Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
470
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 22:24:12 -
[91] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:
Why would you agree to a reskinned old ship as a new prize to a new tournament rather than an actual new ship?
But it's not a new tournament. It is the same kind of tournament as the last one, with the same reward. |
Vollhov
Senators of Eridan Red Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 22:29:25 -
[92] - Quote
Utremi Fasolasi wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:
Why would you agree to a reskinned old ship as a new prize to a new tournament rather than an actual new ship?
But it's not a new tournament. It is the same kind of tournament as the last one, with the same reward.
That's right it's just the replay. And the new can not come up. That with the plot can not come up with that with the reward.
Thanks you -í-íP Falcon"that helped to quit EVE"
Jamyl the Great
CCP can never come up with such a character as Jamyl Sarum.
No love of the the project and imagination.
They can only cross out all.
|
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 22:31:14 -
[93] - Quote
And you're all using logic a 5 year old would use to try and get that cookie. It's so obvious and hilarious, no one is falling for it. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 22:38:05 -
[94] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:That's some fancy words you're trying to use there, let me give you a very basic reply:
Why would you agree to a reskinned old ship as a new prize to a new tournament rather than an actual new ship?
Because it saves CCP some time or is it because you're a not-have and more than anything else you, and everyone else in this thread, is so full of jealousy that you'd rather see something taken away from folks who DO have... or had, at any cost. I'm a not-have but at the same time I'm mature enough to realise that it being out of grasp is fine. Considering I don't have a single character that is even eligible for selection the prize is still well outside of my grasp. Given where I am now there is not nor was there ever anything I could have done to predict the return of this event or the prize. There was never anything in it for me personally. I knew this when I made that post.
Further there was never anything I could take from anyone else. I can't take the history of the original gold magnate. Nor will releasing a new one, which was the point.
As for the reason for the agreement, as stated, it's because it's a prize tied to the event. That makes sense logically. It's not about time saving (more time would have been saved by foregoing a rebalance) but about creating something of an in game consistency.
I get that others may value that differently or not at all.
Gregor Parud wrote:You're all hilariously jealous, like 5 year olds. That's some delicious irony considering your tone.
You claim maturity but at the first sign of disagreement go on a rant fueled by your own delusions of other peoples intent. Hilarious indeed. |
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 22:55:30 -
[95] - Quote
again, many fancy words but all we're hearing is "someone has something I can't have so lets try and make sure he can't have it either".
There is NO LOGIC whatsoever to reuse old special edition ships for a new tournament for the exact same reason that they make new prizes every tournament. Otherwise they could have used the exact same prizes every time but they didn't. You can type :words: all you want but it just makes you look more like a 5 year old that wants his cookie. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:05:17 -
[96] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:again, many fancy words but all we're hearing is "someone has something I can't have so lets try and make sure he can't have it either".
There is NO LOGIC whatsoever to reuse old special edition ships for a new tournament for the exact same reason that they make new prizes every tournament. Otherwise they could have used the exact same prizes every time but they didn't. You can type :words: all you want but it just makes you look more like a 5 year old that wants his cookie. We've only had one prior instance of this tournament and don't have another NPC driven selection/competition to my knowledge. So effectively they DID use the same prizes for every time this happened.
This event sets that precedent and that decision and the reasoning are CCP's not mine alone.
So is the logic now that CCP themselves are collectively a "5 year old that wants his cookie"?
What even is this "cookie"? |
Divine Entervention
Legion's Knights Of The Round Intrepid Crossing
642
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:09:37 -
[97] - Quote
Who cares what the entitled trillionaires of EvE think, they're huge reasons the game sucks.
Rerelease the gold magnate, it'll be a great addition to the game.
Look at how much content in the form of entitlement tears just mentioning it's release has generated.
CCP should make a youtube video of them laughing at all the crybabies squirting tears onto these forums just to highlight how unimportant their selfish opinions really are. |
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:14:43 -
[98] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Who cares what the entitled trillionaires of EvE think, they're huge reasons the game sucks.
Rerelease the gold magnate, it'll be a great addition to the game.
Look at how much content in the form of entitlement tears just mentioning it's release has generated.
CCP should make a youtube video of them laughing at all the crybabies squirting tears onto these forums just to highlight how unimportant their selfish opinions really are.
How will it be a great addition? |
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:15:29 -
[99] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:again, many fancy words but all we're hearing is "someone has something I can't have so lets try and make sure he can't have it either".
There is NO LOGIC whatsoever to reuse old special edition ships for a new tournament for the exact same reason that they make new prizes every tournament. Otherwise they could have used the exact same prizes every time but they didn't. You can type :words: all you want but it just makes you look more like a 5 year old that wants his cookie. We've only had one prior instance of this tournament and don't have another NPC driven selection/competition to my knowledge. So effectively they DID use the same prizes for every time this happened. This event sets that precedent and that decision and the reasoning are CCP's not mine. So is the logic now that CCP themselves are collectively a "5 year old that wants his cookie"? What even is this "cookie"?
Nice try, but still just :words: |
Divine Entervention
Legion's Knights Of The Round Intrepid Crossing
642
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:24:03 -
[100] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Who cares what the entitled trillionaires of EvE think, they're huge reasons the game sucks.
Rerelease the gold magnate, it'll be a great addition to the game.
Look at how much content in the form of entitlement tears just mentioning it's release has generated.
CCP should make a youtube video of them laughing at all the crybabies squirting tears onto these forums just to highlight how unimportant their selfish opinions really are. How will it be a great addition?
My maniacal laughter will be so forceful it will reverberate through all fiber optic lines and manifest itself into everyone's eve clients |
|
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:28:55 -
[101] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Who cares what the entitled trillionaires of EvE think, they're huge reasons the game sucks.
Rerelease the gold magnate, it'll be a great addition to the game.
Look at how much content in the form of entitlement tears just mentioning it's release has generated.
CCP should make a youtube video of them laughing at all the crybabies squirting tears onto these forums just to highlight how unimportant their selfish opinions really are. How will it be a great addition? My maniacal laughter will be so forceful it will reverberate through all fiber optic lines and manifest itself into everyone's eve clients
Aha, so you're jealous.
Noted. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:36:32 -
[102] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Nice try, but still just :words: Well, yes, that's what text posts are, words. But those words mean things. Maybe try actually interpreting and responding to them? Or you can just continue the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and shouting while ironically calling others 5 year olds.
|
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 23:44:40 -
[103] - Quote
Quote:We've only had one prior instance of this tournament and don't have another NPC driven selection/competition to my knowledge. So effectively they DID use the same prizes for every time this happened.
Backwards logic so stupid it shouldn't need explaining, but hey you asked for it.
Quote:This event sets that precedent and that decision and the reasoning are CCP's not mine. Again backwards logic, you're trying to state that it's fine to use this old ship because there's a precedent, while it's... its own precedent.
Quote:So is the logic now that CCP themselves are collectively a "5 year old that wants his cookie"?
No but nice try for construing it that way.
Quote:What even is this "cookie"?
You wanting something that you can't have (currently), the ship. That is so obvious that it's hilarious you even have to ask.
Hence me not really replying to your :words: because they add nothing as there is no valid reasoning. Nothing but "lets try a barrage of **** and hope something sticks". |
Divine Entervention
Legion's Knights Of The Round Intrepid Crossing
642
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:01:58 -
[104] - Quote
Grow up man babies.
You're arguing over someone else being able to dress their barbie doll up in the same dress as yours.
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:02:37 -
[105] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Again backwards logic, you're trying to state that it's fine to use this old ship because there's a precedent, while it's... its own precedent. No, I never said there was a precedent for reuse, I'm saying they decided to set one. They set one because they felt it reasonable for there to be a consistent prize for this event if CCP Falcon is to be believed.
Your statement was that since other tournaments had different prizes this one should to, my reasoning was that this event was clearly being viewed distinctly for others like the alliance tournament, which is clearly true.
Quote:No but nice try for construing it that way. Why not? If the logic is indicative of a certain goal, as your collective dismissal strongly insinuates, wouldn't everyone who uses that logic have the same goal? Even if not, why do differing parties get static assignments of intent and what criteria do you use to determine them?
Quote:You wanting something that you can't have (currently), the ship. That is so obvious that it's hilarious you even have to ask. Except I still have no chance of having it so this reasoning fails.
So aside from failings in your own understanding compounded by false assumptions, it sounds like you have no real issue to argue. |
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1488
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:14:19 -
[106] - Quote
Quote:No, I never said there was a precedent for reuse, I'm saying they decided to set one. They set one because they felt it reasonable for there to be a consistent prize for this event if CCP Falcon is to be believed.
Your statement was that since other tournaments had different prizes this one should to, my reasoning was that this event was clearly being viewed distinctly for others like the alliance tournament, which is clearly true. where did they state to set one?
Quote: Why not? If the logic is indicative of a certain goal, as your collective dismissal strongly insinuates, wouldn't everyone who uses that logic have the same goal? Even if not, why do differing parties get static assignments of intent and what criteria do you use to determine them?
Again, nice try with :words: but it's not working. It's terrible this even needs explaining. The whiners in this thread want the ship, CCP doesn't want it, one of them just though it'd be ok to re use it. Difference.
Quote:Except I still have no chance of having it so this reasoning fails.
So aside from failings in your own understanding compounded by false assumptions, it sounds like you have no real issue to argue.
How does that change the obvious notion that said cookie is the ship?
Just say it, just be honest: "I want something that I currently can't have, and even if I can't really get it I think it'd be hilarious to introduce it anyway if only to fck over EVE's history and the people who had it once because I'm so jelly as hell. And I'll use any kind of :logic:, barrage of :words: and backwards reasoning to try and get it because I'm SO FRICKING JELLY!".
|
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
195
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:27:41 -
[107] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:I think it's pretty silly to deny a majority of people what they want so a miserly minority can feel like special entitled snowflakes.
I agree. So when is CCP going to make the tourney ships available to everyone. After all, lets be done with all special snowflakes. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:32:44 -
[108] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:where did they state to set one? By the declaration of the second events prizes, and more explicitly here
Quote:Again, nice try with :words: but it's not working. It's terrible this even needs explaining. The whiners in this thread want the ship, CCP doesn't want it, one of them just though it'd be ok to re use it. Difference. So basically there must be some sinister plot on behalf of any poster who thinks reuse is ok because only CCP internally could possibly think reuse is ok without an ulterior motive? Based on what?
Also, do you think it was a single person's decision? I'd lean towards it not being up to one person, but I don't really know.
And yes, again with words in a text post. That's what text posts are; it's not worthy of repeated note.
Quote:How does that change the obvious notion that said cookie is the ship?
Just say it, just be honest: "I want something that I currently can't have, and even if I can't really get it I think it'd be hilarious to introduce it anyway if only to fck over EVE's history and the people who had it once because I'm so jelly as hell. And I'll use any kind of :logic:, barrage of :words: and backwards reasoning to try and get it because I'm SO FRICKING JELLY!". It wouldn't be honest for me to say that. But I do get at this point that you very much seem incapable of fathoming that. I don't really care what others have beyond my reach, nor any appreciation or depreciation those items may have. I don't actually care about the tears that may be shed either way. I just stated an opinion, that it's ok as I think it enhances Eve's history rather than detracting.
So, yeah, the ship isn't the cookie because there is no cookie. Only a opinion that there's no issue in having. |
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1490
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 00:58:33 -
[109] - Quote
Alright, lets make this really simple for you...
Given that, as you yourself stated, you will never own one why are you so invested in this subject and thread that you keep replying in it with the stance that you have? Why would you prefer the current idea over, say, a new/different ship or prize?
I know of only one reason, you're jelly, but I'm sure you can explain to us WHY you have the stance that you have. Oh and please, keep it to one paragraph because your attempt at misdirection through a waterfall of :words: doesn't really work nor get you anywhere, it's just time consuming. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:10:30 -
[110] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Alright, lets make this really simple for you...
Given that, as you yourself stated, you will never own one why are you so invested in this subject and thread that you keep replying in it with the stance that you have? Why would you prefer the current idea over, say, a new/different ship or prize?
I know of only one reason, you're jelly, but I'm sure you can explain to us WHY you have the stance that you have. Oh and please, keep it to one paragraph because your attempt at misdirection through a waterfall of :words: doesn't really work nor get you anywhere, it's just time consuming. This is the way I write, and I feel Ive been very direct to this point. Feel free to ignore the posts if it taxes or offends you in some way.
What I'm invested in at this point isn't the determination of the prize. That's already done. Even if it's not, a change won't draw any offense or objection as I have no concern as stated above. I simply see no issue with the current determination and stated as such. What I've found of interest and has actually kept me posting was your rather pointed response.
More specifically it was and is figuring out if this line of thinking had any reason to it and whether I actually stated anything deserving of it, or was just some self justifying condemnation attached to anyone of a differing opinion. That and defending my prior statements because that's a thing I do. |
|
Gregor Parud
Ordo Ardish
1493
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:18:41 -
[111] - Quote
So just a lot of words and misdirection which culminate into "err none really. I'm just jelly".
See, that's just so much easier. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:26:36 -
[112] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:So just a lot of words and misdirection which culminate into "err none really. I'm just jelly".
See, that's just so much easier. Yes, spouting BS is apparently very easy for you.
|
Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
1139
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:43:05 -
[113] - Quote
Do we actually know anything yet, or is this all still based on one really interpretable tweet?
Oh yeah. All rumor-mongering crap.
I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:45:43 -
[114] - Quote
Glathull wrote:Do we actually know anything yet, or is this all still based on one really interpretable tweet?
Oh yeah. All rumor-mongering crap. There is the blog detailing the prizes. |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
394
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:46:24 -
[115] - Quote
There's a podcast with Fozzie and Guard talking about it , not just a tweet. |
Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2274
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 01:53:19 -
[116] - Quote
EVE online, the game where nothing is ever safe, even "unique" status of items. |
Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
1139
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 02:05:45 -
[117] - Quote
So it's a totally different ship. Based on that dev blog.
I fail to see the problem.
I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1602
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 02:08:44 -
[118] - Quote
Glathull wrote:So it's a totally different ship. Based on that dev blog.
I fail to see the problem. I'm curious, where did you get that impression from the blog? |
Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
1139
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 02:17:27 -
[119] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Glathull wrote:So it's a totally different ship. Based on that dev blog.
I fail to see the problem. I'm curious, where did you get that impression from the blog?
I got it from the part where they said the attributes have been changed.
These have been rebalanced. They are not the same whined-about-Cee-U-Next-Tuesday ships that are causing so much butthurt. They are different ships with different attributes and similar names. Extremely similar names.
I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1602
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 02:27:58 -
[120] - Quote
Glathull wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Glathull wrote:So it's a totally different ship. Based on that dev blog.
I fail to see the problem. I'm curious, where did you get that impression from the blog? I got it from the part where they said the attributes have been changed. These have been rebalanced. They are not the same whined-about-Cee-U-Next-Tuesday ships that are causing so much butthurt. They are different ships with different attributes and similar names. Extremely similar names. Fascinating. I'm not sure where to begin. Maybe I need to check up on my reading comprehension, but:
They used the same name, not a similar one. Also how does one "rebalance" a ship that supposedly has never been in game? Or are you saying the old ones will get those stats and the new ones some other stats?
Relevant quote:
Quote:In anticipation of the Tournament, both the Gold and Silver Magnate have been rebalanced. Their stats are shown below, without taking into account pilot skills: |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |