Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ozzie Udan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 07:57:37 -
[31] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.
White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills.
I'm pleased you put your thoughts down, thxs for the reply, so many have understood already but I will spell it out for you "yes we will be ganking".
Just like to add I'm not talking about real merc that do a job, just the one's that hide under that title ,so if we get this group together I'll look forward to seeing you |
Noragen Neirfallas
Dedicated and Dangerous The Marmite Collective
1450
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 09:50:11 -
[32] - Quote
Ozzie Udan wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.
White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills. I'm pleased you put your thoughts down, thxs for the reply, so many have understood already but I will spell it out for you "yes we will be ganking". Just like to add I'm not talking about real merc that do a job, just the one's that hide under that title ,so if we get this group together I'll look forward to seeing you I wish you luck.
Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
[s]ISD Dorrim Barstorlode favourite ISD[/s]
|
Tarojan
Tarojan Corporation
166
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 10:41:03 -
[33] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple. Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior."). I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so. You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry.
You left out a 3rd reason: curiosity. How good is she in comparison to you? CAN she take you? what lessons will be learned by it and can be taken away from it wether she wins or loses? the experience of fighting a skilled merc 1v1 is surely going to improve her skill set regardless of the outcome. Plus gdamn it sometimes you just NEED to know.
the 4th reason is ofc the sheer fun of it: anyone can gank a miner. or smart bomb a frig a low sec gate. Atron to Atron though? nows thats fun. Can I go ten rounds please XD (yeah yeah I know go join RvB...)
you said "I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge", well thats not true shes offering to pay you a merc contract to take it :P
Will gank for food
|
Tarojan
Tarojan Corporation
166
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 10:55:17 -
[34] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:That's a lot of words to say "CODE./suicide ganking weeds out the people who shouldn't be playing EvE anyway." We both know that's not what I said, but to be clear and focus any interpretations: I think that what code does to miners is bad for the game. I don't think most types of suicide ganking are bad for the game.
I disagree with you. Heres why.
I think ganking in general is "bad" for the game, if you want lots of people playing the game. The problem with eve is that its a pure blood pvp game AND for the longest time the only decent spaceship game out there. So it was feeding of two audiences. Now the pure blood pvpers felt nothing but contempt for the "carebears" who were trying to play spaceships online and have been hounding them from the game since it started. I've read the old accounts of what it was like before concord, before new player protection in the starter systems etc. Its always been this way and playing other games when I say I play eve theres always people cropping up to say "ewwhhh" and then relate their sad tale of having their sand castle driven over by a bulldozer which took out them and the sand pit too.
The simple fact is CCP want a pure blood pvp game thats set in space NOT a spaceship game. For proof of this I point you to the stickies on this very subforum where they respond to bumping saying its legit, to killing empty freighters just to harvest tears with the throw away remark "some people just want to see the world burn". If someone wants to throw a billion isk vindi into ganking my little tanked wreathe at a station, JUST so I fail my distribution mission and they can ask me in local "u mad?" this is completely within the rules and CCP are not only happy that this occured it is the design of the game that it does occur.
What code does to miners isn't bad for the game. It is the game as designed.
Will gank for food
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1274
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 11:09:59 -
[35] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Noragen Neirfallas wrote:@Serendipity Lost Tldr What little I did read suggested you don't have any backing statistics or proof of any kind and only the worst analogy I've ever seen on these forums. With basic research you can find out that bill gates is worth 78.9bil us. With basic research I can tell you suicide ganking new players has the highest rate of retention of the 3 categories of players who didn't die in their trial, people who got killed legally and people who got suicide ganked. So at this point I say you are just wrong and that's the end of it unless you can find facts and figures to refute my own You are both attempting to quantify things with studies, and are therefore both right and both wrong. You can find statistics to prove anything. I'm one of those people that responds positively to having my teeth kicked in, so yes, getting ganked and roflstomped only drives my resolve. However, I am also in the group of players who easily separates EVE from RL. Some dudes can't. It depends on the player, and their definition of fun. Me? I don't like winning all the time. I don't play games on easy settings, and I married a succubus IRL. Bring on the pain. If there is not a danger, if there is no challenge, I don't care for it. Some share my taste, others don't, and the best thing anyone can do is accept the game for what it is and not what they want to turn it into.
I was using common sense and general knowledge of how life works. No charts studies or graphs.
You do like winning. Winning to you just doesn't fit the easily understandable kb norm. Me and the guys 'won' a fight last night. Look at our kb and you may scratch your head a bit. A little detail. It's been a busy summer and work has kept 'the group' kind of scattered. The guys we had on last night wanted to get in a fight. We caught a mega rolling a wh, but got there late. WH was verge of collapse and they had way more fleet on the other side than we could reasonably have a chance at fighting. We had a quick vote and 'screw it let's go' won the discussion. We jumped what would fit through the wh, watched it close behind us and got pwnd. The win was jumping in together and executing the plan. The win was a small group of guys playing eve the way we like to play it. We took a really really bad fight, knew we would lose and it played out as expected.
https://zkillboard.com/corporation/164893220/
Looking at the kb I think the operative word would be 'ouch'. The funniest part of the whole thing. After 10 years or so of playing eve I bought my first set of high grade pirate implants. They lasted 3 days before I tossed them for a few laughs. Now I'm sure of the reason I never get high grade anything. I always thought I knew why, but now.... now I know why. I will say it was pleasing to not have to update my actual clone though.
Anyway Leto, you like to win - it's just that most folks don't understand the scale you use to measure winning. When you say 'ships are ammo' - most guys probably understand what you are saying, but few will ever actually live in that mindset. |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1274
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 11:29:09 -
[36] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple. Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior."). I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so. You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry.
This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours.
You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither.
This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it. |
Leto Thule
Origin. Black Legion.
3142
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 12:24:11 -
[37] - Quote
Meh. Truths.
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2318
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 12:38:39 -
[38] - Quote
Thankfully this isn't about that panda at the zoo the other day. Mixing bourbon and beer isn't always a bad thing, but it is if you start with the beer and then move on to the bourbon... It gets worse when you follow that up with non-consensual panda sexy times.
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Renegade Heart
Carebear Miners R Us
517
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 12:48:56 -
[39] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it.
You might not be risk averse or whatever, and you might think this makes you cool or something, but from where I am standing, and the fact that you haven't dropped this, continuing over multiple threads, just makes you look like a completely uncool attention seeker!
I'm almost tempted to say I admire Vimsy more, for being honest, and not really caring what others think.
GO VIMSY!!!!!! NEVER 1v1 FTW |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1276
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 13:25:04 -
[40] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Meh. Truths.
Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house. |
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
1423
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:03:58 -
[41] - Quote
Hello OP
As a New Order threat assessment officer I am interested to hear more about your operation. It is often hard for us to track this kind of rebellions because the vanish so fast or never take off in the first place.
It seams like your character did not biomass yet, so it is not too late to ask some questions if I may:
- Is there a deeper purpose to this rebellion and if yes, what is this purpose?
- Will this endeavour be financed by you or a third party or do you prefer the popular "bring your own ship" model?
- At what time in the future can we expect some first ingame interactions with you or one of your associates?
- Where there any particular antimatter related incidents in the past that fuelled your desire to start this rebellion?
I hope to hear back from you and I am looking forward to all the content you will provide once this rebellion takes off. Also, please make sure you always follow the Code when operating in our territory as it is required since CodeSov was established. Mining permits can be acquired for the price of 10mil ISK per year if you don't have one already.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
Noragen Neirfallas
Dedicated and Dangerous The Marmite Collective
1452
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:21:43 -
[42] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Leto Thule wrote:Meh. Truths. Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house. Was he wearing the assless chaps?
Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
[s]ISD Dorrim Barstorlode favourite ISD[/s]
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1278
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:42:16 -
[43] - Quote
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Leto Thule wrote:Meh. Truths. Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house. Was he wearing the assless chaps?
Is there any other kind? |
Leto Thule
Origin. Black Legion.
3142
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:43:17 -
[44] - Quote
Uh, its creepy seeing as how I actually just got back from the beach house....
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Noragen Neirfallas
Dedicated and Dangerous The Marmite Collective
1453
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:47:46 -
[45] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Leto Thule wrote:Meh. Truths. Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house. Was he wearing the assless chaps? Is there any other kind? He could have been wearing that golden speedo he always packs
Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
[s]ISD Dorrim Barstorlode favourite ISD[/s]
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1279
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 15:49:09 -
[46] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Uh, its creepy seeing as how I actually just got back from the beach house....
It's like I'm sharing your chaps isn't it. |
Xeno Szenn
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
6
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 18:03:48 -
[47] - Quote
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Xeno Szenn wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.
White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills. I'm curious as to wether or not you are going to accept or decline my 1v1 thunderdome challenge. Since you're a merc, I'll talk in you terms. I'd like to hire you for 100 mil isk to compete with me in a 1v1 thunerdome match. 1v1 has a place in eve but not in eve warfare. If it's for fun sure but if the Op is going to war then 1v1's have no business in it. Sush you this is forum drama spread across 3-4 posts now. Read more forums. Also where do snigg hang out again?
Wherever we want to and were Waffles friend. Also Noragen come back to real pvp high sec pvp is so boring no cap kills to be had.
My Thoughts and Views on eve http://xenoszenn.blogspot.com/
|
Anyanka Funk
Jacklight Corporation
162
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 18:10:28 -
[48] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple. Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior."). I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so. You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry. This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours. You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither. This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it. If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want?
|
Demerius Xenocratus
Rapid Withdrawal
554
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 18:32:24 -
[49] - Quote
Anyanka Funk wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple. Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior."). I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so. You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry. This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours. You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither. This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it. If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want?
Because suicide ganking isn't viable against someone that flies 1600 plated ships with HG slaves and neutral logi on stand-by?
Also, ganking is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being -10 are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it.
If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.
|
Anyanka Funk
Jacklight Corporation
162
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 18:51:08 -
[50] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Anyanka Funk wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple. Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior."). I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so. You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry. This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours. You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither. This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it. If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want? Because suicide ganking isn't viable against someone that flies 1600 plated ships with HG slaves and neutral logi on stand-by? Also, ganking is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being -10 are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it. If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on. Also, mining is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being ganked are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it. |
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
1425
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 22:02:22 -
[51] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on. You know, i'm never sure if this is funny or sad. You carebaers are so focused on ISK printing you can't possibly imagine that someone would not mindlessly grind to PLEX their account. So you have to invent some myth about CODE. mains.
I just pay my subscriptions and my income actually comes from ganking, which isn't much, but it's positive and it allowed me to not think about ISK efficiency anymore and just kill stuff. Every now and then some faction module will drop from a miner and pay for all the other ganks. My actual "main", or the character I once started with is in CODE. as well and he acts as my scout and everything else I need. Feel free to come after him.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
John E Normus
The Conference Elite CODE.
615
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 22:59:23 -
[52] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.
Yes, if we had a weak spot this is it! Join us, gain our trust, and while you bathe in the tears and pod goo of non-compliants, hunt our elusive non-Deklein alts. If you roll a gank alt and get to -10 with it I'll tell you where you can find all of mine...
Please app into New Order Logistics when ready.
Between Ignorance and Wisdom
|
Paranoid Loyd
6466
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 23:16:34 -
[53] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:You carebaers While I don't agree one bit with Demerius' statement or idea of a strategy to mess with you, he is far from a carebear.
Whinebear, sure, no question about that, but definitely not a carebear.
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!
|
Alana Charen-Teng
Vatlaa Corporation
637
|
Posted - 2015.07.31 23:19:32 -
[54] - Quote
The title of this thread is, strangely, "think less and do more". But we all know that the OP's target demographic, the disgruntled carebears of highsec, have never been good at doing, much less thinking.
Ozzie Udan wrote:So to my plan , form a group that operates as code do and start ganking back, all in cheap ships and easy to train alts. So if you want pay back or want to try out this elite PvP or just want to **** a Goon off mail me in game .
Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.
It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online
Your movement will never gain traction or legitimacy because:
1) We have the Supreme Protector and his blessings 2) We have the popular support of the Highsec community 3) We have the Elite PvP skills |
Karla the Careless
Beyond Reproach
5
|
Posted - 2015.08.01 01:05:24 -
[55] - Quote
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:The title of this thread is, strangely, "think less and do more". But we all know that the OP's target demographic, the disgruntled carebears of highsec, have never been good at doing, much less thinking. Ozzie Udan wrote:So to my plan , form a group that operates as code do and start ganking back, all in cheap ships and easy to train alts. So if you want pay back or want to try out this elite PvP or just want to **** a Goon off mail me in game .
Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.
It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online Your movement will never gain traction or legitimacy because: 1) We have the Supreme Protector and his blessings 2) We have the popular support of the Highsec community 3) We have the Elite PvP skills
#3 Most notably in evidence by your outstanding performance in past Alliance Tournaments, I am sure........ |
Avi Shekelstien
New Order Logistics CODE.
14
|
Posted - 2015.08.01 17:45:06 -
[56] - Quote
Ozzie Udan wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.
White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills. I'm pleased you put your thoughts down, thxs for the reply, so many have understood already but I will spell it out for you "yes we will be ganking". Just like to add I'm not talking about real merc that do a job, just the one's that hide under that title ,so if we get this group together I'll look forward to seeing you Well you better be quick because faction police will pew pew us within 15 seconds of undocking. |
Avvy
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2015.08.03 11:55:35 -
[57] - Quote
Ozzie Udan wrote: Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.
So you think that and you want to emulate them, doesn't that strike you as odd?
Maybe high-sec should have viable PvP, might get rid of all the ganking nonsense.
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
1436
|
Posted - 2015.08.03 15:36:09 -
[58] - Quote
Karla the Careless wrote:#3 Most notably in evidence by your outstanding performance in past Alliance Tournaments, I am sure........ We won that tournament over a year ago without a single loss and people are still butthurt about it. Flawless victory! As always!
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2909
|
Posted - 2015.08.03 18:53:11 -
[59] - Quote
Ozzie Udan wrote:It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online
I love a man an NPC with a plan. I'm sure you'll be as memorable as those who have gone before you, like... ummm, errr, wait a minute, it's on the tip of my tongue. Nope, I can't remember any of them, honestly. I wonder why?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2911
|
Posted - 2015.08.03 19:06:03 -
[60] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:CODE... they are doing more harm than good (this box has already been checked).
I know we shouldn't feed trolls but seriously, in what twisted version of reality is this the case?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |