Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Circumstantial Evidence
151
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 14:19:06 -
[181] - Quote
User could get temporarily confused as to which tab or window is active, because the color on mouse hover of inactive tabs is identical to the final color, once the tab is made active.
If there is a difference between hover state on tabs and the active state, it is not distinct enough. Please increase contrast between the different states.
TQ / current behavior: for tabs, the text will get brighter on mouse hover. The background color/brightness doesn't change, until the tab is made active. |
Damjan Fox
Fox Industries and Exploration
53
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 15:41:56 -
[182] - Quote
In addition to my previous post:
Some icons/services in the station service panel are redundant and should be removed. Like: Industry, Ship Fitting and Regional Market. Most players have these servies already in their neocom.
Furthermore, you may rethink the design of some icons, to make them more distinguishable.
- Inventory: I guess the cube should depict some sort of box to indicate wares and such. but the very neutral form of the cube makes it hard to get that connection. Suggestion Maybe make it look more like a parcel.
- Fleet: The three stars could be confusing, because the star symbol is already used in the corporation icon. Suggestion 1 You could use a formation of ships as a clear indicator, or Suggestion 2 maybe some sort of military insignia.
- Loyalty Point Store: A shield with a star in its middle is pretty meaningless in that case. Suggestion Keep the current bay wreath symbol. Maybe add "LP" to the icon,, since this is a term commonly used ingame.
- Ship Insurance: The lock is an inappropriate symbol to depict an insurance Suggestion Since you are getting back ISK in an insurance, why not use an ISK-symbol?
One other thing off the top of my head:
Speaking of the ISK-symbol, i think the dash in the middle crossing the "Z" should be a double dash. It is used in many currency symbols and many people recognize this form of imagery (capital letter crossed by double dash) as an icon for wallet or money in general.
Regards, Damjan |
Ronin Silfar
Our Big Spaceship Gang
11
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 15:53:01 -
[183] - Quote
Cynthia Aishai wrote:In the new UI, brackets can't be seen through pinned windows. This is a serious problem.
Casey Ambraelle wrote:
I like the new window transparency layers especially if they work with the hacking interface there wasn't anything to scan down and test it. Not all windows are resizable, stackable, or able to be rolled up to just the title bar. Fitting is one of these, Industry is another. Please make all windows resizable, stackable, and able to be rolled up. I'm a big boy I can decide how big I need a window to use it Flat monochromatic icons are hideous and makes the game look like something from the 80's. I use to play ASCII games on a Kaypro II with a green monochromatic screen, while I like to wax poetic about ye old days I have no desire to relive them. Please keep the multi color icons that look modern and not a throw back to the 80's. Where have all the sliders gone so I can create my own skin colors? You want to make some presets you can theme the UI on default with thats fine but please do not take away my ability to change the skin color as I see fit. Maybe I want a hot pink UI or a purple one or some other nausea inducing color that is possible with the RGB sliders. /signed on all points. I don't hate the new icons, but I wouldn't like having them forced on me and do feel they are inferior overall. I'll give it time and report back, but I'm very passionate about UX design, and know my tastes well enough that I doubt time will soften my opinion of them. At a minimum people who want color should be able to have it. The great thing about the simple design of these monochromatic icons is that they could very easily be adjusted to a different color. Allowing us to color each of the icons ourselves if desired is preferable. A single color still, but one that we choose for each icon individually.
Better would be letting us keep the old UI if we prefer it.
Better still would be to officially support user UI modifications. Let the community create UIs for you and let the community decide what they want to use. [Insert MMO here] permits UI modifications, why don't you yet? :-/
I get that learning new icons takes time. I'll report back like I said, but I can honestly say some of these icons need improvement as already mentioned. Better than flattening the icons would be improving some of the existing icons (like the confusing ship fitting icon) and keeping the same style.
With regards to the color schemes. take a look at this screenshot from an alt: http://i.imgur.com/3mDm0w1.jpg That look is impossible with the new UI. Custom color schemes are 100% required. The Minmatar colors are pink?... really?!
Aurelius Valentius wrote:Also I should mention people with astigmatism are going to have hard time with this concept unless it is properly implemented - due to the high contrast - I have an issue with this and I can't read some of text due to the contrast issues mentioned, but even the ones that are clearer - are blurry.
the current UI has a very nice grey blend to it on some of the buttons in it - the old station tab replacement buttons - I would suggest that as an optional theme for people that have astigmatism, or other such issues.
Also - while I am not - make sure you get color blind input as well. I have an astigmatism and can completely agree with this statement.
Kaaeliaa wrote:The goal of an interface is to present the most broad usability possible, not to look pretty. And if this were for a job I'd be fine with that. It's for a game though, so damnit I want pretty! Flat monochromatic icons are not pretty. Now maybe if it were line-art that animated when you hovered over it it'd be more tolerable.
Lykouleon wrote:Had a group of ~10 pilots on SISI for a while this evening. General consensus of the fleet was: 1) Even after settling in, using the new NeoCom icons without colors is incredibly confusing. We much, much prefer the idea laid out by Google in their recent material design specifications, substituting NeoCom items as the 'branded' product icon: http://www.google.com/design/spec/style/icons.html#icons-product-icons ie: each NeoCom element should communicate its function. A lack of color on those elements deprived us of understanding their function visually. Otherwise, perfectly fine with the rest of the UI icons. 2) Consistency of transparency needs to be addressed. Yada yada yada. 3) Highlighted tabs are far too bright to be able to read underlying text. And personally, I really would prefer more options for background transparency. I've been using 'Black' as the window color and 'Stealth' as the background color for years to achieve a visual style that doesn't become overly intrusive with colors. The new colors...really, really annoy me and distract from what's going on behind the ui screens. I can not thumbs this up enough.
Conclusion: A large portion of my enjoyment in video games comes from aesthetics and visuals. I don't take serious issue with the mechanical and balance changes happening recently because I have faith in CCPs ability to sort all that out and provide a superior game experience in the end. However, UI and UX design have always been rather poor imo. It is in this area that I lack faith in CCPs ability to deliver. The current changes are too heavy-handed. Eve needs more color, not less of it. Why don't you start making monochromatic nebulae while you're at it eh? :P
Also, I fully support an overview overhaul as a previous poster mentioned. http://bit.ly/1ttX9dy
In the end though, it doesn't matter. Time has taught me that by the time CCP posts about a change they are committed to following through with it, allowing only minor changes. They also appear to subscribe to the
|
Loonge Karlin
Thy Sant Not Boost
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 16:02:15 -
[184] - Quote
Holy Jihad Warrior wrote:810mb of ram for each client on all low setting for useless **** on my screen i dont want or asked for, Dont do this CCP.
Sounds like a hardware issue. I run 5 clients, all sit at 600-700 mb of ram each at max settings and not a single problem. |
Loonge Karlin
Thy Sant Not Boost
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 16:32:36 -
[185] - Quote
On another note more focused on these changes, overall its great. Stuff like tabs blinking and/or highlighting is cool, much more suited for a sci fi space game like EVE.
Improvements are needed without a doubt.
Things like as mention many time before, trans sliders for each window would be great. Overview is the first thing that comes to mind. Having the overview pinned and not active while trying to deal with the background lighting effect from such things as the sun or random light makes it very hard to read. Perhaps a slider for both the inactive and active stats for windows would be a good starting point.
More customizable color schemes would be awesome. Being able to make our own themes is advisable. If i want a pink base color with elements being green or something nutz is cool.
The "current" neocom icons are way better then the "new" ones. I would advise keeping the old icons but modernizing them. Take a leaf out of google's book but make them more 3D and clearer/cleaner. Same for station icons although I barely use them anyway but hey.
Yes, Im gonna mention and complain about it. Where the hellz is the UI "Sharing" option? Much like what you've done with the overview but linking it up with the UI, weather you combine the sharing into one central screen or have them split doesn't matter but in all honesty that would've been the first thing you should of looked at when overhauling the UI. I'm a multiboxer and it would suit us more than most but in a way the same thing is true for the overview but I can tell you for a fact that it with would be used more then the overview sharing option.
Also having the option to use the old UI or the new one |
Dreiden Kisada
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 17:08:28 -
[186] - Quote
I'm not understanding the choice to not support customization. In the very least, color sliders are a very minimal way of allowing customization. Making the whole UI modable would be awesome, but I understand that would take a while to actually do. If you guys decided to join the rest of us in the new millennium.
But the specific design choice to remove functionality is contraindicated when trying to expand it.
Also, I agree with a many folks who do not like the grey button neocom. The redesigns are nice, but color is just one single pipeline for information. Removing any differentiation actually reduces it.
Edit: We keep being told to "Just try it, you'll like it" as if we had A) We had a choice, and B) like you're trying to feed us brusselsprouts. |
WhoBeI
Duty. Circle-Of-Two
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 17:35:52 -
[187] - Quote
Looks good in general although it's going to take some time getting used to the new icons.
I agree with the comments so far i.e. glow to bright, transparency needs a slider and icons need some work. Good effort though and looking forward to see the iterations.
How about font size? Doing anything on that front? Would be nice if I could set the font size globally for all windows and not just for individual chart channels and context menus. I'd be happy with a small/medium/large with medium being the current size. |
Owen E Vader
TheMurk
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 18:23:12 -
[188] - Quote
Some feedback.
New visuals make windows not transparent for the HUD. Some artifacts like square shadows. Colour presets are generally bad idea if they're not editable. Some presets give bad visual experience, like making text unreadable.
Here are the screenshots:
The HUD is not visible: http://i.imgur.com/dlz8Sze.jpg "Amarr" colour theme, look at the 3rd tab of the overview, it's unreadable: http://i.imgur.com/MDcJdqU.jpg Coloured areas of all new themes definitely need transparency: http://i.imgur.com/lNkWqVV.jpg Misplaced shadows over some windows: http://i.imgur.com/5jtHKoc.jpg
Please, make an editable colour theme, or increase the available variety at least 3 times (not an exaggeration). Current choise is too narrow. Many of us like to customize the game client to their exact tastes, please don't oversimplify things.
"Lock target" button needs a tooltip showing current lock range.
Also, please look at this: http://i.imgur.com/kYeoMsv.jpg It's my left control panel on linux. Some groups of icons manually separated by me. The "separator" icon has manually changeable size. Please make Neocom panel so that it would allow to freely move and separate icons, to change their colours (or to choose between 2-3 icon presets). |
Owen E Vader
TheMurk
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 18:42:58 -
[189] - Quote
This is a possible leader between the strange effects (on the left): http://i.imgur.com/1Jvxds8.jpg |
Wakah Menk
Versus Gloria Omnis Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 18:53:32 -
[190] - Quote
Like the song says, hate is a strong word, but I really really really donGÇÖt like this. I donGÇÖt know how difficult it would be to implement, but I would definitely ask that there is some kind of GÇÿclassicGÇÖ (IE: the current) theme when this ships. As is, the whole thing comes off as change for the sake of change. IGÇÖve gone through this sort of thing with windows and various browsers as well. Options are always nice, as are new features, but unilateral stylistic changes are extremely subjective.
IGÇÖm sure there will be plenty of people who love this, and most (including me) would be able to get used to it. But that could be said about any change. Even ignoring things that are probably glitches like disappearing station services and transparent to the point of invisibility right click menus, this doesnGÇÖt seem like an improvement to me.
|
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
760
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:13:02 -
[191] - Quote
I'm not a fan of the monochrome icons for neocom and station panel.
The process of quickly identifying an icon is usually done using a combination of these (in order of importance) - positional ("muscle memory" of sorts) - color - shape
You take away the color component, it becomes harder to identify icons (until the positional factor kicks in again after using the UI for a while)
I'm not entirely sure why fine looking 11 year old icons need to be changed. Seems to me like this is a change for the sake of change and has very little to do with the UI engine upgrade itself.
Gòª......Gòæ...GòöGòù.Gòæ.Gòæ.GòöGòù.GòªGòæ.GòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù
Gòæ.GòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòú.GòöGòùGòá..Gòá GòáGòùGòáGò¥.GòæGòá GòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù
Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥Gòæ.GòÜGò¥.GòÜGò¥Gòæ..GòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥.Gò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥Gòæ.GòæGòÜGò¥
Got Item?
|
Owen E Vader
TheMurk
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:28:49 -
[192] - Quote
Entity wrote: Seems to me like this is a change for the sake of change and has very little to do with the UI engine upgrade itself.
Exactly like so many other changes over last couple of years. |
Owen E Vader
TheMurk
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:31:07 -
[193] - Quote
I personally would prefer if the old and new icons co-existed as two optional icon sets. |
IronLance
Best Laid Plan
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:44:03 -
[194] - Quote
The color and transparency selections of the current UI are excellent. I can already create transparent UI windows that are pretty invisible if left unpinned, or adjust them to suit my style. Obscured transparency is great for bathroom windows and shower stalls, but not for something like this. (Unless you are deliberately trying to **** off the art department by blocking everyones view of their work)
The new icons in the Neocom, for the most part, are fine. I'm going to assume that these are what was ready when the decision was made to add this patch to Sisi, since there are some icons that can use work. The "People and Places" icon, if you're going to continue using that title, looks nothing like it should. On TQ it's a combination of , huh, People and part of the Map icon. Perhaps something similar for the new icon would make it look less like the new Journal icon.
Using the generic "pages" icon for ISIS, the Tutorial button, and everything that's minimized to the Neocom is a big NO-GO, hence my assumption that these are WIP.
When in space, the D Scan also has the generic 'pages' button on the Neocom, why not the same icon as under the Scanners button? The Inventory button on Neocom, why not the same as Cargo Hold button on the HUD?
|
Kristoff Merkas
Ares' Legion The Bastion
8
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:45:36 -
[195] - Quote
This is terrible. The new UI makes it look like some sort of over-simplified mobile port. The switching between transparent and opaque are also very, very annoying.
It doesn't look militaristic at all, instead it looks cheesy. I see nothing wrong with the current UI, and in fact, the icons on the current one are less confusing than the new one.
This seems like just change because you want something new, but it is downright ugly.
Do not implement this CCP, it looks terrible, and will detract from gameplay IMO. If there was some way to keep the old UI when this is ported in, it wouldn't be so bad.
I am Loyal... Like a Dog. Give me a ship; give me food, and I'll stick by your side forever.
[u]LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM FOREVER!!!![/u]
|
Challus Mercer
Sacred Temple The Gorgon Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:52:22 -
[196] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:Challus Mercer wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:Challus Mercer wrote:After some testing i was surprised how good actually the new UI is. It is really easier to work with new abstract icons instead of that old fashioned pseudo 3d icons. Transparency effect is really amazing! Finally i can see more of the space behind all windows. I hope you will keep on removing the excel-look and adding more of sci-fi look into the game! What about negative feedback - there will be allways ppl who just stick to old thing despite of how bad they are and cant accept anything new. So dont let you discourage yourself by such posts. Not being able to read the text isn't a complaint about how older is better. You should make a screenshot of it and submit a bug report. This is the only way you can help with development, of course if you really want to help, because some people only want to shitpost on the forums make devs stop any progress they make. This is from the same thread not more than 6 posts before you. As i was on test server i didn't manage to make the UI look like this. It's either a bug and will be hopefully fixed or the author made such look deliberately just to throw the sh*t at the fan. |
Wagsy
Dies Lustricus Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 20:09:12 -
[197] - Quote
For the love of all that is holy, consider the option to scale the UI down further. The current options of "gigantic" or "slightly less gigantic" are falling abit short. Surely this would be the time to give us the option to go down to at least 50%, preferably even smaller.
Or even better. Divide the UI into segments and allow scaling from 10-150% size on each individual part.
Also, the ability to save your window positions , sizes and UI scale along with your overview settings. So often is the response to a problem to "reset your cache" deleting all the work you put into your UI. |
Christopher AET
hirr Northern Coalition.
826
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 20:09:18 -
[198] - Quote
Is it possible to have the UI colour preset change depending on ship race. So it's yellow when I am in my Archon and automatically that greenish colour as soon as I jump in a Proteus for example
I drain ducks of their moisture for sustenance.
|
Lykouleon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1461
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 20:39:25 -
[199] - Quote
Looking back at last evening, every time I was using the NeoCom to do something, I was not basing my use of the NeoCom off of the shapes of the icons. I was doing almost all of my tasks on the NeoCom based on relative location from the NEX store icon since that was the only one I could easily identify based on it having color and an understandable shape.
A handful of the icons are really confusing in their current state, regardless of color or not.
Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword
|
Blue Harrier
174
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 20:46:37 -
[200] - Quote
IGÇÖve tried out the new UI on my laptop and on this it just doesnGÇÖt work, the screen res is 1366 * 768 and uses an ATI Radeon HD 4300 graphics card. The Neocom Icons are almost unreadable because they merge into the background. Also they donGÇÖt seem to scale as well as the old Icons (IGÇÖm running at 90%).
Another thing that might not be helping is the fact I had to dial back the graphic settings to low or disabled just to get a reasonable FPS of 60, using the old TQ settings I could only manage 20 to 40 Fps and in some cases as low as 15 Fps, it made a not very pleasant experience.
On a large screen it might work but for laptop users it may well be a step backwards. Trouble is some people like it, some love it and some will hate it, you can never please everyone.
"You wait - time passes, Thorin sits down and starts singing about gold." from The Hobbit on ZX Spectrum 1982.
|
|
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3075
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 22:33:02 -
[201] - Quote
Currently, when you are buying an item from the market and you get a "This item is 4000000% above market price, are you sure you want to do this?" warning, the entire screen dims except for that box. I understand that it's an important warning, but can we maybe not do the screen-dimming? It's incredibly annoying when Microsoft does it with Windows and it's not any less annoying in EVE. Simply have the message box appear without the dimming, like it is on TQ.
Other than that, the new UI is looking pretty good. I especially like how when you set the color scheme to "Black", it looks virtually like the UI on TQ except a bit sleeker. Though, with the black scheme I do kind of miss the ability to set my highlights as some other sort of color.
EDIT: It appears that all the "Do you really want to do this?" boxes and all the "Insufficient Powergrid/CPU/etc" boxes are accompanied by screen-dimming. This is going to result in an awful lot of "never ask again" boxes being checked for things I deliberately want to be asked every time. Please, really really reconsider shipping the new UI with this screen-dimming on confirmation box function. |
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1161
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 23:52:02 -
[202] - Quote
I have found the black/black theme which looks nice but my 2 concerns with the new UI re-skin are;
As a pvper, i much prefer function over form. While i understand the design choice, I want to be able to see brackets though my windows (perhaps as an option). Without this, the whole UI change is a typical ccp hatchet job aimed at appearance and marketing with no eye on function.
And when i select a window (specially if it is pinned) i dont want it to darken or be in any other way different to any of my other windows (i know which is the active window because i just clicked on it and i am not a complete ******* ******). Maybe just darken the title bar, but absolutely not the whole window. Or *gasp* give us the ability to chose whole window darken/title bar darken only.
These are two very important aspects of any UI change for me, and i would appreciate some sort of consideration to these as OPTIONS instead of just shoehorning a less functional, less practical UI on us in the name of glitz.
One other suggestion, the fleet window currently obliterates any other tabs its stacked with because it lists how many members, what wing and squad you are in IN THE TAB TITLE. Since the green arrow this is not needed, and the windows tab could easily be called 'fleet' only |
Funzinnu BT
Bread Fish
99
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 02:59:11 -
[203] - Quote
shadow deviated
http://i.imgur.com/HvG2Yk1.jpg |
Torgeir Hekard
I MYSELF AND ME
84
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 04:58:13 -
[204] - Quote
Challus Mercer wrote: As i was on test server i didn't manage to make the UI look like this. It's either a bug and will be hopefully fixed or the author made such look deliberately just to throw the sh*t at the fan.
That's Amarr theme + Amarr station + postprocessing disabled.
I do admit it's more of a showcase, but quite telling nonetheless.
From amarr theme we get shiny unreadable highlights. The color scheme blends with the station. No. Actually the correct way would be "the camo pattern allows UI to hide in the plain sight on amarr stations". From disabled postprocessing we get completely transparent pinned windows (including neocom by the way). Which is completely unreadable on any complex background. And while windows like market or item info don't have to be pinned, the always-on ones like overwiew, d-scan and chat windows do. On the positive side, disabled postprocessing is the only way to get 100% opaque windows. |
Teverine
UK Corp RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 05:05:06 -
[205] - Quote
Only had a quick look Not liking the corner brackets on all the windows, to me this looks odd. Not liking the new icons and prefer the old ones. Really don't like the corner brackets. Not sure I need a button to glow if I hover over it. I know where my mouse is. After all the changes the overall feel still looks the same to me apart from those damn corner brackets which I just don't like. |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1633
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 05:25:42 -
[206] - Quote
right click menu needs some work. It displays excellently in dark areas of space and against a less detsailed backround, but it impossible to read in opposing condistions. Especially in stations and against bright nebulae.
E: and its is also especially difficult to read when the box is over other text. |
Idoru Yoshikawa
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 06:56:28 -
[207] - Quote
Overall I think all the changes are pretty cool. Great job so far! More detailed comments below:
- NEOCOM ICONS
I really like them. The only one I find confusing is the ISIS one. Had a hard time to locate and remember its shape as it can be anything really.
- COLOR LAYOUTS
After playing a while I found the Black theme the one that helps keeping the important information highlighted while allowing to enjoy the space landscapes.
- CHAT FONTS AND COLORS
I find the typeface of the chat windows a bit outdated and the colors to highlight text disconnected with the new UI color themes. Maybe adding new options to highlight text with more colors in line with the UI themes would help to make the whole UI more consistent.
- ICONS CONSISTENCY
This is a tough topic, but I think all the modules and items icons need to be redesigned to match the new NEOCOM icon theme. That would be really awesome and a huge step forward in the modernization of the EVE UI experience and its graphic consistency.
Loving the direction of the changes. Great work. |
Torgeir Hekard
I MYSELF AND ME
84
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 07:53:42 -
[208] - Quote
Idoru Yoshikawa wrote: This is a tough topic, but I think all the modules and items icons need to be redesigned to match the new NEOCOM icon theme. That would be really awesome and a huge step forward in the modernization of the EVE UI experience and its graphic consistency.
Yyyep. Monochrome icons for ammo types would be a huge step. Into something. While we are at it, let's vouch for monochrome icons for overview colortags. After all + is clearly distinguishable from - without any colours involved And background colours can be replaced by hatching. |
Idoru Yoshikawa
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 08:40:23 -
[209] - Quote
Torgeir Hekard wrote:Yyyep. Monochrome icons for ammo types would be a huge step. Into something. While we are at it, let's vouch for monochrome icons for overview colortags. After all + is clearly distinguishable from - without any colours involved And background colours can be replaced with hatching.
lol
Of course ammo icons should include a color mark to distinguish them. Sharing a monochrome ammo shape background with a color mark related to the damage type would make easier to recognize faster different types of ammo than it is right now. |
Loonge Karlin
Thy Sant Not Boost
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 10:21:34 -
[210] - Quote
I have some more feedback now I've spent a little more time using the new UI and playing around with it more.
Although I don't use station or neocom icons much cause I remember most of there keybinds, I'm still having a lot of trouble getting familiar with what icons are which though. I still believe the old icons are better and CCP is better off just making the old icons more crisp and cleaner, aka less blurry and richer color.
After spending some time playing with each theme, Amarr and Amarr2 need work. Amarr completely makes tabs unreadable and Amarr2 aint much better. Caldari, Blue and Green tab glow could use some dimming also. Minmatar2, Gallente2, Caldari2, Hologram tab glow needs to be more of a solid color and little less glow.
I've noticed now that when in-space, panning the camera makes windows little more see-through which I like the idea of but once you stop panning, I believe the windows should get less see-through then currently, or again have a slider to adjust this on a personal feel for each person, window, theme Etc all separate from each other.
On another note about the same thing if its possible, is that when a window is over a bright nebula, windows should darken to help with making the text readable while both panning and stationary. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |