Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
709
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:19:44 -
[181] - Quote
basically the whole post is fundamentally flawed and it only takes a few SNIPES from the periphery to reveal it as unfounded garbage |
Sgt Ocker
Military Bustards FUBAR.
651
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:33:33 -
[182] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:So all those soon to be ok systems in Branch (that might see 1 person active in them a day) are still off the table without a blue tick next to your name.. Shame - that space could be put to good use by smaller groups. i mean you're certainly welcome to try to put it to use yourself it is not like the space becomes unusable by hostiles the second it gets conquered you could also try to, y'know, conquer the space yourself Yeah every small group wants to invite the wrath of the CFC by stepping into the blue donut of protection. (don't care what you call your selves now - You will always be CFC)
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
|
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
709
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:40:05 -
[183] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote: blue donut
lmbo |
Klyith
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
172
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:54:41 -
[184] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote: Yeah every small group wants to invite the wrath of the CFC by stepping into the blue donut of protection. (don't care what you call your selves now - You will always be CFC)
There are currently 58 alliances with 5 or fewer systems owned, seems there is room for "little guy". There are 25 alliances that own sov with fewer than 200 members, which is smaller than your alliance. What is holding you back? Is there something particularly special about us, that you will only throw your hat in the ring if you can have the space we own and not any other? |
Duffyman
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:08:11 -
[185] - Quote
Klyith wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: Yeah every small group wants to invite the wrath of the CFC by stepping into the blue donut of protection. (don't care what you call your selves now - You will always be CFC)
There are currently 58 alliances with 5 or fewer systems owned, seems there is room for "little guy". There are 25 alliances that own sov with fewer than 200 members, which is smaller than your alliance. What is holding you back? Is there something particularly special about us, that you will only throw your hat in the ring if you can have the space we own and not any other?
Effort. It's easier to come to the forums and "grr goons" than actually do something about it.
With fozzie sov, even the last excuse of the massive DPS required to grind sov will be out of the way. |
Amarisen Gream
Divine Demise
86
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:22:47 -
[186] - Quote
Does this mean Provi won't be the most poor kid anymore???
And just think - more people per system - means we might not run as much when reds show up...
xoxo
Amarisen Gream
|
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1101
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:36:58 -
[187] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote: Yeah every small group wants to invite the wrath of the CFC by stepping into the blue donut of protection. (don't care what you call your selves now - You will always be CFC)
oh good, so you realize you are not good enough
do you complain that the [best sports team in the sport popular in your local area] also does not let you play for them and only lets the people actually good at [sport popular in your local area] play for the team
we are motherfucking lebron james you work your way up to being even allowed to be discussed in the same sentence as us |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1101
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:39:02 -
[188] - Quote
Amarisen Gream wrote:Does this mean Provi won't be the most poor kid anymore???
And just think - more people per system - means we might not run as much when reds show up... absolutely not, under the wise leadership of Maximilian Singularity Providence will enter a new age of prosperity
you won't be around to benefit from it of course, but such is the price of the march of progresss |
Anthar Thebess
1221
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:44:16 -
[189] - Quote
This will generate TONS of additional isk that will flow into the system. Do we have ANY new isk sink?
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1751
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 14:58:17 -
[190] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:This will generate TONS of additional isk that will flow into the system. Do we have ANY new isk sink?
As though a new sink would be needed with a 20-30% playerdrop?
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.
Creator of Burn Jita
Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.
|
|
Nergal Hurrian
Orange Lazarus Petroleum Inc. Euphoria Pharmaceuticals
7
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 15:26:37 -
[191] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:How surprising, another gewn buff.
20 Nyxgewnbots ratting in a cynojammed pocket in now officially a thing.
I thought CCP will never go through with the gewn proposal of more anoms, I believed that much favor was ridiculous even for CCP. But no, I see now that there is no favor CCP won't do to their masters.
Please reconsider the anomaly changes. I am asking this as a nullbear living in -0.1 system. This creates a huge PvE favor to one alliance, and while intentions might've been good, the implementation is unacceptable.
Take your tinfoil hat off. Not only you are lying in your post by attesting (falsely) that you are a "nullbear living in -0.1 system", you also inevitably reveal your ignorance about null by arguing that anyone (much less Goons) rat in Nyxes.
We need legitimate feedback in this thread, not your feeble attempts at meta-gaming (poorly). |
Nergal Hurrian
Orange Lazarus Petroleum Inc. Euphoria Pharmaceuticals
8
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 15:41:49 -
[192] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:I would be ok with the reduction of c5-npc nullsec if the safety of all nullsec and lowsec was compromised by a change to how local function so that ratters still have fear of getting hit by anybody.
Probably the easiest and most direct way would be to change local system chat to local constellation chat.
The average region has about 10 to 20 constellations and 6 to 12 systems in each constellation. So instead of instant Intel per system, it would be instant Intel per constellation. You can't tell where in a constellation a person is, you just know they are somewhere there. Gates can be monitored, instant anon clockers can hunt, all pve in a system doesn't stop because 1 anonymous person logged into the system. Risk is brought back, a greater voice is created, hunting of larger groups spans between the constellation vs just the system. Hunting and roaming with groups increases because now when you enter a empty constellation, you know it's empty, and when you enter a busy constellation, you know people are there.
You change local to constellation chat, where a plus 1 doesn't cause everybody to insta warp to a pos.. I'd be ok with the spawn changes.
No.
A certain type of space will never be your trophy grounds while at the same time, you are having almost perfect control of where and how your home wormhole is connected to, therefore, ensuring perfect safety for your PvE activities.
All you are proposing is to make null farming grounds whenever you feel like going and ganking ratters.
Nullsec does not exist to gratify your effortless lolpwnmobile playstyle. You will not get to choose where your hole connects to by ragerolling it continuously until you get a connect to the certain null constellation you wish to trophy in.
If you are in need of such easy gratification, why don't you go and cancel the non-invasion treaties between your wormhole alliance and other large wormhole alliances? (w-space blue donut) |
Nergal Hurrian
Orange Lazarus Petroleum Inc. Euphoria Pharmaceuticals
8
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 15:44:31 -
[193] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:Altrue wrote:Not bad at all! However I have a question about the quantum flux: What are the tweaks made to increase its PVE daytripping value? Its never mentionned.
Furthermore, using entosis on ESS is a massive increase in how tideous it is to use them...
Finally, it seems that quantum flux are overall quite nerfed. Would it be unreasonable to buff their null to high chances ? More null to highs would be a backdoor buff to freighters and logistics. It would kill the attempted progress towards null industry.
Again, you are masquerading as providing constructive feedback and acting like you are voicing your legitimate concerns, but in reality, everything you say and point out is trying to push for having constant null-sec connections from your wormhole systems so that you can go gank ratters and miners any time you feel like doing it.
Needless to say, if even I'm personally able to figure this out, you've failed big time. |
Vic Jefferson
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
483
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 16:34:01 -
[194] - Quote
Raising the property value of large parts of null - good!
WH changes - terrible. Awful. Seriously, if anything, it should be changed the other way, and null-null connections should be even more common. If you want to reward stewardship of space, and people actually 'living" in their constellations, then you should encourage people to find and deal with problematic WHs in their backyard, instead of just removing them. With how spread and thin people are becoming on the map, you want to give as many ways to force interaction as possible, not remove them. The Phoebe capital changes have made it incredibly hard to counter or punish capital usage on a local level, with good WH connections being one of the only ways to actually weave a more complex local conflict. It's actually engaging that people have to look and even possibly fight for WHs before a major fight, because that is literally the only way help for either side will arrive. It was bad before with the entire server showing up, but you don't want the opposite effect where conflict is so localized and one dimensional that fewer people choose to even fight. You absolutely need WHs if you are to fight locally against an entity that has more capitals than you. This threatens even more post-phoebe stasis.
It's still a terrible idea to live in null. Even if you raise the bar of the bad true-sec systems, you still haven't addressed that higher, less hassle income than the best true-sec systems is available elsewhere, namely FW space or HS. Why would I ever want to deal with a 2 hour commitment everyday defending against entosis for less isk/hr opportunities than I could find elsewhere? A single character carrier ratting is only turning about 100m/hr before escalations, which as others have mentioned, has killed the exploration profession due to how saturated deadspace loot is at the moment.
Let's try expressing this another way. Currently....
WH>FW/HS Incursions > Null.
It needs to be...
WH> Null > FW > HS Incursions/L4 blitz.
Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1487
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 17:13:40 -
[195] - Quote
Nergal Hurrian wrote:
A certain type of space will never be your trophy grounds while at the same time, you are having almost perfect control of where and how your home wormhole is connected to, therefore, ensuring perfect safety for your PvE activities.
On the contrary, I dislike the concepts of critting holes and closing oneself off from the world so they can farm. I want the concept of a shattered highway to exist in wormhole space, and to move 75% of the farming and escallations in c5 and c6 space into shattered space, with unclosable regenerating shattered wormhole entrances (so no matter what, there is a connection, and a substantial sized one to go attack). Wormholers can still roll holes, they can still play with mass, but if you want to do massive isk making, you have to go into shattered space.
I wrote this out about 8 days ago on the 1st of July. Do note this was pertaining to specifically c5 and c6 space and not the nullsec interaction.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5858241#post5858241
In the end, I want perfect intel in nullsec to go away. I am ok with keeping how character info pops up in local, but local itself needs to expand to constellation chat (so no more perfect intel, just imperfect intel.
I want wspace to not turn into endless logoff traps to go kill escallation fleets because there is no way to do it due to them critting or rolling their hole, as now there will be no entrance into them. I want people to risk their ships, in both wspace and nullsec when they rat. Both area's have come up with perfect ways to close each other off to gain isk in safety.
I want both areas of space to change.
Yaay!!!!
|
Sadew42
SUPERFLUOUS WANDERLUST Gentlemen's.Club
14
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 17:25:21 -
[196] - Quote
Querns wrote:C5s are not the only wormholes in eve, and this change specifically targets them.
The way it was worded, it seems to imply all WHs in null will be affected. At any rate, I finally have the tools to daytrip into C5s now, and this happens out of nowhere for no discernible reason?
|
kai il
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
29
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 18:14:31 -
[197] - Quote
I remember when CCP said "we think wormholes are in a good spot and probably the most balanced part of space" then ccp started to change it and it all went down hill and now we have A giant krab empire in highclass with no fights because everyone ****** off and getting fights in null is now 10 times as hard.
These changes to null wormholes are bad and you should feel bad, The only thing worse then large null blobs using wormholes to get fights is ccp nerfing wormholes even more to fix this problem, congrats you took a part of space that was working fine for the most part and absolutely destroyed with awful changes. |
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
713
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 18:27:25 -
[198] - Quote
kai il wrote:I remember when CCP said "we think wormholes are in a good spot and probably the most balanced part of space" then ccp started to change it and it all went down hill and now we have A giant krab empire in highclass with no fights because everyone ****** off and getting fights in null is now 10 times as hard.
nerf diplomacy |
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1752
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 18:50:01 -
[199] - Quote
Sort Dragon just pointed the finger at Manny (PL) championing these changes.
Cats/Dogs/Up/Down What do we believe anymore!
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.
Creator of Burn Jita
Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.
|
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
254
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 19:59:18 -
[200] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Sort Dragon just pointed the finger at Manny (PL) championing these changes.
Cats/Dogs/Up/Down What do we believe anymore!
We are making the antidote for finger pointing |
|
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
254
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 20:15:04 -
[201] - Quote
It is heating up
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/3cpfp0/wormhole_gate_heats_up_snort_dragon_blames_manny/csxqnwr
https://twitter.com/PLIRC/status/619238039361994757/photo/1 |
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1752
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 20:42:56 -
[202] - Quote
The new meta. Snitches get Stitches.
Anyone that gets null nerfed gets invaded. Lol
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.
Creator of Burn Jita
Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.
|
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2578
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 22:24:25 -
[203] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: blue donut
lmbo I think a better term nowadays would be blue croissant |
Yroc Jannseen
Enlightened Industries Goonswarm Federation
123
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 23:51:38 -
[204] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: blue donut
lmbo I think a better term nowadays would be blue croissant
I blame French localization. |
GeeBee
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
86
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 01:39:41 -
[205] - Quote
Good changes all around with the exception of Incursions and ESS.
Suggestion for the Activity Defense Multipliers, Allow POS's in a limited way to contribute to the activity defense multipliers, both hostile and friendly. Similiar to the sov system of olde, but with severe limitations. Numbers could be generated to a working balanced system, I'm not going to do that just expressing the interest in this form of content to help keep capital ships somewhat useful.
Future group PVE, it would have to be incursion style content. There probably is a place for this but keeping it balanced while being profitable to non-multibox and non-multibox viable may be an issue, there's still probably some people using isboxer without mirror to run incursions.
Incursions, the basis of this is Sanshas raiding space and stealing pilots for drones/clones, After years of failing the Sansha's have given up on this endeavor and Incursions have stopped. The basis of incursions and the content they exclusively provide has no real purpose and should be migrated elsewhere and incursions removed.
ESS - This is a failed attempt at forcing content, just get rid of it, I mean you're about to remove how many SBU's from the game, the ESS can go with it. |
FT Diomedes
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
1266
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 05:45:39 -
[206] - Quote
SCom Thor wrote:I very rarely write here, but this one is special, this time Fozzie really proved that he has 0 understanding of what drives EvE around.
Dude, I'll be short and blunt: YOU RETARDS DON'T HAVE THE SUBSCRIBERS TO FILL NULLSEC. No, you don't even have enough to fill 10% of current nullsec system, even if everyone will move in today. Granting carebears the ability to pile 1000/system does NOT benefit the game. Allowing them to pile 800 in a -0.1 system AGAIN does not benefit the game.
FFS get your heads out of your ass, it's clear as daylight: REDUCE the number of anoms/system so one system won't be enough for 100 carebears, increase their ISK/h so to motivate hisec mission runners to move into nullsec, and then come back for more suggestion.
Oh, but I bet you won't. I, at least, tried to profit from the loss and bet a huge amount on the fact that by February EvE online will be on full decline with no way to be stopped from disappearing by next summer.
Since you took us our favorite game, at least that's what we can make out of it.
Exactly. CCP, you have been encouraging players to clump up more and more, rather than encouraging them to spread out more.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So, why do I post here?
I'm stubborn.
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
1266
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 05:47:07 -
[207] - Quote
Gideon Enderas wrote:Aneu Angellus wrote:PL Reddit thread is so much better than this one... especially where they cry a lot. Yeah, this change specifically, all wormholes to and from and nullsec being reduced to 16 hours only is basically putting the nails in the coffin of wormhole space. PL used an in game tool to find content, this tool isn't new. It's been used by several wormhole groups before. Now that a large organized group is using this method to travel, somehow it's unfair.
That's how it always goes. Once a process gets industrialized, CCP has to nerf it. They could have just removed the API data pull so that you have to do your own scouting.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So, why do I post here?
I'm stubborn.
|
GeeBee
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
86
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 06:38:31 -
[208] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:SCom Thor wrote:I very rarely write here, but this one is special, this time Fozzie really proved that he has 0 understanding of what drives EvE around.
Dude, I'll be short and blunt: YOU RETARDS DON'T HAVE THE SUBSCRIBERS TO FILL NULLSEC. No, you don't even have enough to fill 10% of current nullsec system, even if everyone will move in today. Granting carebears the ability to pile 1000/system does NOT benefit the game. Allowing them to pile 800 in a -0.1 system AGAIN does not benefit the game.
FFS get your heads out of your ass, it's clear as daylight: REDUCE the number of anoms/system so one system won't be enough for 100 carebears, increase their ISK/h so to motivate hisec mission runners to move into nullsec, and then come back for more suggestion.
Oh, but I bet you won't. I, at least, tried to profit from the loss and bet a huge amount on the fact that by February EvE online will be on full decline with no way to be stopped from disappearing by next summer.
Since you took us our favorite game, at least that's what we can make out of it. Exactly. CCP, you have been encouraging players to clump up more and more, rather than encouraging them to spread out more.
This entire sov patch is designed to make holding vast amounts of space impossible. Groups have been clumping up for their own survival. Whether there will be any new groups to take sov to fill the vacuum is a completely different story. I guess BL trolling/farming brave out of fountain was just the start.
If new blood is to get into nullsec and stay either the playerbase needs to sing kumbaya and go here ya go, or CCP needs to rework the skill system to allow new players a chance. Constantly changing meta's for doctrines is very skillpoint intensive for a newer player that doesn't even have core skills done yet.
I propose a removal of the majority of core skills to level the playing field. Any core skill that is removed is then re-added upon subscription, trial accounts would get somekind of lower level of core skills. One of the biggest problems with this game attracting and retaining new players is due to the overhead of skills that need to be trained. Unless this problem is addressed eve is likely going to slowly die. Any core skill that is removed is not reimbursed / refunded either, I'm talking about the removal of at least 20mil Skillpoints. |
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
3799
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 06:55:27 -
[209] - Quote
At some point it should be noted that Sovereigny as a game system is faulty.
When you create a "race to the top" system, the natural outcome is someone on top too big to fall, followed by not-so-top forces too dangerous and bothersome to defeat, and a variable amount of fools who will never be top and can lose everything as soon as some of the top dogs focuses on them.
Of course, that mimics RL. We know that (enter rogue state) can not do anything meaningful to the USA and we know Russia and China are too big and dangeorus to mess with even if you're the USA.
What nobody said is that RL balance of power is *fun* or at all worthy to experience in a game...
"Welcome to EVE Online, the 12 years old MMO. These guys are the USA, there's Russia and there's China. The ultimate goal of the game is to topple any of them without being nuked to the ground as soon as your gang shows any potential to topple any of them. Alternatively you may enjoy staying irrelevant or aligning with any of the top dogs. Have fun"
73% of EVE characters stay in high security space. 62% of EVE subscribers barely PvP. 40% of all new accounts just "level up their Ravens". Probably that's why PvE content in EVE Online is sub-par and CCP is head over heels for PvP...
|
Napo BonaParte
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 07:37:09 -
[210] - Quote
CCP Phantom for president!
thnx damn it more incursion more combat yea this is the way...
i cant wait new jews moment :D |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |