Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Garrett Howe
Spectres
11
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 17:08:48 -
[1] - Quote
-Reduce the number of alliances that can join, and alliances with more systems are given preference on entering -To compensate, have more games between the same alliances, less single elimination -Would give alliances reasons to seek out sov and hold more systems -I would also increase the prize pool and give out lesser prizes even to those alliances that just made it in -Ban any two alliances that have set each other to blue since the last tournament from both entering, with preference given to the one owning more sov -Along similar lines, maybe have CCP fly the Alliance Tournament winners (just the pilots) to Iceland for fanfest for free as an additional motivator to enter and win |
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1852
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 17:30:43 -
[2] - Quote
In fact, it's not even worth this reply |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
1808
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 17:31:38 -
[3] - Quote
Are you high?
Akrasjel Lanate
Member of Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
Citizen of Solitude
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
1609
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 17:33:30 -
[4] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Are you high?
"SACO, we need to conduct a urinalysis. Please have the meat-gazers ready at 0630."
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So, why do I post here?
I'm stubborn.
|
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
72
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 18:27:58 -
[5] - Quote
Would be better to restrict it to alliances NOT holding sov, they already have their e-peen place on the sov map :P |
Sonya Corvinus
Chickenhawk.
101
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 18:30:55 -
[6] - Quote
*checks numbers*
*sees sov holding alliances are 15% of the accounts in the game*
*wonders how high someone is to exclude 85% of the population* |
Samillian
Angry Mustellid The Periphery
929
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 19:00:49 -
[7] - Quote
Garrett Howe wrote:-Reduce the number of alliances that can join, and alliances with more systems are given preference on entering -To compensate, have more games between the same alliances, less single elimination -Would give alliances reasons to seek out sov and hold more systems -I would also increase the prize pool and give out lesser prizes even to those alliances that just made it in -Ban any two alliances that have set each other to blue since the last tournament from both entering, with preference given to the one owning more sov -Along similar lines, maybe have CCP fly the Alliance Tournament winners (just the pilots) to Iceland for fanfest for free as an additional motivator to enter and win
I knew there were reasons I and so many I know left Null after so much time and found fun places to live, thank you for the timely reminder.
Not supported.
NBSI shall be the whole of the Law
|
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3742
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 19:02:44 -
[8] - Quote
Post with your main. |
Garrett Howe
Spectres
11
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 19:05:31 -
[9] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote:Post with your main. This is my main. |
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
404
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 21:01:04 -
[10] - Quote
AT equal to the World Cup, where Argentine could beat Jamaica 5:0 or Brazil lost to Germ 1:7.
Fair play my friend. |
|
Nameira Vanis-Tor
Angry Mustellid The Periphery
232
|
Posted - 2015.08.21 23:24:16 -
[11] - Quote
Sorry OP. I doubt you will get much support. You have PVP focussed alliances based in:
High Sec (Merc Alliances) Low Sec (Faction Warfare or Pirate) Non-Sov Null Wormhole Space
I don't see how holding sov has anything to do with PVP ability or providing exclusive entertainment for viewers. |
WarFireV
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
424
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 00:01:35 -
[12] - Quote
So basically you want PL to win every AT. I'm cool with that. |
Hopelesshobo
Tactical Nuclear Penguin's
491
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 00:52:55 -
[13] - Quote
Because this game soley revolves around the politics of nulsec as there are no other areas of space where people prefer to play the game in
Lowering the average to make you look better since 2012.
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2944
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 02:15:47 -
[14] - Quote
No, not supported, will argue against if ever brought up in csm . . . will never mention it at all
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2582
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 02:30:27 -
[15] - Quote
As a member of a sov-holding alliance, no.
Pirate ship Nightmare, can you fathom
Larger but with smaller spikes than Phantasm
The Succubus looks meaner
But the Revenant cleaner
Seems as they get bigger, the smaller spikes they has'm
|
Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance
275
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 04:39:58 -
[16] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:As a member of a sov-holding alliance, no. I concur. Also as a member of a Sov Holding alliance, this is a bad idea.
The Alliance Tournament is just that: the alliance tournament. Not the Sov-Holders Tournament. Its the Alliance Tournament.
So... all around: no.
Now, maybe if you suggest something like: Lets have a Winter Tournament consisting of Sov Holders... then I suggest you start planning and putting it together. See if it takes off. |
Zan Shiro
Alternative Enterprises
741
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 05:10:36 -
[17] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Are you high? "SACO, we need to conduct a urinalysis. Please have the meat-gazers ready at 0630."
Wouldn't happen to be a jarhead by chance....present or prior active duty? I always loved the "random" drug tests after the Cobra Gold det came back form Thailand. Random as in everyone with a social ending in number from 0-9.....even us unlucky peeps who got stuck in garrison. SACO still the crap billet they give to newb SSgt's? Was when I left many moons ago lol.
But back to op.....why?
RvB runs in AT. Their whole purpose in life is to bring accessible pvp to empire. Its even "pure" pvp. No CAOD crap, almost no meta gaming crap either. They have no desire to leave empire nor do I or many want them too. When idiots complain I don't want to be a pirate, don't want 0.0, don't want WH's but I want to pvp and they have no options (usually for "arena" threads) I say well go join RVB. They imo do a pretty good job as a starting step to organized pvp for many players. IF they want to leave empire...they do it. With some good fundamentals learned from RvB.
Or...wait I know. You lost money betting against the AT only alliances that form up last year didn't you. How much money did you lose betting against Camel Empire last year? |
Garrett Howe
Spectres
12
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 06:20:26 -
[18] - Quote
Zan Shiro wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Are you high? "SACO, we need to conduct a urinalysis. Please have the meat-gazers ready at 0630." Wouldn't happen to be a jarhead by chance....present or prior active duty? I always loved the "random" drug tests after the Cobra Gold det came back form Thailand. Random as in everyone with a social ending in number from 0-9.....even us unlucky peeps who got stuck in garrison. SACO still the crap billet they give to newb SSgt's? Was when I left many moons ago lol. But back to op.....why? RvB runs in AT. Their whole purpose in life is to bring accessible pvp to empire. Its even "pure" pvp. No CAOD crap, almost no meta gaming crap either. They have no desire to leave empire nor do I or many want them too. When idiots complain I don't want to be a pirate, don't want 0.0, don't want WH's but I want to pvp and they have no options (usually for "arena" threads) I say well go join RVB. They imo do a pretty good job as a starting step to organized pvp for many players. IF they want to leave empire...they do it. With some good fundamentals learned from RvB. Or...wait I know. You lost money betting against the AT only alliances that form up last year didn't you. How much money did you lose betting against Camel Empire last year? I was just trying to think of a reason to give people to own sov who don't currently own any, since everyone complains that sov is dead because people have no reason to own it, but I see now my idea is probably not the best approach.
It's just that every other suggestion I see as well gets shot down by someone, yet everyone still complains. If you make a suggestion to nerf highsec, all of the highsec people complain that they won't make as much money anymore and will quit the game. If you make a suggestion to buff nullsec, everyone complains that you'll just help out the existing power blocs more and encourage more turtleing. Some people suggest other things, like being able to control local in nullsec or other things that make you feel like you own the space more, but none of these actually encourage anyone currently in high sec to go to nullsec, but instead just make life more enjoyable for people who already have a reason to be in nullsec.
I was trying to give people some sort of external reason to make the move from high sec to nullsec. Maybe the more reasonable answer is to have a separate tournament that follows these rules, but then, people would probably make the same complaints as in this thread. |
Zan Shiro
Alternative Enterprises
742
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 06:48:16 -
[19] - Quote
Garrett Howe wrote: I was trying to give people some sort of external reason to make the move from high sec to nullsec. Maybe the more reasonable answer is to have a separate tournament that follows these rules, but then, people would probably make the same complaints as in this thread.
Not everyone wants 0.0 dude. Fun fact....there are 0.0 crews who have no interest in SOV. Rote Kapelle among them. May have noticed they had a really good run in last years tournament. They would be cutoff by this bad idea, they don't do SOV.
Nullsec is not the end game to the game dude. SOV based even less so. Lose the elitism fast. Many low sec and wh people I know are former 0.0 blobbers. One too many tarded op, too much BSwith the politics. They did their time in 0.0, saw a better game in other places. |
Garrett Howe
Spectres
12
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 06:51:19 -
[20] - Quote
Zan Shiro wrote:Garrett Howe wrote: I was trying to give people some sort of external reason to make the move from high sec to nullsec. Maybe the more reasonable answer is to have a separate tournament that follows these rules, but then, people would probably make the same complaints as in this thread.
Not everyone wants 0.0 dude. Fun fact....there are 0.0 crews who have no interest in SOV. Rote Kapelle among them. May have noticed they had a really good run in last years tournament. They would be cutoff by this bad idea, they don't do SOV. Nullsec is not the end game to the game dude. SOV based even less so. Lose the elitism fast. Many low sec and wh people I know are former 0.0 blobbers. One too many tarded op, too much BSwith the politics. They did their time in 0.0, saw a better game in other places. I don't do sov either, I do solo lowsec PvP. |
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
1615
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 09:58:03 -
[21] - Quote
Zan Shiro wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Are you high? "SACO, we need to conduct a urinalysis. Please have the meat-gazers ready at 0630." Wouldn't happen to be a jarhead by chance....present or prior active duty? I always loved the "random" drug tests after the Cobra Gold det came back form Thailand. Random as in everyone with a social ending in number from 0-9.....even us unlucky peeps who got stuck in garrison. SACO still the crap billet they give to newb SSgt's? Was when I left many moons ago lol.
Yes, I am a Marine. I loved the number generator that randomly picked me for 18 months straight - I thought it was pretty funny as a new lieutenant. Since then, the numbers seem to actually be a bit more random. And yes, boot SSgt's still get made SACO.
To the OP, there is no one right way to play Eve. The only wrong way to play Eve is to not log in. Proposing something that suggests that one play style is more virtuous than the others is just a great way to **** everyone off and make them question your sanity or sobriety.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So, why do I post here?
I'm stubborn.
|
Nyalnara
AdAstra. Beach Club
126
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 14:19:57 -
[22] - Quote
Garrett Howe wrote:-Reduce the number of alliances that can join, and alliances with more systems are given preference on entering -To compensate, have more games between the same alliances, less single elimination -Would give alliances reasons to seek out sov and hold more systems -I would also increase the prize pool and give out lesser prizes even to those alliances that just made it in -Ban any two alliances that have set each other to blue since the last tournament from both entering, with preference given to the one owning more sov -Along similar lines, maybe have CCP fly the Alliance Tournament winners (just the pilots) to Iceland for fanfest for free as an additional motivator to enter and win
Kill stats over there. Most violent region of Null atm are NPC ones: Syndicate & Providence. Most violent excluding HighSec is the CalGal FW zone.
Remove the possibility for Sov Owners to enter the AT, they clearly don't represent the majority of PvP. Statistic wise, most active place is The Forge, and following your logic, only high-sec only groups should be able to enter.
In case of ponies, keep calm and start running.
French half-noob. Founder of [DEUPP]Dark Evil Undead Ponies Productions.
|
Daoden
The Scope Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2015.08.22 16:54:36 -
[23] - Quote
They should make a 2nd AT for sov holders, and if you lose, the winner gets all the Sov from the losers hows that sound then.
ps: op is afraid of us WH dwellers |
Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
429
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 19:16:28 -
[24] - Quote
Garrett Howe wrote:-Additionally, to improve competition, reduce the number of available team slots, and alliances with more systems are given preference on entering -To compensate, have more games between the same alliances, less single elimination -Would give alliances reasons to seek out sov and hold more systems -I would also increase the prize pool and give out lesser prizes even to those alliances that just made it in -Ban any two alliances that have set each other to blue since the last tournament from both entering, with preference given to the one owning more sov -Along similar lines, maybe have CCP fly the Alliance Tournament winners (just the pilots) to Iceland for fanfest for free as an additional motivator to enter and win
Seriously imbalanced game change that helps only SOV holders at the expense of everyone else playing the game....
Im sure CCP will find a way to proclaim this is a must for game balance and put this in place with a hotfix before next downtime.
Got any more game breaking ideas you want to toss in so that CCP can get your entire wish list done before tomorrow, we wouldnt want our precious nullsec to lack for their every whim.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
Tabyll Altol
Breaking.Bad Circle-Of-Two
103
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 15:06:24 -
[25] - Quote
Garrett Howe wrote:-Additionally, to improve competition, reduce the number of available team slots, and alliances with more systems are given preference on entering -To compensate, have more games between the same alliances, less single elimination -Would give alliances reasons to seek out sov and hold more systems -I would also increase the prize pool and give out lesser prizes even to those alliances that just made it in -Ban any two alliances that have set each other to blue since the last tournament from both entering, with preference given to the one owning more sov -Along similar lines, maybe have CCP fly the Alliance Tournament winners (just the pilots) to Iceland for fanfest for free as an additional motivator to enter and win
No.
-1 |
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
757
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 16:55:31 -
[26] - Quote
This idea is just bad in every way.
Doesn't deserve a proper reply.
-1
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
FireFrenzy
SUPREME MATHEMATICS A Band Apart.
569
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 20:01:49 -
[27] - Quote
On one hand he's full of **** (and clearly and patently so) on the other hand if i need to hold sov for an afternoon on test day i can manage that, hell ABA took sov BY ACCIDENT once....
Ofcourse it would block out PL and some other people who everyone agrees should be in there (or have they formally claimed sov in Amamake while i wasnt paying attention?) |
Crimson Draufgange
Extreme Overkill Inc. Mordus Angels
681
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 20:24:28 -
[28] - Quote
This forum really needs a dislike button...
|
Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
713
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 20:26:12 -
[29] - Quote
You want to make it so that SOV means something, then make it so people can't siphon off the hard work people put in to upgrading their system. For instance, the daytrippers who just go into sov null to run sites. Is it right that they get the same amount of sites as the people who live there? In my opinion those extra sites that system upgrades spawn, should only be available to that SOV alliance's membership base. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16553
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 21:37:47 -
[30] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:*checks numbers*
*sees sov holding alliances are 15% of the accounts in the game*
*wonders how high someone is to exclude 85% of the population*
We are the 1%
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |