Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
12066
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 19:02:31 -
[61] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bug
Yup this is a known issue.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
7131
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 19:10:45 -
[62] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bug Yup this is a known issue. grandso, i also lost control of one, like runaway train style, my pod "fell" out and it just rode off into the sunset.
"I'm also quite confident that you are laughing
and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers."
=]I[=
|
Joseph O'Neil
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 19:25:36 -
[63] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bug Yup this is a known issue. grandso, i also lost control of one, like runaway train style, my pod "fell" out and it just rode off into the sunset. Edit: that said i have just had my 4th closed socket this afternoon so i wouldn't be surprised if that's due to something on my end.
^^ this would have been funny to see. Too bad you didn't fraps it for everyone else to see it in action :) |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
18041
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 20:57:03 -
[64] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.
So, when can we expect Tactical Battlecruisers and Strategic Battleships? Seems to me to be the next logical progressions in the T3 lineups.
Simply saying "in the next 2 years" would be enough to keep me going.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Vote Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10!
|
Tarpedo
Incursionista
1412
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 21:37:36 -
[65] - Quote
Why does Amarrian ship use Minmatar design? |
Arthur Aihaken
X A X
3969
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 03:17:33 -
[66] - Quote
Gosti Kahanid wrote:http://i.imgur.com/QkR8QZb.png this is the conzept of the Caldari-Destroyer Do I want to know which end is the front?
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
prolix travail
Blue Mountain Trails
19
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:56:56 -
[67] - Quote
Did you find out why the bonuses weren't applying? |
Armin Arraeb
Confidential Intelligence Service
24
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 11:09:58 -
[68] - Quote
Hi All
First of all thx to CCP for the very nice looking and interesting Confessor.
I only have one issue to report: If you put on all Turrets, there are still 4 empty Turret Hardpoints on the Model. Isn't it possible to just display (only graphical, on the Model) one Turret as three (instead of two, as normal), as you did that on the Hawk for example? I know it is not that important, but I like it when Ships look fully equipped and not half empty... |
|
CCP Lebowski
C C P C C P Alliance
343
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 13:50:41 -
[69] - Quote
Hey all, the known issues have been updated with todays build. The most important thing to note is that the bonuses should now all be working, so please feel free to report any problems you find with them.
Thanks!
CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski
|
|
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects
807
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 14:03:33 -
[70] - Quote
Engine trails are not complete in speed mode. Missing the two that are covered in the other modes.
If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide
See you around the universe.
|
|
|
CCP Lebowski
C C P C C P Alliance
344
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 16:17:07 -
[71] - Quote
Salpun wrote:Engine trails are not complete in speed mode. Missing the two that are covered in the other modes. Upgrades for the existing booster effect system are being explored and considered by Team TriLambda. For now, however, the Speed Mode boosters are displaying the appropriate effect.
CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski
|
|
Sara Curtis
MASS A DEATH Mordus Angels
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 20:52:43 -
[72] - Quote
Why manufacture of confessor require "Amarr Starship Enginering" at V (The same as Legion). At the end it is only destroyer? |
Seandals
Derp Legion Hobo Division
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 21:23:38 -
[73] - Quote
Why couldn't we have the T3 Destroyer speed mode also include warp speed? |
Andreus Ixiris
Duty. Circle-Of-Two
5028
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 00:14:52 -
[74] - Quote
Can you integrate some sort of option into the fitting window to toggle between the ship's modes? This would allow us to look at how the modes affect our ships while we're in station.
Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.
Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.
Andreus Ixiris > ...
Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
944
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 01:21:25 -
[75] - Quote
Seandals wrote:Why couldn't we have the T3 Destroyer speed mode also include warp speed?
Because they don't want you to be GOD in it.
Yaay!!!!
|
Alexa Coates
Space Wolves ind. The Revenant Order
749
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 02:53:25 -
[76] - Quote
confessor confirmed to have a tank of the gods. This thing rivals a heavy tanked cruiser.
That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.
|
Nomistrav
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 05:17:29 -
[77] - Quote
S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them. |
Andreus Ixiris
Duty. Circle-Of-Two
5029
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 19:27:32 -
[78] - Quote
Nomistrav wrote:S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them. I'm really not happy they're not releasing the T3 destroyers at the same time. I think it was a very spiteful decision on CCP's part.
Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.
Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.
Andreus Ixiris > ...
Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.
|
Lady Rift
What Shall We Call It
112
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 19:50:39 -
[79] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Nomistrav wrote:S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them. I'm really not happy they're not releasing the T3 destroyers at the same time. I think it was a very spiteful decision on CCP's part.
well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months. |
Andreus Ixiris
Duty. Circle-Of-Two
5029
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 23:44:01 -
[80] - Quote
Lady Rift wrote:well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months. Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day.
Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP.
Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.
Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.
Andreus Ixiris > ...
Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.
|
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
7150
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 00:46:23 -
[81] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Lady Rift wrote:well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months. Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day. Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP. Should have been on the ball with those requested items then shouldn't ye .
Don't take this as amarr victor spiel I'm looking forward to the gallente one most also , but I don't mind waiting. it's hardly spiteful, a little trollish possibly but far from anything worth harbouring any resentment over.
Btw any idea when these things will start popping up on mmy combat probes?
"I'm also quite confident that you are laughing
and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers."
=]I[=
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
952
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 04:02:33 -
[82] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Lady Rift wrote:well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months. Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day. Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP.
Well they basically made it a contest and we all chose which ones we wanted first. In the end, it's our own damn fault.
Yaay!!!!
|
Laerise
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
60
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 13:52:07 -
[83] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Lady Rift wrote:well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months. Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day. Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP.
How about you stop blaming CCP for holding a fair contest. I for one applaud their guts to reintroduce in game events that have real ingame consequences.
Pro-Tip: If you want your faction to succeed in a given scenario, support it more? |
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
393
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 15:37:16 -
[84] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Omnathious Deninard wrote:I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.
Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.
Any chance you'll give combining the two some thought? |
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
954
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 17:09:31 -
[85] - Quote
The difficulty comes with balancing them all.
Sometimes the best of both worlds is the worst of each one.
Do T3's need a rebalance, yes.
Would merging this and adjusting the T3 subsystems work.. Maybe.
That would be ALOT of adjusting.
Yaay!!!!
|
Sable Blitzmann
Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred
145
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 06:39:47 -
[86] - Quote
Can you comment a bit about how the bonuses work on the backend for those of us who develop fitting applications? At first it seemed to be the Amarr Tactical Destroyer Defense/Prop/Sniper Mode items secretly being applied just like any module changing the stats of a ship. However, I took a look at the effect expressions from the SISI client and it doesn't really make much sense with the current attributes / expressions even tho the modes work fine in the game, which leads me to believe that it's either 1) hardcoded for now (bad bad bad!), 2) a different method of implementation that I cannot yet figure out |
Yongtau Naskingar
Yongtau Naskingar Corporation
81
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 07:32:54 -
[87] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day. You have a quote that each destroyer has to wait for a whole release? There's no reason why they couldn't add those in a smaller patch. |
Torgeir Hekard
I MYSELF AND ME
92
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 08:03:01 -
[88] - Quote
Sable Blitzmann wrote:Can you comment a bit about how the bonuses work on the backend for those of us who develop fitting applications? At first it seemed to be the Amarr Tactical Destroyer Defense/Prop/Sniper Mode items secretly being applied just like any module changing the stats of a ship. However, I took a look at the effect expressions from the SISI client and it doesn't really make much sense with the current attributes / expressions even tho the modes work fine in the game, which leads me to believe that it's either 1) hardcoded for now (bad bad bad!), 2) a different method of implementation that I cannot yet figure out I bought a fresh confessor (no module active) and fitted it with a rack of pulses with scorch, 2 TEs, 2 ODs, 2 SeBos. Also then swapped some stuff for 2 EANMs and a DCU later.
After running some tests with switching modes, it looks like a mode behaves like a non-stacking-penalized module. That is, it applies full force after 2 modules affecting the same stat. And defensive mode does not interfere with DCU. So pretty much like Bastion.
At least the numbers match. |
Lady Rift
What Shall We Call It
112
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 08:37:14 -
[89] - Quote
Yongtau Naskingar wrote:Andreus Ixiris wrote:Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day. You have a quote that each destroyer has to wait for a whole release? There's no reason why they couldn't add those in a smaller patch.
and cut out content on there fast expansion schedule, I doubt it. |
Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
490
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 10:57:51 -
[90] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote: Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day.
Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP.
So you want ALL pilots to have nothing and wait 18 weeks then? That sounds rather spiteful on your part...
Also, despite being a Minmatar, I can fly all 4 destroyers and use all racial small weapons. Same for many players. So I'm getting a new ship now and an additional ship every 6 weeks... assuming you are correct and they are actually spacing them out that much.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |