|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maekchu
Gunpoint Diplomacy
598
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 18:03:53 -
[1] - Quote
Funki Ellecon wrote:Lol my post got closed cause its as they say redundant to this one . THIS POST IS NOW ALMOST 2 YEARS HERE AND SOLUTION NOWHERE . Hey CCP are you actually checking this post or you just wanted to put it on one place so you dont have to be bothered by it ? Oh, so your solution/post wasn't a special snow flake after all? :D
On a more serious note, pretty much every argument has been discussed here and finding a solution is really not that easy.
But I think CCP are still planning on that intel gathering structure, which is what people are waiting for. Maybe within the context of the new structure, afk-cloaking isn't a thing. One just gotta be patient. |
Maekchu
Gunpoint Diplomacy
599
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 20:39:56 -
[2] - Quote
Funki Ellecon wrote:Maekchu wrote:Funki Ellecon wrote:Lol my post got closed cause its as they say redundant to this one . THIS POST IS NOW ALMOST 2 YEARS HERE AND SOLUTION NOWHERE . Hey CCP are you actually checking this post or you just wanted to put it on one place so you dont have to be bothered by it ? Oh, so your solution/post wasn't a special snow flake after all? :D On a more serious note, pretty much every argument has been discussed here and finding a solution is really not that easy. But I think CCP are still planning on that intel gathering structure, which is what people are waiting for. Maybe within the context of the new structure, afk-cloaking isn't a thing. One just gotta be patient. It was never supposed to be special . It was supposed to be exactly what it was named . Question to the Developers . Not my fault you started to polute my post . So it's because of me your post got locked? Not because it was just another reiteration of a post that has been posted a gazillion times? :D |
Maekchu
Gunpoint Diplomacy
600
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 22:17:31 -
[3] - Quote
Funki Ellecon wrote: To Maekchu : did i say cause of you my post got locked ? No
You kinda did by stating that I "polluted" your post or at least you insinuated that I degraded the value of your thread by my response.
Your thread was **** from the start. I merely provided you with a different view from yours. |
Maekchu
Gunpoint Diplomacy
600
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 22:52:30 -
[4] - Quote
Funki Ellecon wrote:Probably poor choice of words on my side . Not degraded the post . But i would just prefer if someone from CCP would respond . I am pretty familiar with the standing of the community . There is two camps one who use it one who hates it . i Think my thread wasnt **** . It was just presenting my point of view on the problem . And provided some possible solutions . Aight, I'll retract my statement that your thread was ****, since we are starting to be a bit more civilized. However, it was redundant as you can see by the 419 pages of this threadnaught.
Given that this topic has been discussed to death and no one really knows how to optimally solve this problem with the current mechanics, you shouldn't hope for a direct response from CCP. Their response is basically, the fact that they are working on some form of intel structure.
|
|
|
|