Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2151
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 00:48:14 -
[1] - Quote
Yo, Chance bbeh, can you reiterate to us all what your goal for wormhole space is, now you are our only real representative on the CSM? i mean, you sent enough gumf around to everyone telling us how you were super pro at wormholes because you trained into a bomber, which is all it takes.
What kind of philosophy will you bring to managing the CSM? Will it be fact based, logical, methodical? Will you send out surveys, take straw polls, discuss with people on skype? Or will this be a more hands-off kind of silent partner dealio? You know, the one where you fly to Iceland, and sit in a room with an expression like a stunned mullet, while people who actually know what they are talking about start talking about real man's business?
Like, you're so pro at losing 300M bombers, what's your take on the proposal to bring in system-wide decloaking arrays? Can we have them in wormholes? if we do, how will you do as badly as you do now, considering you and yours will have to find a way of wasting a whole weekend to kill viz. one mammoth, one interceptor, in a situation where it is impossible to cloak up?
Are you going to push to make probing even easier, so as to assist with finding your way out of wormholes you get lost in?
What's your take on structures? Do you believe that there should be POS bubbles after the revamp? Or are you more concerned with docking-gamesey stuff like mooring? Have you ever used a structure? Do you even lift?
What about assembly arrays? Do you think that roles should be assignable such that corp members can deliver your jobs for you, even remotely, or should they not? Do you think it's neccessary to deliver other people's jobs to avoid losing materials and blueprints during an unanchoring? And what of refining arrays, do you think they should scale up from small mobile refineries, or be restricted to the larger structures?
What about mooring, should you have to moor to depots? I think you do.
Will you be pushing to have the depot RF period dropped from 48 hours to 24 hours?
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Iroquoiss Pliskin
Hedion University Amarr Empire
57
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 01:15:48 -
[2] - Quote
Why, permanent player-constructible star gates to Deklein in every C5, of course.
( -í° -£-û -í°)
|
Kirasten
No Vacancies
127
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 01:15:53 -
[3] - Quote
I don't think Chance really ran as a "wormhole" rep specifically. More like a rep "who does stuff in wormholes" if I understood it correctly.
I know people are hurt over corbexx, as am I. However, if he had ran as any other CSM candidate instead of a wormhole platform, I still would have voted for him because he was one of the best game representatives on CSM 9. Sugar Kyle and corbexx should have pretty much been on lock on everyone's list, no matter what space they play in. I'm sure most people will feel the same when/if they can get over their feelings of betrayal.
The fact is, we didn't have any good candidates besides corbexx, and if that is what you want to be mad about, that I get. Maybe if we didn't think we were going to be taken care of by a candidate of his caliber, someone else might have stepped up.
That all said, Chance, learn from the examples set by Sugar and corbexx. I know your platform was new player experience mostly, but being one of the only wormhole-ish candidates we have, some people are going to look to you with some kind of hope if you can prove yourself worthy. |
Jack Miton
Isogen 5
4272
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 01:28:32 -
[4] - Quote
Jesus Trinket, tell up how you REALLY feel!
Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/
|
Ilaister
Absolutely Certain
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 01:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Will you be pushing to have the depot RF period dropped from 48 hours to 24 hours?
's funny. I raised that with Corbexx a few weeks after he got voted on last year. He didn't seem to understand what I was on about.
|
Adriana Nolen
Sama Guild
62
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 10:09:40 -
[6] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote: Do you even lift?
I too would like to know this. |
epicurus ataraxia
Z3R0 Return Mining Inc. Illusion of Solitude
1621
|
Posted - 2015.03.23 10:54:51 -
[7] - Quote
Well, chance at the very least appears full of energy, so that's good, If he is open minded, and takes even a little advice from Corbexx, and Sugar and focuses on wormhole space rather than just being "excited" by things, and listens and learns, he may develop into a good and effective CSM partner. Up to him.
Nothing Corbexx has done in any way reduces the effect he has had on wormhole space, and will still achieve. He still has my full support, as he has many others.
You never know, It might just show to everyone concerned, that he is acting for the good of the game overalll, and not be accused of just being in it for the wormholers.
He, for me, by his actions has placed himself above politics in the most direct manner. And the effect he can have in making sure the null rebalance does not harm wormhole space has increased. He cannot be accused By CCP of just having narrow interests.
But your mileage may vary.
TLDR, I am still glad I voted for corbexx and chance may or may not be good, who knows?
There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2167
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 01:47:22 -
[8] - Quote
my prediction is Chance will be pushing CCP to prevent people from, you know just for arguments sakes - if there was the rare chance that Wingspan was reinforcing your own POCOs just hypothetically - flipping one of your own POCOs into Wingspan ownership and then RFing it.
I mean...how annoying would it be if Wingsspan suddenly owned a whole bunch of POCOs in random wormholes and our most valued CSM member got notifications time after time after time after time. Or even lossmails for POCOs he didn't build, never expected to own, but just receives magically because someone just right clicks and transfers them?
Pretty annoying, I would bet.
Ping. Ping. Ping.
Ping.
Ping.
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Iyokus Patrouette
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
381
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 02:52:35 -
[9] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:my prediction is Chance will be pushing CCP to prevent people from, you know just for arguments sakes - if there was the rare chance that Wingspan was reinforcing your own POCOs just hypothetically - flipping one of your own POCOs into Wingspan ownership and then RFing it.
I mean...how annoying would it be if Wingsspan suddenly owned a whole bunch of POCOs in random wormholes and our most valued CSM member got notifications time after time after time after time. Or even lossmails for POCOs he didn't build, never expected to own, but just receives magically because someone just right clicks and transfers them?
Pretty annoying, I would bet.
Ping. Ping. Ping.
Ping.
Ping.
I hope not, I get to log in every afternoon and take a leisurely warp over to the customs office while blatantly ignoring the pests currently residing within our hole and give Wingspan a nice wake up PING to let them know i'm online.
Ping, ping, ping.
---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----
|
Andrew Jester
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
1090
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 03:54:43 -
[10] - Quote
MAN
THE
****
UP
JESUS
PLEASE
acting like a bunch of pubbies
If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
|
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2168
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 05:29:17 -
[11] - Quote
Pubbies live in the pub, amirite?
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Trinity Griffin
Clann Fian
9
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 06:29:18 -
[12] - Quote
Yeah your right, they're the idiots huddled together in the corner acting tough. |
calaretu
Honestly We didnt know Unsettled.
268
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 06:37:44 -
[13] - Quote
Not sure if troll or sincere. Nope no clue.
~Bringer of happiness
http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/
.ORLY is recruiting
|
Swann Zeigenfuse
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
2
|
Posted - 2015.03.24 08:30:32 -
[14] - Quote
Kirasten wrote:I don't think Chance really ran as a "wormhole" rep specifically. More like a rep "who does stuff in wormholes" if I understood it correctly.
Here is his campaign platform. He stood as a exploration candidate. |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2172
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 01:30:38 -
[15] - Quote
Look, Chance is on the CSM. The CSM has to provide input to CCP on structures.
This is Chance's corp's first experience owning a POCO. methinks he will need to brush up on structures pretty quick.
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Paul Vashar
Periphery Bound
35
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 01:46:36 -
[16] - Quote
that Procurer damage though |
Kirasten
No Vacancies
127
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 02:36:23 -
[17] - Quote
Swann Zeigenfuse wrote:Kirasten wrote:I don't think Chance really ran as a "wormhole" rep specifically. More like a rep "who does stuff in wormholes" if I understood it correctly. Here is his campaign platform. He stood as a exploration candidate.
Right. Daytripping is his wh platform. So like I said, wormhole-ish |
Adriana Nolen
Sama Guild
65
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 03:18:57 -
[18] - Quote
be glad I didn't run & win WH CSM. |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2174
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 04:28:40 -
[19] - Quote
You would have to do it on an alt, I am sure no one would have voted for you.
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Iowa Banshee
Fenrir Vangard
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 16:24:12 -
[20] - Quote
Adriana Nolen wrote:be glad I didn't run & win WH CSM.
Why not. Don't you want to be part of Goonswarm? |
|
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
151
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 14:32:37 -
[21] - Quote
Trinkets, first of all I'd like to thank you for helping me fit my Proteus a couple weeks ago. You will be proud to know that while I haven't killed a single thing with it yet, I did manage to almost lose it to gate guns. Luckily it was PLEX tanked and I got out in structure.
As far as my approach, yes I'd like to take polls and surveys. WINGSPAN corp already has bi monthly corp surveys to assess direction and morale, as well as gauge other KPIs among our agents.
Now, I can see from your posts you are operating on a few false assumptions about me. The first is that "Chance cares about being competent at PVP." I enjoy EVE because it's a sandbox where nobody defines success other than yourself. When I want to feel good at games, I play titles that were made with clear goals and score/objectives, and optimize strategy to meet those goals. When I want to play space ego wars, I play Eve.
The second presumption is "Chance knows how to tell if his structures are being attacked." Can't say I've figured that one out yet!
You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
|
Ilaister
Absolutely Certain
170
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 15:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Trinket - much love but you realise nobody in Wspace has pointed out how worthless bombers are here for a reason?
Edit blog pls :)
|
Keskora Yaari
POS Party Low-Class
23
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 15:31:35 -
[23] - Quote
Haha Trinket that POCO switch is so deliciously trolly. |
Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
234
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 16:11:06 -
[24] - Quote
Isk sent to cover loss of poor mammoth. |
slam34
Defiance LLC
11
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 16:42:15 -
[25] - Quote
I just recently discovered the Wingspan Delivery Services video collection. Entertaining.
I'm sure Chance will do his best to contribute to the CSM now that he is there.
I expect that the new mechanics and new structures will develop a life of their own and the reasons they need changing, especially in regards to wormhole use, will be lost in the gathering momentum of the shiney new things as they are developed. As deadlines loom and programming compromises are made, we will most likely have a baffling new array of things that do not work right and cannot be easily changed. And we will grumblingly adapt and make do with what we have, to do what we want them to do instead of what they were designed to do.
And you know what? I'm OK with that. That's always been the best part of EvE.
-áPeople are people. No matter what country, culture, religion, political party, business or communtiy you encounter in your travels, you will never find a shortage of people who will make it their personal mission in life to tell you how to live yours.
|
Viggo Konstanin
Midnight Elites Failure To Communicate Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2015.03.26 17:09:57 -
[26] - Quote
On the bright side, we have now in Chance a WH CSM that will advocate hard for the revision of POCO ownership mechanics. |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2187
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 14:31:07 -
[27] - Quote
If the innumerable POCo attacks he's getting this week don;t prompt a change to POCO tranfer mechanics, then Marmites will be the ones who Q.Q the most and get it done.
Just sayin', I am working on Anooyikis, a wormhole bastion in a C2 with E545/R474 null-C6 statics (which no one in their right mind wants, ergo no one will ever actually seriously siege) where the POCOs are owned by, viz. Marmites, Wingspan, Pursuit of Happiness, Deadly Fingertips, etc etc. and where wormhole representatives who are annoyed by said wardec station camping griefers come to congreagate and, using alts in omens with Standard M crystals which nev er burn out, ping said POCOs ever couple of hours until said owners of the POCos get jack of receiving notifications and come onto the forums and Q.Q about it.
Annoyikis. it's wormholes for douches.
Prolapse. Taking fights since 2014.
Sudden Buggery. Got duumb? Hola, Batmanuel!
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Andrew Jester
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
1101
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 17:11:44 -
[28] - Quote
how has nobody made the "we have a chance Chance will do something about structures"?
come on people
If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
|
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
152
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 18:34:10 -
[29] - Quote
Well what I'm hearing is you guys don't want docking, and only want mooring if it solves similar problems that POS shields solve. It certainly sounds like a reasonable request.
PS I do personally dislike the 48 hr mobile deport timer but not enough to fight against it unless there's a reason/support.
You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
|
scorchlikeshiswhiskey
Totally Abstract O X I D E
384
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 18:41:56 -
[30] - Quote
Chance Ravinne wrote:Well what I'm hearing is you guys don't want docking, and only want mooring if it solves similar problems that POS shields solve. It certainly sounds like a reasonable request.
PS I do personally dislike the 48 hr mobile deport timer but not enough to fight against it unless there's a reason/support. What we don't want, and those things are part of, is for WH space to become an extension/bastard clone of null. So if you're ever unsure how we would react, just ask yourself if a given suggestion would make WH space more like null and you will likely have your answer.
What is your opinion on the possibility that gates in Sov null will be able to influence WH spawn mechanics and/or behaviors? I don't think the actual effects being considered have been released, if they have I haven't been made aware, but I am not a fan of the "wormhole stabilizer" mechanic for the reason listed up there^^. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |