Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Digitalfox
The Cold Equation
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 20:16:02 -
[1] - Quote
So, I love destroyers and the SoE ships. I love my stratios but I would love to see a destroyer class exploration hull.
Discuss
|
James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
163
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 21:56:15 -
[2] - Quote
Destroyer class exploitation hull is more acurrate, especially if it keeps the sort of offensive performance seen of most destroyers but gets the fairly deep EHP pool associated with faction hulls.
Yes, I do incursions. Find out more here
Things I support:
Channel links directly from tab.
Tech 3 battleships.
Brains over blobs.
|
elitatwo
Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team
384
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 23:50:17 -
[3] - Quote
There is no need for pirate faction destroyers because they are powerful enough.
And we get Amarr tech 3 destroyers for christmas, so be a good boy and you can get one too.
signature
|
Digitalfox
The Cold Equation
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.24 23:59:48 -
[4] - Quote
I agree that there is no need for a faction destroyer. However that doesn't mean I wouldn't like a faction destroyer. This is why I recommended an SoE faction destroyer, one geared towards low/null exploration. Looking at it honestly the two ships from SoE already fill the role nicely. I have just always loved the destroyer class ships and since all I do anymore and I really enjoy my SoE ships I would love to see this faction get a dessy designed for exploration. |
elitatwo
Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team
384
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 00:18:23 -
[5] - Quote
There is nothing wrong with liking destroyers. I don't but I don't have to
I am however concerned that a faction destroyer could step on some other shipclasses feet.
So if you propose a new ship some questions need an answer.
- what role would they have?
- how much hp is not too much to outclass something else?
- can another class already do it?
- do they get one more slot than others?
- cloak yes or no (for the SOE one)
It might not cover everything but it will poke you in the right direction.
Also keep in mind that I would answer similar to a battlecruiser proposal even thou I like them a lot but they don't quite fit the current meta very good.
signature
|
Jason Amelana
Lith 'n' Brannor Enterprises Northern Associates.
9
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 19:23:51 -
[6] - Quote
What role would they have? Exploration & DPS
How much hp is not too much to outclass something else? A little Bit MOAR!
Can another class already do it? Not Properly
Do they get one more slot than others? Yes They Do
Can They Cloak? Yes!
Ambrotos or Some Greek Word The Immortal
Fitting High Slots: 8 Medium Slots: 4 Low Slots: 6 Powergrid: 90 Mw CPU: 225 Tf Torrent Hardpoint: 6 Calibration: 350 Points Upgrade Slots: 3
Structure Volume: 47,500 M3 Inertia Modifier: 2.65 x Mass: 1,750,000 Kg Max Velocity: 275 m/s Capacity: 425m3
Capacitor Capacitor Capacity: 775 Gj Recharge Rate: 340s
Targeting Maximum Range: 45.25 Km Max Locked Targets: 6 Magnetometric Sensor Strength: 16 Signature Radius: 52m Scan Resolution: 525mm 50% Optimal Range
Shields Shield Capacity: 750Hp Shield Recharge: 625s Shield Resistances: 0% EM / 50% Explosive/ 40% Kinetic/ 20% Thermal
Armor Armor Hitpoints: 975Hp Armor Resistances: 50% EM/ 10% Explosive/ 35% Kinetics/ 35% Thermal
Drones Drone Capacity: 125 m3 Drone Bandwidth: 50 Mbit/sec
Role Bonus 50% bonus to Small Energy Turret optimal range 37.5% bonus to Core and Combat Scanner Probe strength 10+ bonus to Relic and Data Analyzer virus strength Can fit Covert Ops Cloaking Device Cloak reactivation delay reduced to 15 seconds
Amarr Destroyer Bonus (Per Level) 4% Bonus To All Armor Resistances
Gallente Destroyer Bonus (Per Level) 10% Bonus To Drone Damage
Skills Amarr Destroyer III Gallente Destroyer III |
Lugh Crow-Slave
189
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 20:27:20 -
[7] - Quote
Digitalfox wrote:I agree that there is no need for a faction destroyer. However that doesn't mean I wouldn't like a faction destroyer. This is why I recommended an SoE faction destroyer, one geared towards low/null exploration. Looking at it honestly the two ships from SoE already fill the role nicely. I have just always loved the destroyer class ships and since all I do anymore and I really enjoy my SoE ships I would love to see this faction get a dessy designed for exploration.
there should be 'x' because i really like the idea of "x". is not a reason to implement something
because i sure think it would be cool if i could get an AOE DD that i can set off on Jita's undock |
Jason Amelana
Lith 'n' Brannor Enterprises Northern Associates.
9
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 20:38:54 -
[8] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Digitalfox wrote:I agree that there is no need for a faction destroyer. However that doesn't mean I wouldn't like a faction destroyer. This is why I recommended an SoE faction destroyer, one geared towards low/null exploration. Looking at it honestly the two ships from SoE already fill the role nicely. I have just always loved the destroyer class ships and since all I do anymore and I really enjoy my SoE ships I would love to see this faction get a dessy designed for exploration. there should be 'x' because i really like the idea of "x". is not a reason to implement something because i sure think it would be cool if i could get an AOE DD that i can set off on Jita undock
This Has Nothing To Do With The Post And Is Unnecessary to even to be posted, we talking about a SOE Destroyer and your bring up the top of AOE DD To use in Jita? Read The Rules Before You Post Mr Crow Slave. It not hard, just simply walk away, no need for off topic comments |
elitatwo
Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team
407
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:48:02 -
[9] - Quote
Jason Amelana wrote:What role would they have? Exploration & DPS Both the Astero and the Stratios do just fine with both. Need more dps, fit guns.
Jason Amelana wrote: How much hp is not too much to outclass something else? A little Bit MOAR!
Why? And more than what?
Jason Amelana wrote: Can another class already do it? Not Properly
Explain!
signature
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |