nk
Hedion University
86
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 12:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Logistics cruisers might need some slight adjustment for drone support?
Augoror and Osprey Currently have 20 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 25 MBit drone bandwidth to match their tech 2 equivalents.
Scimitar and Scythe Currently have 45 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 50 MBit drone bandwidth to match Oneiros and Exequror Is that my two cents or yours? |
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1231
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 12:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
w3ak3stl1nk wrote:Logistics cruisers might need some slight adjustment for drone support?
Augoror and Osprey Currently have 20 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 25 MBit drone bandwidth to match their tech 2 equivalents.
Scimitar and Scythe Currently have 45 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 50 MBit drone bandwidth to match Oneiros and Exequror
Or it might be intended seeing as the T2 should be an upgrade... |
Fer'isam K'ahn
None Of One
380
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 12:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
w3ak3stl1nk wrote:Logistics cruisers might need some slight adjustment for drone support?
Augoror and Osprey Currently have 20 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 25 MBit drone bandwidth to match their tech 2 equivalents.
Scimitar and Scythe Currently have 45 MBit bandwidth Both of these cruisers should have 50 MBit drone bandwidth to match Oneiros and Exequror And that has balance relevance because ?????????????????????? Humes Guillotine ?! Are you sure your issues aren't elsewhere ?! |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
891
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 12:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
thats more of a buff than a balance ...
anyway they are too strong and are more in need of a nerf than a buff ...
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please |
Ghaustyl Kathix
Rising Thunder
28
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 14:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:anyway they are too strong and are more in need of a nerf than a buff ... They're very difficult to fly, are very vulnerable to EWar and are more vulnerable to fleet tactics (such as switching targets repeatedly) than many other ship classes.
If you're having trouble with logi, bring a few ships that can counter logi. |
elitatwo
Congregatio
293
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 16:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Why fly logi when we haz tech 3??
Just buff the tech 3 system thingy on the Legion, Tengu, Proteus and loki a bit, like more tank and range of remote reps and stuff.
And ontop of that why not increase some overall healt of the tech 3 hac and ewar systems? Okay the Proteus seems okay in healt but all those tech 3 ships really need more firepower.
If that doesn't help to declass all specialized ship, I don't know what will.
And for the logistic ships I would propose a nerf to signature radius. Those tech 2 logistic ships seem to have very large signatures and smaller seems better(er).
They also seem to lack some mobility. I find the Guardian is rather slow, so is the Basilisk. Haven't flown an Oniros yet but speed is always good even for the scimitar.
So make them a little faster and agile, maybe increase the range on them a bit to compensate so that they don't get out of range too fast, lower the signature radiuses on them and give them some more hp.
Ha almost forgot!
Medium remote reps seem a little underused at the moment, so it would be great to increase the rep power of them a fair bit and make a special logistic command ship like battlecruiser for the large remote reps.
Those battlecruisers could have bonuses for large remote reps like 20% less cap consumption per level and the minmatar one could have a 200% cycle time bonus for remote hull reps, which seems to lack at the moment. And large remote hull reps eat way too much cap for any logi pilot. signature |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2101
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 01:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
As this is neither a proposal for a new feature or a new idea, this thread gets a lock.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |