Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 76 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Puh Tayto
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 10:39:26 -
[31] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:I came across this quite interesting quote from CCP Falcon and with all the recent changes was wondering if he feels the new NulSec meets his stated opinion or does it need some amending.
Eve is now further away from what he describes than ever before. The amount of "rules" are overwhelming the sandbox element. what makes you think a sandbox with rules is not a sandbox?
Here's a big box full of sand, go play in it. NO NOT LIKE THAT |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
9212
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 10:54:53 -
[32] - Quote
Puh Tayto wrote:Bienator II wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:I came across this quite interesting quote from CCP Falcon and with all the recent changes was wondering if he feels the new NulSec meets his stated opinion or does it need some amending.
Eve is now further away from what he describes than ever before. The amount of "rules" are overwhelming the sandbox element. what makes you think a sandbox with rules is not a sandbox? Here's a big box full of sand, go play in it. NO NOT LIKE THAT As a parent of twin boys, that's exactly what happens " no, don't ,stop that,put that down,let go of her hair.....and his"
"I'm also quite confident that you are laughing
and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers."
=]I[=
|
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
197
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 11:20:50 -
[33] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Puh Tayto wrote:Bienator II wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:I came across this quite interesting quote from CCP Falcon and with all the recent changes was wondering if he feels the new NulSec meets his stated opinion or does it need some amending.
Eve is now further away from what he describes than ever before. The amount of "rules" are overwhelming the sandbox element. what makes you think a sandbox with rules is not a sandbox? Here's a big box full of sand, go play in it. NO NOT LIKE THAT As a parent of twin boys, that's exactly what happens " no, don't ,stop that,put that down,let go of her hair.....and his" CCP has to shape the conditions in the sandbox universe so that more than 1 player can happily use the sand to do something with it, also players of different age need a meaningful way to play "together" without dividing the box. A virtually impossible endeavor requiring a constant flux of re-balancing. That said, I'm in general for simple (but effective) rules, but it's hard to find those in front of a bathful of criminal energy from thousands of experienced pixel warriors.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
1174
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 11:21:43 -
[34] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Iteration on the sov changes is underway.
The first outline won't be what the final implementation looks like.
If the 4 hours comes about then yeah it will not be what most players want, but we still don't know the final sov updates.
In relation to the NPE comments, I can't disagree with you. Solo play for a new player sucks. There's been a few related threads in recent times. Only the 4 hour window?
The whole Fozzie Logic plan is ludicrous. For a few months people will do a lot of fighting, try hold onto the SOV Then they will fail cascade and give it up, moving into NPC Null and Low Sec. The huge alliances will hold the moons from there. Smaller ones will try feed on the dead carcass of SOV until they get tired of being trolled by the huge alliances.
Eventually, Null will be even more empty and a waste land. CCP will shift server resources to Low Sec and the Moon systems where the fighting occurs.
People will give up on making their own kindoms, bringing down the huge alliances. The huge ones will become shawdows of themselves, like the alliances you see floating around now that used to have SOV but can't grab it any longer.
The game will lose ambitious players and theme park game play will be on its way.
OR
CCP will actually see how terrible it all is, get someone else to take over as "SOV Null game designer" (to sideline Fozzie) and do some emergency patches to fix the huge mess he is about to make.
I am very about the coming changes ... but hey, there is always High Sec Incursions and Worm Holes!
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other areas of space, where they can grow.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
210
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 12:01:15 -
[35] - Quote
CCP will actually see how terrible it all is, get someone else to take over as "SOV Null game designer" (to sideline Fozzie) and do some emergency patches to fix the huge mess he is about to make.
I am very about the coming changes ... but hey, there is always High Sec Incursions and Worm Holes!
P.S. Fozzie has his vision, he has written it in his dev blog. He believes that he is completely right. Jump fatigue for all the complaining is working perfectly as planned in the design. Now he is very sure of himself, so he is going to push through magic wands and easy flips to forward his Pandemic Legion style of playing EVE.[/quote]
CCP games worst mistake is hiring players to become dev's who have no idea on proper game design for the entire customers for which they provide a service for.. and in turn turning the game into "their own game" which all it does is ruin the sandbox even more.
if he designed other games and had a portfolio to prove he's excellent I'd be a little kinder out of respect. but honestly if they continue down this road of allowing fanboys to ruin their art.. then I look forward to the day I unsub and stop paying their bills.
vision.. vision.. yeah last dev said he had a vision and that ended well with teams being removed.. he didn't include his vision involving him splitting just like the others visions who split as well.
|
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
33744
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 12:12:44 -
[36] - Quote
It's impossible to design a sandbox with no rules. EVE has had rules since forever, just like any other sandbox. It's the players that are unable to expand properly into the setting most of the time.
Why do bad threads happen to good people?
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10491
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 12:24:23 -
[37] - Quote
I'm not nearly as doom and gloom about, well, anything going on with the game right now as some of you are. That's not to say I don't have serious concerns. But at the end of the day, CCP isn't doing anything on the scale of "monoclegate/incarna" bad.
What is happening I think (as an outside observer that not only doesn't have the same information CCP has, but also as a guy who doesn't depend on EVE for food, shelter and clothing like a CCP employee does) is that sometimes people on the inside forget how to see things like people on the outside do. Developers may have been (and may still be) players, but actually working for a company changes all perspectives.
Anyways, yes, the "FozzieSov" idea is terrible. Not because it isn't well designed. Not because Fozzie and Co. are stupid (their are very smart). No, it's bad because it demonstrates that those guys don't understand the people they are developing for. They seem to think "pvp is pvp" without understanding that individual people and groups that like pvp like different forms of it.
The pvp that happens in low sec and FW is fundamentally different from what happens in null (and what happens in null is different from wormholes, what happens in wormholes is different from high sec, etc). "FozzieSov" is more like FW than anything else, and FW is small gang/solo style pvp. While plenty of null players like that kind of stuff, if they wanted that full time they'd have just gone to or stayed in FW.
Null sec attracts 'big fleets and big ships' types (the so called F1 monkeys, of which I am a proud member) and this Sov system creates an environment directly counter to what sov null dwellers are there for. Putting FozzieSov in null is like wiping away the current FW system in low sec and replacing it with Dominion Sov.. FW people would have just gone to null if they wanted to play that way.
Most of the pvp in EVE is actually small gang and solo. High sec, low sec and FW low sec, npc null, wormhole space, all of these are small gang territory (99% of the time, if there is a big fight in low sec or npc null, it's Sov null coalitions fighting lol). EVE has one real fleet fight (and capital fight) arena (Sov null) and CCPs brilliant idea here is to impose a small gang Sov system on it....
This is why CCP gets complaints, because sometimes they demonstrate breath-taking short sightedness. |
Sgt Ocker
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
387
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 13:36:03 -
[38] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:that quote was originally taken from the largest ganking tear thread of last year and pertains to non consensual pvp in all areas of space(read highsec). Here is the origional Quote from this thread and was a direct response to being called out over nerfs to the predatory playstyle Edit: he has a couple of other posts in that thread escalating to that one that inform it somewhat, sovereignty was not even remotely relevant to the discussion (read ****fest) and is somewhat out of context for this topic. So his views and opinions on Eve would vary depending on what the topic is? I hope your wrong, he is one of the few Devs I have any faith in, that he wants what is best for the game, rather than what makes him popular with his game friends. Don't take me the wrong way now, I have my concerns about the upcoming changes also , however I think it's a bit early to be calling our community manager out over proposed features while they are still very much in development. I'm not calling CCP Falcon to task over the changes to SOV. I'm asking if "his vision" and perception has changed since he wrote what i quoted in the original post. The quoted post was to an extent a general overview of his opinion on Eve, not just 1 specific part of it. As I said, I actually have faith CCP Falcon does have good intentions, I would just like to know if he believes the game is headed in the right direction, in his opinion.
Not long now till these major changes to the way many play the game are due to go live. CCP said, they wanted to give plenty of notice to players to have time to evaluate feedback to the proposal. So far, there has been a lot of feedback but no further input from the Devs responsible for the coming changes. Not even the obligatory - We are reading this.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
|
Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
299
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 13:45:09 -
[39] - Quote
WhyYouHeffToBeMad IsOnlyGame wrote:is eve kill yet? Sisohiv wrote:As for the Sandbox, it was never a sandbox. Even look at CCP social media. They don't showcase building in EVE. They showcase lie, cheat, steal, backstab and destroy. and you're saying that whatever players are destroying was put there by the devs, like in the mainstream FPS games that tell you, "here's a wall, shoot a rocket at it and watch it explode"? there is nothing that players build in this game, such as ships, starbases and even entire empires with vast armies of tens of thousands of other players? no? okay then if that's the case I think I might be in the wrong game. time to unsub, eve is definitely kill.
I already answered that, you parsed it out when you misquoted me.
Sisohiv wrote:EVE by the numbers. What numbers?
As for the Sandbox, it was never a sandbox. Even look at CCP social media. They don't showcase building in EVE. They showcase lie, cheat, steal, backstab and destroy.
The most recent being a 600 billion ISK corp theft that was '6 months in the making'. Ignore the years and players it took to build it.
|
Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
601
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 13:45:31 -
[40] - Quote
Interesting in the history of CCP and Eve, there appears to be one developer that while ambitious, seems to have carte blanche or "whatever I feel is correct" free rein to do whatever they like, instead of working as a group it seems.
CCP Soundwave CCP Greyscale CCP Fozzie
The next one will be...?
I could be wrong, but just a perspective of mine. |
|
|
CCP Falcon
11091
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 13:52:07 -
[41] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:CCP Falcon, I would be really interested to hear whether your perspective of the new and improved "Eve by numbers" has changed your "opinion" as quoted above.
Nope
CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon
Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3
|
|
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 14:05:46 -
[42] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: Null sec attracts 'big fleets and big ships' types (the so called F1 monkeys, of which I am a proud member) and this Sov system creates an environment directly counter to what sov null dwellers are there for. Putting FozzieSov in null is like wiping away the current FW system in low sec and replacing it with Dominion Sov.. FW people would have just gone to null if they wanted to play that way.
Most of the pvp in EVE is actually small gang and solo. High sec, low sec and FW low sec, npc null, wormhole space, all of these are small gang territory (99% of the time, if there is a big fight in low sec or npc null, it's Sov null coalitions fighting lol). EVE has one real fleet fight (and capital fight) arena (Sov null) and CCPs brilliant idea here is to impose a small gang Sov system on it....
This is why CCP gets complaints, because sometimes they demonstrate breath-taking short sightedness.
Very on the point. My second thought on the proposals was ... this is FW 2.0. As a small gang / solo player I personally would like to see my playstyle expanded to new areas, but I think a lot of people don't like it, meaning less targets finally. I don't have a good idea yet ... just some random "feelings". Sov should be around siege and shooting big things with many ships (scrap that Entosis thingy)... maybe Moon goo should be randomly redistributed periodically, so regions get exhausted on usage of the same people (similar like the swing of FW today). Actually the FW analogy is not that bad, "just" scale it up to longer periods and bigger fleets.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Gilan Isana
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 19:16:51 -
[43] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I'd just like to say that I didn't read one word of this thread past the title and I intend to keep it that way. Nonetheless, I felt I should post on principle. So here I am poking at keys and contributing not in the least to whatever is passing for discourse here. Mr Epeen
HAHAHAHAHA
best post on the thread!!
+1 |
Serene Repose
2525
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 19:20:36 -
[44] - Quote
What I want to know is, what side am I on? Without Mr. Epeen taking a discernible THRUST, it's difficult to navigate these waters.
Point of curiosity: Is it really true to play in null sec all you have to do is pound on F1 (after you've Ctrl+clicked a target, that is?) Unless of course you become a fleet commander which requires non-stop shouting of indecipherable expletives - true?
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to type on your keyboard and remove all doubt.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
1175
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 20:03:36 -
[45] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:What I want to know is, what side am I on? Without Mr. Epeen taking a discernible THRUST, it's difficult to navigate these waters.
Point of curiosity: Is it really true to play in null sec all you have to do is pound on F1 (after you've Ctrl+clicked a target, that is?) Unless of course you become a fleet commander which requires non-stop shouting of indecipherable expletives - true? ..... pretty much. There are other factors, such as:
- remembering to anchor up. - broadcasting for repairs when they target you. - over heating the right modules at the right times. - remembering to take drugs. - fitting your ship according to the latest doctrine - spreading ewar if it is used. - aligning, warping and jumping correctly and not being a lemming.
Then there are always other things to do:
- come up with the doctrines - supply the ships and modules - be a logi achor - be a logi and decide who lives or dies (you can "accidentally"repair enemies sometimes) - fly ewar ships and learn to survive in fleets while essentially 3rd partying on the fight and being extremely useful. - tackling (hero tackling is an activity branch of this)
You can also subdivide roles.
- fleet commander doesn't have to be booster and can just warp the fleet around - ewar squad leaders can warp in and out - target callers can be seperate.
So forth and so on the fleet commander can sit in a squad and pretend to be Picard essentially.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other areas of space, where they can grow.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 20:27:04 -
[46] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Interesting in the history of CCP and Eve, there appears to be one developer that while ambitious, seems to have carte blanche or "whatever I feel is correct" free rein to do whatever they like, instead of working as a group it seems.
CCP Soundwave CCP Greyscale CCP Fozzie
The next one will be...?
I could be wrong, but just a perspective of mine.
no you're correct,
that's all because their head boss came up with a brilliant plan to allow devs to work on whatever they feel , as if this gave them a chance to rejuvenate their minds and not be so stressed out and under the gun.. she is the one allowing this free reign.. the owner is the one hiring players to ruin his business.. THAT is a problem.
eve online is not going to "hold the line" once the competition comes.. eve valkerie?? what a joke hahah VR is a gimmick just like 3D gimmick.. it never stays around just some companies pulling a money grab.. it will not become standard, it will not be a success but ccp still pulling out those cut scenes trailers hoping it will dangle the carrots for them.
then super cap pilots went totally batchit crazy and threatened to quit this extremely biased game.. ccp seagull makes a "promise" to make capital ships important this year..
now we'll wait for her promise to make null sec more thrilling to get new players there to experience it...
cause the damage fozzie-sov is about to do is worse than soundwave, greyscale (ccp greyscale **** things up really really bad)
he talks a good game and that's why ccp hired him.. just like why they gave that mintchip chick a job. fawking players of the god damn game getting jobs cause they allow it. not cause they have experience in game design.. all cause they played the ****ing game! in the states dev's or people trying to call themselves a dev with that limited experience would be laughed out of the studio. like that idiot who tried to apply for head coaching position in the NFL... all cause his Madden Game Stats said he was brilliant!!!!
hey CCP I save squirrels and made a life-sized titan out of bacon.. give me a damn job you punks! then let me take on pvp in this game.. I will show you the future!!!
I would make sure to invite guest speakers to fan fest and make it so exciting they would not fall asleep during their own presentation on stage!... ( yes! ccp im not ever going to let that one go!!)
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
16211
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 20:29:36 -
[47] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Iteration on the sov changes is underway.
The first outline won't be what the final implementation looks like.
If the 4 hours comes about then yeah it will not be what most players want, but we still don't know the final sov updates.
In relation to the NPE comments, I can't disagree with you. Solo play for a new player sucks. There's been a few related threads in recent times. Only the 4 hour window? The whole Fozzie Logic plan is ludicrous. For a few months people will do a lot of fighting, try hold onto the SOV Then they will fail cascade and give it up, moving into NPC Null and Low Sec.
If getting lots of fights makes current sov owners fail-cascade, then so much the better.
My experience is that long intervals of getting no fights that mean anything is what actually leaves alliances vulnerable to fail-cascading.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
|
Joia Crenca
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
95
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 21:10:05 -
[48] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I'm not nearly as doom and gloom about, well, anything going on with the game right now as some of you are. That's not to say I don't have serious concerns. But at the end of the day, CCP isn't doing anything on the scale of "monoclegate/incarna" bad.
What is happening I think (as an outside observer that not only doesn't have the same information CCP has, but also as a guy who doesn't depend on EVE for food, shelter and clothing like a CCP employee does) is that sometimes people on the inside forget how to see things like people on the outside do. Developers may have been (and may still be) players, but actually working for a company changes all perspectives.
Anyways, yes, the "FozzieSov" idea is terrible. Not because it isn't well designed. Not because Fozzie and Co. are stupid (they are very smart). No, it's bad because it demonstrates that those guys don't understand the people they are developing for. They seem to think "pvp is pvp" without understanding that individual people and groups that like pvp like different forms of it.
The pvp that happens in low sec and FW is fundamentally different from what happens in null (and what happens in null is different from wormholes, what happens in wormholes is different from high sec, etc). "FozzieSov" is more like FW than anything else, and FW is small gang/solo style pvp. While plenty of null players like that kind of stuff, if they wanted that full time they'd have just gone to or stayed in FW.
Null sec attracts 'big fleets and big ships' types (the so called F1 monkeys, of which I am a proud member) and this Sov system creates an environment directly counter to what sov null dwellers are there for. Putting FozzieSov in null is like wiping away the current FW system in low sec and replacing it with Dominion Sov.. FW people would have just gone to null if they wanted to play that way.
Most of the pvp in EVE is actually small gang and solo. High sec, low sec and FW low sec, npc null, wormhole space, all of these are small gang territory (99% of the time, if there is a big fight in low sec or npc null, it's Sov null coalitions fighting lol). EVE has one real fleet fight (and capital fight) arena (Sov null) and CCPs brilliant idea here is to impose a small gang Sov system on it....
This is why CCP gets complaints, because sometimes they demonstrate breath-taking short sightedness.
This is pretty well reasoned out, so I wanted to give it a little more life before it gets buried. Is it fairly correct? |
Mashie Saldana
Gallente Rebels Inc. Villore Accords
1562
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 21:23:33 -
[49] - Quote
In my opinion CCP has no clue what to do with this game anymore. You got bittervets on one side complaining just about everything (OMG CCP U GONNA NERF MY 10 TITANS AND 20 SUPERS IM UNSUBBIN WITH 50 ACCOUNTS) and you got newbros on the other side who want to get stuff fast and easy.
You can't please everyone. I would personally remove all supers from the game, maybe caps too but not sure about that.
But that's just me.
How to win EVE
|
Sgt Ocker
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
388
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 22:03:15 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:CCP Falcon, I would be really interested to hear whether your perspective of the new and improved "Eve by numbers" has changed your "opinion" as quoted above. Nope Thank you for paying attention. Out of curiosity; On the subject of SOV; Do you see the reductions in play styles as something of a problem? Stating goals for change that are not going to be achieved? Turning SOV into a series of mass player grinding, mini games? Holding Sov becoming a part time job? CCP imposing limits on when and how an individual plays?
From a players perspective, all these things are reasons NOT to play eve. I did FW, the mini game concept, although it paid well and served a purpose, overall turned me off it. Now Sov is being turned into a bigger version of FW but without the incentive of income (or anything else) as a draw card.
These changes not only remove player choice for sov warfare (if you can still call it that), they impose strict conditions of entry.
I know you can't, or choose not to come out and publicly speak against current development trends BUT for the sake of Eve, I hope your doing something. If indeed you do believe this is the right direction for Sov Nul and Eve as a whole, I was completely wrong about you.
I won't quit, I'll keep 1 account active, using up my isk reserves, just to watch the SOV changes fail.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
|
|
Eve Solecist
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 22:06:21 -
[51] - Quote
You're hilarious.
The beginning of the initial post of this thread ... ... only the first few lines ... ... already showed that it's not worth it reading.
Like, for example, how you take nullsec and believe that it's literally all of EVE.
Because that's what you write.
Dude, you're just angry and feel somehow self important enough that you posted here, because somehow it seemed like it would matter.
It doesn't.
You are delusional on so many levels that it's not even amusing anymore.
But the best part is the character you post with.
Or the fact that you seem to somehow believe you understand everything so well ... ... that you can correctly predict what will happen.
Thanks for the insight into your mind, though. Sadly there was nothing new to learn.
"Please do not file support tickets to ask if your support ticket will be answered soon." - Actual Quote.
|
Sgt Ocker
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
388
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 22:39:05 -
[52] - Quote
Eve Solecist wrote:You're hilarious.
The beginning of the initial post of this thread ... ... only the first few lines ... ... already showed that it's not worth it reading.
Like, for example, how you take nullsec and believe that it's literally all of EVE.
Because that's what you write.
Dude, you're just angry and feel somehow self important enough that you posted here, because somehow it seemed like it would matter.
It doesn't.
You are delusional on so many levels that it's not even amusing anymore.
But the best part is the character you post with.
Or the fact that you seem to somehow believe you understand everything so well ... ... that you can correctly predict what will happen.
Thanks for the insight into your mind, though. Sadly there was nothing new to learn. +1 for troll value. I was going to award it to Mr Epeen but you outdid him.
You have an amazing ability to misread or is it misinterpret.
I didn't say Nulsec is all of Eve, I said Eve is no longer the same and nulsec is..... I'm not angry, I started unsubbing when the range nerfs fatigue and then restrictions on multiboxing came into play. Also the reason i am posting with this toon. I don't plan on resubbing a 7 year old toon with thousands of kills and easy to see activity just to post MY opinion.
If I'm wrong, all the better but I don't believe I'm far from correct. Having played this game daily for 7 and a half years (I live alone and have limited movement capabilities so Eve has been my 2nd home; those I interact with are like family), I don't know everything but have a pretty good all round view.
I am aware my voice and opinions mean little in the overall scheme of things but I am allowed to voice them. At least I have an opinion, all you did was tell me mine is wrong.
My ability to amuse was not something I considered when writing. As for the insight into my thoughts, your welcome.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
|
Ned Thomas
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
1384
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 23:03:44 -
[53] - Quote
Is it June yet? I really want it to be June.
Don't get lost alone - Join Signal Cartel, New Eden's premier haven for explorers!
Onward to Thera with Eve Scout
|
Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
449
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 23:50:24 -
[54] - Quote
why are you feeding Why for BoB sake
anyway CCP need to open da damn door !!
CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and Put Them on Killmail too, add Logi on killmails
.... Open that damn door !!
|
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
239
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 23:54:38 -
[55] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:CCP Falcon, I would be really interested to hear whether your perspective of the new and improved "Eve by numbers" has changed your "opinion" as quoted above. Nope Thank you for paying attention. Out of curiosity; On the subject of SOV; Do you see the reductions in play styles as something of a problem? Stating goals for change that are not going to be achieved? Turning SOV into a series of mass player grinding, mini games? Holding Sov becoming a part time job? CCP imposing limits on when and how an individual plays? From a players perspective, all these things are reasons NOT to play eve. I did FW, the mini game concept, although it paid well and served a purpose, overall turned me off it. Now Sov is being turned into a bigger version of FW but without the incentive of income (or anything else) as a draw card. These changes not only remove player choice for sov warfare (if you can still call it that), they impose strict conditions of entry. I know you can't, or choose not to come out and publicly speak against current development trends BUT for the sake of Eve, I hope your doing something. If indeed you do believe this is the right direction for Sov Nul and Eve as a whole, I was completely wrong about you. I won't quit, I'll keep 1 account active, using up my isk reserves, just to watch the SOV changes fail.
just unsub and go, we don't care as much as you don't.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
213
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 00:01:45 -
[56] - Quote
just unsub and go, we don't care as much as you don't. [/quote]
if another player unsubs then we'll never know the true number of active players in the eve online.
oh wait.. we still don't know cause ccp refuses to show the "real" number
no alts mess,
real numbers..
they wont show you cause it looks THAT bad, and with these changes its going to be even worse..
just wait till june when folks get REALLY ANGRY..
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
1176
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 00:05:14 -
[57] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Iteration on the sov changes is underway.
The first outline won't be what the final implementation looks like.
If the 4 hours comes about then yeah it will not be what most players want, but we still don't know the final sov updates.
In relation to the NPE comments, I can't disagree with you. Solo play for a new player sucks. There's been a few related threads in recent times. Only the 4 hour window? The whole Fozzie Logic plan is ludicrous. For a few months people will do a lot of fighting, try hold onto the SOV Then they will fail cascade and give it up, moving into NPC Null and Low Sec. If getting lots of fights makes current sov owners fail-cascade, then so much the better. My experience is that long intervals of getting no fights that mean anything is what actually leaves alliances vulnerable to fail-cascading. Low Sec 2.0
Different strokes and folks. Low Sec is already a tiny niche. They aren't going to suddenly fill Null Sec.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other areas of space, where they can grow.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
12359
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 00:06:16 -
[58] - Quote
Milla Goodpussy wrote: they wont show you cause it looks THAT bad
Is that why they so happily shed all those ISBotter subs?
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
|
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
58
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 00:43:25 -
[59] - Quote
NPE should include a mandatory 'tour of duty' in Faction Warfare. Welcome to combat 1.1 (1.0 is shooting at red crosses). Learn to fight, and learn to die. Many times, preferably.
In fact, any NPC corp character should automatically be in Faction Warfare. Don't like the heat? Then find solace in the rookie systems. Otherwise man up or join a corp. Or you can stay NPC and be a persistent target for your faction's enemies. No more 'free pass' for NPC neutrals (you are all spais anyway)
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1377
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 00:51:50 -
[60] - Quote
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:NPE should include a mandatory 'tour of duty' in Faction Warfare. Welcome to combat 1.1 (1.0 is shooting at red crosses). Learn to fight, and learn to die. Many times, preferably. In fact, any NPC corp character should automatically be in Faction Warfare. Don't like the heat? Then find solace in the rookie systems. Otherwise man up or join a corp. Or you can stay NPC and be a persistent target for your faction's enemies. No more 'free pass' for NPC neutrals (you are all spais anyway ) It's funny when people post this as if it would actually play out like that. The only thing that would do is create a flood of 1 man corps with only characters who never undock remaining in NPC corps. That and a rash of wardec corp cycling like you've never seen should people actually try dec'ing individuals. Or further proliferation of alts. Or both.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 76 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |