Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mercfromabove
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
152
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 21:15:30 -
[181] - Quote
If you want an impartial view on Bobmon then here it is;
Me and Bob have had some ups and downs throughout eve, being in crappy alliances together such as unclaimed. & better such as NC. His personality has become clear over the many years of knowing him and I honestly believe that he would want to change eve for the better. This game is what he desires, it is his hobby and his lover.
My opinion comes from my experience of this individual and many may differ but if he were to be elected eve would benefit greatly.
+1 |
Wrik Hoover
Hoover Inc. Pandemic Legion
103
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 22:08:20 -
[182] - Quote
Good men
+1 |
riverini
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
518
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 13:05:40 -
[183] - Quote
I am voting for Bob mainly because he used some weird crowns on his CSM thread title -->> GÖ¢GÖ¢ I mean how cool is that!? I didn't knew those existed!!!
Ohh yeah, he's cool. Vote him on first place.
Bobmon for CSM X!
p.s.: GÖ¢ GÖ¢ GÖ¢
RIVERINI / EVENEWS24
@evenews24
|
LordPepstores
Sacred Templars DARKNESS.
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 15:26:06 -
[184] - Quote
Bobmon has my vote.
Known him for a few years now and he has proven to be extremely dedicated to every job and responsibility that he takes on and accepts. |
Dacil Arandur
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 18:34:55 -
[185] - Quote
I'll be voting for my friend and corpmate Bobmon. He's a fair and trustworthy guy who genuinely loves EVE. |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
130
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 06:49:30 -
[186] - Quote
Thanks for all the nice words guys!
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Overman
Hax. Northern Coalition.
6
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 22:48:29 -
[187] - Quote
<3 +1 |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2693
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 23:14:42 -
[188] - Quote
Bob is a good man, and what I believe is most important for a CSM is social activity, which Bob is in spades.
If you want a CSM that will talk to you and answer your questions, vote Bob.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|
JEFFRAIDER
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
379
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 23:58:28 -
[189] - Quote
Very good duder and now runs the most credible EVE news site on the internet thanks to le martini's decline |
Reeses Peices
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2015.02.21 01:47:47 -
[190] - Quote
+1 |
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
133
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 13:54:42 -
[191] - Quote
so many nice words, THANKS!
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
133
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 20:27:03 -
[192] - Quote
Also lol fixed some mistakes like: t2 cruisers should have been T2 logi Frigates
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Darknesss
Hax. Northern Coalition.
182
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 20:57:09 -
[193] - Quote
Bobmon is good guy :) +1 |
Rutger Centemus
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
28
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 21:14:12 -
[194] - Quote
Bobby ending up in CSM should, at the very least, give us some interesting notes. Let's just hope he doesn't end up having to be the one editing 'em :D.
(Edit: + 1/2 , but only because he asked nicely) |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
133
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 21:28:52 -
[195] - Quote
Top priority! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=405599
Lets address this #team!
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Skilo
Higher Than Everest Black Legion.
6
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 21:45:58 -
[196] - Quote
+1 for a good CSM candidate |
Firefox4312 Yatolila
Nex Exercitus Northern Coalition.
68
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 22:33:31 -
[197] - Quote
Dutch are #1
+1 |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
134
|
Posted - 2015.02.23 06:34:12 -
[198] - Quote
New Idea: Security status rework
Every region gets a pool of Security (based on size and distance from empire). If you rat then the security status of a system goes up (to 0.0). But systems that you are not using get less secure, making them more valuable over time. This will mean that you have to move around in order to make the most money.
This will make space more valuable and it would attack cloaky camping, seeing that they cant sit in one spot anymore. it would also stimulate to make alliance more logistical and it would encourage an alliance to fully use their region. This will drive content which is always a good thing
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3886
|
Posted - 2015.02.23 08:09:15 -
[199] - Quote
"Hey guys, we want people to be actually out and using their space, so let's punish them for being out and using their space."
This idea isn't anything new and has never actually been good.
So throw out the bad idea and step back. What's the goal, what's the reasoning? People should be rewarded for being out and using their space, but there should be "content". What's "content" mean here? PvP, of course. That's what it always means in this context, right?
So movement is good, because movement means taking gates, and you're never quite sure what's on the other side of the gate. Or you are, because your pals are out, flying around, skirmishing with intruders and providing you with intel. Either way, movement good. But degrading the quality of a system to induce movement, that's bad. So what to do? Implement missions, perhaps. Simple answer, boring answer, but it gets the job done.
No reason it has to be exactly missions of course. Residents install an Alliance Command Hub in each system which, among other things, directs pilots to newly discovered pirate incursions. "Sorry pilot, the Serpentis have withdrawn from the system to lick their wounds, but they've launched a new incursion two systems away. I've added a bookmark to your journal; good luck." Get there, wipe out your very own incursion - two Serpentis Forsaken Hub and a Serpentis Haven - and you've beaten them back, have to go somewhere else.
Of course because this is a game and because we want to maintain a fairly high population density (as people with friends nearby are more likely to group up and fight back instead of just hide) the fact that the system is depleted for you doesn't necessarily mean it's depleted for a corpmate. He shows up twenty minutes later and has two or three sites to himself, as does the next fellow ten minutes after that and so on. Thus infinite PvE content for an arbitrary number of people to be able to live in an area, yet content that obliges those people to move around and be content.
And this is part of the function of the CSM. We're not game designers, no, but when CCP comes to you and goes "What do you think of _______, it's supposed to accomplish _______" tackle it objectively, think like the player you are, and imagine how it might be broken, might fail because we players do the damndest things.
Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
135
|
Posted - 2015.02.23 11:53:57 -
[200] - Quote
I know how the csm works just trying to give people an idea to think about / discuss
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
135
|
Posted - 2015.02.24 21:31:24 -
[201] - Quote
My suggested ballot will likely go up tomorrow at Evenews24.com
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Aimel
Parental Control
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 09:24:29 -
[202] - Quote
RIP
also : +1 for bobmon |
Malcolm Otsolen
F---ing Nublets Bad Intention
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 11:28:10 -
[203] - Quote
Not voting for anything PL since I heard excessive use of racial epithet on Twitch Streams by PL leadership. |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
135
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 11:32:08 -
[204] - Quote
VOTE FOR BOBMON! https://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/vote
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Tara Read
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
818
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 19:04:48 -
[205] - Quote
Bobmon wrote:THE BELLOW CONCEPTS ARE JUST IDEA's Based on either CCP Idea's or Player feedback! Concept #1 ''Hardcore Player Mode'' CCP Rise talked about this a few weeks back and it got me interested. I did some thinking, and I liked the idea to have a ''special alt'' who is badass at doing pvp related stuff. Hardcore player mode in my opinion should be based on the pirate faction lines, This would work because it would back up the fact that your char can always be shot, even in highsec by all other players. This char is special because once you ''unlock'' it you get a certain amount of SP that you can use on ALMOST ALL PVP RELATED SKILLS.. With ''almost all'' I mean that I want to exclude every skill that doesn't require you to actually pvp in your ship such as: - no cloak and cloak related ships (bombers, probers) - no station skills - no poss related skills (only anchor maybe) These pirate faction chars would only have the capability to fly their own pirate race ships (maybe all pirate ships, haven't decided yet) because they created these themselves to fight off their enemies. The effect of them self designing their ships might result in a small extra bonus but again, not sure on this yet. Pirate Chars won't have access to WH space because their focus is to fight their true enemy, The big four factions. Fleet wise I want these chars to basically be solo ''roaming'' ácross new Eden but I do think that they should be able to group up with other pirates of their faction but this might result in them getting some drawbacks at forming fleets or whatever. Pirate Chars should basically force a player to be on top of their game or they get killed Pirates can maybe even make isk through killing people that do militia related stuff, and I would love them to be these little pricks who cause a lot of chaos everywhere their go. #3 LowsecMake lowsec better for new alliances and Players to get into pvp so that they have a place to grow (more on this in this you can find here)
I think if i may be frank in my response that these two bullet points are the main reasons why I will not be voting for you in the CSM. I'll outline my counter reasons below:
1. "Hardcore Mode". While I admire that you think Pirates in Eve are "hardcore" I find the concept of alts skipping training and other foundation based skills for the sole purpose of having a "max level" alt is utterly ridiculous. Eve is full of alts. I myself have six accounts for various uses and I'm sure you being in PL have members that have dozens of alt accounts.
Putting alts in a position of "niche" maxed pvp skilled factions for the sole purpose of getting into pvp quicker in theory is okay but when looked at in Eve's current playstyle of having multiple accounts and characters is rather dangerous and unreasonable. Various entities would just train alts and place them in whatever Pirate Faction gave the best bonus for the current meta to support whatever doctrines were niche at the time.
Furthermore, the concept of locking out players of certain areas like WH's not only neuters WH's usefulness post Phoebe for travel and fleet placement, but limits the concept of the sandbox as a whole. Pirates already become locked out of High Sec due to Security Status. Further restricting players based upon "lore" or rather your loose concept of what lore should be in Eve is rather damaging to an already dying playstyle.
Which leads me to my next point:
2. Lowsec.
Your concept of low Sec being a "training ground" for a bunch of F1 pressing tidi fests is not only laughable, but is frankly insulting to those of us who live in low Sec for the very fights you claim Low Sec is to "train" people towards in Null. Null is not the end all nor is it the be all of Eve.
There are many players who flock to Low Sec to get away from the very grinds and blobs that you claim is the "Endgame" of Eve Online. Not only do I disagree with this ignorant concept but I find it rather amusing how Low Sec is so lightly thrown aside to only focus upon what makes YOUR game playable for your specific niche.
Indeed why wouldn't we get rid of post Phoebe changes to jump fatigue and give players streamlined combat alts? With your proposed reduction of nerfs to jump fatigue there would be no use for WH's and it would once again align entities who depended upon non fatigue timers and high SP characters with being back on top of the proverbial food chain.
Which leads be to my conclusion:
1. There are already Pirates in Low Sec (hi! *waves*)
2. Using Low Sec as a watered down region where players dip their toes in for very little to skitter off to Null is baseless and frankly insulting not only to those who thrive upon small gang PVP, but feel very strongly of improving and making Low Sec and Piracy a viable and fun place.
3. Post Phoebe changes are staying because it defangs entities who forgot to use Stargates and trying to undo them is laughable.
Until you actually approach people as a CSM candidate and try to learn their playstyle don't go throwing out ignorant concepts as the "best" solution or idea. it makes you look bad.
Visit my blog for all the latest in jeers and tears as well as news at http://hoistthecolors.org
|
weboide
The Cult of Personality DARKNESS.
14
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 18:35:24 -
[206] - Quote
Malcolm Otsolen wrote:Not voting for anything PL since I heard excessive use of racial epithet on Twitch Streams by PL leadership. That's like calling an white Australian cop racist coz a white American cop beat up a black guy. Just because they look the same, wear the same clothes and do the same job doesn't mean they're the same.
Everyone has an individual personality, maybe you should give them a chance? Or maybe just keep calling people out as racists because that's a lot of easier than providing legitimate reasons to dislike them
You can't go Bob-wrong with Bobmon
BOBMON FOR CSM
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=388887
|
SilentAsTheGrave
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
7
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 22:08:23 -
[207] - Quote
Malcolm Otsolen wrote:Not voting for anything PL since I heard excessive use of racial epithet on Twitch Streams by PL leadership. Do you have a link? I'm curious to see how bad this is.
Either way, not voting for Bobman or anyone else dragging their blocs agenda around trying to get on the CSM. I want to actual healthy change. |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
137
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 09:21:30 -
[208] - Quote
Im hyped! Can't wait to see the results!
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
137
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 12:45:36 -
[209] - Quote
CCP Leeloo: UPD: 23792 votes last year and 27304 this year! YOU STILL HAVE A CHANCE TO VOTE http://goo.gl/6TcUZ1 #CSMX #CSM10 #tweetfleet #eveonline
Woot Woot! Cant wait to see the results!
GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Sister Night
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 18:39:49 -
[210] - Quote
Sorry cant vote for you
1. You dont have the well being of Eve as a agenda, only your bit 2. Be capable of growing chest hair first :P |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |