Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2764
|
Posted - 2014.11.23 21:19:29 -
[31] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post.
The Rules: 5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
ISD Ezwal
Vice Admiral
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
Tzar Sinak
Mythic Heights
147
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 00:26:45 -
[32] - Quote
I thought the Nestor was a T3 battleship...
Hyrdostatic Podcast First class listening of all things EVE
Nolen Cadmar Spreadsheets Make industrial life easier!
|
Lucrii Dei
Vector Galactic Did he say Jump
122
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 04:58:28 -
[33] - Quote
Yes, T3 Battleships with T3 Bastion mode that transforms it into a biped Armored CoreGäó that can drop onto planets from orbit and engage EVE: LegionGäó forces that are trying to take over your Planetary Interaction facilities.
Gÿå The Explorer I
Gÿå The Explorer II (Coming Soon!)
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5701
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 07:50:52 -
[34] - Quote
Just let there be T3 rigs at least.
Oh and a Serpentis Hyperion
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
5984
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 08:13:48 -
[35] - Quote
Not interested in a T3 battleship.
A new T2 battleship, something akin to a 'battlestar' or a mini-carrier on the other hand... there's a niche there just begging to be filled. We already know the Hyperion hull would be perfect for that.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Igor Nappi
Perkone Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 09:08:35 -
[36] - Quote
T3 BS would probably be easier to balance than the current T3 cruisers that benefit from all the perks of being medium sized hulls.
Furthermore, I think that links must be removed from the game.
|
Sequester Risalo
Significant Others
18
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 10:08:36 -
[37] - Quote
indifferent |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Cynosural Field Theory.
1424
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 10:17:18 -
[38] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:T3 might be an interesting option for the day after they finally balance the T2 and faction ships. Mr Epeen
They are quite balanced imo.
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|
Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
819
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 10:45:02 -
[39] - Quote
I'm happy in a BC
A T3 BC that's designed to kill things and not be Se-Bo cheerleader would be nice. |
Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
487
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 17:39:05 -
[40] - Quote
There is a lot of room between the battleships and capitals, and a lot of options that could come into play in this area.
It's the 1 class of ship that could support a T3 variant without stomping on any other ships in the game. Anything smaller and it will step on something. |
|
Jean Luc Lemmont
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
309
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 17:53:22 -
[41] - Quote
CCP can I get a T3 titan please?
Thanks!
A bitter vet trying to start anew.
|
Raviel Oxidans
Uranus Intruders Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 18:15:27 -
[42] - Quote
What is the diference beetween t2 and t3?
what i know is that t3 can morph and t2 not
do we need a bs with diferent roles?
I prefer more t2 ships like, logistic battleships, electronic warfare battleships (not only the scorpion hull), rather than t3 hulls
same for the destroyers.
and where is my damn logistic t2 frigate!? |
Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere Republic of the 5phere
871
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 00:52:16 -
[43] - Quote
Personally, I can see a T3 everything, and hopefully sooner rather than later.
Then, bring on the T4!!
Post with your main, like a BOSS!
And no, i don't live in highsec. -áAs if that would make your opinion any less wrong. -á
|
Tarpedo
Incursionista
1410
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 03:42:24 -
[44] - Quote
I am collecting ships which look good no matter of their characteristics (I don't use anything above 300M). Could be nice to see more sophisticated designs to park them in Jita and aimlessly fly around once in a while |
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
3711
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 06:50:28 -
[45] - Quote
Tech 4 titans please!
On a more serious note though, for a tech 3 BS to make sense, a clear niche for it to fill would need to exist. I see none.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
1586
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 09:22:25 -
[46] - Quote
T3 cruisers have their subsystems. T3 destroyers have that Transformers feature. One would have to come up with another feature suitable for Battleships that doesn't break the game, but does shake up the meta. Any idea for T3 Battleships would sound rediculous at first. How about making them crazy from a utility standpoint? Refitting, clone vats, RR, Portal Generation, etc? off course with limiters in place that force you to make a few choices from a wide range of options. |
BrundleMeth
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 11:02:59 -
[47] - Quote
I'd be happier to be able to fit Doomsday Devices to Frigates and to be able to use them in Hi-Sec... |
Rosira
Warframe Industry And Salvage Fortis Et Certus
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 12:42:49 -
[48] - Quote
Would rather see a T3 Industrial first. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |