Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8459
|
Posted - 2015.09.07 18:53:32 -
[1] - Quote
...because 'why not?', and discrimination against drones is not cool
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
275
|
Posted - 2015.09.07 22:43:24 -
[2] - Quote
This can only end with more capital lossmails.
I fully endorse this. |
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8460
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 00:25:32 -
[3] - Quote
Click 'like' to support ;-)
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8468
|
Posted - 2015.09.08 21:32:23 -
[4] - Quote
On balance, I might have to suggest that it would be restricted to sub-cap hulls, because, as you rightly point out, the number of capital lossmails will increase hilariously. This would be in the interests of balance.
Having said that, though, I would encourage CCP to allow them on carriers, so that the tears flow more freely.
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
3384
|
Posted - 2015.09.09 04:19:48 -
[5] - Quote
all polarized weapons are the close range variant of the weapon class. Drones would be long range. I don't think CCP wants that.
how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8470
|
Posted - 2015.09.09 10:40:06 -
[6] - Quote
Have them affect Gardes only, in that case vOv
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8491
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 11:56:35 -
[7] - Quote
Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs.
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
11744
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 22:20:42 -
[8] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs. Have you seen the new bc thread atop this sub? f&I (I assumed that's where we we, it's usually where the silly ends up)
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8500
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 13:53:33 -
[9] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Bumblefck wrote:Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs. Have you seen the new bc thread atop this sub? f&I (I assumed that's where we we, it's usually where the silly ends up )
Ha, ha...easy to confuse! Thanks for the tip
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
xttz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
674
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 07:50:20 -
[10] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:all polarized weapons are the close range variant of the weapon class. Drones would be long range. I don't think CCP wants that.
The Polarized module could simply enforce a cap on drone control range in the same way it limits resists. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |