Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chang Liang
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
I read the blog about the Burner missions and CCP's look into the matter. CODE. have stated they have done alot of damage since their foundation. But I think they got a big challenger on their hands now.
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66504/1/Alliance.jpg
"All in all, 19962 player ships had been destroyed by Burners as of September 14th, worth a total of 870 billion ISK." - Excerp from the Dev Blog on Burner NPCs
From the looks of it, players really bling out their ships to try and beat the Burner ships. If the Burners were to actually roam around outside of missions and decide for a little trip to Jita... let us say Jita will literally burn.
Im posting it here since the Burners are criminals and I wasn't sure where else to post this.
Also... since people usually ask for a source, here it is: CCP Dev Blog: Some NPCs just want to watch the world burn |
Eldwinn
SomeWhat SophiSticateD Shadow Cartel
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
We really need to step up our game. Burner NPC's must have their hot dropping skill to PL levell x500. |
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
779
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
i gotta gank some more missioners |
Tengu Grib
Happy Fun times
411
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 23:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Read the blog. It made my laugh. Tengu Grib> I read that as "Suddenly Noobships" and it made me want to hot drop someone with noobships. Buhhdust Princess> You have set us a challenge..We will try and do it!!!!!!!!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEeBnYi5bG0&feature=youtu.be |
Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
431
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 00:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Now all we need are burner nyxes waiting at a unspecified lowsec system with a roaming burner tengu to light a cyno that works in highsec to hot drop on autopiloting freighters and the like and camp systems for days on end.
Then CCP will introduce the mission burner blobs where every burner blob has 10x the logi behind their backs and will all switch reps a burner getting primaried and will also do the same and primary ships one at a time. |
Dirk Decibel
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 09:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Meh, I thought it was all alliances combined from the title. Now that would be something to write about, this: meh... |
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite CODE.
142
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 09:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
I bet we did the most per member! :) Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com
Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,-á live it, breathe it! |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1633
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 11:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:I bet we did the most per member! :)
Lol not even close.. on that metric we outclass you by 10:1. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
58
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 12:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
I am not sure why I am stepping into this pissing match but, fact check:
Kagura Nikon wrote: Lol not even close.. on that metric we outclass you by 10:1.
September 2014 ISK destroyed:
The Pursuit of Happiness (-BRO): 77.89B ISK/ 66 members = 1.18B ISK/member CODE. : 311.96B ISK/ 277 members = 1.13 ISK/member
So no, you outclass CODE. by closer to 5%, not the 1000% you claim.
But you both lose to Marmite, who are far and away the current masters of elite PvP. Here is the ranked list of the alliances (plus (-BRO)) listing in Falcons post by ISK destroyed per member for September:
Alliance....B ISK/member MYM8......2.00 PoH.........1.18 CODE......1.13 SHDWC...0.41 MEN........0.27 -10...........0.25 -GE-........0.23 NC...........0.11 SOLAR....0.09 CONDI.....0.06 BRAVE.....0.04
And at around ~0.15B ISK damage inflicted per burner as described in the dev blog, you can see that several alliance do more damage on this metric than the NPCs although comparing persistent player alliances to continually spawning NPCs is a bit sketchy.
|
Ned Thomas
Hellbound Turkeys Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects
141
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 14:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yang Aurilen wrote:Now all we need are burner nyxes waiting at a unspecified lowsec system with a roaming burner tengu to light a cyno that works in highsec to hot drop on autopiloting freighters and the like and camp systems for days on end.
Then CCP will introduce the mission burner blobs where every burner blob has 10x the logi behind their backs and will all switch reps a burner getting primaried and will also do the same and primary ships one at a time.
Let us puse for a moment and imagine the hilarity that would ensue if high sec ganking were added as an npc activity. |
|
Chang Liang
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 16:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dirk Decibel wrote:Meh, I thought it was all alliances combined from the title. Now that would be something to write about, this: meh...
If you look closer in this picture ( http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66504/1/Alliance.jpg ), you will see that Burner NPCs (all five types of them) have caused far more damage since their introduction than the most top damaging Alliances in the game, including the Marmites and CODE. and CONDI.
That speaks volumes that the Burner NPCs are really good at one thing: Destruction of ships and causing real damage in value of ISK. Let us only imagine what would happen if Burner NPCs were allowed to move out of mission areas and start to randomly hotdrop infront of stations, inlcuding Jita.... |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1639
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 18:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:I am not sure why I am stepping into this pissing match but, fact check: Kagura Nikon wrote: Lol not even close.. on that metric we outclass you by 10:1.
September 2014 ISK destroyed: The Pursuit of Happiness (-BRO): 77.89B ISK/ 66 members = 1.18B ISK/member CODE. : 311.96B ISK/ 277 members = 1.13 ISK/member So no, you outclass CODE. by closer to 5%, not the 1000% you claim. But you both lose to Marmite, who are far and away the current masters of elite PvP. Here is the ranked list of the alliances (plus (-BRO)) listing in Falcon's post by ISK destroyed per member for September: Alliance....B ISK/member MYM8......2.00 PoH.........1.18 CODE......1.13 SHDWC...0.41 MEN........0.27 -10...........0.25 -GE-........0.23 NC...........0.11 SOLAR....0.09 CONDI.....0.06 BRAVE.....0.04 And at around ~0.15B ISK damage inflicted per burner as described in the dev blog, you can see that several alliance do more damage on this metric than the NPCs although comparing persistent player alliances to continually spawning NPCs is a bit sketchy.
Well 10 time was clearly a hyperbole. But the crime and punishment forum has the code of conduct that demands any statement to be made with hyperboles. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Chang Liang
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 23:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: Well 10 time was clearly a hyperbole. But the crime and punishment forum has the code of conduct that demands any statement to be made with hyperboles.
If that is so... then I can clearly point out that the five Burners together indeed outclass you by atleast 10:1 and that is not being a hyperbole.
And this is only because of the Burner missions. Imagine what would happen if these Burner NPCs were to roam rampant in mining belts or even do daring blitz assaults on a random player near gates or space stations. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9822
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 00:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP troll, best troll. This is just an extension of that. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
Dirk Decibel
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 09:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
Chang Liang wrote:Dirk Decibel wrote:Meh, I thought it was all alliances combined from the title. Now that would be something to write about, this: meh... If you look closer in this picture ( http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66504/1/Alliance.jpg ), you will see that Burner NPCs (all five types of them) have caused far more damage since their introduction than the most top damaging Alliances in the game, including the Marmites and CODE. and CONDI. That speaks volumes that the Burner NPCs are really good at one thing: Destruction of ships and causing real damage in value of ISK. Let us only imagine what would happen if Burner NPCs were allowed to move out of mission areas and start to randomly hotdrop infront of stations, inlcuding Jita....
I can read charts :P It's a nice ammount of damage proving that it's a worthwile PvE addition, but it's not earth shattering.
But any extra destruction is good so keep it coming Burners!
|
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1639
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 09:47:00 -
[16] - Quote
Chang Liang wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote: Well 10 time was clearly a hyperbole. But the crime and punishment forum has the code of conduct that demands any statement to be made with hyperboles.
If that is so... then I can clearly point out that the five Burners together indeed outclass you by atleast 10:1 and that is not being a hyperbole. And this is only because of the Burner missions. Imagine what would happen if these Burner NPCs were to roam rampant in mining belts or even do daring blitz assaults on a random player near gates or space stations.
They have a huge advantage over us.. players do not dock when they enter in local .. as they do when we enter. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |