Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2307
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 09:56:23 -
[1] - Quote
Can you put a jump gate on one of the combat areas, please?
The capital dog piles can become tedious after awhile. I think it puts a lot of people off the server.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
|
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
143
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 13:21:37 -
[2] - Quote
this wont help , they can bubble it |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2307
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 14:24:34 -
[3] - Quote
Amak Boma wrote:this wont help , they can bubble it Multiple gates to the same location, perhaps?
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
|
|
CCP Habakuk
C C P C C P Alliance
1390
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 16:59:17 -
[4] - Quote
Unfortunately there is currently no easy solution for this, while being in the same system. Please use the system PVH8-0 for sub-capital combat, but you will need to ask others to join you, as it is normally quite empty.
CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Gridlock
Bug reporting | Mass Testing
|
|
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
39
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 18:13:07 -
[5] - Quote
You can make the subcapital deadspace gate right off the station. It can't be bubbled there or camped tbh. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2307
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 00:10:33 -
[6] - Quote
Romana Erebus wrote:You can make the subcapital deadspace gate right off the station. It can't be bubbled there or camped tbh. Good idea.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
|
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
143
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 00:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2307
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 01:52:34 -
[8] - Quote
Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling No non-consentual combat at the station. No bubbles at the station.
The interdictors can jump the gate and bubble on the other side but the capitals can't go there.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
|
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc Brave Collective
1957
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 06:53:19 -
[9] - Quote
I like the acceleration gate on station idea.
Otherwise you can also put 10 acceleration gates leading to the same subcap combat area. It will be harder to have people camp all 10 of them at the same time.
Signature Tanking Best Tanking
Exploration Frontier Inc [Ex-F] CEO - BRAVE - Eve-guides.fr
|
Ether Mayaki
Ethereal Beings
10
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 20:33:31 -
[10] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling No non-consentual combat at the station. No bubbles at the station. The interdictors can jump the gate and bubble on the other side but the capitals can't go there.
Someone is probably going to slowboat capitals in from the edge of deadspace. Given enough time, it'll happen.
It's not that they can't, it that it's really time consuming for them to do it. |
|
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
40
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 22:28:01 -
[11] - Quote
Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling
And idiots bubbling on station grid will get an introduction to new mechanics known as ban hammer. |
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
40
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 22:29:35 -
[12] - Quote
Altrue wrote:I like the acceleration gate on station idea.
Otherwise you can also put 10 acceleration gates leading to the same subcap combat area. It will be harder to have people camp all 10 of them at the same time.
Yeah thats an excellent idea. 10 seperate warp ins to same area. |
Cadre Arareb
Disruptive Tendencies
7
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 08:23:59 -
[13] - Quote
My two cents to this are, why should CCP take actions to give sub capitals a Capital free environment, when people don't use the one already given to them.... Then precede to complain about capitals when they are literately 45 seconds away from a Capital free environment...
The supers will rise again!
|
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc Brave Collective
1959
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 08:45:31 -
[14] - Quote
Romana Erebus wrote:Altrue wrote:I like the acceleration gate on station idea.
Otherwise you can also put 10 acceleration gates leading to the same subcap combat area. It will be harder to have people camp all 10 of them at the same time. Yeah thats an excellent idea. 10 seperate warp ins to same area.
Exactly, with 10 separate warp ins you also prevent things like smartbombing battleships camping the beacon from happening.
Signature Tanking Best Tanking
Exploration Frontier Inc [Ex-F] CEO - BRAVE - Eve-guides.fr
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
2309
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 10:40:44 -
[15] - Quote
Cadre Arareb wrote:My two cents to this are, why should CCP take actions to give sub capitals a Capital free environment, when people don't use the one already given to them.... Then precede to complain about capitals when they are literately 45 seconds away from a Capital free environment... I think Capitals can go to High Sec on the test server and PVP needs to be consentual outside of those two systems. Also, not sure how much data is gathered outside those two systems Further, it is better with a small population to stick to one Local channel.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
|
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
41
|
Posted - 2015.09.07 02:55:06 -
[16] - Quote
Because you guys that camp all day in supers can finally camp and MYx blap each other instead of rage bubble camping ca1 to play im an 8000 dps fighter NYX. And maybe it would be easier for them to just add deadspace gates off the station within 6-c for subcaps only instead of designating a seperate system for them. I dont see a PVH move me in the move me script so it kind of makes since to just do away with that system as an option and just add a gaggle of deadspace gates cap blobbers cant camp. Let';s be honest most of the people that do mass tests do it so they can get enough sp to camp in capitals all day long. So it's a legit reason to do something for subcaps only within the system. Or the alternative is a capital only system where only capitals are seeded and nothing else.
Cadre Arareb wrote:My two cents to this are, why should CCP take actions to give sub capitals a Capital free environment, when people don't use the one already given to them.... Then precede to complain about capitals when they are literately 45 seconds away from a Capital free environment...
|
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
41
|
Posted - 2015.09.07 02:58:19 -
[17] - Quote
Ether Mayaki wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling No non-consentual combat at the station. No bubbles at the station. The interdictors can jump the gate and bubble on the other side but the capitals can't go there. Someone is probably going to slowboat capitals in from the edge of deadspace. Given enough time, it'll happen. It's not that they can't, it that it's really time consuming for them to do it.
Yeah some special retards will go thru the trouble of doing it . Since its the only time they will ever get to use a cap ship. |
RcTamiya
SUPREME MATHEMATICS A Band Apart.
6
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 06:37:14 -
[18] - Quote
Romana Erebus wrote:Ether Mayaki wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling No non-consentual combat at the station. No bubbles at the station. The interdictors can jump the gate and bubble on the other side but the capitals can't go there. Someone is probably going to slowboat capitals in from the edge of deadspace. Given enough time, it'll happen. It's not that they can't, it that it's really time consuming for them to do it. Yeah some special retards will go thru the trouble of doing it . Since its the only time they will ever get to use a cap ship.
Add a rule -> exploiting this will get you banned.
fixxed. |
Brent Anders
Project Pendragon
1
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 06:52:50 -
[19] - Quote
Cadre Arareb wrote:My two cents to this are, why should CCP take actions to give sub capitals a Capital free environment, when people don't use the one already given to them.... Then precede to complain about capitals when they are literately 45 seconds away from a Capital free environment...
I'am with this Guy, if you're really that annoyed by People dropping Supers on you, you can always go next door, where it's Subcap only, so basicly you have only yourself to blame i'd say. But i think it's a bit more then this, because being in a no capital system means, you can't bring your own Cap/Super when you feel salty having lost to a officer fitted Whiptail.
And in case anyone dosn't know what System it is, check out PVH8-0 |
big miker
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
335
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 12:19:07 -
[20] - Quote
Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8-
Latest video: Ferocious 6.0 Nano battleships / maruaders
|
|
|
CCP Habakuk
C C P C C P Alliance
1390
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 14:12:28 -
[21] - Quote
big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital.
In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules.
CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Gridlock
Bug reporting | Mass Testing
|
|
Brent Anders
Project Pendragon
1
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 15:57:05 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules.
And we all know how this would end..
"Yeah, this guy movemed in a capital, so i dropped my cap blob on him because he was breaking the rules first" and any other iteration of this.. as it already happens on sisi with the usual "He aggressed on station Grid.. (Or add any other stupid reason to find yourself in the holy right to enact general justice on sisi and don't use the official way and just move along and drop a report) .. so i whelped him with my 20 alts just to make sure and save the devs the hassle" |
elitatwo
Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team
833
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 18:45:52 -
[23] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules.
Easy script. Ask database if boat is capital boat and make it explode in 6-c and not explode in pvh8-q, same rule for thera. SiSi is awesome again and fixed.
Tired of low and nullsec? Join Eve Minions and experience the beauty of wormholes!
|
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
43
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 19:41:38 -
[24] - Quote
RcTamiya wrote:Romana Erebus wrote:Ether Mayaki wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Amak Boma wrote:yeach accel gates to combat areas near station. that will work and no camping on these gates. very good idea . howewer devoter/sabre still will be able to use their bubbles? its just no no for anchorable ones or im wrong and ded stargate block all bubbling No non-consentual combat at the station. No bubbles at the station. The interdictors can jump the gate and bubble on the other side but the capitals can't go there. Someone is probably going to slowboat capitals in from the edge of deadspace. Given enough time, it'll happen. It's not that they can't, it that it's really time consuming for them to do it. Yeah some special retards will go thru the trouble of doing it . Since its the only time they will ever get to use a cap ship. Add a rule -> exploiting this will get you banned. fixxed.
Sadly nobody wants to enforce rules on Sisi. So the rule being there does not seem to stop people from doing it. |
Romana Erebus
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
43
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 19:43:25 -
[25] - Quote
Brent Anders wrote:CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules. And we all know how this would end.. "Yeah, this guy movemed in a capital, so i dropped my cap blob on him because he was breaking the rules first" and any other iteration of this.. as it already happens on sisi with the usual "He aggressed on station Grid.. (Or add any other stupid reason to find yourself in the holy right to enact general justice on sisi and don't use the official way and just move along and drop a report) .. so i whelped him with my 20 alts just to make sure and save the devs the hassle"
Yeah well someone gotta use frontier justice round these parts cowboy. |
Max Croxford
Nightmare Inc 01
15
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 20:28:29 -
[26] - Quote
Romana Erebus wrote:Brent Anders wrote:CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules. And we all know how this would end.. "Yeah, this guy movemed in a capital, so i dropped my cap blob on him because he was breaking the rules first" and any other iteration of this.. as it already happens on sisi with the usual "He aggressed on station Grid.. (Or add any other stupid reason to find yourself in the holy right to enact general justice on sisi and don't use the official way and just move along and drop a report) .. so i whelped him with my 20 alts just to make sure and save the devs the hassle" Yeah well someone gotta use frontier justice round these parts cowboy.
I have to agree with romana on this one, since CCP refuse to reinforce their own rules then people need to take it into their own hands. It's quite clear that CCP do not care about rules being broken on the test server, just take one look at the rule violation thread. |
Ether Mayaki
Ethereal Beings
11
|
Posted - 2015.09.09 02:38:37 -
[27] - Quote
elitatwo wrote:CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules. Easy script. Ask database if boat is capital boat and make it explode in 6-c and not explode in pvh8-q, same rule for thera. SiSi is awesome again and fixed.
CCP shouldn't have to be scripting/programming anything for this server imo. Us being here is a privilege, if users abuse it they should be removed, someone shouldn't get stuck writing up code that won't make it into the real-time server release. |
Brent Anders
Project Pendragon
1
|
Posted - 2015.09.09 06:36:20 -
[28] - Quote
Max Croxford wrote:Romana Erebus wrote:Brent Anders wrote:CCP Habakuk wrote:big miker wrote:Swap PVH8- system rules with 6-C Capitals for PVH8- This would be just asking for rule violations, if players use /moveme to 6-C, while they are in a capital. In general I want the rules to be as easy as possible as we really don't want to spend lots of time with enforcing rules. And we all know how this would end.. "Yeah, this guy movemed in a capital, so i dropped my cap blob on him because he was breaking the rules first" and any other iteration of this.. as it already happens on sisi with the usual "He aggressed on station Grid.. (Or add any other stupid reason to find yourself in the holy right to enact general justice on sisi and don't use the official way and just move along and drop a report) .. so i whelped him with my 20 alts just to make sure and save the devs the hassle" Yeah well someone gotta use frontier justice round these parts cowboy. I have to agree with romana on this one, since CCP refuse to reinforce their own rules then people need to take it into their own hands. It's quite clear that CCP do not care about rules being broken on the test server, just take one look at the rule violation thread.
I don't say someone shouldn't enforce to rule. But if you're so hellbend on doing it, then do it offical, and app for ISD/Mod. Because a rule violation dosn't justify another rule violation and any escalation of that. That being said, the idea of a script that simply monitors the System shouldn't be that (kinda, don't know the eve code) much of work. Lets say it works in ticks of 30sec, scaning the system for ships who don't belong there, and just auto moves them to the other system in this case capitals from PVH8 to 6-C or vice versa, BUT the same script should monitor the capital system then and move any subcaps (save for pods) to the designated subcap system.
There, the Problem is solved, no one can whine and complain about being whelped by supers/caps anymore.. oh wait, now people will start to whine that they're not able to bubble and whelp caps anymore..
Don't take anything after the "BUT" to serious, just sarcasm runing a bit wild. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |