Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Khador Vess
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
246
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 22:28:03 -
[31] - Quote
On behalf of everyone who processes corp applications
THANK YOU
Khador Vess For CSM X - The Not So Bitter Vet Choice
|
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
360
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 22:36:06 -
[32] - Quote
Altrue wrote:@CSM: Stop slacking on the forums and validade the damn devblog!! Given the number of people telling everyone to set the CSPA at 0, this is definitely a good change. I just hope it doesn't comes with an increase in the number of spam bots.
Idk about you, but across 5 accounts, all ranging from 5 years to a few weeks old, I've never encountered spam bot issues. I would, however, find that every rookie I could potentially recruit, had their CSPA turned on, which was annoying to say the least.
This is as nice as I get.
Best quote ever
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165
|
Brink Albosa
Brink's Bar
85
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 22:52:25 -
[33] - Quote
It's a good change. |
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
4776
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 23:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
Good change. If RMT spam becomes an issue like it was in the past this can be reassessed.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
|
Sleightz
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
12
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 23:50:09 -
[35] - Quote
Sounds good. Makes sense to me.
RIP "How to turn off your CSPA charge" gif.
You served me well. o7
Twitter | www.tricksofthetrades.net
|
Valterra Craven
516
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 00:50:56 -
[36] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: Spam hasn't been a problem for a long while.
Well, that really depends on how you define spam. Chat request spam likely not. Local spam... well I'm lookin at you Jita...
|
Jane Shapperd
SUPERFLUOUS WANDERLUST Gentlemen's.Club
122
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 01:06:00 -
[37] - Quote
at last , its ******* annoying to pay isk every time u invite new people to fleet when they x up for it . |
Stefan Silviu
Knowledge is Money - Money is Power
7
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 01:06:44 -
[38] - Quote
is not about the isk , is bout pressing ok on popup message good change |
Code2200
Guardians Descendants LOADED-DICE
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 02:38:16 -
[39] - Quote
YES FINALLY!!!! Now we don't have to explain how to change it to newbies! o7 |
Malcolm Faust
Soldiers of Cthulhu
14
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 03:08:15 -
[40] - Quote
Very not bad |
|
Syri Taneka
NOVA-CAINE
112
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 04:30:28 -
[41] - Quote
"Hell, it's about time." |
Jon Hellguard
X-COM
26
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 07:10:33 -
[42] - Quote
CCP Lebowski wrote:Afternoon Space Friends, When Scylla is released, the default CSPA charge for newly created characters will default to 0 ISK instead of 2950 ISK.
admit it, it did take you longer to write this post than implement the change - did it? :D jokes aside - easy win. o7 |
drummendejef maaktnietuit
Active Fusion ArK Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 09:43:53 -
[43] - Quote
Not a bad idea, never saw the real use of it anyway. |
Sulindra
Aliastra Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 12:27:08 -
[44] - Quote
How about you also make it so that those of us who set a change actually get the isk in our wallet as a fee for dealing with stupidity instead of it going into the ether or npc land. |
Koebmand
Silverflames
25
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 13:39:07 -
[45] - Quote
If it is changed so the player gets the money, then it will only create spam.
50000 spambots will constantly spam every player in Eve every 2 minutes to hope to get some replies. |
Annah Sun-Scape
Temet Nosce Ex Astra
10
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:43:53 -
[46] - Quote
That was antispam feature? lol If you want to help us with spam then make chat checkbox with OPTIONAL BLOCKING TRIAL ACCOUNTS IN LOCAL CHAT
Easy way to force scammers to pay you
|
Aleczi Volikov
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 11:18:33 -
[47] - Quote
Morwen Lagann wrote:Yay!
Now all we need the CSPA charge to actually go into people's wallets instead of into the void. (And remove the upper limit.)
Also: the CSPA charge should only be taken when the conversation is accepted, not when the request is made.
+1 to the 'also'. CSPA charge should only be taken when the conversation is accepted. The first would just be begging for lazy scams. |
Hardcore Nightmare
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 13:56:10 -
[48] - Quote
Didn't we wait for like...eight years for this? |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3560
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 10:36:54 -
[49] - Quote
The CSPA does need to have its limit raised. If you can't make it 1b or 100m, then 10m will do.
1m ISK is chicken feed. |
Basil Pupkin
Why So Platypus
129
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 02:38:45 -
[50] - Quote
I like the change (my CSPA is 0 and I ranted about it every time I had to pay it to talk with other people).
However, I am rather disturbed that some people I would rather choke are also liking it.
Also, everyone asking for CSPA to go into their wallets, and raising its limit, is going to be noted in my ledger of rancor.
A crap ton equals 1000 crap loads in metric, and roughly 91 shit loads 12 bull shits and 1 puppy's unforeseen disaster in imperial.
|
|
Alexis Nightwish
126
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 21:40:42 -
[51] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:CCP Lebowski wrote:Afternoon Space Friends,
Another quick post here to let you know of a change Five-0 have ready for testing on Singularity.
When Scylla is released, the default CSPA charge for newly created characters will default to 0 ISK instead of 2950 ISK.
For any existing characters that have their CSPA charge still at the default of 2950 ISK, the charge will also be changed to 0 ISK. Characters that have chosen to set their charge to any other value will be unaffected. All characters can still configure this setting as normal (via the Settings option in the Mail window).
In general, we want to be enabling social interaction in EVE rather than blocking it. The anti-spam value of this feature did not outweigh the downsides of requiring players (especially new players) to pay in order to talk to each other. Most experienced players already change their CSPA charge to 0, so we do not expect this change to negatively affect a large number of players.
As always we're looking for feedback (in this thread) and reports on any issues found (using the in-game bug reporting tool) with this change.
Thanks in advance! Finally.Spam hasn't been a problem for a long while. Thanks for this change. I'm curious if it hasn't been a problem because of, or despite the CSPA. I guess we'll find out!
CCP only approaches a problem in one of two ways: nudge or cludge
EVE Online's "I win!" Button
|
Lyric Masters
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 16:53:17 -
[52] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:I like the change (my CSPA is 0 and I ranted about it every time I had to pay it to talk with other people).
However, I am rather disturbed that some people I would rather choke are also liking it.
Also, everyone asking for CSPA to go into their wallets, and raising its limit, is going to be noted in my ledger of rancor.
Why? It's a useless mechanic as it stands. If you don't want to speak to random pubbies, you can block all unknown characters.
If someone is dumb enough to pay 1B ISK to talk to me, that's their problem, not mine. Why should CCP get to take money out of the market if my loving and beautiful pirate personality can extract it?
It has absolutely zero use as a mechanic as it stands right now. |
Jack Rinjakka
Oven Industries
2
|
Posted - 2015.04.13 01:00:51 -
[53] - Quote
Morwen Lagann wrote:Yay!
Now all we need the CSPA charge to actually go into people's wallets instead of into the void. (And remove the upper limit.)
Also: the CSPA charge should only be taken when the conversation is accepted, not when the request is made.
I agree with the accepted/requested part. I don't think the wallet thing should be implemented because the charge is more like a personally set tax. Also, people could easily exploit the ability to suck money out of people who are trying to talk to them. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |