Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Quacka
Minmatar Mercurialis Inc. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 19:26:00 -
[1351]
support
|
Lusulpher
Dirkistan Raining Doom
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 02:19:00 -
[1352]
Originally by: Eint Truzenzuzex But a DEV from CCP answered the question why they don't change the POS system.
I quote a DEV from my memory:
" No Dev want to touch the large Tower code. "
So basically they have to rewrite a large and challenging part of the code, and lets face it the AGILE , here looks some devblogs in the past, fit not in CCP workflow, bring every bit in small pieces....
greetings
We don't want them to touch the POS("pieces of crap randomly strewn about") code.
We want entirely new code made, you know the coding they showed off to create the customizable, linkable, sexy T3 cruisers*. Each of the OP's modules click together in a unique customization, and have/produce different stats...it's now a reality to deploy a POS like this in the EVE system.**
That's the same train of thought...how much lag does a T3 cruiser cause when rendered/prerendered?
I doubt we care about the implementation problems. Fly/anchor what you can afford to lose.*** CCP can lock Sov, give everyone a week or two to turn them in for points/Kredits, and reimburse with new modules.4*
Also, make sure the new modules can stack vertically, a real lack of vertical ships/objects in EVE. And when are POS fuel pellets coming?
"A man's home, is his castle."- a wise guy.
*Get those guys to do it. **If I get banned, you know who did it. ***Really? I had to say it. 4* Done before. 7 |
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 03:13:00 -
[1353]
This was on a wrong page....
Hi CCP.... this aint going away mates.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 18:56:00 -
[1354]
First page. Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Dr Xophis
|
Posted - 2009.08.05 21:04:00 -
[1355]
This requires as much attention as possible, especially with the planned revamp of sov rules in 0.0
If they give use a new, logical, streamlined system, why not give it a new, logical, streamlined look.
|
Morghaine
Minmatar The Legion of Spoon
|
Posted - 2009.08.07 17:36:00 -
[1356]
Originally by: Lusulpher
Originally by: Eint Truzenzuzex But a DEV from CCP answered the question why they don't change the POS system.
I quote a DEV from my memory:
" No Dev want to touch the large Tower code. "
So basically they have to rewrite a large and challenging part of the code, and lets face it the AGILE , here looks some devblogs in the past, fit not in CCP workflow, bring every bit in small pieces....
greetings
We don't want them to touch the POS("pieces of crap randomly strewn about") code.
We want entirely new code made, you know the coding they showed off to create the customizable, linkable, sexy T3 cruisers*. Each of the OP's modules click together in a unique customization, and have/produce different stats...it's now a reality to deploy a POS like this in the EVE system.**
That's the same train of thought...how much lag does a T3 cruiser cause when rendered/prerendered?
I doubt we care about the implementation problems. Fly/anchor what you can afford to lose.*** CCP can lock Sov, give everyone a week or two to turn them in for points/Kredits, and reimburse with new modules.4*
Also, make sure the new modules can stack vertically, a real lack of vertical ships/objects in EVE. And when are POS fuel pellets coming?
"A man's home, is his castle."- a wise guy.
*Get those guys to do it. **If I get banned, you know who did it. ***Really? I had to say it. 4* Done before.
Gotta say I agree with this. With the upcoming changes to the sov system that have been mentioned for the winter expansion, I would hope we'd start seeing some talk about a rebuild/redesign of the POS system. Something building off the T3 base would be freaking amazing imho, and the T3 team proved it can be done.
It's high time this gets some real attention.
|
Saju Somtaaw
Gallente Kiowa Tribe MagiTech Corp
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 01:02:00 -
[1357]
Edited by: Saju Somtaaw on 08/08/2009 01:03:50
Originally by: Lusulpher
Originally by: Eint Truzenzuzex But a DEV from CCP answered the question why they don't change the POS system.
I quote a DEV from my memory:
" No Dev want to touch the large Tower code. "
So basically they have to rewrite a large and challenging part of the code, and lets face it the AGILE , here looks some devblogs in the past, fit not in CCP workflow, bring every bit in small pieces....
greetings
We don't want them to touch the POS("pieces of crap randomly strewn about") code.
We want entirely new code made, you know the coding they showed off to create the customizable, linkable, sexy T3 cruisers*. Each of the OP's modules click together in a unique customization, and have/produce different stats...it's now a reality to deploy a POS like this in the EVE system.**
That's the same train of thought...how much lag does a T3 cruiser cause when rendered/prerendered?
I doubt we care about the implementation problems. Fly/anchor what you can afford to lose.*** CCP can lock Sov, give everyone a week or two to turn them in for points/Kredits, and reimburse with new modules.4*
Also, make sure the new modules can stack vertically, a real lack of vertical ships/objects in EVE. And when are POS fuel pellets coming?
"A man's home, is his castle."- a wise guy.
*Get those guys to do it. **If I get banned, you know who did it. ***Really? I had to say it. 4* Done before.
Maybe we should start saving those mutant ferriers from that Level I mission? A freighter full hovering over their Office might provide enough motivation to implement this.
edit:for those who don't know/haven't done it some scientist created a bunch of cute cuddly killing machines that could gnaw through the doors in the station. Oh, and did I mention they asked for more food after eating the scientists? ---- --- --- Devs Sign Here; GMs and ISD welcome to :) |
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 16:38:00 -
[1358]
First page.
Support the Dead Horse Pos Thread Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Saurish
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 17:04:00 -
[1359]
Back to top, this is a must.
|
nemississ
Clearly Compensating
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 19:33:00 -
[1360]
GO GO GO DO IT CCP
|
|
Naran Darkmood
Gallente Firman AB 101010 Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.09 16:42:00 -
[1361]
Back to top!
Originally by: Shadowsword
It's a good thing you're not in charge of balance, my stupidometer just exploded at the sight of this thread...
|
Zach 101
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 14:44:00 -
[1362]
TOTAL LOL i put that idea up yesterday except my explination WAS CRAP! 100% support.
Zach (WAKE UP CCP this is the future!)
|
Bael Gar
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 21:01:00 -
[1363]
This topic was on the wrong page
|
Inturist
The Spirit of War RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2009.08.11 00:09:00 -
[1364]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.08.12 01:23:00 -
[1365]
I must admit, last few weeks have been spent supping up my Forester and not playing EVE, hmmm, the usual break time I guess - still this thread was on the wrong page.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.12 20:34:00 -
[1366]
Originally by: Jinx Barker I must admit, last few weeks have been spent supping up my Forester and not playing EVE, hmmm, the usual break time I guess - still this thread was on the wrong page.
Seem to be a lot of junk idea's popping up, that mixed with the no bumping more then once in 24 hrs by a single player make it hard to keep this on the front page. Still, Its the best of the best in idea's for pos's, now if only we could get CCP to agree to do it... Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Lenasha
|
Posted - 2009.08.13 19:16:00 -
[1367]
Originally by: Eint Truzenzuzex But a DEV from CCP answered the question why they don't change the POS system.
I quote a DEV from my memory:
" No Dev want to touch the large Tower code. "
So basically they have to rewrite a large and challenging part of the code, and lets face it the AGILE , here looks some devblogs in the past, fit not in CCP workflow, bring every bit in small pieces....
greetings
Touch it, touch it, touch it, touch it, touch it, touch it... come on we know you want to.
|
BeanBagKing
Ch3mic4l Warfare Gypsy Nation
|
Posted - 2009.08.15 01:53:00 -
[1368]
OMG what's this doing on page 4!
Back up to the top you!
/me prods the thread back to page 1 |
Mattk50
Caldari House Maadiah
|
Posted - 2009.08.15 02:12:00 -
[1369]
FLOG
|
Drakoulia
Caldari The Night Corporation
|
Posted - 2009.08.15 11:42:00 -
[1370]
Originally by: Lusulpher
Originally by: Eint Truzenzuzex But a DEV from CCP answered the question why they don't change the POS system.
I quote a DEV from my memory:
" No Dev want to touch the large Tower code. "
So basically they have to rewrite a large and challenging part of the code, and lets face it the AGILE , here looks some devblogs in the past, fit not in CCP workflow, bring every bit in small pieces....
greetings
We don't want them to touch the POS("pieces of crap randomly strewn about") code.
We want entirely new code made, you know the coding they showed off to create the customizable, linkable, sexy T3 cruisers*. Each of the OP's modules click together in a unique customization, and have/produce different stats...it's now a reality to deploy a POS like this in the EVE system.**
That's the same train of thought...how much lag does a T3 cruiser cause when rendered/prerendered?
I doubt we care about the implementation problems. Fly/anchor what you can afford to lose.*** CCP can lock Sov, give everyone a week or two to turn them in for points/Kredits, and reimburse with new modules.4*
Also, make sure the new modules can stack vertically, a real lack of vertical ships/objects in EVE. And when are POS fuel pellets coming?
"A man's home, is his castle."- a wise guy.
*Get those guys to do it. **If I get banned, you know who did it. ***Really? I had to say it. 4* Done before.
QFT All good points. ---
Originally by: The Mittani Don't touch that! Don't open the refrigerator! The spy is in the refrigerator!
|
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.16 06:03:00 -
[1371]
Saved from page 3
Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Taladool
|
Posted - 2009.08.16 13:54:00 -
[1372]
I like it, I think Ill take it :P
|
Kane Plekkel
We Are The Walrus
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 13:01:00 -
[1373]
:yawn: page 3? really? back to the top with ya!
|
Saju Somtaaw
Gallente Kiowa Tribe MagiTech Corp
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 17:59:00 -
[1374]
I think some of the dust bunnies haven't seen this yet, so lets send it back to the top. ---- --- ---
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&thread |
Yukie Lay
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 19:00:00 -
[1375]
o/ Support for this, although why do people think CCP actualy look at these threads?
|
Yilan Cheran
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:40:00 -
[1376]
Originally by: Yukie Lay o/ Support for this, although why do people think CCP actualy look at these threads?
Oh, they do. Especially this one since the idea is so good. It may be a pretty complex idea to implement though (completely overhauling something that is already in place!)
But! With tech 3 ships, we have modular ships. And something tells me that the devs have at the very least been seriously considering modules for higher tech POS's as well.
(but until they are introduced, let's keep this thread going, we can keep it up for a couple more years if need be ) |
Nikita Alterana
Gallente Clearly Compensating
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 17:31:00 -
[1377]
'
image captured from the Q2 2009 Economic report.
Maybe there is hope for the horses yet. __________________________________________________ I was Amarr before they were the FOTM and I'll be Amarr after it! I'm also training Minmatar Capitals! And I eat Lions! |
Grideris
|
Posted - 2009.08.19 07:17:00 -
[1378]
Seems like this topic again is trying to run away again...
/me puts it back on page 1
I think they should sticky this already! |
Cuteeh
|
Posted - 2009.08.19 09:31:00 -
[1379]
Are you kidding me?? I looked at this thread when I was just a little velator pilot ^^
How could this not have been implemented already? Lucky me for not owning a POS...
/bump
|
Ankheon Lionheart
|
Posted - 2009.08.19 10:44:00 -
[1380]
/bump /bump /bump
The post I made before I saw this...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |