|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1256
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 18:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Other command ships dont have missile launchers.
So what?
After fitting a full rack of HML IIs and a ganglink, the NightHawk has 120.5 PG left After fitting a full rack of HAM IIs and a ganglink, the Nighthawk has 7.1 PG left
After fitting a full rack of HPL IIs and a ganglink, the Absolution has 521.35 PG remaining After fitting a full rack of HBL IIs and a ganglink, the Absolution has 283.75 PG remaining
After fitting a full rack of 425mm AC IIs and a ganglink, the Sleipnir has 654.8 PG remaining After fitting a full rack of 720mm Arty IIs and a ganglink, the Sleipnir has a deficit of 107.5PG - but it has the option of dropping to a lower tier waepon system, the 650mm Arty II, leaving it with 239 PG. The Nighthawk has no such option.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1256
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 18:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
In before someone claims that the Nighthawk doesn't need a prop mod because of missiles. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1256
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 19:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Andski wrote:I have a better idea, don't fit ganglinks on nighthawks
Yeah who puts ganglinks on Commandships? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1262
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 10:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Andski wrote:Malcanis wrote:Andski wrote:I have a better idea, don't fit ganglinks on nighthawks Yeah who puts ganglinks on Commandships? people who fly vultures, damnations and claymores maybe
Great, let's just get rid of the ganglink bonus and turn it into something useful then. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|
|
|