Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Solecist Project
Weapons of Mass Distraction
18978
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:18:44 -
[631] - Quote
Solops Crendraven wrote:baltec1 wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote: Except for all the times Wardecs do work
This would be never. Solops Crendraven wrote:The Question Of The day Will Players Of Eve Online Really Miss Awoxers?? And will it suck?Imean it really only affects a small % of already a small Fanbase Its not like a New Bro can Fly a Cap or a Bling ship or will even stay long enough to even want too whats really re8arded is Why would I want to pay for a $3500 for A Titan anyway(Unfortunately Likely One day I will) to only get Awoxed by my own corp that recruited me. All of those things will still happen after this change. Exactly business as usual. So the only way to end this is to make Cap ships Worthless and take the value of all ships away( will never happen) once you take away what Motivates griefers in the first place to cause tears than this issue is no more no more awoxers so the Next question How do we make Eve Not Suck for Griefers and still make everybody happy(new bros and carebears) including the Awoxers.I think there is enough us here on the this thread to come up with a real solution. Solops Crendraven delivers again. ^_^
Ralph King-Griffin > **** you sol, years, ****ing years since thats happend
The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D
Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
|
Aredontis
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:26:57 -
[632] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context.
CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp, leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options.
As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ... ... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences.
Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence.
To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say, but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair.
Your third sentence makes your 4th false, as you've already pointed out that there are 2 ways to kill people. Ganking still "legal" (I love when people use that term, since the law really has nothing to do with internet spaceships, I just find it funny).
On your final statement, he's been calling to have awoxing stay the way it is, while changing dec mechanics. Wants cake, wants to eat cake. |
Ned Thomas
Hellbound Turkeys Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects
632
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:28:26 -
[633] - Quote
So, we've gotten to "make all ships worthless" as a solution to awoxing....neat.
Vote Sabriz!
|
Neo Kathura
New Order of Highsec
32
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:33:22 -
[634] - Quote
I find it amusing the amount of times "Trammel" is used in this thread. If you actually think about it Trammel didn't actually remove anything. All it did was offer an alternate world to play in and players who preferred playing without non-consensual pvp moved away. What upsets people is the realisation that a far smaller subset of players stick around to get killed leaving the players who like pvp with just other people who also like to pvp - and it turns out that they actually liked fighting people who had no intention of fighting back, so being surrounded by other pvpers was boring.
So the problem wasn't that the game was "ruined" by Trammel, the problem was that the loudest players didn't like what the majority of players did and cried about it while the game itself actually rolled on quite healthily for years.
EVE is likely the same. If you made an identical universe without non-consensual pvp its likely that a mass of players would move to that leaving the pvp server with just players who want to fight, and they would be upset at having to fight each other rather than easy kills. CCP seem to be realising this and trying to find a balance between keeping to the spirit of the game and appealing to the largest audience. Good on them. |
Solecist Project
Weapons of Mass Distraction
18984
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:34:25 -
[635] - Quote
Aredontis wrote:Solecist Project wrote:There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context.
CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp, leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options.
As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ... ... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences.
Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence.
To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say, but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair. Your third sentence makes your 4th false, as you've already pointed out that there are 2 ways to kill people. Ganking still "legal" (I love when people use that term, since the law really has nothing to do with internet spaceships, I just find it funny). On your final statement, he's been calling to have awoxing stay the way it is, while changing dec mechanics. Wants cake, wants to eat cake. "Legal" within ingame mechanics.... ... wow, it's really necessary to point out the obvious to you ...
I apologise for assuming even the slightest bit of intelligence.
Ralph King-Griffin > **** you sol, years, ****ing years since thats happend
The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D
Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
7563
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:38:22 -
[636] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:Wait, this thread is already 30+ pages?
Maybe I should start reading it to see how many of the posts are 2 people arguing over semantics. Not worth it. The usual idiots being victims of a lower class troll. It was better before these people came back to the forums. We haven't had this to that extent before they came back. Destiny Corrupted, Dave Stark ... and Kaa, sadly, J'Poll! Don't you fall for him too! You people are so weak, it's nuts!
Needs more Tippia, to be honest. And a few others that I'm actually surprised haven't joined in.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
Aredontis
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:47:03 -
[637] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:"Legal" within ingame mechanics.... ... as in: it's "illegal" to attack someone without CONCORDs approval.
Wow, it's really necessary to point out the obvious to you ...
I apologise for assuming even the slightest bit of intelligence.
No need to apologize. I knew what you meant, as I said, I just find the use of the term "legal" funny. It gets used a lot when people are talking about the EULA and say "that is illegal...." instead of "that is against the rules". I meant no offense. |
Solecist Project
Weapons of Mass Distraction
19008
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 16:53:53 -
[638] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:Wait, this thread is already 30+ pages?
Maybe I should start reading it to see how many of the posts are 2 people arguing over semantics. Not worth it. The usual idiots being victims of a lower class troll. It was better before these people came back to the forums. We haven't had this to that extent before they came back. Destiny Corrupted, Dave Stark ... and Kaa, sadly, J'Poll! Don't you fall for him too! You people are so weak, it's nuts! Needs more Tippia, to be honest. And a few others that I'm actually surprised haven't joined in. Mr Epeen Tippia, at least, is always right. Like, literally. I am totally envious about her ability to ride semantics!
Unless these people here though, Tippia intentionally keeps at it and actually has something valid to say.
Didn't you notice that Tippia always picks her fights carefully?
Haven't seen her in a while, but I miss her.
Aredontis wrote:Solecist Project wrote:"Legal" within ingame mechanics.... ... as in: it's "illegal" to attack someone without CONCORDs approval.
Wow, it's really necessary to point out the obvious to you ...
I apologise for assuming even the slightest bit of intelligence. No need to apologize. I knew what you meant, as I said, I just find the use of the term "legal" funny. It gets used a lot when people are talking about the EULA and say "that is illegal...." instead of "that is against the rules". I meant no offense. *sighs*
*drops grenade in thread*
Ralph King-Griffin > **** you sol, years, ****ing years since thats happend
The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D
Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
|
J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5546
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 17:29:04 -
[639] - Quote
I was going to say:
Where the F is Tippia?
But maybe if I just say, I agree that Tippia is never posting again on the forum, maybe she will disagree...
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2559
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 17:41:04 -
[640] - Quote
Neo Kathura wrote:I find it amusing the amount of times "Trammel" is used in this thread. If you actually think about it Trammel didn't actually remove anything. All it did was offer an alternate world to play in and players who preferred playing without non-consensual pvp moved away. What upsets people is the realisation that a far smaller subset of players stick around to get killed leaving the players who like pvp with just other people who also like to pvp - and it turns out that they actually liked fighting people who had no intention of fighting back, so being surrounded by other pvpers was boring.
So the problem wasn't that the game was "ruined" by Trammel, the problem was that the loudest players didn't like what the majority of players did and cried about it while the game itself actually rolled on quite healthily for years.
EVE is likely the same. If you made an identical universe without non-consensual pvp its likely that a mass of players would move to that leaving the pvp server with just players who want to fight, and they would be upset at having to fight each other rather than easy kills. CCP seem to be realising this and trying to find a balance between keeping to the spirit of the game and appealing to the largest audience. Good on them. And once again, we're back to the argument for removing nonconsensual pvp from EVE in order to give the masses what they want, and already have plenty of in terms of alternatives: a generic, pve-focused MMO with no real requirement of interacting with others aside from making groups in order to take down dungeon bosses.
I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
|
|
Basil Pupkin
Why So Platypus
105
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 17:48:17 -
[641] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Aredontis wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hey, while we're at it, can we patch out the loop hole that allows you to avoid wardecs when otherwise you'd have to pay for a surrender? This seems to be a recurring theme with you. You complain that a change that affects your play style (negatively) shouldn't be made, while in the same breath, complaining that a change that affects your play style (positively) should be made. Hypocrite much? There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context. CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp, leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options. As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ... ... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences. Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence. To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say, but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair.
There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec. Losing all offices rented. Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know). Lose all rights and have to redo them. Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them. 24 hours stasis before quitting corp. New corp creation fee. Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know). Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.
No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.
A crap ton equals 1000 crap loads in metric, and roughly 91 shit loads 12 bull shits and 1 puppy's unforeseen disaster in imperial.
|
J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5546
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 17:55:06 -
[642] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Aredontis wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hey, while we're at it, can we patch out the loop hole that allows you to avoid wardecs when otherwise you'd have to pay for a surrender? This seems to be a recurring theme with you. You complain that a change that affects your play style (negatively) shouldn't be made, while in the same breath, complaining that a change that affects your play style (positively) should be made. Hypocrite much? There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context. CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp, leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options. As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ... ... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences. Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence. To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say, but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair. There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec. Losing all offices rented. Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know). Lose all rights and have to redo them. Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them. 24 hours stasis before quitting corp. New corp creation fee. Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know). Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times. No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.
You are missing consequences up with annoyance.
Sure, it's annoying...but you happily evaded a wardec with 0 real consequences.
P.s. if you have a POS, you should be able to defend it.
IMO, the moment you are wardecced, any "space" assets should be locked in place. Defend it or let it be killed...your choice. CCP did that exact thing with PoCo's. During a war they can't be transfered ownership, so when they finally do that POS overhaul...I hope they do it to the POS too.
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2560
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 17:56:07 -
[643] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec. (1) Losing all offices rented. (2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know). (3) Lose all rights and have to redo them. (4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them. (5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp. (6) New corp creation fee. (7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know). (8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.
No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution. (1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later. (2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible. (3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes. (4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields. (5) Wrong. There isn't one. (6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one. (7) This is the only task that requires some time. (8) Another 10-minute ordeal.
And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.
I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
|
J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5547
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:01:43 -
[644] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Basil Pupkin wrote:There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec. (1) Losing all offices rented. (2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know). (3) Lose all rights and have to redo them. (4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them. (5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp. (6) New corp creation fee. (7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know). (8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.
No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution. (1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later. (2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible. (3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes. (4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields. (5) Wrong. There isn't one. (6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one. (7) This is the only task that requires some time. (8) Another 10-minute ordeal. And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.
All of this.
If that what you have listed is a consequence in your eyes. You are truely the most stupid person around as it doesn't take that much effort.
A smart person would already have thought about it and luckily plenty have done it:
1. Have 2 corps, with 2 CEO-alts with the exact same corp set up (roles etc).
2. During war, have people move from one corp to the other (p.s. CCP removed the 24h stasis a long long time ago).
3. POS, just set up a dickstar and nobody will touch it.
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2560
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:08:15 -
[645] - Quote
Honestly you don't even need to make a second corporation. Just keep people in NPC corps for a week, and the aggressors will let the war lapse and look elsewhere. Those who come back to you after you put the players back into the corporation (often happens with mercenary contracts with disbandment as a goal), would have went after a recreated corporation anyway.
And I really can't emphasize the "no one's going to shoot a ****-star" thing enough. Good, large groups charge like 3-4 billion for that. No one else will bother.
J'Poll wrote:Fun part: I expect a whole lot more of wardecs and/or ganking with this change. All the awoxers will still go after the same easy targets, just in a different way. Let's see how long people that come out of their NPC corp will stay in those player corps that they have to keep leaving and rejoining with every war This is exactly what will happen, and why they'll have to go after wars next. There will be nothing else to go after, aside from non-combat stuff such as theft.
I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
7563
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:08:28 -
[646] - Quote
This is now a wardec thread?
Time to send a note and get this thing Ezwalled. I've got 10m that says he drops 15 pages from it. Any takers?
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2560
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:10:39 -
[647] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:This is now a wardec thread? Time to send a note and get this thing Ezwalled. I've got 10m that says he drops 15 pages from it. Any takers? Mr Epeen By extension of dealing with the same thing as awoxing, which is targeting players in high-sec corporations without their consent. You can't discuss one without the other.
I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
|
J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5547
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:10:46 -
[648] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:This is now a wardec thread? Time to send a note and get this thing Ezwalled. I've got 10m that says he drops 15 pages from it. Any takers? Mr Epeen
Hell, ISD should just lock it all together and be done with these whining kids all together.
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
759
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:13:57 -
[649] - Quote
Shailagh wrote:Ccp cant you see this logic is flawed?? Some csm dudes even tried to say so. Wtf is the poijt of them is you dont listen?? This vhange and gonna increase RETENTION 1% IF ANYTJING GONNA MAKE OLDVETS QUIT MORE. Old veterans are a naturally declining group of players.
MMOs aim for three years out of a player and to keep cycling new ones into their game. When a game gets top heavy with veterans that starts affecting newbie retention and drives the game into the ground.
Especially, in a game where veterans can go and beat up on newbies.
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
Ned Thomas
Hellbound Turkeys Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects
633
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:24:06 -
[650] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:This is now a wardec thread? Time to send a note and get this thing Ezwalled. I've got 10m that says he drops 15 pages from it. Any takers? Mr Epeen Hell, ISD should just lock it all together and be done with these whining kids all together.
No! This thread is too much fun!
Vote Sabriz!
|
|
Basil Pupkin
Why So Platypus
107
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:27:18 -
[651] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Basil Pupkin wrote:There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec. (1) Losing all offices rented. (2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know). (3) Lose all rights and have to redo them. (4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them. (5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp. (6) New corp creation fee. (7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know). (8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.
No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution. (1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later. (2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible. (3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes. (4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields. (5) Wrong. There isn't one. (6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one. (7) This is the only task that requires some time. (8) Another 10-minute ordeal. And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.
(1) Corp standings will go down in a week of only-ceo-alt in there. You still pay for office renting but now you have to pay 2x if you make second corp. (2) Large POS yes, medium and small ones are undefendable. Also, with 2 corps they can't use each other's POS. (3) It's a table with thousands of checkboxes, and a major PITA. (4) Moving stuff out of old hangars and placing them into new ones is a PITA. (5) Confirming stasis is there, I just tried to quit corp and it prompted me with a 24 hour stasis period. (6) Odds are grief deccer never worked for them, just got them for free suicide wanking someone who did, so I don't really see grief deccer expenses as a valid excuse. Even if he did work for them, for 50 million he's getting too much, while for 2 million all you get is PITA. (7) Same as 2. (8) That isn't only the corp standings you set, there are also NPC standings toward your corp. They matter less now, but you can't get tax reduction and jump clones in hisec otherwise, and they take a week to set in, so every grief dec you lose them.
Every industrial corporation is currently forced to have a POS, there is no other way to compress ORE otherwise and POS facilities are still better than NPC stations, means not using them is a setback, so you either do or suck.
It's only suicide wanking corps who don't have to own anything at all, 9000 catalysts aside.
A crap ton equals 1000 crap loads in metric, and roughly 91 shit loads 12 bull shits and 1 puppy's unforeseen disaster in imperial.
|
Solecist Project
Weapons of Mass Distraction
19038
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:51:39 -
[652] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:This is now a wardec thread? Time to send a note and get this thing Ezwalled. I've got 10m that says he drops 15 pages from it. Any takers? Mr Epeen Hell, ISD should just lock it all together and be done with these whining kids all together. Although you were an ass, I still like and respect you.
Especially as long as you don't fall for the hating troll who keeps triggering the monkeys.
Ralph King-Griffin > **** you sol, years, ****ing years since thats happend
The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D
Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
|
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2560
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:59:23 -
[653] - Quote
I like how he laces everything he says with that little bit of ad hominem. Really gives it that Midas touch.
I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
|
Solops Crendraven
Solops Inc
51
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 19:16:21 -
[654] - Quote
Dont worry this is still a Avoxing is no more Thread.
Check Me Out!!! On Twitch Tv 24/7 enter link description here
|
Memphis Baas
67
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 20:08:01 -
[655] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Hell, ISD should just lock it all together and be done with these whining kids all together.
I think they decided to let this thread be the "let the kids whine about an unwanted change" thread. We're going all over the place, too.
The thread only gains several pages of replies during Euro prime time though; it's almost dead during US prime. Which may be something.
|
Concord Guy's Cousin
State War Academy Caldari State
355
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 20:15:14 -
[656] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:(1) Corp standings will go down in a week of only-ceo-alt in there. You still pay for office renting but now you have to pay 2x if you make second corp. Only if the CEO-Alt has any standings at all, if all the alts standings are zero then the corp standings remain static.
Quote:(5) Confirming stasis is there, I just tried to quit corp and it prompted me with a 24 hour stasis period. The 24 hour stasis timer is gone, the role timers are not IIRC, although a CEO can leave immediately by resigning and appointing a new CEO.
I'm not going to bother with the rest, as it's just more whining from an ignorant fool.
ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"
NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.
|
J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5551
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 21:20:31 -
[657] - Quote
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:Basil Pupkin wrote:(1) Corp standings will go down in a week of only-ceo-alt in there. You still pay for office renting but now you have to pay 2x if you make second corp. Only if the CEO-Alt has any standings at all, if all the alts standings are zero then the corp standings remain static; this is extremely well documented. Quote:(5) Confirming stasis is there, I just tried to quit corp and it prompted me with a 24 hour stasis period. The 24 hour stasis timer is gone, the role timers are not IIRC, although a CEO can leave immediately by resigning and appointing a new CEO. I'm not going to bother with the rest, as it's just more whining from an ignorant fool.
Dont waste your time.
Carebeara never learned how the game works, dont want to learn and never can learn.
It is the nature of the beast, dumb prey will stay dumb prey.
Its like a herd of wildebeast, once 1 starts to run the others will follow, not even having a clue why they are running...
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|
Solecist Project
Weapons of Mass Distraction
19087
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 21:23:49 -
[658] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote:J'Poll wrote:Hell, ISD should just lock it all together and be done with these whining kids all together. I think they decided to let this thread be the "let the kids whine about an unwanted change" thread. We're going all over the place, too. The thread only gains several pages of replies during Euro prime time though; it's almost dead during US prime. Which may be something. I think more US people are on reddit. And also the forums are dead.
NO ISDs around either ...
Maybe lots of people died and we just don't ******* know it!
And, tbqfh, most traffic this thread had was from the same few. And it was completely worthless.
Ralph King-Griffin > **** you sol, years, ****ing years since thats happend
The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D
Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
|
MajorBean
Mystic Methheads
59
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 21:30:30 -
[659] - Quote
All good things must come to an end sometime.
|
Shailagh
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 21:50:00 -
[660] - Quote
So we have like 4 weeks til this kicks in? Roger that, ima grief the total utter complete hell out of all newbie friendly corps til then with rerolling 10hr hero trial alts if need be. Over and over and im going to EXXXCLUSIVELY TARGET THE VENTURES AND L1 FRIG NEWBROS. This is what they say we do right? Let it be true. Ima gank/grief their little ventures face off then proced to talk trash to said newb til he uninstalls. 4 weeks. Time to bring the hurt |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |