Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
mikal Rotineque
Caldari Capsuleer Coalition I'd Rather Be Roaming
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 03:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
The idea is that wormholers can control their hole easier than the current "rolling" methods! ideas are as follows:
1. its a mobile anchorable structure that is global broadcasted inside the WH! takes 15 seconds to anchor! must be anchored within 50km of the existing wormhole, but not closer than 5km. once anchored player would right click the structure and click "cycle wormhole" would take 60 seconds "roll" the hole. during said "rolling" the wormhole is visible on the other side of the wormhole duration entire "cycle time"!
2. 1,000,000 hit points total spread through shield, armor, hull. cannot be targeted while anchoring.
3. Single use item, once used it self destructs (maybe causing damage to nearby ships within "x"km)
4. similar size to mobile cyno inhibitor.
additional ideas are to prevent this from being used asa "hunting device" prevent it from being used inside of or close to a mobile warp disruptor.
lets spitball this idea! sorry if something similar is up, i dont have the patience to read all the posts or common ideas =D |
mikal Rotineque
Caldari Capsuleer Coalition I'd Rather Be Roaming
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 03:32:56 -
[2] - Quote
also only anchorable in wormhole space and once anchored is seen system wide on overview until used and self destructed! |
The Hamilton
Outer Ring Sleeper Collective Illusion of Solitude
66
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 05:21:08 -
[3] - Quote
Don't make wormholes safer/easier. Make them harder, they're already too easy to role. Add in the Higgs module and I'll be rage rolling with a Battleship all night long. |
King Fu Hostile
Imperial Collective Unsettled.
191
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 05:45:09 -
[4] - Quote
No |
James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
166
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 05:47:15 -
[5] - Quote
Anything other than: I want a safe way to roll holes by myself, fast? If you can't put more thought into making it a workable, risk/reward balanced idea, it probably deserves to be nixed before posting.
Yes, I do incursions. Find out more here
Tech 3 battleships.
Moar battleships
|
Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire
726
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 10:12:16 -
[6] - Quote
Scrub.
Wormholes aren't nullsec, the lack of security is part of the deal.
"I honestly thought I was in lowsec"
|
Celthric Kanerian
Ascendance Of New Eden Workers Trade Federation
141
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 10:31:50 -
[7] - Quote
Is this a bad attempt at trolling... or are you actually serious about this "idea" ? |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3014
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 16:30:48 -
[8] - Quote
Wormhole stabilizers are a terrible idea.
Why would a wormhole destabilizer be any better? |
elitatwo
Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team
386
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 18:22:52 -
[9] - Quote
Not empty quoting
signature
|
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
851
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 20:31:34 -
[10] - Quote
No.
There was nothing wrong with the WH mechanics (without mass based spawn range). |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |