Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] [15]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
1561
|
Posted - 2014.11.16 20:25:03 -
[421] - Quote
Any idea when the next round of balancing is?
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
|
Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
523
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 20:53:30 -
[422] - Quote
Is anyone at CCP still working on Module Tiericide, or is this considered to be a failed project? |
Cledus Snowman Snow
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 12:16:59 -
[423] - Quote
MBizon Osis wrote:module balancing, "Tiericide", Hello all made it to the end of 20 pages of "I don't like the name". I don't care about names and pairing down some of the many not used named mods. But the ship Tiericide made them better in most cases. The Survey Scanner could be improved to display units and volume (m3), just to simplify the process and remove the math equation. My mining lasers, ore hold, cargo holds, and station hanger all read m3. I know this is a humble module and this will get not get the time of day. But here was a year long thread about them and a Dev urging players to post. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=237199 Lots of crazy in it but a lot of folks just think that reading in m3 would be a nice improvement and make it more useful. I am not a bright guy on these flux mods shields or cap EFT shows me they are bad for every fit I try so how can they be good or in the game at all? what fits would anyone use them for? I would like any advice on this. And the whole we have to change the names of every thing every 2 years? http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/whats-in-a-name/ Feb 2012 https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Module_changes Like I said I don't care but it seams like a waste of time and money you could be making more content or real improvements. Can't wait to see the fur fly when you get to mods most players really care about.
I understand you and agree. It is the oll 'Order, counterorder, disorder.'. on the name changes. And the ore scanner changed to read in M3 like eveything else in the Game would make too much Sense. |
IBISWARS
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 22:06:13 -
[424] - Quote
I do not think tier 3 bcers should be able to snipe pos structures outside of range of the guns. If your attacking a pos you should be under fire of the pos weapons not safely out of it's range. Reward vs risk. |
Bolimbe
Shiga's Playground Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.07 20:42:05 -
[425] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote:Oceanus is released next week and with it starts the advertised module rebalancing. To start out with the team decided to target eight specific groups of modules and CCP Fozzie has written a dev blog to explain the reasoning, method, and the groups. Head on over here to check it out. Oceanus is released on Tuesday, September 30th. These changes are looking very good. What do you think?
I think the module rebalancing looks like a good idea. However, I do not agree that the name changes were needed. As a matter of fact, changing the names and the unique descriptors is another step toward making Eve "just another mmo". You are removing the challenge and limiting the sandbox in order to favor the carebear and those who are too lazy, scared or just wrong in the head to grasp the fun in a dangerous world where, at any time, one can find oneself waking in a new clone or short a billion isk due to a scam or any of the other things that make Eve a unique and fun experience.
CCP should go ahead and create a "carebear server", like every other mmo out there. A server on which pvp is super limited and the only way to engage another pilot is through duel request or if they have pvp turned on. Then, when people cry about the game being too hard or getting blown up or whatever, we can just tell them to go to the carebear server. Many would just cry about pvp on the pvp server but when they get over their pride and moveto the carebear server they will be able to mine away in low and null sec with no fear of loss. (Sounds like fun, right)
BTW, the unique item names and descriptions were one of the biggest reasons I continued to play Eve. I loved reading the cool descriptions and names. They really were quite awesome. |
Paynus Maiassus
Capital Munitions
187
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 18:07:06 -
[426] - Quote
I didn't see any rebalanced modules in the Rhea patch notes. Are there any? Or is this something that CCP started in on and gave up on?
ECM, remote rappers, energy neutralizers are still hopelessly jacked up. |
Dangeresque Too
Pistols for Pandas
14
|
Posted - 2014.12.09 16:11:22 -
[427] - Quote
Bolimbe wrote:BTW, the unique item names and descriptions were one of the biggest reasons I continued to play Eve. I loved reading the cool descriptions and names. They really were quite awesome. Oh you mean like:
Partial Weapon Navigation Peripheral Weapon Navigation Diameter Parallel Weapon Navigation Transmitter Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron
And then shortened: PWN PWND PWNT PWNAGE
But seriously, what the heck is a navigation array generation extron?
And I'm pretty sure the module rebalance thing has probably died as there has been not a peep from CCP about it since the first one.
|
Akemon Numon
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 10:15:35 -
[428] - Quote
WHO cares about the names? Call it whatever you want this year and change it two years from now again. How bout the CCP balancing specialists take the time to even try to make some of these mods better for the users in this game? If your mining laser, strip mining laser, modulated deep core mining laser, ore hold, cargo hold, station hanger, fleet hanger, cans, POS, SILOS, and every thing in the ENTIRE GAME reads in m3 why would the Ore Scanner read in Units of Ore? And not m3 amount?
Just how hard would it be to make it read both? Or just m3? |
Blastil
Aideron Robotics
111
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 18:05:05 -
[429] - Quote
The word 'Restrained' has a bit of a negative connotation (unless you're into that sort of thing). I would suggest the world 'Optimized' or 'Efficient' Since you're reducing a drawback instead of restraining something good. |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
1659
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 19:35:08 -
[430] - Quote
Ooh, another ten module categories! I never doubted you guys... Good stuff.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec.
|
|
Esceem
Suns of New Eden
12
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 23:03:02 -
[431] - Quote
Bolimbe wrote:BTW, the unique item names and descriptions were one of the biggest reasons I continued to play Eve. I loved reading the cool descriptions and names. They really were quite awesome.
Agreed. And yes, I already miss e.g. the old AB names. |
GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Spaceship Samurai
86
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 23:29:51 -
[432] - Quote
Love how this is going to help new guys get into doctrine ships just a liiiiiittle faster, or come very close, with the extra "fitting" meta taking care of skill points in some areas.
Haaaaaalp my head's on fire
|
D'Kelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 13:53:20 -
[433] - Quote
module balancing, "Tiericide", Will this involve every pilot over 12 months old, likely dealing with the potential substantial refit program now for all ships outfitted? Which in fairness new players wont have the accumulated volumes of ships, but older players sure will. |
phobos1
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
3
|
Posted - 2015.01.01 13:35:03 -
[434] - Quote
Ive been away for over a year and find on returning that the developers are still Fcking it up as normal when are they going to leave well enough alone , it used to be a great game now its just a great shame !!. |
Cledus Snowman Snow
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 04:26:49 -
[435] - Quote
Hello CCP Devs
Can I please get a response here as to the why T2 are not getting buffed to the same stats as the (better) Meta4s your removing from the game? This is going to be clear fitting issue. Why so silent about it?
Lets skip for the moment all these wonderful side effects of your efforts to date. The re-naming, re-re-naming, and on and on. The crap Faction/SL/COSMOS mods not making any sense, Faction mods with the same stats as T2 of the same type (Gallente Mining Laser being total crap compared to Miner2). Adding even more faction mods to make up for the meta mods getting the axe. The fact that T2 Invention and production is a complete mess unless you own a T2 BPO. And an ORE SCANNER that is useless with out doing your own math equation just so see how much ore will fit in your holds.
Make a statement regarding your decision not to buff the T2 mods to the better meta4 stats in those cases. I can not believe this is an oversight on your part. Show us you at lest know this is going to be major fitting Nerf to the game. Or you either just don't care or think we are to stupid to see what's going on here. |
Katana Seiko
Made in Germany
8
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 00:57:36 -
[436] - Quote
The Tiericide initiative is nice and all, but while we have a faction strip miner, you have effectively removed the only roid scanner with the same range. Can we have maybe a faction roid scanner to even this out? |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] [15]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |