Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 52 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
842
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:15:07 -
[91] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
This is a classic rant, the thing was that some of us wanted to run challenging missions as a team, level 4's are actually a laugh when you do it with a small fleet but only a very few missions are a challenge and to do that one has to shoot all the triggers, but level 5's in hisec were for a brief period a lot of fun for us, and then the risk reward player killers did their whining and they got them removed from hisec . Thanks for your work in making PvE boring for us...
whats broing? the fact you cant make nullsec income with concord protection? if your bored then move to somewhere more fun, its not really hard is it Concord does not exist in null sec are you some sort of wombat? There was some nice missions that required team effort and some people whined and got them moved to lowsec, for a brief period some people had a lot of fun doing them as a group, but people whined and the fun was removed from us all because people could not find anything to kill in lowsec because they killed off anyone who went in there.. And people now do level 4's as a group every so often and have fun blowing up the damsel, or setting all the triggers off for something challenging in PVE in hisec... EDIT: The correct thing to have done was give some extra reward for the ones on lowsec, but CCP are not clever at times... you are the only wombat for not even understanding a word i just said
You make your own safety in null sec I thought everyone understood that, but obviously not, take Deklin for example that is safer than hisec, its remote and protected by the ultimate 0.0 war machine, behind loads of other regions that attackers have to get past to attack. That is the only place in the game where you have a certain amount of security, OK certain constellations in Cobalt Edge are pretty damn good in terms of being difficult to get to. I have been in null, get it...
It was a great shame that engaging team orientated PvE content was removed from hisec due to the whining by HTFU types.
Ella's Snack bar
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10800
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:17:56 -
[92] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
This is a classic rant, the thing was that some of us wanted to run challenging missions as a team, level 4's are actually a laugh when you do it with a small fleet but only a very few missions are a challenge and to do that one has to shoot all the triggers, but level 5's in hisec were for a brief period a lot of fun for us, and then the risk reward player killers did their whining and they got them removed from hisec . Thanks for your work in making PvE boring for us...
Oh, it's classic all right. You and people like you are why we have a problem (in game and in the world in general).
What you posted here translates as "I was having fun doing something that I didn't care was bad for the game, then the people who actually do care about the game complained and CCP took away my unbalanced thing". You prove my theory about "carebearism": At the heart of carebear thinking is a selfishness so intense, the carebear thinks it's normal to be that way.
CCP said over and over that they didn't remove high sec lvl 5s because of complaining, but because high sec lvl 5s were never intended, it was a BUG that a few people learned how to exploit. It created the unfair situation of allowing a few players to farm up income (SOLO, in a Rattlesnake) that should not have been possible.
What's incredible is that CCP turned right around and made incursions, which did nothing but replicate the high sec lvl 5 problem.
Oh, and that "fun" argument is a lie. When CCP announced they were going to nerf incursions, Incursion runners claimed "it's not about the isk, it's about the fun and the community!". CCP nerfed incursions and those communities that somehow didn't care about isk died overnight, proving that they were lying. If it was about 'fun' the isk wouldn't matter.
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
842
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:22:34 -
[93] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
This is a classic rant, the thing was that some of us wanted to run challenging missions as a team, level 4's are actually a laugh when you do it with a small fleet but only a very few missions are a challenge and to do that one has to shoot all the triggers, but level 5's in hisec were for a brief period a lot of fun for us, and then the risk reward player killers did their whining and they got them removed from hisec . Thanks for your work in making PvE boring for us...
Oh, it's classic all right. You and people like you are why we have a problem (in game and in the world in general). What you posted here translates as "I was having fun doing something that I didn't care was bad for the game, then the people who actually do care about the game complained and CCP took away my unbalanced thing". You prove my theory about "carebearism": At the heart of carebear thinking is a selfishness so intense, the carebear thinks it's normal to be that way. CCP said over and over that they didn't remove high sec lvl 5s because of complaining, but because high sec lvl 5s were never intended, it was a BUG that a few people learned how to exploit. It created the unfair situation of allowing a few players to farm up income (SOLO, in a Rattlesnake) that should not have been possible. What's incredible is that CCP turned right around and made incursions, which did nothing but replicate the high sec lvl 5 problem. Oh, and that "fun" argument is a lie. When CCP announced they were going to nerf incursions, Incursion runners claimed "it's not about the isk, it's about the fun and the community!". CCP nerfed incursions and those communities that somehow didn't care about isk died overnight, proving that they were lying. If it was about 'fun' the isk wouldn't matter.
Really so the brief period when me and some corp mates did level 5's in a small fleet were lies, yeah right we had a really good time doing them and you lot ruined it again...
Ella's Snack bar
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10800
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:23:10 -
[94] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
Concord does not exist in null sec are you some sort of wombat?
Typical, you misunderstand what he was saying and then call him names. You are the worst part of this community.
Quote: There was some nice missions that required team effort and some people whined and got them moved to lowsec, for a brief period some people had a lot of fun doing them as a group, but people whined and the fun was removed from us all because people could not find anything to kill in lowsec because they killed off anyone who went in there.. And people now do level 4's as a group every so often and have fun blowing up the damsel, or setting all the triggers off for something challenging in PVE in hisec...
Bull. people did high sec lvl 5s solo in rattlesnakes or in RR Domis with an alt.. And again, no one cares about where you play, they whole "you just want me to go to low so you can kill me" thing is just paranoid dementia talk.
Quote: EDIT: The correct thing to have done was give some extra reward for the ones in lowsec, but CCP are not clever at times...
Like they did with low and null incursions... It's amazing, you can SEE that that does not work, and you still think it's a good idea. Amazing.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15674
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:24:13 -
[95] - Quote
Tipa Riot wrote:If I remember correctly it was said, the most liquid income for individual players comes from nullsec ratting ... I don't think Incursions are a big issue, especially as there is a limited supply of them in highsec.
You make less ratting in null than you do in high sec incursions. A lot less.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly.
424
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:24:31 -
[96] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
This is a classic rant, the thing was that some of us wanted to run challenging missions as a team, level 4's are actually a laugh when you do it with a small fleet but only a very few missions are a challenge and to do that one has to shoot all the triggers, but level 5's in hisec were for a brief period a lot of fun for us, and then the risk reward player killers did their whining and they got them removed from hisec . Thanks for your work in making PvE boring for us...
whats broing? the fact you cant make nullsec income with concord protection? if your bored then move to somewhere more fun, its not really hard is it Concord does not exist in null sec are you some sort of wombat? There was some nice missions that required team effort and some people whined and got them moved to lowsec, for a brief period some people had a lot of fun doing them as a group, but people whined and the fun was removed from us all because people could not find anything to kill in lowsec because they killed off anyone who went in there.. And people now do level 4's as a group every so often and have fun blowing up the damsel, or setting all the triggers off for something challenging in PVE in hisec... EDIT: The correct thing to have done was give some extra reward for the ones on lowsec, but CCP are not clever at times... you are the only wombat for not even understanding a word i just said You make your own safety in null sec I thought everyone understood that, but obviously not, take Deklin for example that is safer than hisec, its remote and protected by the ultimate 0.0 war machine, behind loads of other regions that attackers have to get past to attack. That is the only place in the game where you have a certain amount of security, OK certain constellations in Cobalt Edge are pretty damn good in terms of being difficult to get to. I have been in null, get it... It was a great shame that engaging team orientated PvE content was removed from hisec due to the whining by HTFU types.
you still dont understand what im talking about, simply you want to earn similar income of that of nullsec pve but want the protection of concord ie..in highsec lots of isk and lots of safety, you claim you are bored of highsec pve because they took lvl 5's out but yet you seem reluctant to actually move out of highsec to find the fun again
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
842
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:25:51 -
[97] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
Concord does not exist in null sec are you some sort of wombat?
Typical, you misunderstand what he was saying and then call him names. You are the worst part of this community. Quote: There was some nice missions that required team effort and some people whined and got them moved to lowsec, for a brief period some people had a lot of fun doing them as a group, but people whined and the fun was removed from us all because people could not find anything to kill in lowsec because they killed off anyone who went in there.. And people now do level 4's as a group every so often and have fun blowing up the damsel, or setting all the triggers off for something challenging in PVE in hisec...
Bull. people did high sec lvl 5s solo in rattlesnakes or in RR Domis with an alt.. And again, no one cares about where you play, they whole "you just want me to go to low so you can kill me" thing is just paranoid dementia talk. Quote: EDIT: The correct thing to have done was give some extra reward for the ones in lowsec, but CCP are not clever at times...
Like they did with low and null incursions... It's amazing, you can SEE that that does not work, and you still think it's a good idea. Amazing.
So people come in do max ISK per hour and get the content removed from those that did them for fun, I suppose thats right isn't it.
Ella's Snack bar
|
Aladar Dangerface
Zebra Corp The Bastion
156
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:26:48 -
[98] - Quote
Otso Bakarti wrote:There it is... "cheapens...low or null sec". This is just another "move everyone in high sec to low and null so we have more people to gank, since rental gaming is so BORING" thread. So, it's an impromptu conspiracy. Take the tinfoil hat off please, no one is saying everyone should move to null/low/wh space, they are saying 'why should they earn less isk while risking more than someone earning a lot of isk while risking very little'.
EVE is based on risk vs reward which is why people hate on incursions and if you actually read what people are saying you would know this already.
I don't need twitter.
I'm already following you.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10801
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:27:43 -
[99] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
Really so the brief period when me and some corp mates did level 5's in a small fleet were lies, yeah right we had a really good time doing them and you lot ruined it again...
Case in point about selfish carebearism. It doesn't matter that it was a bug. It doesn't matter that it was wrong. It doesn't matter that most people did them solo with Rattlesnakes (killing that whole "group pve" argument). What mattered to you is that you liked it.
And "you lot" (ie people pointing out that a bug existed) did noting, no one made CCP fix something they said was a BUG, they made that choice. And it was a good one, one of the few CCP has made with PVE imo.
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
842
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:29:49 -
[100] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
Really so the brief period when me and some corp mates did level 5's in a small fleet were lies, yeah right we had a really good time doing them and you lot ruined it again...
Case in point about selfish carebearism. It doesn't matter that it was a bug. It doesn't matter that it was wrong. It doesn't matter that most people did them solo with Rattlesnakes (killing that whole "group pve" argument). What mattered to you is that you liked it. And "you lot" (ie people pointing out that a bug existed) did noting, no one made CCP fix something they said was a BUG, they made that choice. And it was a good one, one of the few CCP has made with PVE imo.
But where is the engaging team PvE in hisec?
EDIT: Coincidently I am not a carebear...
Ella's Snack bar
|
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10801
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:31:43 -
[101] - Quote
Aladar Dangerface wrote:Otso Bakarti wrote:There it is... "cheapens...low or null sec". This is just another "move everyone in high sec to low and null so we have more people to gank, since rental gaming is so BORING" thread. So, it's an impromptu conspiracy. Take the tinfoil hat off please, no one is saying everyone should move to null/low/wh space, they are saying 'why should they earn less isk while risking more than someone earning a lot of isk while risking very little'. EVE is based on risk vs reward which is why people hate on incursions and if you actually read what people are saying you would know this already.
That's well said. As I said in my example, it's crazy that I ca make 150 mil per hour with my ONE sniper mach in high sec (in an incursion fleet where all I have to do is keep at range of the aaa and broadcast for shields and occasionally cap, damn Outuni Wave) when It takes me TWO ships and characters to do the same thing in space someone had to fight for and upgrade.
Personally, I don't give a flip about how fat some high sec dude's wallet is or isn't, CCP made incursions so if you want to do them, have at it. But that doesn't change the fact that it's pretty unbalanced, even if it's not faction warfare bomber unbalanced lol.
|
Otso Bakarti
Aliastra Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:32:15 -
[102] - Quote
Aladar Dangerface wrote:Otso Bakarti wrote:There it is... "cheapens...low or null sec". This is just another "move everyone in high sec to low and null so we have more people to gank, since rental gaming is so BORING" thread. So, it's an impromptu conspiracy. Take the tinfoil hat off please, no one is saying everyone should move to null/low/wh space, they are saying 'why should they earn less isk while risking more than someone earning a lot of isk while risking very little'. EVE is based on risk vs reward which is why people hate on incursions and if you actually read what people are saying you would know this already. Try reading the subject line of the OP. The "tin foil hat" reference is tired, and worn.
I survived Win95
|
Milan Nantucket
New Eden Misfits
218
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:32:31 -
[103] - Quote
2Sonas1Cup wrote:SilentAsTheGrave wrote:2Sonas1Cup wrote:Or drastically drop their payouts not the point of killing them but to a more balanced level compared to other highsec activities.
Highsec Incursions payout WAY too much for the risk and time you take.
Many people run incursions to plex accounts log out for the month.
Theres little to no incentive to do anything else in the game once you start running incursions, you wont stop, and you will not do anything else other than your casual pvp on a random alt when the opportunity arises.
Incursions are a decease, they are killing/killed a major part of the game, took the need of doing and trying different things to make isks.
Hell theres not even a reason to leave highsec anymore, whats the incentive of null when you can make as much or even more in the safety of highsec?
Please put an end to incursions, its been far too long already, sanshas must go. Your grammar is a bigger problem than Incursions. Yea but you understand what Im saying right? It is really nonsensical how much highsec incursions pay. It kills eve. CCP: "Youre not supposed to feel safe when you log in, youre supposed to feel a cold and harsh environment" Well this is totally the opposite of what eve feels like right now if youre an incursioner. Heres what I do as an incursioner in eve: - log in - waitlist and grab a beer - join fleet make 250mil an hour with lp included (each account) - run for 2 or 3 hours and log out Wheres the harsh and cold environment in this?
Well I hate the grind of incursions however it does pay for my expensive null sec ship losses. If your looking for a cold harsh environment then post your incursion toons name and next time I am repping ships I would be happy to ignore your request for shield, armor, and cap. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3337
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:32:42 -
[104] - Quote
The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions.
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15675
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:33:48 -
[105] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:take Deklin for example that is safer than hisec
Please provide any evidence that this is the case. Just a quick glance at the KB shows that ratting ship losses dwarf any high sec mission/incursion area despite the far higher population of highsec.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
842
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:34:59 -
[106] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:take Deklin for example that is safer than hisec Please provide any evidence that this is the case. Just a quick glance at the KB shows that ratting ship losses dwarf any high sec mission/incursion area despite the far higher population of highsec.
Already proved that in another thread, despite certain removals from that thread.
Ella's Snack bar
|
Solecist Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
21889
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:36:06 -
[107] - Quote
There is no engaging group PvE in highsec. Incursions aren't engaging.
The only remotely engaging PvE is burner missions ... ... until they are equally predictable to run.
Anything that can be read up on prior to doing it ... ... is not in any way or form engaging.
And you just prove the point about the typical carebear selfishness.
Bumping is fine, Ganking is fine.
The real issue are Carebears. Bad people wishing ill and death upon on all of us.
The obvious solution is to wipe them out and make sure they don't come back.
Let's kill them all for the good of EVEmanity.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10801
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:36:26 -
[108] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
Really so the brief period when me and some corp mates did level 5's in a small fleet were lies, yeah right we had a really good time doing them and you lot ruined it again...
Case in point about selfish carebearism. It doesn't matter that it was a bug. It doesn't matter that it was wrong. It doesn't matter that most people did them solo with Rattlesnakes (killing that whole "group pve" argument). What mattered to you is that you liked it. And "you lot" (ie people pointing out that a bug existed) did noting, no one made CCP fix something they said was a BUG, they made that choice. And it was a good one, one of the few CCP has made with PVE imo. But where is the engaging team PvE in hisec? EDIT: Coincidently I am not a carebear...
It's not in incursions (and it wasn't in high sec lvl 5s, again those were mostly done solo, I know, I did a whole lot of solo high sec lvl 5s). Incursions were supposed to be 'engaging team pve', but it's just monotonous FC led farming that people figured out within a week of it's launch. Good isk but so boring I just sold my incursion boat, I'll buy another in a couple months when I can stomach it.
This is why EVE is a sandbox game, because while I love CCP, they are horrible and making "content", it's better that we make out own.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15678
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:36:28 -
[109] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions.
Station trading does come with risk.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly.
426
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:36:47 -
[110] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions.
not really you face pvp in market trading daily, you dont in incursions
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
|
Mr Duffo
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
98
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:38:08 -
[111] - Quote
I would say remove incursions from low sec. So many times my cruisers have died to gate rats :D Most will abandon the area till incursion is over |
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1724
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:38:31 -
[112] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:FunGu Arsten wrote: lol, actualy as said before it isn't balanced, the isk injection is stupid high for no risk. that doesn't mean we're not allowed to do it - aka: milk the cow.
That's what I do, because I don't see it changing.
Fun fact, the more people getting on the "milk the cow" bandwagon, the lesser the income will be because the number of sites at the same time is limited. No more than 15 HQ fleet (this would already be lower isk/hours because of the delay to get another site would start showing up) will ever be able to get a payout at the same time. 600 character can effectively max it out. If everybody were to put their bling ship where their mouth is, everybody would constantly get contested and chance are incursion would be in "respawn" mode more often after episode of rage popping moms. |
Solecist Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
21889
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:38:36 -
[113] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions. Except that traders are risking billions, because trading is a PvP activity.
You're not a trader it seems. Traders can't predict what will happen, unlike incursion runners.
Bumping is fine, Ganking is fine.
The real issue are Carebears. Bad people wishing ill and death upon on all of us.
The obvious solution is to wipe them out and make sure they don't come back.
Let's kill them all for the good of EVEmanity.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15678
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:39:18 -
[114] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:take Deklin for example that is safer than hisec Please provide any evidence that this is the case. Just a quick glance at the KB shows that ratting ship losses dwarf any high sec mission/incursion area despite the far higher population of highsec. Already proved that in another thread, despite certain removals from that thread.
You proved nothing. Hundreds of losses in null vs a dosen in highsec mission areas. The argument the highsec is more dangerous is a lie.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin. Black Legion.
2174
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:39:45 -
[115] - Quote
2Sonas1Cup wrote:Or drastically drop their payouts not the point of killing them but to a more balanced level compared to other highsec activities.
Highsec Incursions payout WAY too much for the risk and time you take.
I often dream of how the hisec community would self-solve problems like this, if CCP locked people out of NPC corps after 60 days and closed the drop-corp wardec dodging exploit.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Solecist Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
21889
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:40:24 -
[116] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:FunGu Arsten wrote: lol, actualy as said before it isn't balanced, the isk injection is stupid high for no risk. that doesn't mean we're not allowed to do it - aka: milk the cow.
That's what I do, because I don't see it changing. Fun fact, the more people getting on the "milk the cow" bandwagon, the lesser the income will be because the number of sites at the same time is limited. No more than 15 HQ fleet (this would already be lower isk/hours because of the delay to get another site would start showing up) will ever be able to get a payout at the same time. 600 character can effectively max it out. If everybody were to put their bling ship where their mouth is, everybody would constantly get contested and chance are incursion would be in "respawn" mode more often after episode of rage popping moms. Reminds me of how the griefers raged about the goons for killing their moms.
Bumping is fine, Ganking is fine.
The real issue are Carebears. Bad people wishing ill and death upon on all of us.
The obvious solution is to wipe them out and make sure they don't come back.
Let's kill them all for the good of EVEmanity.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10801
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:44:09 -
[117] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions.
That's just insane. "Risk v Reward" in this instance is describing what you can do via in-space activities that actually generate wealth. Trading doesn't generate isk, it's a player run emergent activity where players exchange things.
In other words, station trading has nothing to do with this discussion. We are talking about activities that actually create the isk and items that station traders use. Without PVE , station traders wouldn't exist. |
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1724
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:45:10 -
[118] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:FunGu Arsten wrote: lol, actualy as said before it isn't balanced, the isk injection is stupid high for no risk. that doesn't mean we're not allowed to do it - aka: milk the cow.
That's what I do, because I don't see it changing. Fun fact, the more people getting on the "milk the cow" bandwagon, the lesser the income will be because the number of sites at the same time is limited. No more than 15 HQ fleet (this would already be lower isk/hours because of the delay to get another site would start showing up) will ever be able to get a payout at the same time. 600 character can effectively max it out. If everybody were to put their bling ship where their mouth is, everybody would constantly get contested and chance are incursion would be in "respawn" mode more often after episode of rage popping moms. Reminds me of how the griefers raged about the goons for killing their moms.
With the amount of traction threads like this get, I can't understand why no-one was ever able to motivate 40 dudes to go run a 100+ million isk/hours fleet while also raining on someone else's parade at least partially by stealing some of the best sites.
Then make that 80 dudes and you start to slowdown everybody because sites are not insta-respawning and you also pose a thread to the mom.
Hell you can make it a bit more risky by even solo by pre-loading TCRC sites. A good group will get over it but it's still a tighter spot then smooth sailing the original site from scratch. |
2Sonas1Cup
84
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:48:30 -
[119] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:The entire risk vs reward argument is flawed. The fastest way to make ISK in the game, in terms of ISK per hour is station trading. It carries absolutely zero risk of losing a ship, as you never need to undock.
Given the existence of station trading, I see nothing wrong with incursions. Station trading does come with risk.
1st no, you don't make nearly as much isk and as consistently with station trading as you can with incursions. Been there done that, on top of all the effort you have to put out on your .01 pvp
2nd if there were as many people station trading as there are running incursions then you wouldn't make single penny, be glad not many people trade properly and there's still enough economy for you.
|
Solecist Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
21889
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:52:22 -
[120] - Quote
I think you quoted the wrong person, 2boobs1cup.
Bumping is fine, Ganking is fine.
The real issue are Carebears. Bad people wishing ill and death upon on all of us.
The obvious solution is to wipe them out and make sure they don't come back.
Let's kill them all for the good of EVEmanity.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 52 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |