Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
M1k3y Koontz
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
720
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:25:39 -
[3271] - Quote
Miner Hottie wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:SNIP
LOL. I DARE YOU to really convince 20 thousand players to do that all the time. At least fro more than 1 month.
That would be dear leaders job to motivate us. And that's 13,145 characters to cover all of offense. And we can be motivated to do perform at that level, we did after all ground down Fountain in bombers for example. Those he ignore history are doomed to repeat the same mistakes.
Fountain had an endgame, a light at the end of the tunnel. That will no longer be the case, you'll have to constantly beat down people who contest your ownership of the whole of nullsec, assuming you actually manage to capture as much space as your alliance seems to think it can.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
epicurus ataraxia
Z3R0 Return Mining Inc. Illusion of Solitude
1609
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:26:55 -
[3272] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Oh yeah, someone brought up Dreadnaughts, so now I have a question. What the heck are Dreadnaughts good for anymore? Will they be rebalanced to find a new role? According to the link to the podcast posted my Mike A earlier, the answer is Yes Gäó but not yet. He also answers, your questions on cloaky camping in an interesting way, that may remove your worries, possibly not the way you might expect though........
There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
|
M1k3y Koontz
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
720
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:29:38 -
[3273] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Oh yeah, someone brought up Dreadnaughts, so now I have a question. What the heck are Dreadnaughts good for anymore? Will they be rebalanced to find a new role?
POSs, escalating. Asaki (how do you spell that?) was started over a Cobalt moon, not particularly special or rare. And yet it spawned a massive supercap fight.
Fights will still escalate in the new system, even without mountains of EHP to grind though.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
M1k3y Koontz
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
720
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:36:38 -
[3274] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote: If CCP pre-nerfed everything that people were able to theorycraft into a disaster, nothing in EVE would ever be useable.
They already do that for Caldari. Yea, that's why everyone is flying Tengus.
Caldari are fine, missiles are hit or miss in terms of usefulness.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
12037
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:36:46 -
[3275] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote: Fights will still escalate in the new system, even without mountains of EHP to grind though.
I suspect so, I merely wonder now that the paradigm is shifting to **** jousting in small disposable ships (like FW), whether or not people will commit expensive, vulnerable assets if they can get the job done without it.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
12037
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:37:42 -
[3276] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote: If CCP pre-nerfed everything that people were able to theorycraft into a disaster, nothing in EVE would ever be useable.
They already do that for Caldari. Yea, that's why everyone is flying Tengus. Caldari are fine, missiles are hit or miss in terms of usefulness.
One Caldari ship is fine, anyway. Well, that and the Falcon, but we all know why that is.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1109
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:47:20 -
[3277] - Quote
There are two metrics by which null sec measure success. Strategic objective and isk war. Might i suggest we use the isk war to have an impact on the timers? If the attacker over the preceeding days/ maybe even weeks is winning then the timer would start to shift towards their prime time and even if they overwhelming lock down the area and defeat the resisdents over and over completely switch to their prime for that system. This would spread the battle for control over even more time and allow invasion across time zones which under the suggested system looks tricky. It would also add depth via feints where you reinforce one system but then only contest the reinforce in different parts of the constellation in order to move the tz for those systems when you win a local victory and then reinforce those?
Money at its root is a form of rationing.
When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85
|
Jack Miton
Isogen 5
4225
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:47:56 -
[3278] - Quote
I love this change so much that I can't ever fully express it :) Finally a way to actually make NS randoms interact with you.
Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/
|
Ramman K'arojic
Lone Star Warriors Yulai Federation
35
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:53:25 -
[3279] - Quote
Martin Vanzyl wrote:Entosis Link ranges are stupidly large.
Scale the Entosis Link range. The smaller ship you fit it to, the less range it has. Frig = 5 - 15km Cruiser = 15 - 30km BC = 30 - 40km BS = 50 - 60 Cap = 60 < ....
Etc. Not only will this make a 'logical sense', small comm array on smaller ship means it needs to be closer to link with the appropriate strength to the station's systems etc, it also forces the attackers in closer, where they can be engaged by defenders. Another solution could be to limit the Entosis to BS, cap and super hulls.
I suggest CPP ditch the T2 version - and make Entosis Link come in different sizes and each size has a different range, and activation time.
Say even BS -200km and Cap 300km
Giving more a dynamic play option.
Anyway just 2 isk |
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30780
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:10:44 -
[3280] - Quote
250 km is the hard limit for ship lock ranges, might even be 245, I don't remember. Caps included. 250 km is just a figure that means 'within all possible lock range.'
Help, I can't download EVE
|
|
Drigo Segvian
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
8
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:13:55 -
[3281] - Quote
@ CCP- +1 on the changes. Love it
When I was brand new to EVE I had the following impression:
Hi Sec- Safe, a place where you could skill up until you were ready to go do what you really wanted to Low Sec- Dangerous, money to be made- people will blow you up WH Space- Did not know it existed Null- Where you go to PVP
Now that I have been around for a bit longer...
Hi Sec- Safe but you will get war decd and ganked Low sec- Where you go to PVP WH Space- Dangerous, money to be made- people will blow you up NULL- Vast empty carebear land...... NPC Null- not sure yet
Null needs a change.
And pease do not buff income....from this thread i hear null folks who cant be asked to defend their turf or want to consolidate to a smaller region but make the same isk. Just no
Thanks.
Note: I dont post often but this is a fascinating topic. {gets popcorn out of microwave} |
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30781
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:18:51 -
[3282] - Quote
How likely are vulnerability windows tied to server reinforcement, and in part, an effort to mitigate TiDi.
If that's a significant factor in making everyone commit to a time window, arguments against are rather futile.
Help, I can't download EVE
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
291
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:26:57 -
[3283] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Fountain had an endgame, a light at the end of the tunnel. That will no longer be the case, you'll have to constantly beat down people who contest your ownership of the whole of nullsec, assuming you actually manage to capture as much space as your alliance seems to think it can.
Who's planning to capture anything? Seriously, we're a bunch of retardly masochistic idiots who'll beat our heads against a wall for months on the promise of 'eventually, it'll feel good when we stop!' and 'this hurts everyone else more'. We're not going to do this to take space. We're going to do this to screw other people.
We probably won't even give much of a damn if it leaves all of Null a smoking crater. Before this actually goes live, all of our personal assets will be in safe lowsec or NPC null stations just like S2N's pastebin shows them planning. Our moon operations will still take just as much effort for people to hurt - and we'll still be able to respond w/fleets just like we do now - all with the added benefit of doing all our ratting in other peoples' space while we take it away from them just to watch it burn.
Really, what's the downside to this for us? We don't have sov bills?
This isn't going to do what CCP wants. It's not going to drive fights, it's going to produce a whole lot of griefing. And it's not going to stop until we get tired of it - and if you think we'll get tired of it any time soon, MiniLuv's been active how many years? Goons have been scamming people for how many years?
As the scorpion said to the frog: it's our nature.
Don't let us do this. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
181
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:36:16 -
[3284] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Milla Goodpussy wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 min of introductions.
He addresses interceptors @ 11 minute mark
'If gameplay devolves into people orbiting at 250 km . . . then we would make sure that that doesn't happen"
Prime Time window will be the first 'breakout thread.
Look, go listen for yourself . . . or wait for the next thread. Greygal voiced a good idea of linking prime window to the indices of the alliance. One that is not active would see their window widen, making them more vulnerable.
m he'll ignore it just like he's ignored cloaky camping which also has an impact on system indexes.. he's just trying to keep heat off his behind.. he's lying his behind off.. gameplay has became cloaky afk camping and nothing has been done about it. he pretends there isn't an issue, but if there's hundreds of threads about it.. why not someone from ccp deal with it.. oh that's right .. AFK CLOAKY CAMPING is active gameplay....psssssssssssssssht You may not get the answer you expect, if seeing a cloaky camper in system makes you worry , he may just remove what it is that makes you worry.
then I highly doubt he removes himself from eve online then if he did.. then id really celebrate. |
Eli Apol
Pro Synergy
293
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:41:24 -
[3285] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Don't let us do this. If it really gets that bad, just obscene fitting reqs on the T2 version = trollceptors now have to orbit within web scram range and can't warp off for 5 minute cycles = lots and lots more dead interceptors |
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
291
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:44:05 -
[3286] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Arrendis wrote:Don't let us do this. If it really gets that bad, just obscene fitting reqs on the T2 version = trollceptors now have to orbit within web scram range and can't warp off for 5 minute cycles = lots and lots more dead interceptors
Trolling people with this won't require interceptors. T3s are enough - and we'll use them. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6561
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:46:12 -
[3287] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote:Fountain had an endgame, a light at the end of the tunnel. That will no longer be the case, you'll have to constantly beat down people who contest your ownership of the whole of nullsec, assuming you actually manage to capture as much space as your alliance seems to think it can. Who's planning to capture anything? Seriously, we're a bunch of retardly masochistic idiots who'll beat our heads against a wall for months on the promise of 'eventually, it'll feel good when we stop!' and 'this hurts everyone else more'. We're not going to do this to take space. We're going to do this to screw other people. We probably won't even give much of a damn if it leaves all of Null a smoking crater. Before this actually goes live, all of our personal assets will be in safe lowsec or NPC null stations just like S2N's pastebin shows them planning. Our moon operations will still take just as much effort for people to hurt - and we'll still be able to respond w/fleets just like we do now - all with the added benefit of doing all our ratting in other peoples' space while we take it away from them just to watch it burn. Really, what's the downside to this for us? We don't have sov bills? This isn't going to do what CCP wants. It's not going to drive fights, it's going to produce a whole lot of griefing. And it's not going to stop until we get tired of it - and if you think we'll get tired of it any time soon, MiniLuv's been active how many years? Goons have been scamming people for how many years? As the scorpion said to the frog: it's our nature. Don't let us do this. No you have to do it. This is eve online, it's harsh cold and probably sovless in a bit.
Finally CCP will free us from the shackles of sov where everyone else couldn't with the outstanding mechanics
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Eli Apol
Pro Synergy
294
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:50:16 -
[3288] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Trolling people with this won't require interceptors. T3s are enough - and we'll use them. Well at least the broken record piping out of the propoganda machine has skipped onto a new track.
So we're now onto trolled up T3s....let me guess...you'll threaten to do this with absolutely anything that can't be bubbled to try and change the mechanic which makes all your desolate backyards vulnerable before we get a chance to see it?
Not transparent at all. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6561
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:51:40 -
[3289] - Quote
Milla Goodpussy wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:Milla Goodpussy wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 min of introductions.
He addresses interceptors @ 11 minute mark
'If gameplay devolves into people orbiting at 250 km . . . then we would make sure that that doesn't happen"
Prime Time window will be the first 'breakout thread.
Look, go listen for yourself . . . or wait for the next thread. Greygal voiced a good idea of linking prime window to the indices of the alliance. One that is not active would see their window widen, making them more vulnerable.
m he'll ignore it just like he's ignored cloaky camping which also has an impact on system indexes.. he's just trying to keep heat off his behind.. he's lying his behind off.. gameplay has became cloaky afk camping and nothing has been done about it. he pretends there isn't an issue, but if there's hundreds of threads about it.. why not someone from ccp deal with it.. oh that's right .. AFK CLOAKY CAMPING is active gameplay....psssssssssssssssht You may not get the answer you expect, if seeing a cloaky camper in system makes you worry , he may just remove what it is that makes you worry. then I highly doubt he removes himself from eve online then if he did.. then id really celebrate. they mean your ship will explode
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Specia1 K
State War Academy Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:56:51 -
[3290] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:Vigilanta wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 min of introductions.
He addresses interceptors @ 11 minute mark
'If gameplay devolves into people orbiting at 250 km . . . then we would make sure that that doesn't happen"
Prime Time window will be the first 'breakout thread.
Look, go listen for yourself . . . or wait for the next thread. Greygal voiced a good idea of linking prime window to the indices of the alliance. One that is not active would see their window widen, making them more vulnerable.
m Listen to as much as I could stomach. When Fozzie got to the part where he talked about how much isk was being made in null and how "it's obviously valuable because people rent the space he proved that he doesn't understand the difference between isk (what you get in sov null from anomalies) and WEALTH (what you get more of if you know what you are doing outside, especially if you are doing it outside of sov null). the WEALTH faucets (LP and blue loot for examples) outside of null also sink isk which is good, but that doesn't matter to the individual whose wallet got fatter The presence of rents means null systems AREN'T valuable enough to take for your self (but are totally ok as a form of passive income for your alliance). The kinds of liquid isk you can make in null as a renter is nice (and that liquidity and ease of acquisition is a key selling point), but it has a hard ceiling that once you get there, people usually smarten up and go do the more lucrative things (like l5 blitzing, FW l4 missions and high sec incursions) If the main guy leading the charge for sov changes doesn't understand the above, the system he and his people develop when they get to he "why" stage (phase 3?) will be every bit as flawed as the last anomaly changes were (I'll refrain from linking that 4 year old dev blog just this once). You're supposedly the PVE-ist CSM we have, you should know this things as well , no? Did he actually say that? lord of mercy help us if he did. The way we rent space versus whether its valuable or not is up for debate. There is alot of systems that are basically given away just to generate ~any level of income~ form them. Something like 80% of the rent we collect comes from 5% of the best systems IN THE GAME. Im talking the perfect PVE systems in entire regions, your dead end, tons of advanced warning, lots of belts, ice, -.99 trusec systems. If you want a **** system there like 500 mil a month and you honestly could probably talk us down to 250 mil if you talked a good game. Better than moons? yes, but realize we sell our best space for this income, not just any nullsec system What a load of complete and utter BS. You don't rent for 500mill or even 250mill. There around 1.5 bill at least i mean some are like a ridiculous 10-13billion!. You shouldn't be allowed to rent full stop. You are lazy so and so who intact should be living in their own systems and getting income from this. What gives you the right to say we own this but we won't live in it, so we 'rent' it out. I hate the whole rental thing, its getting out of hand, and if CCP do nothing to stop it then ill be unsubbing for sure this time. Its wrong for the game. For me i would create a new instance of eve and let everyone else have a proper chance to start from the beginning, because anyone who has just started or even been playing a couple of years, either has to kiss someones ass, or will never ever get to the same level as the current large alliances, they just don't have the same options or opportunities. This is why people leave in droves. This is why other MMOs have many worlds so that everyone has a chance.
Yes. Reboot and start Eve2 |
|
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6561
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 01:15:27 -
[3291] - Quote
Specia1 K wrote:lilol' me wrote: For me i would create a new instance of eve and let everyone else have a proper chance to start from the beginning, because anyone who has just started or even been playing a couple of years, either has to kiss someones ass, or will never ever get to the same level as the current large alliances, they just don't have the same options or opportunities. This is why people leave in droves. This is why other MMOs have many worlds so that everyone has a chance.
Yes. Reboot and start Eve2 Is this like some kind of star citizen reference
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Specia1 K
State War Academy Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 01:24:34 -
[3292] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Specia1 K wrote:lilol' me wrote: For me i would create a new instance of eve and let everyone else have a proper chance to start from the beginning, because anyone who has just started or even been playing a couple of years, either has to kiss someones ass, or will never ever get to the same level as the current large alliances, they just don't have the same options or opportunities. This is why people leave in droves. This is why other MMOs have many worlds so that everyone has a chance.
Yes. Reboot and start Eve2 Is this like some kind of star citizen reference
No it is a lesson in the realities of the human condition.
"You always get a special kick on opening day, no matter how many you go through. You look forward to it like a birthday party when you're a kid. You think something wonderful is going to happen."
Joe DiMaggio |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1063
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 01:36:00 -
[3293] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Ok, one point that seems to be being avoided or missed, If as some fear, goons send a swarm across new eden capturing everything as content for their players. Yes they can be disruptive, and yes, there will be lots of fights, and yes, they can capture lots of systems..
What then?
Are they going to sit there bored out of their brains?
No they will go home, back to their core, and then they can be taken back. You haven't seen alliance fail-cascade and flip to alliances of another coalition have you?
It will just be two huge coalitions with gate camps all around to keep the roamers and griefers out. Then they will have their token wars. Bit like now but worse.
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
Eli Apol
Pro Synergy
294
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 01:38:13 -
[3294] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:It will just be two huge coalitions with gate camps all around If they get their way with not allowing interdiction nullified ships use the module then yep, this. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1063
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 01:48:11 -
[3295] - Quote
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Edit: Hmmm ... flip all systems to, "Fozzie sucks" corporation, soon before leaving. Ha ha ha. I can just imagine the Verite Map-over-time:, it gets to the month of the change, flashes up Fozzie Sucks in big letters across the map, before going black . Your not an alt of one of us are you? Nah, that is just me being playful. Goons are pretend evil, like kids wearing Darth Vader costumes for Halloween.Eli Apol wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:It will just be two huge coalitions with gate camps all around If they get their way with not allowing interdiction nullified ships use the module then yep, this. This little corporation nearly took Y-M from a 1500 alliance under the current mechanics. We had to bore them out and just keep grinding SOV in overwhelming force.
The trouble is that Low Sec isn't the next step from High Sec, if it was a valid place to build a large alliance then Null Sec would not be stagnant, right now.
Null is a symptom of bad Low Sec.
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
M1k3y Koontz
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
721
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 02:12:49 -
[3296] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Eli Apol wrote:Arrendis wrote:Don't let us do this. If it really gets that bad, just obscene fitting reqs on the T2 version = trollceptors now have to orbit within web scram range and can't warp off for 5 minute cycles = lots and lots more dead interceptors Trolling people with this won't require interceptors. T3s are enough - and we'll use them.
Great, you'll be slower, more expensive, and all the easier to kill. Please do use T3s.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
291
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 02:18:39 -
[3297] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Arrendis wrote:Trolling people with this won't require interceptors. T3s are enough - and we'll use them. Well at least the broken record piping out of the propoganda machine has skipped onto a new track. So we're now onto trolled up T3s....let me guess...you'll threaten to do this with absolutely anything that can't be bubbled to try and change the mechanic which makes all your desolate backyards vulnerable before we get a chance to see it? Not transparent at all.
Oh, I certainly think that if they let us, we'll use interceptors. And I also think that if they don't, that'll go a long way to resolving the problem. But yes, we'll troll with whatever they let us troll with: interceptors, T3s, covops bringing in blops gangs... we're going to be the same trollish jackasses we are now. The Entosis Link itself will let us do that. Giving us fast-moving ships that can burn off-grid rather than actually giving you a fight will only make it easier. |
Nou Mene
Out of Focus Odin's Call
4
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 02:30:58 -
[3298] - Quote
I overall like the proposed changes. Mostly i like the no-grinding policy. A couple of opinions:
-About 4hr timer. In mi opinion any kind of protection should go away, 4-8hr protection is acceptable maybe. I'll try to explain. Many ppl argue that taking sov would be too easy and that could make alliances lose FULLY upgraded systems, when i think, FULL UPGRADES shouldn't be the norm, they should be rare (and more valuable than now). Defending against a fleet of inties is easy in the system you live in, shouldn't in the systems you don't. You can keep BS with smartbombs on chokes; inties are easily killed by other inties (and many other ships), etc. In general i just can't see the problem in having a really unstable sov system (but sov has to be valuable). With no protection, "frontier" systems would be mostly freeports.
- SOV value. SOV value must be dramatically increased in an scenario where SOV is rapidly changing hands. a)SOV holder ratters should have some bounty increase (CONCORD LP or something), system sec-status (neg sec) should change reflecting activity and reward more activity (maybe in spawn frequency/quality) but not directly trough resource value. b) or, system quality should directly increase bounty on said system, making it more valuable for inhabitants, and more tempting to other entities to raid or just "ninja" kill. POSes (moon mining) needs to go away when SOV is lost.
- Supercaps. I dont like supercaps, but they exist. They need new roles. I propose a strong long range (smaller than grid) warp disruption field wich cannot be avoided
Greetings.
Not completely unrelated, link boosters off grid needs to go... |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6561
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 02:35:03 -
[3299] - Quote
Nou Mene wrote:- Supercaps. I dont like supercaps, but they exist. They need new roles. If they simply have no relevant roles, then it's as if they don't exist...
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Miner Hottie
Valar Morghulis. Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 02:37:06 -
[3300] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:SNIP
LOL. I DARE YOU to really convince 20 thousand players to do that all the time. At least fro more than 1 month.
That would be dear leaders job to motivate us. And that's 13,145 characters to cover all of offense. And we can be motivated to do perform at that level, we did after all ground down Fountain in bombers for example. Those he ignore history are doomed to repeat the same mistakes. Fountain had an endgame, a light at the end of the tunnel. That will no longer be the case, you'll have to constantly beat down people who contest your ownership of the whole of nullsec, assuming you actually manage to capture as much space as your alliance seems to think it can.
Who said anything about capturing and holding systems? I don't want some toilet hovel -0.01 system at the arse end of Omist. If I can ruin someone's day by reinforcing it and spawning whackamole nodes... I will. Maybe I will come back and capture it, maybe I won't. Point being: are you having fun restoring your system to full control?
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |