Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
909
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 20:43:42 -
[61] - Quote
Bing Bangboom wrote:Only an idiot or a completely uneducated newbie OR a highsec miner (but I repeat myself) would think its perfectly OK to undock an expensive but untanked ship, siddle up next to an asteroid or ice block in a public space, start the lasers... and then go do the laundry. And yet they do it ALL DAY LONG. Then, to top things off, when they are educated about their bad decision making process they get hostile and refuse to accept that, "What?!? Someone can shoot my ship? GRIEFER!".
Good write. I still do the laundry sometimes though. Depends on how busy the weekend was . But I do make quite some efforts to be safe.
Remove insurance.
This thread is the reason, why CCP should stop advertising any aspect of EVE PvE
|
Skydell
Bad Girl Posse Somethin Awfull Forums
659
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 01:05:15 -
[62] - Quote
Threads about imaginary High Sec miner rage: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
High Sec Miner rage threads: ...
(most being fabricated troll threads by rage mongers) |
45thtiger 0109
AL3XAND3R.
145
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 01:26:56 -
[63] - Quote
Vector Symian wrote:Hello it may shock you but I am a pretty active pilot and I don't care about going A.F.K (away from keyboard)
The reasons are fairly straightforward ...
- It is high sec, filled with the pilots who may not have the free time available to hold down a activity/isk quota for one of the alliances. - We are human and I sometimes need to pee...or watch a Game of Thrones episode. - We pay a subscription this is an allocated amount of time in which we may play as we will, or not if we so choose. - Those who grind for plex are guilty for simply being tight with their money and will never succeed at the game any way as it requires making decisions, and having fun with friends (and making contacts) is one of the most important strategies of the game. - A lot of game styles may require days of waiting to be able to do something with out unnecessary loss. - It has created a whole new style of play, preying on those who happily accept the risk of going afk
on counter point their is no issue with freighter ganking, this is based purely on the massive potential income a ganked freighter may possess
Basically if you can get away with it then by all means
I am wondering is their any reason I may of missed?
please discuss freely
Thankyou for reading
Wow that was a long Bio break surely you had to much beer
**You Have to take the good with the bad
and the bad with the good.
Welcome to EvE OnLiNe**
|
Kaely Tanniss
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
163
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 02:12:23 -
[64] - Quote
Vector Symian wrote:Hello it may shock you but I am a pretty active pilot and I don't care about going A.F.K (away from keyboard)
The reasons are fairly straightforward ...
- It is high sec, filled with the pilots who may not have the free time available to hold down a activity/isk quota for one of the alliances. - We are human and I sometimes need to pee...or watch a Game of Thrones episode. - We pay a subscription this is an allocated amount of time in which we may play as we will, or not if we so choose. - Those who grind for plex are guilty for simply being tight with their money and will never succeed at the game any way as it requires making decisions, and having fun with friends (and making contacts) is one of the most important strategies of the game. - A lot of game styles may require days of waiting to be able to do something with out unnecessary loss. - It has created a whole new style of play, preying on those who happily accept the risk of going afk
on counter point their is no issue with freighter ganking, this is based purely on the massive potential income a ganked freighter may possess
Basically if you can get away with it then by all means
I am wondering is their any reason I may of missed?
please discuss freely
Thankyou for reading
By all means, feel free to afk anytime..it adds content and target practice for other Eve players. Just don't get angry about it. Every choice comes with consequenses, If you choose to afk in space, you accept that your ship may not be there when you get back.
If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
1967
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 05:15:04 -
[65] - Quote
EVE is a multiplayer game in which thousands of players simultaneously act in the sandbox environment. Your subscription fee no more entitles you to be safe than it does entitle other players to cause you to be unsafe. Your sense of entitlement is astounding and you should be ashamed of it.
Just because I don't want to be tackled by 40 police pursuit comets while sitting suspect flagged in a Gnosis on the Tama gate in Nourvukaiken it doesn't mean those comet fleet should be denied their sandbox experience and not be able to shoot at me while I desperately try and explain why this is happening on teamspeak.
It's everyone's sandbox, not your sandbox. |
Kaely Tanniss
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
165
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 06:58:28 -
[66] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:EVE is a multiplayer game in which thousands of players simultaneously act in the sandbox environment. Your subscription fee no more entitles you to be safe than it does entitle other players to cause you to be unsafe. Your sense of entitlement is astounding and you should be ashamed of it.
Just because I don't want to be tackled by 40 police pursuit comets while sitting suspect flagged in a Gnosis on the Tama gate in Nourvukaiken it doesn't mean those comet fleet should be denied their sandbox experience and not be able to shoot at me while I desperately try and explain why this is happening on teamspeak.
It's everyone's sandbox, not your sandbox.
THIS ^^^^^
If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..
|
Jim en Daire
Akatsukii Organization
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 12:54:21 -
[67] - Quote
Well to you CODE Guys. You are right about afk miners and haulers should be punished for AFK, and they have no right to whine, cause that is how the game Works. But the worst part about you guys is this..... When i have my bulkhead and a friend cloaked in my belt, so you fail the gank. You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. "uh you really need that many people to kill me" "haha you were Lucky you had some one with you" "you really need so many drones to kill me?"
YES!!! I enjoy to see you fail a gank, as much as you enjoy to succeed a gank on an AFK miner/hauler. It goes both way, so stop being so holy about your stuff, and be fair when we get you killed too. You CODE guys make my mining more fun and exciting for me :)
Sry for bad englando.. |
Vermillion Thellere
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 13:11:31 -
[68] - Quote
I was mining in hi this morning and someone in a Catalyst starting shooting at me. I typed 'Shoo!' in local and they left the system. Maybe they thought I was AFK? Dunno. Maybe shoo is a CODE word of great power. |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
713
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 16:14:55 -
[69] - Quote
Jim en Daire wrote:Well to you CODE Guys. You are right about afk miners and haulers should be punished for AFK, and they have no right to whine, cause that is how the game Works. But the worst part about you guys is this..... When i have my bulkhead and a friend cloaked in my belt, so you fail the gank. You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. "uh you really need that many people to kill me" "haha you were Lucky you had some one with you" "you really need so many drones to kill me?"
YES!!! I enjoy to see you fail a gank, as much as you enjoy to succeed a gank on an AFK miner/hauler. It goes both way, so stop being so holy about your stuff, and be fair when we get you killed too. You CODE guys make my mining more fun and exciting for me :)
Sry for bad englando.. I can't speak for all my comrades, but if someone manages to protect himself from a gank and I fail I usually congratulate him with a "gf" in local as it is customary after a PvP engagement. I find it's often not the carebear or the ganker who sheds the really big tears, but the fail white-knight or local hero at the side lines who thinks he is a great warrior because he can shoot red crosses in missions and will stop your operation just by showing up in a fail fitted battleship.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
7324
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 16:50:20 -
[70] - Quote
Jim en Daire wrote:You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord..
You are saying that a dedicated High Sec Pirate wont know he will be Concorded and will be upset?
0/10 Please try again
"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway
"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann
|
|
Renegade Heart
Deadly Fingertips
375
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 16:57:03 -
[71] - Quote
To be honest, I don't think half of you even read the OP. You just assumed it was someone raging over something. OP is funny :D
Vector Symian wrote: It has created a whole new style of play, preying on those who happily accept the risk of going afk
Doesn't really seem like tears to me. I agree entirely!
|
Mag's
the united
18687
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 16:59:50 -
[72] - Quote
Ned Thomas wrote:You are perfectly welcome to go afk anywhere and everywhere. Just be ready to accept the consequences of doing so. This.
**Destination SkillQueue:- **
It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|
Jim en Daire
Akatsukii Organization
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 19:37:25 -
[73] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jim en Daire wrote:You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. You are saying that a dedicated High Sec Pirate wont know he will be Concorded and will be upset? 0/10 Please try again
Meh came out wrong sry :P Damn you get upset when you get som critic, it was not meant that way.
But actually i had one last night, who cried about getting blown up by CONCORD before he could kill me lol. Im just saying what im experiencing out in the belts :)
Im not hating, well you got me to play a tanky retriever. I just cant stand to see you yell at miners they cry to much in Local, when some of your people do the same
|
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
7330
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 19:56:01 -
[74] - Quote
Jim en Daire wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Jim en Daire wrote:You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. You are saying that a dedicated High Sec Pirate wont know he will be Concorded and will be upset? 0/10 Please try again Meh came out wrong sry :P Damn you get upset when you get som critic, it was not meant that way. But actually i had one last night, who cried about getting blown up by CONCORD before he could kill me lol. Im just saying what im experiencing out in the belts :)
Really, what did he say? I can't imagine it was more than an outburst of frustration. No more so than when you lose a ship in a mission or your rocks arent as valuable as you had hoped or you miss out on whatever you enjoy.
Jim en Daire wrote:Im not hating, you got me to play a tanky retriever which i pretty okay. I just cant stand to see you yell at miners that they cry to much in Local, when some of your people do the same
I did? I do? I have people?
Sorry friend, I think you have mistaken me for someone else
HOWEVER
There is no such thing as a "tanky retriever"
Retrievers are tincans that explode as soon as they take off.
Bin it.
Get a Proc.
"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway
"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann
|
Jim en Daire
Akatsukii Organization
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 22:00:01 -
[75] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jim en Daire wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Jim en Daire wrote:You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. You are saying that a dedicated High Sec Pirate wont know he will be Concorded and will be upset? 0/10 Please try again Meh came out wrong sry :P Damn you get upset when you get som critic, it was not meant that way. But actually i had one last night, who cried about getting blown up by CONCORD before he could kill me lol. Im just saying what im experiencing out in the belts :) Really, what did he say? I can't imagine it was more than an outburst of frustration. No more so than when you lose a ship in a mission or your rocks arent as valuable as you had hoped or you miss out on whatever you enjoy. Jim en Daire wrote:Im not hating, you got me to play a tanky retriever which i pretty okay. I just cant stand to see you yell at miners that they cry to much in Local, when some of your people do the same I did? I do? I have people? Sorry friend, I think you have mistaken me for someone else HOWEVER There is no such thing as a "tanky retriever" Retrievers are tincans that explode as soon as they take off. Bin it. Get a Proc.
Yea he said i was Lucky that CONCORD showed up... Like they shouldnt had or something lol we was going back an forth a while before he went offline lol..
And no not You as a person you as CODE pilots or you as you gankers you know :)
Well we can agree that the "tanky" version of a retriever is fitted with defensive modules. Since i've got this fit, no one of you CODE guys have suceeded. You can come visit me in Balle, and take the challenge. :)
Ofcause i cant tank a tech 2 frig or something way out of my League, but typical ship you gankers use, is no problem :)
But as i said i dont mind you gankers look by, you make my mining more fun. |
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
107
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 22:36:55 -
[76] - Quote
Tisiphone Dira wrote:Why sinning is not fine in highsec:
The wages of sin is death.
Some 'wise' men may tell you to ignore the commandments of the code, to do as you please. Such 'wisdom' comes not from above, but is instead earthly, unspiritual and demonic.
if you need to pee and don't want to dock up, fine! The New Order has a protocol for that, simply ask the Supreme Protector or one of his agents for permission first. Otherwise, don't go afk. The reasons are enumerated in the code. For further reading you could start with the manifesto I and manifesto II.
Alas my mining alt has a mind of its own and doesn't believe in the two bit evangelical manifesto presented by the code. it believes in the "clearing the path for the true lord, so that his path is unheeded". It tends to laugh at the code adherents, brain washed without minds of their own...or so i tell it |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6523
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 22:39:45 -
[77] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jim en Daire wrote:You have no right to whine either.... So many of you whine all over local when you get blown up by my friend or the Concord.. You are saying that a dedicated High Sec Pirate wont know he will be Concorded and will be upset? 0/10 Please try again Wow, they need to gank more.
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
107
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 22:56:54 -
[78] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:this may come as a shock but ccp really has no problem with players "going afk".. it's not against any rules. it's when they try to use external software methods to "bot" their gaming sessions that there is a problem. this isn't even an issue for the intellectually honest. While "going afk" isn't against any rules of CCP, it is definitely against The New Halaima Code of Conduct, a very important rulebook in highsec. Therefore, unless you want to risk an enforcement action from an Agent of the New Order, I would suggest you confine your AFKing to places in New Eden where the Code doesn't apply - like wormhole space or nullsec. But to your main point, I have seen no-one be as intellectually dishonest to suggest that going AFK is against the EULA or anything. In fact, CCP built the 'Autopilot' button into the game, one of the major tools facilitating AFKing and a leading cause of bot-aspirancy. However, that doesn't mean it is not against the rules of certain player groups or organizations. Why AFKers? While I actually believe that putting risk back into highsec makes for a better game for everyone, since Eve is all about conflict and exploding spaceships you don't have to look further than the " gotta nuke something" explanation.
An important rule book? Please i am at work and people will look at me weirdly if i laugh out loud at such a funny idea |
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
107
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 23:05:51 -
[79] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Steppa Musana wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:I think OP may have confused the New Order's in-game playstyle which attempts to punish AFKing in highsec, and (some) anti-gankers metagame style of whining about ganking in the hopes it will be removed from the game.
If gankers operated by the same 'logic' as carebears, they would be on here petitioning CCP to make it impossible to AFK mine without exploding or something, i.e. trying to get a playstyle they dislike removed from the game. Then a post like OP's might have a purpose.
Of course, they don't. Gankers love AFK miners because they provide targets. While requests to "fix" ganking are a dime a dozen, requests to 'fix' mining usually take the form of "I mine and it's too boring". I think the OPs point is that going AFK in high-sec is not always a bad thing as long as you accept the risk. The ganking community loves to ridicule AFK miners like they've done something wrong, when they haven't. They've been AFK like that for months before you killed them. The idiotic thing to do would be to stay ATK all that time because you're afraid of having to write off a loss that amounts to 1% of your total profit. The idiotic thing is if you lose your temper over that 1% loss an say stupid stuff, make RL threads against the gankers or come to the forums and whine to CCP to get the game changed. If you go way back and read the Manifesto and Manifesto II of James 315 you will notice that the real purpose for our crusade is not the AFK miner, but the whiny carebear who tries to change this unique competitive sandbox game into a shadow of itself where he can AFK mine in perfect isolation without interference from other players. Well we also like to just blow up stuff, but who says a crusade shouldn't be fun. It is my believe and that the carebears destruction of EVE can only be stopped if their real agenda is exposed, and that is a great part of what the minerbumping blog is about. It is also about fun and treating eve like a game (which it actually is). It is written in a very obvious self ironic tone, which some people seam to still not understand, this are usually the "rebel leaders", and it's probably no accident that they aren't usually the brightest lights in New Eden.
Well since you asked so nicely, the real agenda of all carebears is a truly insidious, evil and dire one. The agenda that we follow is one which no other self respecting game player would ever lower themselves to do, let alone contemplate.
To put it simply, it is to play the game as we see fit, you know, similar to the way you play this game as you see fit. Yes carebearing must be destroying the game as we know it, we can see that clearly how it has destroyed null.
Cheers,
An evil, demonic carebearing AA
P.S. I could have used any other parts of your email to refute the claim of "not the brightest lights in new eden", but that would have been too easy.
P.P.S Do you guys run a lottery to see who the next lucky soul is who will start the next publicity push for the code? |
Demerius Xenocratus
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 23:27:25 -
[80] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:Provence Tristram wrote:The simple fact is, the very nature of EVE's skill queue precludes anyone doing particularly well in combat for a good 4-6 months. Ironcially, while you sit there AFK-mining because combat characters can't do anything for 4-6 months, you get ganked by a 1 month old combat character.
How does that one month old combat character finance his life of crime?
|
|
Ferni Ka'Nviiou
Republic University Minmatar Republic
271
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 23:33:01 -
[81] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Provence Tristram wrote:The simple fact is, the very nature of EVE's skill queue precludes anyone doing particularly well in combat for a good 4-6 months. Ironcially, while you sit there AFK-mining because combat characters can't do anything for 4-6 months, you get ganked by a 1 month old combat character. How does that one month old combat character finance his life of crime? Not relevant. All Crumplecorn had said was that the SP required to gank someone is little-to-none.
Whether they join up with CODE. and get provided with ships, or fund the ships themselves (not that hard), as I say, it's not relevant. |
Demerius Xenocratus
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 23:58:08 -
[82] - Quote
Ferni Ka'Nviiou wrote:Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Provence Tristram wrote:The simple fact is, the very nature of EVE's skill queue precludes anyone doing particularly well in combat for a good 4-6 months. Ironcially, while you sit there AFK-mining because combat characters can't do anything for 4-6 months, you get ganked by a 1 month old combat character. How does that one month old combat character finance his life of crime? Not relevant. All Crumplecorn had said was that the SP required to gank someone is little-to-none. Whether they join up with CODE. and get provided with ships, or fund the ships themselves (not that hard), as I say, it's not relevant. Does CODE actually reimburse ships? 5M isk thrown away at a time is quite a bit for a new player. And to solo gank anything not a venture requires decent skills and a tech 2 fit. I feel like people sometimes forget that not every new character is someone's 19th alt who can rely on transfers from the 5 year old main's wallet.
|
Kaely Tanniss
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
165
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 01:11:40 -
[83] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Ferni Ka'Nviiou wrote:Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Provence Tristram wrote:The simple fact is, the very nature of EVE's skill queue precludes anyone doing particularly well in combat for a good 4-6 months. Ironcially, while you sit there AFK-mining because combat characters can't do anything for 4-6 months, you get ganked by a 1 month old combat character. How does that one month old combat character finance his life of crime? Not relevant. All Crumplecorn had said was that the SP required to gank someone is little-to-none. Whether they join up with CODE. and get provided with ships, or fund the ships themselves (not that hard), as I say, it's not relevant. Does CODE actually reimburse ships? 5M isk thrown away at a time is quite a bit for a new player. And to solo gank anything not a venture requires decent skills and a tech 2 fit. I feel like people sometimes forget that not every new character is someone's 19th alt who can rely on transfers from the 5 year old main's wallet.
1: Yes, they do reimburse ships. 2: To get into a t2 catalyst with decent skills to gank is less than a month of training, even a t1 cat can be quite effective and you can fit one up for less than 5mil a pop. 3: not every new ganker is an alt. If you gank wisely, a lot of the time it can finance itself.
That being said, though in some ways it's true what you said about not being effective in combat for several months, it is also a fact that sp does not determine a pilot's ability. A 1 year old char can beat a char several years old if he is a better pilot. Skill is the deciding factor, not sp..though sp does balance in your favor if you are wise and skilled enough to exploit it to its fullest. The one thing I love about Eve is the fact that sp doesn't detemine skill, nor does age. If that were the case, no char 10 years old would ever die..and yet it happens all the time.
If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
6068
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 01:17:20 -
[84] - Quote
I gotta fight for time to play this blasted game I'm not going AFK.
More commonly my problem is "DAK". Drunk at keyboard.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
716
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 06:16:00 -
[85] - Quote
Arancar Australis wrote:Well since you asked so nicely, the real agenda of all carebears is a truly insidious, evil and dire one. The agenda that we follow is one which no other self respecting game player would ever lower themselves to do, let alone contemplate. To put it simply, it is to play the game as we see fit, you know, similar to the way you play this game as you see fit. Yes carebearing must be destroying the game as we know it, we can see clearly how it has destroyed null. Cheers, An evil, demonic carebearing AA There would be no problem if you only "play the game as you see fit". But what a lot of you carebears do is to whine on the forums instead and push CCP to change the game in their favour. And yes, I don't think a self respecting gamer would try to change the rule of a game which already favours him greatly and where he pretty much already lives in complete safety if he only cares a little about how the game works. Also a self respecting gamer wouldn't probably use his free time to mine virtual space rocks, but that may just be my own opinion...
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
108
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 06:39:48 -
[86] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Arancar Australis wrote:Well since you asked so nicely, the real agenda of all carebears is a truly insidious, evil and dire one. The agenda that we follow is one which no other self respecting game player would ever lower themselves to do, let alone contemplate. To put it simply, it is to play the game as we see fit, you know, similar to the way you play this game as you see fit. Yes carebearing must be destroying the game as we know it, we can see clearly how it has destroyed null. Cheers, An evil, demonic carebearing AA There would be no problem if you only "play the game as you see fit". But what a lot of you carebears do is to whine on the forums instead and push CCP to change the game in their favour. And yes, I don't think a self respecting gamer would try to change the rule of a game which already favours him greatly and where he pretty much already lives in complete safety if he only cares a little about how the game works. Also a self respecting gamer wouldn't probably use his free time to mine virtual space rocks, but that may just be my own opinion...
A lot of us carebears? lol, sorry that did make me smirk at work, i thank you for that.
Maybe i don't go trolling through all the foum threads, but when i do see a thread from a carebear about making changes, it usually is started by "i was happily mining when the big bad nasty code dude came along and blew up my ship and said it was for my own good". So a bit of cause and effect happening there. If my mining alt loses a ship to a ganker, i just laugh, but they don't get a "gf" in local because it wasn't a fight, fair or unfair.
The main message that i see coming from the code sheep is that this game is about interacting with others and the game...and you know what, i support your playing style for this. My message is that this sandbox allows me to spend my money to play the game mining asteroids as i see fit, even if i get blown up by some random ganker, it's a part of the game.
The difference is that where i have no problem with your playing style because the sandbox nature allows you to do (heck, i'll even defend your right to do so), because you are spending your money for that right, you have a major problem with how people want to spend their time in eve because you have this belief that eve has to be played in a particular way...your way.
My only suggestion, stop hiding behind a manifesto that is written by some 2 bit tv evangelist that will probably get caught in the act of rubbing wads of donated isk over body parts susceptible to paper cuts. Just state you don't like my playing style and we'll leave it at that.
Ultimately our opinions are meaningless in the long run as you will do and play the game as you want, and i will play the game as i want...i just hope that we can both just laugh it off and enjoy the game for what we make of it.
Have fun mate!! |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
717
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 07:24:40 -
[87] - Quote
Arancar Australis wrote:The difference is that where i have no problem with your playing style because the sandbox nature allows you to do (heck, i'll even defend your right to do so), because you are spending your money for that right, you have a major problem with how people want to spend their time in eve because you have this belief that eve has to be played in a particular way...your way. If you don't push CCP to change the game then I have no problem with you. I don't think I write very cryptic posts, but it is my believe that I wrote that all the time now.
Arancar Australis wrote: My only suggestion, stop hiding behind a manifesto that is written by some 2 bit tv evangelist that will probably get caught in the act of rubbing wads of donated isk over body parts susceptible to paper cuts. Just state you don't like my playing style and we'll leave it at that.
So you don't get sarcasm? Are you the next rebel leader? (before you write something lengthy, the last question was sarcastic too)
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
108
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 09:04:46 -
[88] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Arancar Australis wrote:The difference is that where i have no problem with your playing style because the sandbox nature allows you to do (heck, i'll even defend your right to do so), because you are spending your money for that right, you have a major problem with how people want to spend their time in eve because you have this belief that eve has to be played in a particular way...your way. If you don't push CCP to change the game then I have no problem with you. I don't think I write very cryptic posts, but it is my believe that I wrote that all the time now. Arancar Australis wrote: My only suggestion, stop hiding behind a manifesto that is written by some 2 bit tv evangelist that will probably get caught in the act of rubbing wads of donated isk over body parts susceptible to paper cuts. Just state you don't like my playing style and we'll leave it at that.
So you don't get sarcasm? Are you the next rebel leader? (before you write something lengthy, the last question was sarcastic too)
Don't need a lengthy reply mate, just read your last quote and reverse the viewpoint. Obviously role playing and sarcasm is a code only ability
I would have used rhetorical question rather than sarcastic
But thanks for the smile, lad to see you ignored the last part about laughing it off
|
Nami Kumamato
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
415
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 11:07:01 -
[89] - Quote
Tisiphone Dira wrote:Why sinning is not fine in highsec:
The wages of sin is death.
Some 'wise' men may tell you to ignore the commandments of the code, to do as you please. Such 'wisdom' comes not from above, but is instead earthly, unspiritual and demonic.
if you need to pee and don't want to dock up, fine! The New Order has a protocol for that, simply ask the Supreme Protector or one of his agents for permission first. Otherwise, don't go afk. The reasons are enumerated in the code. For further reading you could start with the manifesto I and manifesto II.
Bwahaha
" And now my ship is oh so cloaked and fit -
I never felt so good, I never felt so hid ! "
- Ramona McCandless, Untitled
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
719
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 14:55:30 -
[90] - Quote
Arancar Australis wrote:But thanks for the smile, lad to see you ignored the last part about laughing it off We both know you are actually whining
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |