Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Xiomaro Puxi
Demonic Affliction Black Irish Industries
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 00:23:41 -
[31] - Quote
no new pve content for bears? |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
948
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 00:51:47 -
[32] - Quote
Spring? Seriously? We have to wait until the ******* spring for the capital ship overhaul? |
Angry RedGummyBear
The Ascended Fleet Short Bus Syndicate
13
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 01:53:31 -
[33] - Quote
Seagull: Remember when you took over your current job, and took the stage at fanfest nervous as all hell? (Yeah, it showed.)
90% of us do. It's much better eve overall since back then. There's a lot of disappointed people out there and they are disappointed not because we have to wait until spring, or because Fozzie and team needed another iteration to get sov right, but because we are so excited about eve's new potential, we just cannot contain ourselves and want it now.
I won't say you have to give in to us. Please, try to get it right. We know some iteration will be needed, and there will be loud children screaming while we wait for those iterations. Please forgive them for their cries, as they feel no one notices the imbalances but them. On the other hand, don't be so afraid to get things wrong you never release things when they are ready.
Eve is played in the long game. They've waited years for the cap balance pass, let them wait another couple months. Do your best to get it right, but if you don't, don't be ashamed to admit you were wrong.
Eve is looking great.
P.S. Fozzie looks like he could use a hug. |
Aivlis Eldelbar
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Curatores Veritatis Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 02:05:09 -
[34] - Quote
<3 CCP Seagull
Seriously though, a lot of these improvements are right up my alley, looking forward to them. Kill marks in particular.
|
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
1837
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 02:38:52 -
[35] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:MeBiatch wrote:falloff for RR?!?!?!?! hell yes... finally 80km logi will be no more... here is hoping for 60km optimal 20km falloff..
I'd rather see 20km optimal, 60km falloff.
I guess my other question is with all the things getting falloff will there be a change to how falloff works? I'm not 100% on the falloff mechanics of ewar mods but it seems that in general falloff either causes a mod to work or not work. in the long run the numbers work themselves out to appropriate percentages, but when relying on one or two cycles a full hit or miss just seems like too much.
@ChainsawPlankto
|
TheSmokingHertog
TALIBAN EXPRESS
329
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 04:37:08 -
[36] - Quote
I like the future :D
"Dogma is kind of like quantum physics, observing the dogma state will change it." ~ CCP Prism X
"Schrödinger's Missile. I dig it." ~ Makari Aeron
-= "Brain in a Box on Singularity" - April 2015 =-
|
Masao Kurata
Perkone Caldari State
278
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 06:29:55 -
[37] - Quote
The MJFG is pretty.... what? I... don't know what to think about this but I am rather nervous given that the MJD is already almost exclusively used as an evasive module and devalues long points. Is this any ship in range or just fleetmates? Is it considered an aggressive action for crimewatch and weapon flagging and if not why not? Is the direction of the jump dependent on just the destroyer or is it independent for each ship caught in the field? Can you enter the field during warmup to join in on the jump? Are relative positions preserved or does it distribute ships like a fleet warp? Are velocities preserved or set to full in the direction of the jump like an MJD? What's the range of the field? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing targets we are engaging in highsec? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing bumped ships not only away from the bumper but into full alignment (and if this is the intent screw you, competent people escape bumping already)? Can they be activated in range of a station or gate or is this prohibited like a smartbomb? I'm interested but WORRIED. This sounds potentially really broken.
What's the "Tribute System"? It sounds like another ISK faucet, something we definitely don't need.
The rest sounds great and/or exciting. |
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1524
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 06:44:58 -
[38] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:All of this is really good but don't forget off Grid boost (balance them) and don't forget to open the door too I think their time is counted, now with BiB coming before end of the year.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Indahmawar Fazmarai
3992
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 07:03:00 -
[39] - Quote
Xiomaro Puxi wrote:no new pve content for bears?
There's Blood Raider burner missions. Not exactly "bear" stuff but it's highsec PvE. Like, the only new highsec PvE for the next 6 months...
CCP Seagull: "EVE should be a universe where the infrastructure you build and fight over is as player driven and dynamic as the EVE market is now".
62% of players: "We're not interested. May we have Plan B, please?"
CCP Seagull: "What Plan B?"
|
Indahmawar Fazmarai
3992
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 07:06:16 -
[40] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Destoya wrote:Quote:Tribute System In a move to pay tribute to the growing power of Capsuleers and their efforts throughout the universe, CONCORD has authorized a fund to fuel extra rewards for pod pilots on a regular basis. For the sake of all present I'm going to hope that this isn't daily logon bonuses or literally daily quests, because that's exactly what this sounds like to me the way it's worded right now. I'm sure that I can come with some ways in which that vague description could match a sensible and nicely done system. But my bittervet senses say it's gonna be just some kind of passive income for nullbears and the net effect of it will be to inflate PLEX prices and make life harder for highsec PvErs. Dinsdale Pirannha, is that you?
No, just a bittervet with extensive experience in CCP.
CCP Seagull: "EVE should be a universe where the infrastructure you build and fight over is as player driven and dynamic as the EVE market is now".
62% of players: "We're not interested. May we have Plan B, please?"
CCP Seagull: "What Plan B?"
|
|
Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 07:22:59 -
[41] - Quote
Train for HAC - CCP nerfs HACS
Train for LOGI - CCP nerfs LOGI
Working as intended. |
Jeremiah Saken
The Fall of Leviathan
376
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 09:04:08 -
[42] - Quote
You guys are reading my mind. I thought it would be good to show us what will come in a few months
"(...) I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas (...)"
|
Katrina Bekers
Rim Collection RC The Old Guard.
246
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 13:14:42 -
[43] - Quote
Why every time I think it's time to really move on from EVE, stuff like this appear?
Seagull, I love and hate you. You don't even imagine how much.
<< THE RABBLE BRIGADE >>
|
Jita info
Fallen Angels corp
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 14:18:57 -
[44] - Quote
this rusty ship i am going to have from the winter update, will it take damage from the rust or only look rusty? |
Catherine Laartii
Perkone Caldari State
603
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 14:28:27 -
[45] - Quote
The Crimson Harvest.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
793
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 16:15:57 -
[46] - Quote
Masao Kurata wrote:The MJFG is pretty.... what? I... don't know what to think about this but I am rather nervous given that the MJD is already almost exclusively used as an evasive module and devalues long points. Is this any ship in range or just fleetmates? Is it considered an aggressive action for crimewatch and weapon flagging and if not why not? Is the direction of the jump dependent on just the destroyer or is it independent for each ship caught in the field? Can you enter the field during warmup to join in on the jump? Are relative positions preserved or does it distribute ships like a fleet warp? Are velocities preserved or set to full in the direction of the jump like an MJD? What's the range of the field? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing targets we are engaging in highsec? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing bumped ships not only away from the bumper but into full alignment (and if this is the intent, competent people escape bumping already, it doesn't need to be made braindead)? Can they be activated in range of a station or gate or is this prohibited like a smartbomb? I'm interested but WORRIED. This sounds potentially really broken.
What's the "Tribute System"? It sounds like another ISK faucet, something we definitely don't need.
The rest sounds great and/or exciting.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
1840
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 19:49:22 -
[47] - Quote
Masao Kurata wrote:The MJFG is pretty.... what? I... don't know what to think about this but I am rather nervous given that the MJD is already almost exclusively used as an evasive module and devalues long points. Is this any ship in range or just fleetmates? Is it considered an aggressive action for crimewatch and weapon flagging and if not why not? Is the direction of the jump dependent on just the destroyer or is it independent for each ship caught in the field? Can you enter the field during warmup to join in on the jump? Are relative positions preserved or does it distribute ships like a fleet warp? Are velocities preserved or set to full in the direction of the jump like an MJD? What's the range of the field? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing targets we are engaging in highsec? How are we meant to stop neutrals from MJGFing bumped ships not only away from the bumper but into full alignment (and if this is the intent, competent people escape bumping already, it doesn't need to be made braindead)? Can they be activated in range of a station or gate or is this prohibited like a smartbomb? I'm interested but WORRIED. This sounds potentially really broken.
What's the "Tribute System"? It sounds like another ISK faucet, something we definitely don't need.
The rest sounds great and/or exciting.
CCP Seagull just warped in and activated the speculation hype-train field generator on the Eve Playerbase
the AoE MJD just raises so many questions, I think you just asked most of them. all these announcements and no context on most of them
as for the tribute system I would imagine it would be LP based so it would end up being an isk sink, but....
@ChainsawPlankto
|
Kaylin Drake
Profound Destiny
49
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 20:06:23 -
[48] - Quote
I'm really excited reading about all of these features!! Love the direction the game is going.. <3 CCP Seagull
My only complaint would be the ship rusting feature. I experienced that back on SISI last year and it looked horrible.. sorry I know everyone has different tastes.. I love the ships in this game, which is why I don't love rust on them.. that takes away their natural awesomeness. Please don't require me to pay a daily fee to remove rust from from all of my ships. The ability to turn this off would be very ideal. I am suspecting you want it to be an isk sink though.. so if possible can it happen rather slowly over time and perhaps can there be a "clean all ships" button for a single click isk value instead of one at a time or active ship only cleaning? I know details have not been released, so my assumptions might be totally off base.. these are just my initial thoughts.
Thank you for the gamma slider.. I asked about that specifically once. <3 Looking forward to an exciting future in Eve!
|
Garrett Howe
Spectres
15
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 21:43:01 -
[49] - Quote
So falloff for neuts, but not nos? Falloff for nos could really go a long ways to making the Cruor a very viable faction frigate, at least solo. |
Centar Tivianne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 21:50:51 -
[50] - Quote
It all looks good I just wish I could play the damn game, so you can make a ship go rusty but you canGÇÖt give the likes of me who are colour blind a way of setting colours so I (we) can see an attacker arrive on grid.
All I (we) ask is either a colour slider to set an adjustable GÇÿredGÇÖ so we can see it, or a set of colour GÇÿthemesGÇÖ so we can pick a scheme to suite our degree of colour deficiency. We already have this for the windows so why not for the icons/brackets?
|
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5601
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 21:56:57 -
[51] - Quote
Centar Tivianne wrote:It all looks good I just wish I could play the damn game, so you can make a ship go rusty but you canGÇÖt give the likes of me who are colour blind a way of setting colours so I (we) can see an attacker arrive on grid.
All I (we) ask is either a colour slider to set an adjustable GÇÿredGÇÖ so we can see it, or a set of colour GÇÿthemesGÇÖ so we can pick a scheme to suite our degree of colour deficiency. We already have this for the windows so why not for the icons/brackets?
You know you can, for the overview, change the color for people with different standings? (also affects the chat window)
if you open your overview settings, go to the appearance tab, there's a little down arrow next to the icon, where you can pick a color.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Centar Tivianne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 22:58:52 -
[52] - Quote
I was aware of the colour picker for the overview, but the icons/brackets I mean are the actual GÇÿin spaceGÇÖ stuff. Changing the colour of the overview does not (as far as I am aware), change the in space icons especially the NPC icons which from my tests are still almost impossible to see (for me) unless they are from bigger ships.
So, yes I can see a hostile ship approach if they first appear on the overview but if not then I cannot see them approach until I am targeted, by then itGÇÖs too late. The older big red cross filled the bill very well but as we now have all this space clutter with tiny icons all over the place colour deficient people like me need all the help we can get.
But there, it has been said many times before and by many other and more illustrious players than me and little has changed; CCP will do what CCP does best. But thanks for your answer.
|
Sergej Petrow
Aperture Space
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 23:20:33 -
[53] - Quote
Rust and dirt on ships due to their continuous use...
This little thing for me the best news.
The ships looks fine. But they looks new. I hate this. Now we can see, how many fights happend, how many times, we used the ship, I will love this feature. |
Oxide Ammar
216
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 23:49:02 -
[54] - Quote
What a shame..spring 2016 ?
" and due to technical difficulties we pushed citadels to winter 2016"
what the hell they are lacking ? expertise ? resources ? planning? leadership ? what is wrong with this company..
That means next fan fest will be advertising for 2018 patches...right ?
Lady Areola Fappington: -áSolo PVP isn't dead!-á You just need to make sure you have your booster, remote rep, cyno, and emergency Falcon alts logged in and ready before you do any solo PVPing.
|
Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
605
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 03:32:02 -
[55] - Quote
I'm all for new ships and new modules, but.... can we please do so while also avoiding adding more new skills?
For older players, such as myself, with 150M+ SP, new skills are no big deal. We have nothing else to train, except for those level 5 gunnery & missile specialization skills anyways (2% more damage... yay!). So, we just pause the year long list of skills we were training; and train up the new skills to level 5, as soon as they comes out. No problem - all done, so go back to year long queue. Easy peasy.
But, for younger players, adding more new skills increases the skill gap between them and the older players - and, as long as you continue to add more skills, esp. for new modules, they will never have the chance to even try to narrow this gap. It is particularly frustrating for new players (and works against the whole idea of giving them more additional SP with which to start out) - try telling them that it will take them 5+ RL years to be able to fly all the subcap ships, and use all the weapons at the same skill level as most of the older players... hmm.....
We already have plenty of skills in the game - several of which are only good for one particular ship or one particular module - we really do not need more. So, please consider simply reusing the existing skills for the new ships and new modules.
Thank you. |
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas DARKNESS.
82
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 13:08:11 -
[56] - Quote
Is it true? New launcher tomorrow?
I really hope yes, however I cannot find any sight of it, even at teste server feedback forumGǪ
Best post ever!
|
Alt Pilot1
Hysera Innovations
9
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 17:38:44 -
[57] - Quote
Please re-design the Rupture / Broadsword hull. Right now it looks like an old wooden pirate ship, with rocket thrusters.
The Ares / Atron hull also needs a redesign. |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
1848
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 22:21:14 -
[58] - Quote
Alt Pilot1 wrote:Rupture / Broadsword hull. Right now it looks like an old wooden pirate ship, with rocket thrusters. aka perfection
@ChainsawPlankto
|
Sky Marshal
Core Industry. Circle-Of-Two
87
|
Posted - 2015.10.05 00:43:29 -
[59] - Quote
I have to say that this roadmap is good for the moral. I especialy wait for everything who will update the UI, and the gamma adjustment slider can really help for that as I have serious troubles to play since the dark-only UI direction from CCP. I also hope for a change of the stargate effect, this bubble of light in the middle is a real seizure weapon.
But Citadels in 2016 is partially disappointing. Most of the alliances today are waiting and that means less big conflicts since last summer, with consequences for the market and for the game overall. I understand that CCP prefer take his time for something who will be a major change of the gameplay, but I wonder if the game can really wait (logged numbers, etc.). |
Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
517
|
Posted - 2015.10.05 01:00:15 -
[60] - Quote
deleted.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |