Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Fiberton
StarFleet Enterprises Almost Awesome.
60
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:31:03 -
[61] - Quote
Hrm so Mining goods are about to sky rocket. Ok so I have never used one of these things you speak of but even I after over 10 years in the game know that this is a terrible idea. So when you are making decisions did you consult an accountant? You realize that you are prob going to reduce CCP income about 3M a year just from logins who will drop accounts that are used for that sort of thing ? Ok not to tell you guys how to run a company but just flying around for so many years and knowing persons who use that.. At least 5% of eve is just miners on isboxer. Good luck on driving into a brick wall or whatever you dudes do.. Phobe great idea. this.. I would consult an accountant.
GÇ£Out of clutter, find simplicity. From discord, find harmony. In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.GÇ¥ -- -áAlbert -áEinstein-á
"War is a mere continuation of politics by other means,"
|
progstate
1st Steps Academy Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:31:30 -
[62] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. Your response is a bit like "Well, bumping Titans is kind of not allowed in some circumstances". Being a bit more specific on this topic would probably be appreciated.
Well then be more specific in asking questions. @CCP : is using ISBOXER broadcasting to run a bomber wing or a synchronised fleet of mining vessels now against the EULA? |
Rossi Tenmar
Decadence. RAZOR Alliance
5
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:31:44 -
[63] - Quote
eiedu wrote:RIP incursions RIP Ratting RIP bombing
Or join a fleet with other people maybe? |
DaReaper
Net 7
1365
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:32:31 -
[64] - Quote
Frozen Hairdresser wrote:Just to be clear, are we still allowed to bind all our hardeners to the same key?
no. that it interation of ship and moduels and is no longer allowed
OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!
|
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
12019
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:32:39 -
[65] - Quote
progstate wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. Your response is a bit like "Well, bumping Titans is kind of not allowed in some circumstances". Being a bit more specific on this topic would probably be appreciated. Well then be more specific in asking questions. CCP is using ISBOXER broadcasting to run a bomber wing or a synchronised fleet of mining vessels now against the EULA?
Using any method (including ISBoxer) to broadcast your clicks across multiple clients for bomber wings or mining vessels will be against the EULA starting January 1st.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
Darkblad
584
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:32:41 -
[66] - Quote
DragonHelm III wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. For god's sake CCP stop all the bluster and give a straight answer ISBOXER banned or not? It just needs a yes or no All this crap about terms like Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing mean squat to me as I have no idea what they are. If you use ISBoxer (or any other kind of similar software capable of) input multiplexing (like AppleScript?): Bannable offense. If you don't use it that way: All is well.
ISBoxer (and Mac OS X, the software that AppleScript gets installed with) is capable of providing further functionality that is no offense.
In hiatus, indefinitely
|
Gina Taroen
united system's commonwealth
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:32:49 -
[67] - Quote
lol wonder how many people will quit because of this :D |
Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1051
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:32:49 -
[68] - Quote
Cue several dozen pages of people trying to invent increasingly complex vignettes that attempt to subvert the letter of the decision to legitimize actions that violate its spirit.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Lilith5
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
12
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:34:48 -
[69] - Quote
Capri Sun KraftFoods wrote:As someone who actually ISBox's bombers I'm a little upset.
The problem isn't ISBoxer. The problem is that bombs as they currently stand are completely broken Sure isboxer exacerbates the problem significantly, but you can still get 30 dudes into a fleet easily and go kill anything with 4 waves that isn't a T3 or a faction battleship. I'd be happy to see my bomber accounts become useless and de-sub them if it meant I didn't have to worry about getting hell bombed every other fleet.
I think a lot of people would be happy if you and others were to de-sub and play eve how its meant to be played. |
Arkon Olacar
Bearded BattleBears Brave Collective
429
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:35:11 -
[70] - Quote
Capqu wrote:Lyron-Baktos wrote:Jesus, can you be any more vague Falcon? ill explain for u u can no longer press one button, and have things happen on more than one client you can still use isboxer to tile ur clients on the same screen you still can't automate pushing a button thanks capqu
thanks obama
Warping to zero
|
|
Wibla
Tactical Narcotics Team
157
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:35:16 -
[71] - Quote
Querns wrote:Cue several dozen pages of people trying to invent increasingly complex vignettes that attempt to subvert the letter of the decision to legitimize actions that violate its spirit.
I have lots of popcorn |
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
163
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:35:32 -
[72] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:progstate wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. Your response is a bit like "Well, bumping Titans is kind of not allowed in some circumstances". Being a bit more specific on this topic would probably be appreciated. Well then be more specific in asking questions. CCP is using ISBOXER broadcasting to run a bomber wing or a synchronised fleet of mining vessels now against the EULA? Using any method (including ISBoxer) to broadcast your clicks across multiple clients for bomber wings or mining vessels will be against the EULA starting January 1st.
OK, so if my commands are applescript based and use the keyboard and not a mouseclick, I am still OK??
I use my G15 keyboard to run the scripts, if it matters |
Fluoroantimonicacid
Nullbear Tear Extractors
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:35:37 -
[73] - Quote
Is broadcasting commands to dscan allowed?
Was I a large part of triggering this change, just like when I made the best of insurance fraud to the point it had to be patched?
-Replicator |
Marc Callan
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
490
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:35:52 -
[74] - Quote
Seems clear enough: slaving multiple ships to one set of controls is going to be a violation as of New Year's Day. And since CCP can presumably access input logs, and determine how well synchronized a group of ships is, they can make a reasonably accurate determination as to whether a fleet is controlled by a well-coordinated group of players, or slaved to a single player's controls.
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be."
- Kurt Vonnegurt
|
Arkon Olacar
Bearded BattleBears Brave Collective
429
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:36:07 -
[75] - Quote
eiedu wrote:Also, let's unsub 10% of the accounts cus we can't use em anymore No one cares
Give me your stuff already
Warping to zero
|
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5528
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:36:39 -
[76] - Quote
Querns wrote:Cue several dozen pages of people trying to invent increasingly complex vignettes that attempt to subvert the letter of the decision to legitimize actions that violate its spirit.
"But what if I set it up to delay my "broadcasts" by a random few milliseconds, so it looks like I'm pushing buttans on 32 computers in a row really fast... is that ok?"
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|
alpha36
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:37:19 -
[77] - Quote
Change we can believe in. |
Airi Cho
Dark-Rising Executive Outcomes
20
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:37:58 -
[78] - Quote
Warr Akini wrote:I've had a good suicide ganking run, but the wave of nerfs against it don't seem to be stopping anytime soon.
Thanks. It's been fun.
seriously you needed isboxer for suicide ganking? |
BadAssMcKill
ElitistOps
910
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:38:09 -
[79] - Quote
Top lol |
EvilweaselFinance
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
345
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:38:35 -
[80] - Quote
Kenneth Feld wrote: OK, so if my commands are applescript based and use the keyboard and not a mouseclick, I am still OK??
I use my G15 keyboard to run the scripts, if it matters
are you multiplying the same input to multiple instances of the game, via any method whatsoever?
Quote:Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing refer to the multiplication of inputs, actions and events to multiple instances of the game.
then no, you are not ok |
|
Max Croxford
Golden Raiders
6
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:38:52 -
[81] - Quote
Excellent job CCP, this has been something needed done for a while now. |
alpha36
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:39:02 -
[82] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:progstate wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. Your response is a bit like "Well, bumping Titans is kind of not allowed in some circumstances". Being a bit more specific on this topic would probably be appreciated. Well then be more specific in asking questions. CCP is using ISBOXER broadcasting to run a bomber wing or a synchronised fleet of mining vessels now against the EULA? Using any method (including ISBoxer) to broadcast your clicks across multiple clients for bomber wings or mining vessels will be against the EULA starting January 1st.
Beautiful |
Meilandra Vanderganken
Aliastra Gallente Federation
153
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:39:04 -
[83] - Quote
Frozen Hairdresser wrote:Just to be clear, are we still allowed to bind all our hardeners to the same key?
From what I understand that would be illegal too. I can live with that but it would be a nice time to make tank modules groupable. Hitting f1 to f8 was ridiculous, they fixed that, now I think it would be a good idea to fix hitting alt/ctrl f1 to f5
|
Capqu
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
863
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:39:29 -
[84] - Quote
progstate wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ama Scelesta wrote:RIP ISBoxer? ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not. Your response is a bit like "Well, bumping Titans is kind of not allowed in some circumstances". Being a bit more specific on this topic would probably be appreciated. Well then be more specific in asking questions. @CCP : is using ISBOXER broadcasting to run a bomber wing or a synchronised fleet of mining vessels now against the EULA?
i told u son
you can still use isboxer to have multiple clients on the same screen you can no longer use isboxer to send commands to more than one client at a time you have never been able to use isboxer to automatically send commands
is that clear enough? thats pretty much what the OP says btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Powers Sa
1383
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:39:57 -
[85] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Fonac wrote:So is-boxer is banned?
edit: I Honestly dont care about is-boxer or what it can do, since i've never used it, or met anyone who uses it. But the OP is not very clear on it. isboxer isn't banned. Some of the things isboxer can do are banned. It sounds like I can still use it for what i've always used it for: window management. At most I've run 4 accounts with isboxer managing all my windows. In very very rare occasions I've used it to repeat, but that was a long time ago when naga ratting was a thing. I've mainly used it to manage windows when fcing or scouting.
Do you like winning t2 frigs and dictors for Dirt Cheap?https://eveninggames.net/register/ref/dQddmNgyLhFBqNJk
Remeber: Gambling addiction is no laughing matter unless you've lost a vast space fortune on the internet.
|
GOB the Magician
Enlightened Industries Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:40:11 -
[86] - Quote
eiedu wrote:RIP incursions RIP Ratting RIP bombing
Time to go back to wow, where it makes no sense to have multiple accounts
lol. get out. |
Kaaeliaa
The Vendunari End of Life
37143
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:40:27 -
[87] - Quote
Gina Taroen wrote:lol wonder how many people will quit because of this :D
Who gives a ****?
They're the kind of people EVE doesn't want because they **** things up for everyone else.
CCP, congratulations on having the stones to put your foot down and tell these idiots to GTFO. Maybe we can finally have nice things again.
LAGL Cosplayer. Princess of Sibyyl's Pillowfort. This is my jam!
|
padraig animal
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:40:35 -
[88] - Quote
eiedu wrote:RIP incursions RIP Ratting RIP bombing
Time to go back to wow, where it makes no sense to have multiple accounts
How are you even going to "catch" people who are input-multiplexing hardware-wise
Cool , can i have your stuff before you deactivate your accounts ?
......
|
marly cortez
Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:41:39 -
[89] - Quote
The Sandbox ....What can be will be......except when we decide it's not to be. Compliments of CCP... |
Arkon Olacar
Bearded BattleBears Brave Collective
430
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:41:54 -
[90] - Quote
Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Frozen Hairdresser wrote:Just to be clear, are we still allowed to bind all our hardeners to the same key? From what I understand that would be illegal too. I can live with that but it would be a nice time to make tank modules groupable. Hitting f1 to f8 was ridiculous, they fixed that, now I think it would be a good idea to fix hitting alt/ctrl f1 to f5 Is this the hardeners on one account, or across multiple accounts?
Keyboard shortcuts on one account = legal Multiplying that across more than one account = illegal
It really is not hard. Have you tried reading the OP?
Warping to zero
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |