Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
236
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 20:14:30 -
[1] - Quote
Is there some way to permanently opt out of burner missions?
If there isnt one already then im requesting that a permanent opt out option be added, it is getting tiresome rejecting burners. Just today i had to reject 6 burner missions in a row to get a normal one.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3448
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 20:37:22 -
[2] - Quote
It would be nice to be able to permanently opt out of many types of missions. For example, many people will not do "faction kill missions". Some don't like drone missions. However, at the moment, there is not any way to do these things.
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1373
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 20:58:40 -
[3] - Quote
Yes, the automated grinding isn't automated enough yet, it still takes some brain cells and decisions. This will not stand! |
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
10244
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 21:01:52 -
[4] - Quote
We need a better way to gain empire standing than mission.
=]|[=
|
Xercodo
Xovoni Directorate
4223
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 21:07:14 -
[5] - Quote
We also need a method to repair concord stranding.
If you go working for a pirate factions you can eventually repair all the other standings except for CONCORD. You're permafucked
The Drake is a Lie
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
470
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 23:12:52 -
[6] - Quote
To be fair, none of us are opposed to the addition of burner missions, but I feel that the fact that there is (unlike regular missions) no adverse penalty to declining the several burner missions you typically get per normal mission should be considered.
No offense, but how is this any different than when people bitched up and down about your char's AUR total listed on your wallet screen? You know, the one that is no longer displayed anywhere on the wallet screen? A simple toggle for agents to skip burner missions can't be that unreasonable of a request either. At the very least, isn't this a better option than asking for people who like to run them to bite the bullet for the rest of us and have CCP significantly reduce their likelihood of being offered?
+1
"Tomahawks?"
"----in' A, right?"
"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."
"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
470
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 23:19:47 -
[7] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:We also need a method to repair concord stranding.
If you go working for a pirate factions you can eventually repair all the other standings except for CONCORD. You're permafucked
I'm not entirely sure as I have no expertise in that arena, but I believe running missions for non-pirate agents in low sec is a possible answer (unless there are no such agents in low sec/outlaw space?). Unless I'm mistaken, shwacking officer spawns also nets a sec increase. There' s also those new NPC's that drop the tags you can trade for sec increases as well.
"Tomahawks?"
"----in' A, right?"
"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."
"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
|
Otso Bakarti
Filial Pariahs
276
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 00:27:52 -
[8] - Quote
Hey. This is digital technology. What do you expect, options?
I survived Win95
|
Sniper Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
492
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 05:43:34 -
[9] - Quote
Just be happy you are able to decline them without penalty of cooldown, and move on. |
Nevil Oscillator
206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:22:20 -
[10] - Quote
There is a way to do it
Overview Settings: Un-check the box next to Pirate Faction Ship |
|
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
38412
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:27:37 -
[11] - Quote
Nevil Oscillator wrote:There is a way to do it
Overview Settings: Un-check the box next to Pirate Faction Ship Um, really?
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
|
Nevil Oscillator
206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:28:52 -
[12] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Nevil Oscillator wrote:There is a way to do it
Overview Settings: Un-check the box next to Pirate Faction Ship Um, really?
Sorry My mistake it is NPC Pirate |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
38413
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:35:23 -
[13] - Quote
Nevil Oscillator wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Nevil Oscillator wrote:There is a way to do it
Overview Settings: Un-check the box next to Pirate Faction Ship Um, really? Sorry My mistake it is NPC Pirate How do your overview settings affect what missions you get offered?
I have no clue when it comes to most PvE. It doesn't really seem all that logical but not everything in the game is, so interested to know.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
|
Nevil Oscillator
206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:40:51 -
[14] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Not being stupid. I have no clue when it comes to most PvE. It doesn't really seem all that logical but not everything in the game is, so interested to know.
Its to do with they way you have to go back to doing level 3 missions after you lose your battleship.
Level 3 doesn't have burner missions. Problem solved.
|
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:12:16 -
[15] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Yes, the automated grinding isn't automated enough yet, it still takes some brain cells and decisions. This will not stand!
Well, yes, just thought the same...
"Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
Forum Main
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11483
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 12:46:05 -
[16] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Is there some way to permanently opt out of burner missions?
If there isnt one already then im requesting that a permanent opt out option be added, it is getting tiresome rejecting burners. Just today i had to reject 6 burner missions in a row to get a normal one.
Wrong forum section for this, but +100 from me. Burner missions are "no penalty for declining" , you should be able to opt out completely as they are optional.
No, we shouldn't be able to opt out of other types of missions like faction missions, the cool down/standings loss mechanics are built around the penalties for declining too many, but burner missions have no decline penalty. It's annoying to have to click through so many burners when you have no intention of running burners at all. |
Tarsas Phage
Freight Club
403
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 13:30:11 -
[17] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Is there some way to permanently opt out of burner missions?
If there isnt one already then im requesting that a permanent opt out option be added, it is getting tiresome rejecting burners. Just today i had to reject 6 burner missions in a row to get a normal one.
Yes, clicking that one Reject button must be so tiring.
Perhaps you could use the exercise. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11483
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 13:38:03 -
[18] - Quote
Tarsas Phage wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Is there some way to permanently opt out of burner missions?
If there isnt one already then im requesting that a permanent opt out option be added, it is getting tiresome rejecting burners. Just today i had to reject 6 burner missions in a row to get a normal one. Yes, clicking that one Reject button must be so tiring. Perhaps you could use the exercise.
Clicking 1 isn't tiring. Clicking 3, 4,5,6 and 7 isn't tiring either. Just annoying as hell.
When it was just one kind of Burner mission (Frigs), it wasn't bad, maybe on click through every few normal missions. Now there are three kinds (frigs, frig teams, and now Cruiser/BCs). If they add battleship burners it will get worse. CCP should have included a way to opt out of Anomic missions before adding Team and Base versions, that they didn't (and haven't) is simply bad/lazy game design. |
Velarra
402
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 15:13:59 -
[19] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:We also need a method to repair concord stranding.
If you go working for a pirate factions you can eventually repair all the other standings except for CONCORD. You're permafucked
Would make for an amusing use of DED Connections. |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
1226
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 15:59:02 -
[20] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Is there some way to permanently opt out of burner missions?
If there isnt one already then im requesting that a permanent opt out option be added, it is getting tiresome rejecting burners. Just today i had to reject 6 burner missions in a row to get a normal one. Wrong forum section for this, but +100 from me. Burner missions are "no penalty for declining" , you should be able to opt out completely as they are optional. No, we shouldn't be able to opt out of other types of missions like faction missions, the cool down/standings loss mechanics are built around the penalties for declining too many, but burner missions have no decline penalty. It's annoying to have to click through so many burners when you have no intention of running burners at all.
and I have no intention of running most of those pesky annoying normal missions, and the standings mechanics have yet to mess with my ability to do so. it is annoying to have to click decline on the super boring missions. Seriously for most missions I think I spend more time in warp, which I don't really mind as it lets me forum post, but to sit there and shoot at a ton of NPCs for a crap payout... no thanks, about as fun as mining.
@ChainsawPlankto
|
|
Xercodo
Xovoni Directorate
4225
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 16:29:07 -
[21] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:Xercodo wrote:We also need a method to repair concord stranding.
If you go working for a pirate factions you can eventually repair all the other standings except for CONCORD. You're permafucked I'm not entirely sure as I have no expertise in that arena, but I believe running missions for non-pirate agents in low sec is a possible answer (unless there are no such agents in low sec/outlaw space?). Unless I'm mistaken, shwacking officer spawns also nets a sec increase. There' s also those new NPC's that drop the tags you can trade for sec increases as well.
Sec has been separated from the standing for a while now. The point is to specifically work for a pirate faction and have a way to get back out of it.
CONCORD doesn't have ANY agents so you're stuck. No options at all.
The Drake is a Lie
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
470
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 20:40:53 -
[22] - Quote
My apologies then, I was unaware they isolated CONCORD standing from a char's sec status. In that case, yeah, you don't really have a whole lot of options. That's a little alarming, to say the least.
"Tomahawks?"
"----in' A, right?"
"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."
"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
|
Nevil Oscillator
206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 20:57:41 -
[23] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:My apologies then, I was unaware they isolated CONCORD standing from a char's sec status. In that case, yeah, you don't really have a whole lot of options. That's a little alarming, to say the least.
You have an option, don't be a pirate. |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
38499
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:14:19 -
[24] - Quote
Nevil Oscillator wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:My apologies then, I was unaware they isolated CONCORD standing from a char's sec status. In that case, yeah, you don't really have a whole lot of options. That's a little alarming, to say the least. You have an option, don't be a pirate. I don't think you understand how Concord standings work, nor why you might want good standings, not only the repair of bad ones.
This shows as much understanding as suggesting overview settings affect what missions are offered.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1518
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:34:53 -
[25] - Quote
Not a bad suggestion since declining caries no penalty. Don't see any reason why not to have it. |
Nevil Oscillator
206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:37:29 -
[26] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Nevil Oscillator wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:My apologies then, I was unaware they isolated CONCORD standing from a char's sec status. In that case, yeah, you don't really have a whole lot of options. That's a little alarming, to say the least. You have an option, don't be a pirate. I don't think you understand how Concord standings work, nor why you might want good standings, not only the repair of bad ones. This shows as much understanding as suggesting overview settings affect what missions are offered.
I don't know what Concord Standings do.. but if you have a problem with my statement explain why not being a pirate is not an option ?
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1518
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:41:40 -
[27] - Quote
Nevil Oscillator wrote:I don't know what Concord Standings do.. but if you have a problem with my statement explain why not being a pirate is not an option ? It's not that it isn't an option, but rather that it's not an even remotely balanced option when compared to the standings repair options available to pretty much every other NPC org in the game and further overtly eliminates ones ability to partake in a nicely sized chunk of content. |
Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
237
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:41:53 -
[28] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Yes, the automated grinding isn't automated enough yet, it still takes some brain cells and decisions. This will not stand! what decisions are you talking about that require so much brain power, its a matter of spamming i dont want burner missions and being annoyed at having to do so.
Of course im looking at things from my own intellectual gifts, perhaps it is a mental stretch for you to push a button.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
38499
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:43:05 -
[29] - Quote
Nevil Oscillator wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Nevil Oscillator wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:My apologies then, I was unaware they isolated CONCORD standing from a char's sec status. In that case, yeah, you don't really have a whole lot of options. That's a little alarming, to say the least. You have an option, don't be a pirate. I don't think you understand how Concord standings work, nor why you might want good standings, not only the repair of bad ones. This shows as much understanding as suggesting overview settings affect what missions are offered. I don't know what Concord Standings do.. but if you have a problem with my statement explain why not being a pirate is not an option ? Being a pirate isn't necessarily what gives you bad standings with Concord.
Mission runners can develop bad standings with Concord, just because they run missions for the wrong faction. Nothing to do with them being pirates, just running missions.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
|
Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
237
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 21:44:55 -
[30] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:Yes, the automated grinding isn't automated enough yet, it still takes some brain cells and decisions. This will not stand! Well, yes, just thought the same... How about an "Auto Win" Button? Go into mission, which you might win since you maxed out you mission boat and press "Auto Win". No longer need for that time consuming fight stuff...
Another mentally challenged person that finds pushing an 'i don't want burner missions" mentally strenuous. Wow, EVE is full of stupid.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |