Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kassidus
Gallente Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 04:37:00 -
[1]
A: Allow them to only fit NOS/Energy Transfer/Repair moduals in high. B: Make them the ONLY ship that can fit more than 1 NOS (Nos should be nerfed to limit per ship) C: Give them a drone bay with drone bonus, but only allow it to use repair drones. D: Make it fast E: Give it a huge cap and uber recharge rate. F: Give it very few medium and low slots like 1 or 2 of each max. G: Give it good resists like other T2 ships. H: Bonuses to repair amounts of transfer arrays etc.
Ok this would do a few things, This would give you a small easy to use fleet ship capable of making use of NOS and other moduals, it would become quite valuable in larger battles. It would also be useless on its own This would also balance NOS away from all the other ships that abuse it, One NOS is a nice advantage and helps your cap, but isnt really capable of disableing much, which would make other fights more interesting , instead of he who has more nos wins.
But i do think this game needs a "battlefield Medic" type ship thats smaller than a carrier.
anyways just an idea before i go to work.
|
Demora Anglis
Amarr The Splinter Syndicate SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 05:21:00 -
[2]
And the difference between this supposed T2 BC "Support Ship" and a Logistics ship would be...?
If you're trying to say there should be a "Battlefield Medic" type ship, then I don't see why Logistics can't be changed to reflect this. Or are you saying these ships become primaries first? Then what the heck is stopping somebody from calling primary on "Support" ships?
|
Montaire
Lacedaemon. Sparta Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 05:26:00 -
[3]
I actually would like to see a T2 BC that had a mini-jump drive.
Give it a real nice range, probably double that of a carrier. Let them do huuuge hops. But leave them a small cargo hold, so they'd have to refuel between jumps, kind of like a Shock Troops sort of ship.
Might be a better Idea for a T2 Battleship rather than battlecruiser.
Still I think its an idea with merit.
|
Kiyano
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 05:33:00 -
[4]
GG you've just suggested making the Curse, Pilgrim and Bhalgorn completely useless
so no.
|
Haffrage
Revelations Inc. Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 05:44:00 -
[5]
HAY GUYZ LET'S MAKE THIS REALLY EXPENSIVE SHIP WITH REALLY GOOD RESISTS BUT THEN TAKE AWAY ANY CAPABILITY OF IT TO FIT A TANK AND THEN MAKE ONLY THE MINMATAR AND AMARR ONES GOOD BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE BEST NATURAL RESISTS.
God knows we need more passive tank ships and ships nobody ends up using anywhere but missions -----
|
Itaro Flagg
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 06:45:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Haffrage God knows we need more passive tank ships and ships nobody ends up using anywhere but missions
Hell yes we do!
But, realistically? All this is, is a rather silly attempt to just get nos nerfed. This time by suggesting a new ship class, specialized in cap warfare/space medic such, and then removing pretty much nos from all the other aspects of the game.
Ridiculous suggestion. Logistics cruisers are already one of the worst implemented ship types, and you want to add a larger tier in to nerf nos? Pshaw.
|
Xendie
Forsaken Empire
|
Posted - 2006.12.02 06:54:00 -
[7]
a regular commandship with logistics drones are far better at the logistics role then the logistics ships.
but the guardian is still the sexiest ship ingame.
Quote: Nertzius > having fun being incompetitent?
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |