Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Karl Jerr
Herzack Unit
90
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 19:24:27 -
[91] - Quote
yup and +1 |
Dave Korhal
Kite Co. Space Trucking Brave Collective
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.18 00:01:15 -
[92] - Quote
What features would you like to add to the way Standings currently work?
Matt "Diplomatic Incident" Arcanth: "Miners are the spawn of Satan. If any of you mine, I will AWOX you."
Vikkiman: "What about Dave?"
Matt: "Dave gets a pass. He's batshit insane."
|
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
942
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 06:51:28 -
[93] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote: I like what you are saying and I completely agree. If elected would you pursue this platform within CSM X? Is there anyone within the previous CSM which you would see yourself working with on the subject?
I plan to continue to push the subject and suggest it as a wonderful idea that everyone should love as much as I do. Within the CSM, as with all ideas and topics it is open to collaboration and opinion by anyone who wishes to join in. I like owning ideas but I am not going to live in a void with a project. With there being so many different play styles on the CSM there would be many angles beyond my own personal knowledge cases that would apply.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2332
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 18:18:44 -
[94] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote:I don't think anyone deserves another seat in the CSM as much as Sugar Kyle.
I wanted to know your thoughts on combat boosters and if you had any ideas on how to improve them. Would you be willing to have CCP take another look at them or do you feel they're mostly fine as they are? Boosters are not fine as is. I like their concepts. But they are are an abandoned, neglected project that received a mild touch up in Apocrypha. The general idea is fantastic. I love the idea of making choices and fine tuning not just your ship but your pilot to your situationGÇÖs needs. There are implants that do this to some extent. However, the temporary nature of boosters makes them their own viable series of choices. But they need to be revisited and updated. Contraband was introduced but smuggling never reached its potential. Instead, itGÇÖs handicapped the market for boosters and caused them to be an inconvenience in a game where we maintain assets across multiple regions and sectors of space. Ether the restrictions need to go or smuggling, a completely untapped zone, needs to be brought into the current game. We need more booster types. I think that fine details would be fine. The idea of the explorer selecting a mix to help him hack into systems better at the loss of other sensory feedback is an interesting one. Let them potentially harm themselves trying to string out to the max. Increase and decrease risks based upon the choices the pilot makes and the skill training they have put into it. It opens up more gas potential in player consumption, acquisition, industry, and marketing. Currently the role of combat boosters in the game feels as if it was only the first or second step to a much larger project that was never finished. I like what you are saying and I completely agree. If elected would you pursue this platform within CSM X? Is there anyone within the previous CSM which you would see yourself working with on the subject?
for the record? I like this idea as well
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
980
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 22:29:08 -
[95] - Quote
You have my vote. I especially like the way you describe your EvE in your character bio. You demonstrate a rich and mindful understanding of how things work here.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
944
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 23:26:42 -
[96] - Quote
Dave Korhal wrote:What features would you like to add to the way Standings currently work?
There are several common complaints about standings that have been brought to me. One is the slow method of repairing standings from a negative standpoint. This topic was discussed during the Summit Summit and no resolution came of it yet. The idea is that healing negative standings should become more flexible and more productive. Please understand that any time I speak of any type of standings repair it never, ever goes above zero. There are tools in high sec where you can turn in tags for instance for a standings buff but those agents are tucked deep in high sec space where negative standing pilots would have to deal with the faction police while trying to repair them. Much of this discussion comes from players who have decided to leave faction warfare and their repair comes at a long series of level one missions.
It makes me ask questions. Is our current mission system the best? Do people have to go through a series of level 1 missions to get to level 2 missions or should it be a choice? If people could grind their standings back with level 4 and 5 agents instead of level one agents would it be a better solution? It is a topic IGÇÖd want to sit back and engage in a broad spectrum of players with. It needs to be more graceful. When players walk away from a game mechanic and give up a chunk of the game they want to play rather than endure it I think it needs to be looked at and a way to make that better found.
The other idea is doing more for those with positive standings. There are bonuses but why not more for those who keep them up? More reasons and options to try to maintain high standings for those that do. It is a mechanic that I believe needs to be looked at. It needs to be a bit more clear and the information for gains and losses more obvious to the player.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2764
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 17:00:07 -
[97] - Quote
+1 Sugar Kyle. I can confirm, from personal experience, that she listens to the player base and transmits our feedback and suggestions to CCP.
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1811
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 18:59:30 -
[98] - Quote
I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Sugar?
F
Would you like to know more?
|
voetius
Quiet Days in Clichy
335
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 22:50:03 -
[99] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Sugar?
F
As someone said in another campaign thread, it's not that simple. I've murdered people in an instalocking HIC in low sec gate camps and in that sense I was driving conflict. I also got killed doing that when the bigger fish arrived, so still driving conflict. If I was able to do that with impunity on the Jita 4-4 undock it would drive conflict but not necessarily be good for the game. |
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
945
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 23:20:49 -
[100] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Sugar?
F
I cannot answer yes or no and you do not want any other words about it.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
|
Dave Korhal
Kite Co. Space Trucking Brave Collective
13
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 23:50:50 -
[101] - Quote
voetius wrote:As someone said in another campaign thread, it's not that simple. I've murdered people in an instalocking HIC in low sec gate camps and in that sense I was driving conflict. I also got killed doing that when the bigger fish arrived, so still driving conflict. If I was able to do that with impunity on the Jita 4-4 undock it would drive conflict but not necessarily be good for the game.
That reminds me of an experience I had in a small scifi PvP MUD years ago.
New players started on Earth. In order to do anything, you had to launch off Earth and travel to other planets. However, the moment you reached Earth orbit a camping battleship immediately blew up your ship. I tried several times over the next few days to leave, including pooling my money with other players to buy a better ship, and got blown up every time. Checking the game's forums, I wasn't the only one with this problem; apparently the player(s) spent 10+ hours every day just camping Earth orbit and blowing up new players trying to leave just for the lulz. The game's developers said the game was working-as-intended and that they wouldn't act against the camper. The popular theory among the forum populace was the camper was close friends with the developers. I quit a few days later and moved on to greener pastures.
There was plenty of conflict there; it was just horrendously one-sided and caught new players in a Catch-22 loop of needing a more expensive ship to leave Earth, but being unable to make money without leaving Earth.
Not all conflict is the same. There are certain types of conflict we want to encourage, and other types of conflict we want to avoid like the plague. In addition, there needs to be downtimes between conflict, an ebb and flow between conflict and peace, etc. If, for example, all of NullSec was locked into sov war and fighting over timers every day, there would be obscene burnout amongst the NullSec coalitions.
Dave Korhal for CSM 10
Matt: "Mining is the devil's work. If any of you mine, I will AWOX you."
Vikkiman: "What about Dave?"
Matt: "Dave gets a pass; he's batshit insane."
|
Sylphy
TSOE Po1ice TSOE Consortium
66
|
Posted - 2015.01.22 09:19:02 -
[102] - Quote
Nice work on the so-far released minutes of Winter Summit.
Go Kyle.
The character does not represent the views/opinions of its Corporation or Alliance.
|
Kiryen O'Bannon
Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans
180
|
Posted - 2015.01.26 04:25:51 -
[103] - Quote
+1 from me! |
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
951
|
Posted - 2015.02.04 01:39:40 -
[104] - Quote
Thank you for the support everyone. Special thanks to those who have worked so hard to help bring the election and candidates to the player base at large. The amount of time and effort you are putting into this is absolutely amazing.
My application is officially submitted for CSMX. I'll see everyone at the poles.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
Vulfen
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
166
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 15:43:28 -
[105] - Quote
It nice to see you running again sugar. You have my vote. |
Saska Samar
Jebediah Kerman's Junkyard and Spaceship Parts Co. Brave Collective
7
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 02:55:09 -
[106] - Quote
I actually came here to read the Sky thread, however once done laughing I spotted this thread.
+1, like, endorse and whatever else I can do to approve this person for CSM X.
The game needs more people like Sugar and everything I've read this year says you should be #1 on everyones list (well not mine as I have to vote for HERO people but certainly in top 3 ) |
Bellak Hark
New Eden Media Organization
14
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 22:56:31 -
[107] - Quote
A campaign ad for Suger Kyle.
She Has my vote. |
Kim Lesley Hartman
Hartman Ornamental Confectionery and Pies The 20 Minuters
23
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 22:31:16 -
[108] - Quote
Definitely voting for Sugar (again) this year. I love that she is passionate about EVE and that she treats everybody equally and is always willing to hear all sides. |
Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
419
|
Posted - 2015.02.14 18:23:34 -
[109] - Quote
+1 for Sugar. If I could I would clone her and vote for both of them. |
FireFrenzy
Satan's Unicorns
220
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 19:52:17 -
[110] - Quote
So i just asked Corbexx for a "in 10 seconds or less who'd you like to work with next year the most" and Your name came up...
And thats good enough to get you a place on my balot for me:) |
|
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
962
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 01:37:39 -
[111] - Quote
FireFrenzy wrote:So i just asked Corbexx for a "in 10 seconds or less who'd you like to work with next year the most" and Your name came up...
And thats good enough to get you a place on my balot for me:)
He is my ten seconds or less answer as well. He has been a great partner this year and we work amazingly well together.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
Rhavas
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
388
|
Posted - 2015.02.23 03:30:35 -
[112] - Quote
After researching all of the 77 candidates, Sugar Kyle is one of only nine to earn a full endorsement from me. She's on my list and she should be on yours.
https://interstellarprivateer.wordpress.com/2015/02/22/csm-x-full-endorsements/
Author of Interstellar Privateer
Shattered Planets, Wormholes and Game Commentary
|
Soul-on-Ice
Doughboys Snuffed Out
49
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 07:23:27 -
[113] - Quote
She has my vote and she should have yours too... I will tell you why.
Recently she took the time to speak to me 1 on 1 on coms.
She logged in a Roqual to make clones for me and 2 alts.
The whole time she was cool, kind and patient.
If you are miner she told me her "favorite ship is a Roqual."
If you are a pvper, she is a passionate defender of a pvpers interests.
Please give her your vote, she deserves it, and we deserve someone like her representing us to CCP. |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Cynosural Field Theory.
1531
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 11:15:10 -
[114] - Quote
+4
low sec representative of my heart (unless someone more arousing steps up)
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|
Arkady Vachon
Intaki Technical Services Combine
919
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 12:11:25 -
[115] - Quote
Threw you some vote love.
Nothing Personal - Just Business...
Chaos Creates Content
|
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
1960
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 13:14:26 -
[116] - Quote
The following is an excerpt of my endorsements for CSMX:
Quote:Sugar Kyle has near single-handedly proved that CSM representatives can constantly and openly communicate with the playerbase, keeping them informed in a manner that would allow for understanding a feedback, while then taking the time to receive that feedback. She has, along with Corbexx and couple others, maintained some of the best transparency possible by any CSM delegation. Sugar is smart, articulate, and driven as a person, which allows her to capitalize on the opportunities she finds while serving on the CSM. If you aren't a wormholer, she should most assuredly be your #1 vote! If you are a wormholer, I would encourage you to place her as your #2, as she has worked hand-in-hand with Corbexx over the last year and shown that although they have different experience and individually represent different playstyles, they manage to accomplish a tremendously great deal serving on the same delegation. The rest of the article/list is found here. Best of luck, Sugar!
Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare
E-mail: [email protected]
My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/
The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
|
Belinda HwaFang
Coreli Corporation The Kadeshi
41
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 14:53:33 -
[117] - Quote
Hello Sugar,
I would like FW to be changed so that allegiance to a faction wasn't (for most people) merely an incentive to just choose the Faction based on LP Stores and ISK per hour.
Perhaps open up special cosmetic items (medals, ribbons, ship skins) or something else that could not be traded, or perhaps a deeper involvement in the story through certain scripted NPC events or Billboard adverts or other ways to engage a veteran of a particular FW faction. You probably have better ideas already, after all, I don't spend much time in losec these days.
And could we please please have pirate factions in the FW system?
I would like to hear your thoughts on my suggestions and if these topics have ever reached CSM airtime recently? (I do try to skim read the CSM minutes but I am less than thorough perhaps).
-- Fang
|
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
984
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 19:40:45 -
[118] - Quote
Don't forget, my Rorqual which has the Ore edition skin is named 'Buttered Scone'.
Belinda,
I want FW to be more than where and who has the best LP. There are a lot of rules and restrictions that a FW pilot takes on to battle for their militia. I've pushed for and continued to push for more depth in the war zone, more lore and dynamic changes from the war zone.
I'd love pirates moving more into non FW low sec but I don't think just making FW with pirate militas would be that exciting game play. Having players able to align themselves with pirate factions for other interesting reasons, rewards, and hard decisions would be fantastic and start adding more to the nature of things. I like piracy as a player and piracy as a game expander.
And yes, there are whole files and conversations in the CSM forums/confluence pages about FW. I've been going to members and gathering all of that up. From the winter minutes we've had an uptick in FW which is a good thing to see. There are many things on my plate for this such as a look over the missions, LP, and PvP reward systems to name a few.
Member of CSM9 - CSM9 Weekly Updates
Running for CSMX - ReElect Sugar Kyle
Low Sec Lifestyle - An Eve Blog
@Sugar_Kyle
|
Curieux Bizarre
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 21:58:38 -
[119] - Quote
Great platform. I'm curious what your thoughts are on current highsec wardec mechanics and if you feel there are any issues that which need to be addressed? |
Belinda HwaFang
Coreli Corporation The Kadeshi
43
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 22:53:27 -
[120] - Quote
Thank you for the detailed answers, good luck in the elections. -- Fang |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |