Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Joe Themachine
Sleeper Tech. Research Foundation
50
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 19:49:43 -
[181] - Quote
I have to yet again agree with Gehen. The simple way to keep everything as is is to vote everything down - not voting is silent agreement to the majority decision of the actual voters - it constitutes a mandate to continue.
Regarding the 15 vote mandate - there is no precedence or bylaw to draw on what constitutes a mandate threshold, so if you'd like to set a threshold for future mandates, please run for office, and create the rule with the council so that we don't run into this dilemma again.
Either way participating in the process is the way to go.
Thanks for your feedback. It's always welcome.
|
Ollie Rundle
198
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 14:54:54 -
[182] - Quote
Joe Themachine wrote:I have to yet again agree with Gehen. The simple way to keep everything as is is to vote everything down - not voting is silent agreement to the majority decision of the actual voters - it constitutes a mandate to continue.
There is no option in your first section to 'vote everything down' just a choice between a 'general' council and a 'science' council. The former with a regulatory function, the latter with an advisory function.
Arek'Jaalan did not have either of these structures in the past. And as you have deliberately chosen to ignore/unilaterally reject the proposal to do away with an elected council tier - which would have more accurately reflected the original motivating goals of project - you have effectively drawn a line through 'keeping everything as is'.
Which is presumably why Unit has raised their concerns.
Anslo, The Antiquarian and others have effectively demonstrated the impotence and limitations of a top-heavy structure over-burdened by bureaucratic indecision. It seems a pity you weren't paying attention. |
Anslo
Scope Works
21187
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 15:01:09 -
[183] - Quote
We'll be happy to give another lesson. Don't worry Ollie. In fact, would you like to join this next lesson as a guest speaker?
[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
|
Unit XS365BT
Unit Commune
182
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 16:14:56 -
[184] - Quote
Pilot Mataar
The assumption that pilot Tukoss was the 'head' of Arek'Jaalan is incorrect. On multiple occasions he stated both publicly and within the channel bearing the project's name, that he was not interested in such a position.
The capsuleers involved chose to look to him for guidance and, at times, permission to perform their tasks. However that was their choice, not the mandate of Arek'Jaalan.
We would also note that, at the time of pilot Tukoss' disappearance, there were multiple aggressive splinter groups working in direct opposition to one another within the project.
From what we experienced at the time, most withdrew from the project due to the apparent negative influence of Nation and Blood Raider supporters, and the constant infighting that was caused by this.
To reiterate our initial point. Arek'Jaalan should have no single or group command instance. The intent was simply for a place for collaborative and individual scientific and research endeavours to come together, in the hope of future advancement.
Given the above fact, this premise of this symposium is flawed.
We Return.
Unit XS365BT.
Designated Communications Officer.
Unit Commune.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |