Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tyrant Scorn
184
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 12:50:59 -
[121] - Quote
Our latest episode of the Legacy Of A Capsuleer podcast is out: http://mp3.legacyofacapsuleer.com/mp3/LOAC_ep_15.mp3
We had Mike as our guest... Enjoy !!
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
Ashterothi
The Order of Thelemic Ascension
212
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 19:50:04 -
[122] - Quote
I look forward to working with you ;-)
Ashterothi for CSM 10!
|
Dave Korhal
Kite Co. Space Trucking Brave Collective
21
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 05:02:18 -
[123] - Quote
1. What are the 3 most important lessons about EVE newbros should be taught within their first 3 days of playing?
2. Do you want to change the location of the starting systems? If so, where would you put them instead? Closer to LowSec & NullSec? Cordoned off in an isolated space?
3. Should Mining Ships and Industrials have more offensive power?
Dave Korhal for CSM 10
Matt: "Mining is the devil's work. If any of you mine, I will AWOX you."
Vikkiman: "What about Dave?"
Matt: "Dave gets a pass; he's batshit insane."
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2393
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 05:33:53 -
[124] - Quote
Dave Korhal wrote:1. What are the 3 most important lessons about EVE newbros should be taught within their first 3 days of playing?
2. Do you want to change the location of the starting systems? If so, where would you put them instead? Closer to LowSec & NullSec? Cordoned off in an isolated space?
3. Should Mining Ships and Industrials have more offensive power?
Ooh, I like these questions.
1) about eve? Basic mechanics, communications with other players, more of the choices than just mine or mission
2) I can see an argument for putting them on the perimeter of high sec, to give them the option temptation but I don't think I would actively push for a map shift at this point.
3) I loved battle badgers and the idea of an offensive miner appeals to me but only if the offence comes at the cost of mining efficiency. Remember the mining Rohk?
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Dave Korhal
Kite Co. Space Trucking Brave Collective
22
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 14:20:22 -
[125] - Quote
For the lessons, I meant something more philosophical, like "Don't fly what you can't afford to lose", "expect to die a lot", and "better to have many cheap ships than one expensive ship".
As for the mining, I don't remember the mining Rokh. I think mining barges are in a good place offense-wise, with the Procurer being a tough nut to crack. It's the Industrial haulers I'm concerned about, as the T1s can often be blown up by a single T1 frigate. This can be a problem in NullSec.
It feels like the intention was for Industrials to have escorts, but in practice 90% of them travel by themselves and have to avoid every fight. Perhaps a more expensive faction version of the haulers that could hold its own against 1-2 frigates? My main concern is whether that's dissuade newbros from attacking haulers more often, but it might also encourage them to group up and socialize to take them down.
Although that brings up another question: do you think increased difficulty encourages players to group together? Does it need a little nudge to get players grouping? Or do you think players group up for other reasons entirely?
Dave Korhal for CSM 10
Matt: "Mining is the devil's work. If any of you mine, I will AWOX you."
Vikkiman: "What about Dave?"
Matt: "Dave gets a pass; he's batshit insane."
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2400
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 19:08:22 -
[126] - Quote
Dave Korhal wrote: that brings up another question: do you think increased difficulty encourages players to group together? Does it need a little nudge to get players grouping? Or do you think players group up for other reasons entirely?
Ever tried Dagan at the end of the sisters arc?
Yeah I think that we need more of that sort of mission that drives people to cooperate. It could be made optional so the people who really want to fly alone, could. There is a fine line between encouraging and forcing and I want to see us stay on the right side of that line.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Ashterothi
The Order of Thelemic Ascension
219
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 19:13:21 -
[127] - Quote
Right now one could argue a fair chunk of the PvE risk in groups is other players, for obvious reasons. Would you advocate group PvE content that protected the group from PvP disruption, but have very low rewards to allow groups to practice mechanics and learn the game?
Follow up, with the change in corp FF mode, would you advocate a "holo room" which is effectively Sisi on Tranq where players can fight each other in a simulation for training and tournaments?
Ashterothi for CSM 10 #AshYC117!
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2298
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 20:28:06 -
[128] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Yeah I think that we need more of that sort of mission that drives people to cooperate. It could be made optional so the people who really want to fly alone, could. There is a fine line between encouraging and forcing and I want to see us stay on the right side of that line.
m I've always felt that designing PVE to act such that a good group of two partnering together is much more than twice as strong as each individually, so that their combined efforts multiply rather than divide. Do you see such things as encouraging? Like, for instance, if a mission pitted you against a bunch of frigates and cruisers all at once, but if you go in with a frigate and a cruiser each NPC will go after the target of their size, allowing you to split up the incoming fire as well as having NPCs go toward the player that can better fight them. Is that like what you mean?
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle, Corbexx, Jenshae Chiroptera
|
Dave Korhal
Kite Co. Space Trucking Brave Collective
25
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 21:02:30 -
[129] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Dave Korhal wrote: that brings up another question: do you think increased difficulty encourages players to group together? Does it need a little nudge to get players grouping? Or do you think players group up for other reasons entirely? Ever tried Dagan at the end of the sisters arc?
Actually, no I didn't. I bolted for NullSec after completing half the tutorials because they were taking too long and covering stuff I felt I could figure out on my own, and I avoided doing the Sisters arc after that because I heard there were plenty of griefers that camped the sites on that mission arc to kill newbros.
Dave Korhal for CSM 10
Matt: "Mining is the devil's work. If any of you mine, I will AWOX you."
Vikkiman: "What about Dave?"
Matt: "Dave gets a pass; he's batshit insane."
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2404
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 01:41:23 -
[130] - Quote
Ashterothi wrote:Right now one could argue a fair chunk of the PvE risk in groups is other players, for obvious reasons. Would you advocate group PvE content that protected the group from PvP disruption, but have very low rewards to allow groups to practice mechanics and learn the game?
I'd argue that damn near all of the danger in PvE comes from other players. But I would not argue for too much more protection because that ill prepares them for the big beyond. See that is where the concept of balance comes in. I object to guys greening their killboard by blapping people less than three weeks old but then I also object to giving protection to people making stupid mistakes like rushing into a ship they are not ready for only to lose it to the aforementioned 'l33t pvp3rs'. So darwinism is maybe the answer but with a little help.
I wan tfocus on keeping new players but not at the cost of losing the basic essence of the game which I presume was what brought them here in the first place.
Ashterothi wrote:Follow up, with the change in corp FF mode, would you advocate a "holo room" which is effectively Sisi on Tranq where players can fight each other in a simulation for training and tournaments?
No
That is what Sisi is. I have said before that I like them to have some 'skin in the game' and so losses on TQ should be real.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
|
Gynax Gallenor
Conquering Darkness
12
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 11:23:20 -
[131] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Protovarious wrote:
(Just not like 20 years of something. I don't wanna fit the bill for your CCP retirement)
d
OK but if I do 10 years will I get a sword? A letter opener even? m
Don't know about any of the above, but I'd be willing to give you a nice, shiny new ISK if you get that far. :)
Fly Reckless, cos flying safe is no damn fun!
http://flyreckless.com/newsite/
|
XeX Znndstrup
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 18:26:36 -
[132] - Quote
Why such a big bounty on your head ?
"Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light". John Milton, Lost Paradise.
Assassins will be punished by The Law. May their souls be cleansed by retaliatory fire and bounties prosecutions.
_The Law_channel
|
Ko-Reen Machu'dog
Perkone Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 18:51:29 -
[133] - Quote
the current csm has achieved nothing other than further entrenching broken and unbalanced gameplay thanks to it being an echo chamber of uninformed opinions, so why should anyone vote you in again? |
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2416
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 19:45:19 -
[134] - Quote
XeX Znndstrup wrote:Why such a big bounty on your head ?
From friends and listeners tot eh podcasts I do. I consider the addition to it to be a show of support and sent thank you notes to the people to add to it (I may miss one or two but most have been thanked). Feel free to add to it as well.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2416
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 19:56:45 -
[135] - Quote
Ko-Reen Machu'dog wrote:the current csm has achieved nothing other than further entrenching broken and unbalanced gameplay thanks to it being an echo chamber of uninformed opinions, so why should anyone vote you in again?
An echo chamber of uninformed opinions? I disagree heartily, but then, being uninformed I suppose I would. Which broken and unbalanced game play do you refer to? And how have you evaluated it to be a failure?
I KNOW what the metrics are, I know what actions have been taken and what is proposed for the future. I am the only person with two seasons of CSM under my belt and willing to run again. I am not uninformed, old son, not at all nor are many of my fellow council members but you are welcome to believe what you will of us. Obviously we did not hand you the style of gameplay you wanted or properly nerfed somebody elses so you are angry. I get that.
Achieved nothing? By what measure would you judge us? How could we show you that we HAVE achieved nothing and not totally break the NDA? What would you expect of a CSM, if you could set the standards?
This is not just for Mr. Grumblypants, here. Part of the election is choosing what and who you want. I have set myself out as a conduit and a communicator. As a casual gamer and a highsec fan. Other candidates have set themselves out in other ways, to distinguish themselves from the pack.
There are interviews and campaign threads and articles and vote match . . . all ways to choose the people who will best represent you and be YOUR CSM
If you don't like any of them? Run yourself. Now is the time to get that application in, up until Feb 15th
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
XeX Znndstrup
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 19:58:06 -
[136] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:XeX Znndstrup wrote:Why such a big bounty on your head ? From friends and listeners tot eh podcasts I do. I consider the addition to it to be a show of support and sent thank you notes to the people to add to it (I may miss one or two but most have been thanked). Feel free to add to it as well. m
Well... but you are also like this a nice prey for a lot of unscrupulous pirates. I prefer to express my friendship in another way than making you a target.
"Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light". John Milton, Lost Paradise.
Assassins will be punished by The Law. May their souls be cleansed by retaliatory fire and bounties prosecutions.
_The Law_channel
|
Ashterothi
The Order of Thelemic Ascension
226
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 20:28:41 -
[137] - Quote
It is easy for a incumbent to laud their successes, and hide failures.
Can you give an example where you supported a side on a decision that ended up not being what CCP went for, and that it turned out work out anyways?
In other words. Was there a topic this last year where you fell on the wrong side of history?
Ashterothi for CSM 10 #AshYC117!
|
Ko-Reen Machu'dog
Perkone Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 20:42:08 -
[138] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Ko-Reen Machu'dog wrote:the current csm has achieved nothing other than further entrenching broken and unbalanced gameplay thanks to it being an echo chamber of uninformed opinions, so why should anyone vote you in again? An echo chamber of uninformed opinions? I disagree heartily, but then, being uninformed I suppose I would. Which broken and unbalanced game play do you refer to? And how have you evaluated it to be a failure? I KNOW what the metrics are, I know what actions have been taken and what is proposed for the future. I am the only person with two seasons of CSM under my belt and willing to run again. I am not uninformed, old son, not at all nor are many of my fellow council members but you are welcome to believe what you will of us. Obviously we did not hand you the style of gameplay you wanted or properly nerfed somebody elses so you are angry. I get that. Achieved nothing? By what measure would you judge us? How could we show you that we HAVE achieved nothing and not totally break the NDA? What would you expect of a CSM, if you could set the standards? This is not just for Mr. Grumblypants, here. Part of the election is choosing what and who you want. I have set myself out as a conduit and a communicator. As a casual gamer and a highsec fan. Other candidates have set themselves out in other ways, to distinguish themselves from the pack. There are interviews and campaign threads and articles and vote match . . . all ways to choose the people who will best represent you and be YOUR CSM If you don't like any of them? Run yourself. Now is the time to get that application in, up until Feb 15th m
why would any sane person waste their time campaigning to be part of a group of players that A) has very little impact on anything B) between them manage to have less game knowledge than ccp rise and C) have to go to iceland when ccp feels like they need a PR boost.
I could go through the last set of minutes that were posted to point out specific failings but honestly I'd rather play eve than waste time looking through that trainwreck
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2416
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 21:14:14 -
[139] - Quote
Ashterothi wrote:It is easy for a incumbent to laud their successes, and hide failures.
Can you give an example where you supported a side on a decision that ended up not being what CCP went for, and that it turned out work out anyways?
In other words. Was there a topic this last year where you fell on the wrong side of history?
Top two?
I would still like to see some counter mechanic for cloaking. I fought on multiple fronts for more dynamic PvE content, incursions variance (pirate raids), more missions, smarter AI and I don't feel I had as much success as I wanted.
Biggest frustration? Being remote makes communication and order of magnitude more difficult. There were things I wanted said during various sessions of the winter summit but could not get a word in edgewise or did so via text and was thus not in the minutes.
Damn, that was a good question Ash, you ought to have a podcast and interview folks.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Ashterothi
The Order of Thelemic Ascension
226
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 21:29:55 -
[140] - Quote
I should! Maybe I could call it... Hyper Mobile.
nah... how about Low Speed?
Eh I'll work on it and get back to you.
Ashterothi for CSM 10 #AshYC117!
|
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
7745
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 16:54:05 -
[141] - Quote
Glad to see you running again, Mike.
One of the few that I see getting involved on a daily basis with the player base. Not like most that you never hear from between election campaigns.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
Tyrant Scorn
184
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 18:14:25 -
[142] - Quote
Because you found it necessary to put a knife in my back on another podcast, I will no longer vote for you.
I have supported your campaign on CSM9 and for CSM10 I got you on the show again, and yet you found it necessary to disrespect me, something I never expected from you.
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
ChYph3r
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
154
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 05:31:55 -
[143] - Quote
Tyrant Scorn wrote:Because you found it necessary to put a knife in my back on another podcast, I will no longer vote for you.
I have supported your campaign on CSM9 and for CSM10 I got you on the show again, and yet you found it necessary to disrespect me, something I never expected from you.
Dude (Tyrant Scorn), your such a douche, he was praising me for being a man about a situation that puts your podcast on the list that I run for the community. I did it because my site is for the community as a whole, so I disregarded your arrogance and egocentric attitude and put your podcast on my list. Even though personally, I don't like you. So if your not going to vote for him because he praised me, well your seriously (in the words of the Legend Ernie Harwell) LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGGGGGGGGGGG GONE!
I can easily remove unnamed podcast from the list. If you so wish. I have no problem with that. Just send me an email on my site listed in my signature.
Want to find all the podcasts around EVE Online visit
http://evepodcasts.com
@chyph3r on Twitter
|
Protovarious
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
33
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 06:41:55 -
[144] - Quote
Tyrant Scorn wrote:Because you found it necessary to put a knife in my back on another podcast, I will no longer vote for you.
I have supported your campaign on CSM9 and for CSM10 I got you on the show again, and yet you found it necessary to disrespect me, something I never expected from you.
Firstly, he never named you. Pukin and Harry did.
Second, Mike was giving ChYph3r credit for doing right by the community and giving you media links on his site despite past personal feelings.
Personally, I doubt anyone cares about your "endorsement" any less than my own. But seeing as how your defensive victim complex has reared it's ugly head yet again, you're giving credence to why ChYph3r is, in fact, the bigger man here.
Easier to throw a tantrum than take a minute to comprehend, eh?
Co-host of The Neocom Podcast - http://www.TheNeocom.com
Eve Community Blogger -
The Eve Editorial - http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Proto_Eve
|
FrFrmPukin
Multiplex Gaming The Bastion
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 09:18:36 -
[145] - Quote
PRO TIP (for newbros) To be good at EVE you have to vote for Mike Azariah for CSM, because if you do, his awesomeness will just magically enhance your gameplay. NO JOKING!!! His awesomeness is retroactive as well.
PRO TIP (for veteran players) Voting for Mike Azariah will NOT make you win at EVE, because voting for him actually has the reverse effect. Winning at EVE = not playing the game... duh
PROT TIP (for bitter old vets) HTFU and just vote for Mike Azariah. Your going to do it anyways... you bitter old fork Harri and Chyph3r are going to do it and so should you.
PRO TIP (for all pilots) Mike Azariah IS NOT in the CFC, nor has been been assimilated or emasculated by the CFC as some may have accused him of. His "Magic School Bus" program is legit and is not a scam even though he has a huge bounty placed on him as a gimmick by many of us in the EVE Media. Just recently, Mike Azariah has been wrongly accused of betrayal by a non factor in the EVE Media who is the host of "Legacy Of An A**hole Podcast". That person owes Mike Azariah a formal apology for being incompetent on his fact checking and for letting his personal bias toward another podcast taint his comments towards Mike Azariah.
Lastly, if I wasn't married and I was batting for the home team... I would certainly do Mike Azariah!! However, I am just going to have to settle with voting for him with all my accounts... even the extra accounts that I just renewed in order to vote the CFC block list because my "Dear Leader" has ordered me so. |
FrFrmPukin
Multiplex Gaming The Bastion
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 09:22:54 -
[146] - Quote
^ sorry for dp |
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers Soviet-Union
329
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 00:19:44 -
[147] - Quote
Mike, I tried talking to you in private about the issues between Tyrant and Cypher.
Honestly I tried burying this when I came on board, but it keeps coming up.
I even publicly thanked Cypher for adding LegacyofaCapsuleer.com to his podcast website, even after he called me names for having a different opinion then him.
- Cypher called anyone who is against the isboxer changes "c*ntsWith and bitches"
- Someone on Podside threatened harm to Tyrants family over some stupid eve argument
- On Podside, on a live feed, CCP Seagull was called names I'd rather not repeat.
- Cypher proceeded on 280 to say that Tyrant is a ****** supporter... Really?
- There was about 6 requests that came in before our interview with CCP Manifest asking us to push him to condemn or flat out ban Cypher and anyone else involved for the comment about CCP Seagull. There is a growing call to have CCP police podcasts and blogs because of these statements on Podside. None of us want that.
You said "With them I only stayed for a little while, I've never done that with anyone else."
You commend Cypher for adding LegacyofaCapsuleer.com to his podcast website but don't even attempt to call out all of these other issues, then take a swipe at us?
We brought you on because we liked you as a candidate and a person. However now we feel a bit slighted for reasons I can't really discern.
EVE Online and Multiboxing
Legacy of a Capsuleer Podcast
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2448
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 00:38:27 -
[148] - Quote
I am sorry you guys feel slighted.
I have been listening in and even taking part in the twitch portion of your casts for the last two (Funky and Manifest) as well as the time I was on.
RL precludes me from being able to stay full time for most casts but I do my best with the ones I do show up on.
I feel like a kid caught in the middle of a parents divorce. I don't want to take side and I am willing to work with you both. But each time 'mom and dad' get together things blow up (and not in a good way)
Each podcast is different. Your LoaC has been doing great one guest formats. Podside is a different beast, it is the equivalent of going out with a bunch of Eve folks, getting drunk, and talking about whatever crosses their minds. There are hours that have no Eve in it, others that are finer focus. Just like going to a sports bar for beers. Sometimes you watch the game, other times the waitresses.
I said it before and I'll say it again. I mean no harm, no disrespect. Trust me, if I do want to disrespect you I will make it very clear.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2328
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 17:10:54 -
[149] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:I don't want to take side and I am willing to work with you both. I'm more than willing to take a side here. I'd say in this heated exchange, Mike is clearly the better man.
You guys should take a moment to cool off before posting, and also try communicating with a person about disputes or tension and see if they're willing to work it out before you openly accuse them of anything. Two times out of three, you'll discover it was a misunderstanding and they meant no harm. One time out of three they go out of their way to make reparations. I'd wager Mike would be in that last one out of three, time permitting, and if you had a good case for damages.
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Xander Phoena, Sugar Kyle, Corbexx, Jenshae Chiroptera, Marlona Sky
Highsec reform thread
|
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers Soviet-Union
330
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 17:14:54 -
[150] - Quote
I tried replying from my mobile, but it apparently didnt send.
Mike - no problem, I understand trying to stay out of this fight back and forth (as I have tried doing as well, but I have a vested interest with Tyrant and also he doesnt seem to be the aggressor in this fight from trying to be objective....)
Staying neutral is a tough thing, we just felt a bit slighted by your comment after we supported your candidacy.
Podside has a few people who seem extremely hostile to other media and even to CCP employees (the statements on a live podcast about CCP Seagull are completely unforgivable).
Your a great CSM candidate and you still have our 100% support, sorry this dragged out longer then it should. Please do come onto our show whenever you want, either on Twitch or even on the live audio. Your always welcome.
EVE Online and Multiboxing
Legacy of a Capsuleer Podcast
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |