Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 46 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Speedkermit Damo
Demonic Retribution The Initiative.
471
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 09:59:48 -
[661] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Tallardar wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I agree, null has been stagnant, that's why we've all agreed that a change is needed. Unfortunately that change is seemingly an attempt to make it even less likely that a large scale battle will occur. Right, except no one was close to doing that nor trying to for over a year before the sov changes came out anyway. This is a bit inaccurate. "Fleet Fights" aren't just Asakai and BR-5 type deals, plenty of fleet fights involve only sub caps, and plenty happened over the coure of the last year. The Mittani website and EVE news detail those kinds of fights all the time. I've been in only 2 mid sized scraps since Aegis began (one involving my old alliance INIT fighting my new alliance lol). And that's it, the rest have been "Aegis style bullshit Nibble fights" (that phrase shall be copyrighted soon lol). I still find it odd that (from my perspective as someone who likes fleet fights) CCP could take a system of occasional fair sized to big fights and make them less occasional lol. Is this really the fault of CCP, or the alliance leaders who blue up everything in sight and NIP the rest? CCP. That "everyone is blue" thing has never been true, when I was in INIT and we were associated with HBC there was plenty to shoot, ,and people are shooting still. Of the two of us, I'm in the alliance with fewer blues,so if it was the fault of 'alliance leaders', those leaders are only enabled by YOU (line members who given alliance leaders power by existing). Why would you complain about this while sitting comfortably in an Imperium Aligned group I do not know. It's a lot like protesting the burning of fossil fuels while owning a gas station.
I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
|
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
114
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:03:07 -
[662] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote: I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Agree. Reset standing of your neighbour or at least deploy to an enemy space and put up a POS. But if you dont do anything, well dont be suprised nothing happens....The fault is with your alliance that decided to blue all your area and not CCP! Take an example from us. We got very few allies and a very rich target environment 50000 to kill |
B0RG 0VERLORD
Viziam Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:27:34 -
[663] - Quote
Icycle wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote: I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Agree. Reset standing of your neighbour or at least deploy to an enemy space and put up a POS. But if you dont do anything, well dont be suprised nothing happens....The fault is with your alliance that decided to blue all your area and not CCP! Take an example from us. We got very few allies and a very rich target environment 50000 to kill . I have never been so happy!
that reset would be nice and sure would generate content for all.but i think ccp needs to do that with the removal of standings,allow 1 blue alliance,1 red alliance and the rest is nuetral.. |
Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
384
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:33:05 -
[664] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Orca Platypus wrote: You know that chasing "nano junk" away is surprisingly easy when you actually live in the system?
How would you know? You're in an NPC corp. Let me guess, here comes the "my main is in nullsec" trope.
MoA NPC corp alt. |
Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
384
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:36:06 -
[665] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Tallardar wrote:Orca Platypus wrote: Gewns and UAxDEATH try being dominionfags and fail pathetically. Working as intended. I like how you had to tack on a bit of homophobia in your descriptor to express how upset you are that active players are sharing their opinions on their mains. CCP and the ISD should probably remove this bit of of aspersion that calls a person a homophobic slur. Recent examples show that people who look for homophobia will find it even in theater shows for kids with no sexual context whatsoever. But it is lovely that instead of the meaningful part you want to remove it for some non-existent homophobia. It shows I'm right.
Not even a sub-atomic particle of reality comes close to proving you are right on anything you have argued under this thread, and you repeatedly saying that you are right will not change that. :)
But hey, please do keep up with your plan, maybe it will work on the 493125th try. |
Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:38:21 -
[666] - Quote
Tallardar wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Tallardar wrote:Orca Platypus wrote: Gewns and UAxDEATH try being dominionfags and fail pathetically. Working as intended. I like how you had to tack on a bit of homophobia in your descriptor to express how upset you are that active players are sharing their opinions on their mains. CCP and the ISD should probably remove this bit of of aspersion that calls a person a homophobic slur. Recent examples show that people who look for homophobia will find it even in theater shows for kids with no sexual context whatsoever. But it is lovely that instead of the meaningful part you want to remove it for some non-existent homophobia. It shows I'm right. Actually, "fags", which you added at the end of "dominion", isn't "finding homophobia where it doesn't exist" since it's quite literally used as a pejorative towards homosexuals. I'm sorry you can't comprehend that and are assuming me pointing out that it breaks the forum posting rules is somehow trying to censor your inane "Grr Goon" posts rife with grammatical errors.
Quelle surprise: Homophobia is ripe within his organization, which is led by a genius who's a war criminal/genocide committer fanboy. |
Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:42:06 -
[667] - Quote
Icycle wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote: I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Agree. Reset standing of your neighbour or at least deploy to an enemy space and put up a POS. But if you dont do anything, well dont be suprised nothing happens....The fault is with your alliance that decided to blue all your area and not CCP! Take an example from us. We got very few allies and a very rich target environment 50000 to kill . I have never been so happy!
I don't see anyone proposing "Mordus Angels members need to develop further brain cells" as a solution against the deficiencies of Fozzie Sov, therefore, you will not find many people that take your ridiculous suggestions such as "unblue your allies" or "undock your alts and shoot them with your main" and such seriously. |
Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:46:54 -
[668] - Quote
B0RG 0VERLORD wrote:nuetral..
Hello MoA NPC alt #8.
|
B0RG 0VERLORD
Viziam Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 10:53:09 -
[669] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:B0RG 0VERLORD wrote:nuetral.. Hello MoA NPC alt #8.
typical goon nub,im not a moa alt infact
sorry to mess up "your" thread,are you bitter about your loss? |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:09:46 -
[670] - Quote
Skia Aumer wrote:These fights have nearly nothing to do with sov. It's goodfight in it's finest. G-Club dudes are great frenemies and I give them huge kudos. No-one would ever want to purge them out of their regions while they ignite such conflicts. The sheer amount of fun all involved side have can only be merited to the event-makers of corresponding alliances, and if anythig, such fights are happening despite the efforts of certain CCP developers. Fozziesov battles should be, by design, spread across the constellation - while what we see is a good old blob slugfest. By the way, a new battle happened just recently. Once again, sov was not a factor, we just wanted to brawl. Oh suuuuuuuure. Station timer was not involved at all. blob slugfests are going to happen anyway, once alliances shrink sov to what they occupy, where sov trolling will be no longer possible due to occupants blapping anything short of blob.
If your sov can be threatened by trollceptor, you own too much sov, simple as that.
CCP don't cave in to tears pls. You never caved to mine, don't go play favorites now.
Alp Khan wrote:Quelle surprise: Homophobia is ripe within his organization, which is led by a genius who's a war criminal/genocide committer fanboy. Those accusations are quite funny considering I explicitly specified being a southbear since 2013. |
|
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
114
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:12:30 -
[671] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:Icycle wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote: I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Agree. Reset standing of your neighbour or at least deploy to an enemy space and put up a POS. But if you dont do anything, well dont be suprised nothing happens....The fault is with your alliance that decided to blue all your area and not CCP! Take an example from us. We got very few allies and a very rich target environment 50000 to kill . I have never been so happy! I don't see anyone proposing "Mordus Angels members need to develop further brain cells" as a solution against the deficiencies of Fozzie Sov, therefore, you will not find many people that take your ridiculous suggestions such as "unblue your allies" or "undock your alts and shoot them with your main" and such seriously.
It was said we wont b*tch about it an we will adapt. It says alot more than CFC tears have I am not sure of the context you are usingf deficiency. But what CCP said, this will give a bit more advantages to the attacker than the defender which is a step in the right direction I think. So far it does what it says. I am not going to care if you dont like it cos you dont care that I like it It is true CCP did not supply in game tools and we have to use external ones. That needs fixing. The lack of content its not a new thing. It has been happening for years. Several years back you guys reseted temporarelly to create content cos too many blues. Its not the first time it has happened. Again, its YOUR and YOUR Alliance fault, not CCP. You create content, not CCP! |
Speedkermit Damo
Demonic Retribution The Initiative.
471
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:16:31 -
[672] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:Tallardar wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Tallardar wrote:Orca Platypus wrote: Gewns and UAxDEATH try being dominionfags and fail pathetically. Working as intended. I like how you had to tack on a bit of homophobia in your descriptor to express how upset you are that active players are sharing their opinions on their mains. CCP and the ISD should probably remove this bit of of aspersion that calls a person a homophobic slur. Recent examples show that people who look for homophobia will find it even in theater shows for kids with no sexual context whatsoever. But it is lovely that instead of the meaningful part you want to remove it for some non-existent homophobia. It shows I'm right. Actually, "fags", which you added at the end of "dominion", isn't "finding homophobia where it doesn't exist" since it's quite literally used as a pejorative towards homosexuals. I'm sorry you can't comprehend that and are assuming me pointing out that it breaks the forum posting rules is somehow trying to censor your inane "Grr Goon" posts rife with grammatical errors. Quelle surprise: Homophobia is ripe within his organization, which is led by a genius who's a war criminal/genocide committer fanboy.
Irony alert!
Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
|
gascanu
Bearing Srl.
242
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:19:52 -
[673] - Quote
question for all those ppl teaching the rest of us how to catch trollceptors: what happens when a trollceptor orbiting a structure at 24.5 km move let's say 20km away and breaks his locking range? can he warp away or not? |
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
6587
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:20:19 -
[674] - Quote
Icycle wrote:It was said we wont b*tch about it an we will adapt. It says alot more than CFC tears have You've spent years bitching about it. The reason you're not bitching (about the mechanics at least) now isn't because you've adapted, it's because the changes support your playstyle because you don't want sov, you just want to troll. From a perspective of fighting over the ownership of space, the mechanics are terrible which is almost unanimously agreed by people interested in holding sov.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Biggle Wondersnap
Bearded BattleBears I N F A M O U S
9
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:20:28 -
[675] - Quote
Is there a good reason why not to add a requirement for attacking to be at war with the alliance you are attacking?
concord is already involved with the new sov mechanics, so adding a requirement for people to declare war would make logical sense. and it would force trolls to put in a bit of extra effort before attacking.
thoughts? |
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
114
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:26:07 -
[676] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:It was said we wont b*tch about it an we will adapt. It says alot more than CFC tears have You've spent years bitching about it. The reason you're not bitching (about the mechanics at least) now isn't because you've adapted, it's because the changes support your playstyle because you don't want sov, you just want to troll. From a perspective of fighting over the ownership of space, the mechanics are terrible which is almost unanimously agreed by people interested in holding sov.
I have b*tched about blue donut. Big deal! I think everybody knows that this is what killing the game and not every other lame excuse you come up with. Simple, reset or redeploy, but dont sit your and just whine about it. We have adapted over time. Let see you adapting over the time for a change |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
63
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:27:27 -
[677] - Quote
gascanu wrote:question for all those ppl teaching the rest of us how to catch trollceptors: what happens when a trollceptor orbiting a structure at 24.5 km move let's say 20km away and breaks his locking range? can he warp away or not?
Not until entosis cycle completes.
Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:It was said we wont b*tch about it an we will adapt. It says alot more than CFC tears have You've spent years bitching about it. The reason you're not bitching (about the mechanics at least) now isn't because you've adapted, it's because the changes support your playstyle because you don't want sov, you just want to troll. From a perspective of fighting over the ownership of space, the mechanics are terrible which is almost unanimously agreed by people interested in holding sov. They had a valid reason to ***** about it, now situation has changed to the better. From a perspective of dominionfags, situation is terrible indeed - it is so hard to hold all those systems you don't use, don't need, don't live in, but need so much for... what again? Once again, downsize to what you use, and viola - trollceptor immunity has been achieved. And MoA doesn't really want to troll - they just want to help you downsize, that's it. |
M1k3y Koontz
Respawn Disabled Initiative Mercenaries
784
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:29:02 -
[678] - Quote
Wolfensrevenge wrote:
You guys have never played eve? Your not going to catch a ceptor with a 250 Km headstart going 750ms faster......Get your head out of jita 4-4
250km? Try fitting a T2 entosis and an MWD on an interceptor. Go on, let me know how that works out.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
6587
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:31:11 -
[679] - Quote
Icycle wrote:I have b*tched about blue donut. Big deal! I think everybody knows that this is what killing the game and not every other lame excuse you come up with. Simple, reset or redeploy, but dont sit your and just whine about it. We have adapted over time. Let see you adapting over the time for a change For you the mecanics is terrible. For me this is better than we had before by a long stretch. Prove that it's killing the game. The only people that believe that are your "grr goons" type who are typically butthurt over being rejected by the larger coalitions. Large groups with large fleets aren't just good for the game, they are what makes EVE stand out from the rest.
An no, we don;t need to reset or redeploy. We can simply continue to sit in our big groups being untouchable by groups like you. The new sov mechanics have made the game more boring, but not more difficult.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
116
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:34:49 -
[680] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:I have b*tched about blue donut. Big deal! I think everybody knows that this is what killing the game and not every other lame excuse you come up with. Simple, reset or redeploy, but dont sit your and just whine about it. We have adapted over time. Let see you adapting over the time for a change For you the mecanics is terrible. For me this is better than we had before by a long stretch. Prove that it's killing the game. The only people that believe that are your "grr goons" type who are typically butthurt over being rejected by the larger coalitions. Large groups with large fleets aren't just good for the game, they are what makes EVE stand out from the rest. An no, we don;t need to reset or redeploy. We can simply continue to sit in our big groups being untouchable by groups like you. The new sov mechanics have made the game more boring, but not more difficult.
If you got to be proven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend...
Good for you! Dont do anything. Dont reset or redeploy. Stay at home whining about why you cant kill stuff. More targets I have to shoot. See if I care. In the end its your loss not mine. I got more than enough targets to shoot. |
|
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
116
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:47:35 -
[681] - Quote
gascanu wrote:question for all those ppl teaching the rest of us how to catch trollceptors: what happens when a trollceptor orbiting a structure at 24.5 km move let's say 20km away and breaks his locking range? can he warp away or not?
if he was entosing, he cant warp away. All it can do is burn away until cycle finishes. The cycles are very long So all you have to do is have a faster ship. Example I got caught by a ship was doing 7000m/s and by another doing 13000m/s in another day |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14260
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:49:47 -
[682] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I just realized what the problem is. Since the T20 scandal, CCP employees have been forbidden to join sov holding alliances, right? So, as far as sov is concerned, they literally don't play their own game, and they haven't for years. A good point. Is it? How much truth lies in the rumors of some of them having alts in such organizations? Even if not, it's an unsolvable problem with human nature as the biggest obstacle.
I'd put more stock in the rumor that Mr. T plays EVE, than believe that the devs are in the nullsec game.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14260
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:57:51 -
[683] - Quote
Icycle wrote:We have adapted over time.
Not from what I can see. Biting ankles and talking unjustified amounts of smack has not changed in any way so as to require adaptation.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
116
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:04:02 -
[684] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Icycle wrote:We have adapted over time. Not from what I can see. Biting ankles and talking unjustified amounts of smack has not changed in any way so as to require adaptation.
I dont see any smack talk here. At least not from my side...It maybe sound like smack to you defenetly not me. So there is a change to entosis ships among others. Its far from ideal from what it was before but we will adapt. We can still work under these changes. We will adapt. Like to see you try that for a change. |
Sgt Ocker
Military Bustards FUBAR.
699
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:12:30 -
[685] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote: I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Damn that must have been one tough solo pvp myrm, 34 of eves best to kill him. Now that's some pretty awesome content right there.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode -
Vice Admiral, Forum Dictator, Arrogant Nobody
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
6587
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:14:47 -
[686] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:They had a valid reason to ***** about it, now situation has changed to the better. From a perspective of dominionfags, situation is terrible indeed - it is so hard to hold all those systems you don't use, don't need, don't live in, but need so much for... what again? Once again, downsize to what you use, and viola - trollceptor immunity has been achieved. And MoA doesn't really want to troll - they just want to help you downsize, that's it. Only in your opinion has it change for the better. Objectively, kill numbers in nullsec are down by 16% compared to last year and 11% compared to last month and the server population is continuing to decline.
And no, it's not hard to hold systems. This is what you fail to understand by not being part of sov. We can hold a large number of systems each with more potential for use by players with an even greater ease, because sov trolling doesn't actually mean sov gets taken. You still need a bigger stick than the other guy to take and hold sov. The new system is even more of a reason to get more blues and sign more non-invasion agreements.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
6588
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:19:21 -
[687] - Quote
Icycle wrote:If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend... It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. Coalitions have existed for a long time and the population has gone up. Now that coalitions are being aggressively attacked though mechanics changes the population is going down. You can't prove that coalitions are bad for the game because they aren't.
Icycle wrote:Good for you! Dont do anything. Dont reset or redeploy. Stay at home whining about why you cant kill stuff. More targets I have to shoot. See if I care. In the end its your loss not mine. I got more than enough targets to shoot. We're not whining about why we can't kill stuff. As we always have, we can roam around and find fight just like you do. What we are doing here is pointing out that the mechanics will increase the level of stagnation in null because they are badly thought out. People like you are happy to see the game lose subscribers as long as it benefits you.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Warmeister
Van Diemen's Demise Pandemic Legion
41
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:40:25 -
[688] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend... It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. your coalition policy is creating boredom for it's members and foes. embrace it. that's how your leaders want it to be. no fun allowed.
do the same thing you did when you were forced to grind structures in bombers |
Icycle
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
116
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:41:01 -
[689] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend... It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. Coalitions have existed for a long time and the population has gone up. Now that coalitions are being aggressively attacked though mechanics changes the population is going down. You can't prove that coalitions are bad for the game because they aren't. Icycle wrote:Good for you! Dont do anything. Dont reset or redeploy. Stay at home whining about why you cant kill stuff. More targets I have to shoot. See if I care. In the end its your loss not mine. I got more than enough targets to shoot. We're not whining about why we can't kill stuff. As we always have, we can roam around and find fight just like you do. What we are doing here is pointing out that the mechanics will increase the level of stagnation in null because they are badly thought out. People like you are happy to see the game lose subscribers as long as it benefits you.
The new mechanics killing the game? So after DRF seized to exist and a blue blob formed in the north and a series of blue blobs in the south, the game subscription began to take a tomble. There was some events that did not really measured up to their hipe and some disapointments began. There was very few actual good events. Before 2013, eve is full of series of great events. In 2013 the game so famous chart of user subscription that people keep showing on an on, it shows a steady decrease for ages of pilots. I am a been playing this game forever. So it shows a steadelly decreasing since before Sep 2013. It not this sov. So thats debunked! No more lies plz. This is put to rest!
You cant fight fight cos there is no one to shoot. How many times i got to say this? You got too many blues! Its your fault not CCP! The level of stagnation is defined by level acitivty. If players like you are so bent on staying and set everyone to blue well what do you get? I mean seriously what you expect? Another DRF? Maybe who knows but you still got old DRF members blue or friendly. So i dont see how this is going to happen....Agin your fault, just in case you miss that too! I am not happy to lose game subscription even thought I was one of the people shooting Jita monument in the riot. Thats one reason I want people to reset to go back to the old chaotic eve, that was much more fun. These were the days when there was not so much blues. |
Arkady Romanov
Hole Violence Whole Squid
630
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 12:47:27 -
[690] - Quote
Warmeister wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Icycle wrote:If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend... It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. your coalition policy is creating boredom for it's members and foes. embrace it. that's how your leaders want it to be. no fun allowed. do the same thing you did when you were forced to grind structures in bombers
No, our policy is to create boredom for our enemies. When we talk about no fun allowed, we're talking about you.
Whole Squid: Get Inked.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 46 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |